White Privilege

It is so obvious that it is pissing you off so much that the white race in American doesn't have absolute power anymore.
Damn!

Public school teaches 'white privilege' class

Published: 12 hours ago
By Todd Starnes

Students exposed to radical leftist thinkers


(RADIO.FOXNEWS) — A school district in Wisconsin said they will review a high school diversity class that exposed students to radical leftist thinkers and promoted a critical race theory that alleges white people are oppressors.

The “American Diversity” class was taught to students at Delavan-Darien High School in Wisconsin, Fox News has learned.

“They’re teaching white guilt,” one parent told Fox News. “They’re dividing the students. They’re saying to non-whites, ‘You have been oppressed and you’re still being oppressed.’”

Read the full story › Public School Teaches ?White Privilege? Class | FOX News & Commentary: Todd Starnes


Read more at Public school teaches ?white privilege? class
 
White Teacher Sues School District Over ‘Pervasive Culture of Racial Animus Against Caucasian Individuals’
Sep. 24, 2015 10:32am
...
White Teacher Sues School District Over ‘Pervasive Culture of Racial Animus Against Caucasian Individuals’

Sounds sexist to me, the threatening comments were targeting her and her daughters for their gender.

And note, it doesn't matter if the offender is male or female, what matters is the characteristic of the target.
If the target of the bullying/harassment is female and targeted based on that, that is still sexist
whether it is males or females attacking a female figure.

Just like if a victim of an attack is targeted for being Black,
does it matter if the offenders are White or Black?

Shouldn't the question be what is the CHARACTERISTIC of the person targeted in the attack.
if it was a sexual threat, then isn't that more SEXIST in nature?
 
Good for a bump...

Playwright Cancels Production Because Student Cast is Too White
"[Y]ou are contributing to an environment of hostility towards people of color."
11.16.2015
News
Trey Sanchez

screen_shot_2015-11-16_at_1.30.12_pm.jpg


Clarion University of Pennsylvania students have been rehearsing six days a week since October for their upcoming premier of the play Jesus in India. But last week, the production was suddenly halted at the request of the playwright because too many white people had been cast.

...

Playwright Cancels Production Because Student Cast is Too White :crybaby:
 
As far as whites supposedly not getting tickets, arrested or convicted, what about the cops and judges? Are they all white and only let the white ones off the hook?
 
Yeah my families privilege is the fact that my father, now in his late 70s, will be the first male on either side of my family to not die of black lung from the coal mines. He'll die from working two jobs while starting a business out of the basement of our home. All while raising 7 kids and demanding that everyone of them get a good education. No homework done, no playing with your friends. Grades not good? Sit down and we'll find out why. Yep sure was a breeze with all that privilege.
 
Privilege is a tough topic for many white folks. Yet, if you talk to alot of people of color some of them know what what privilege is.
 
Privilege is a tough topic for many white folks. Yet, if you talk to alot of people of color some of them know what what privilege is.

White Privilege is part of the three pillars of the modern left wing.
Victimization
Entitlement
Dependency

Teach people their entire lives that they are victims.
Teach them they are entitled to take things from other people because they are victims.
And most importantly make sure they become dependent on taking things from other people.

Breeding a generation of useless parasites.
 
INFphoto_3081895-1.jpg

...
January 13, 2016
Hillary Clinton describes what it is like to be white

By Ed Straker

For those of my readers who are not white, you may be wondering what it is like to have gorgeously white Caucasian skin that absolutely sparkles in natural sunlight. Well, wonder no more, because Hillary Clinton has provided the answer:

Her question in full: "Can you tell us what white privilege means to you and can you give me an example from your life or career when you think you have benefitted from it?"

The prompt ushered in cheers from the crowd.

"I think it is hard when you are swimming in the ocean to know exactly what is happening around you so much as it is when you're standing on the shore perhaps watching," Clinton responded.
So, for Hillary, being white is swimming in an ocean while black people are watching on the beach. Or perhaps being white is like being a great pelican, flapping your arms while watching coconut trees sway in the breeze. Or being white could be like playing with a toy train, while it rains outside and somewhere in China merchants are selling tea.

But Hillary was not yet done rambling:

Clinton then said she considered herself a "lucky person" growing up and listed a few examples of when that luck came into play in her early years.
"I was born white, middle-class, in the middle of America. I went to good public schools. I had a very strong, supportive family. I had a lot of great experiences growing up. I went to a wonderful college. I went to law school," Clinton said.
...

Read more: http://www.americanthinker.com/blog/2016/01/hillary_clinton_describes_what_it_is_like_to_be_white.html#ixzz3x8jIzpcB


That don't look like a pelican to me, looks like
an old beached whale...
 
Last edited:
The 'White Privilege' Lie
And why it does great harm to blacks.
February 16, 2016
Dennis Prager
1426514903074.cached.jpg


A pillar of contemporary leftism is the notion of "white privilege." Given that a generation of high school and college students are being taught that a great number of "unearned privileges" accrue to white Americans — the charge of white privilege demands rational inquiry.

The assertion turns out to be largely meaningless. And more significantly, it does great harm to blacks.

First, no reasonable person can argue that white privilege applies to the great majority of whites, let alone to all whites. There are simply too many variables other than race that determine individual success in America.

And if it were true, why would whites commit suicide at twice the rate of blacks (and at a higher rate than any other race in America except American Indians)? According to the American Foundation for Suicide Prevention, white men, whom the left argue are the most privileged group of all in America, commit 7 of every 10 suicides in America — even though only 3 of 10 Americans are white males.

Whatever reason one gives for the white suicide rate, it is indisputable that, at the very least, considerably more whites than blacks consider life not worth living. To argue that all these whites were oblivious to all the unique privileges they had is to stretch the definition of "privilege" beyond credulity.

Second, there are a host of privileges that dwarf "white privilege."

A huge one is "two-parent privilege." If you are raised by a father and mother, you enter adulthood with more privileges than anyone else in American society, irrespective of race, ethnicity or sex. That's why the poverty rate among two-parent black families is only 7 percent. Compare that to a 22 percent poverty rate among whites in single-parent homes. Obviously, the two-parent home is the decisive privilege.

Another "privilege," if one wants to use that term, that dwarfs "white privilege" is "Asian privilege." Asian-Americans do better than white Americans in school, on IQ tests, on credit scores and on other positive parameters. In fact, according to recent data from the Federal Reserve, Asians are about to surpass whites as the wealthiest group of Americans. Will the left soon complain about Asian privilege?


...

White privilege is another left-wing attempt, and a successful one, to keep America from focusing on that which will truly help black America — a resurrection of the black family, for example — and instead to focus on an external problem: white privilege.

In doing so, the left has become the only real enemy the black has in America today.

The 'White Privilege' Lie
 
The 'White Privilege' Lie
And why it does great harm to blacks.
February 16, 2016
Dennis Prager
1426514903074.cached.jpg


A pillar of contemporary leftism is the notion of "white privilege." Given that a generation of high school and college students are being taught that a great number of "unearned privileges" accrue to white Americans — the charge of white privilege demands rational inquiry.

The assertion turns out to be largely meaningless. And more significantly, it does great harm to blacks.

First, no reasonable person can argue that white privilege applies to the great majority of whites, let alone to all whites. There are simply too many variables other than race that determine individual success in America.

And if it were true, why would whites commit suicide at twice the rate of blacks (and at a higher rate than any other race in America except American Indians)? According to the American Foundation for Suicide Prevention, white men, whom the left argue are the most privileged group of all in America, commit 7 of every 10 suicides in America — even though only 3 of 10 Americans are white males.

Whatever reason one gives for the white suicide rate, it is indisputable that, at the very least, considerably more whites than blacks consider life not worth living. To argue that all these whites were oblivious to all the unique privileges they had is to stretch the definition of "privilege" beyond credulity.

Second, there are a host of privileges that dwarf "white privilege."

A huge one is "two-parent privilege." If you are raised by a father and mother, you enter adulthood with more privileges than anyone else in American society, irrespective of race, ethnicity or sex. That's why the poverty rate among two-parent black families is only 7 percent. Compare that to a 22 percent poverty rate among whites in single-parent homes. Obviously, the two-parent home is the decisive privilege.

Another "privilege," if one wants to use that term, that dwarfs "white privilege" is "Asian privilege." Asian-Americans do better than white Americans in school, on IQ tests, on credit scores and on other positive parameters. In fact, according to recent data from the Federal Reserve, Asians are about to surpass whites as the wealthiest group of Americans. Will the left soon complain about Asian privilege?


...

White privilege is another left-wing attempt, and a successful one, to keep America from focusing on that which will truly help black America — a resurrection of the black family, for example — and instead to focus on an external problem: white privilege.

In doing so, the left has become the only real enemy the black has in America today.

The 'White Privilege' Lie

Dear American_Jihad

Yes and no. If None of us are genetically related to the actual WHITE Founding Fathers,
then this is all psychological or spiritual but not genetic that we "inherited" authority and political
experience, and "connection" to the current govt, corporate and legal system of OWNERSHIP.

So if all of us are spiritually equal upon birth, then technically BLACK Asian Latino and every
other person born or naturalized in America can "inherit" the same advantages from America's legacy.

HOWEVER what I've found is that
(A) No other group has the history in their family generations of OWNING the land
that the govt operates on and taxes people to keep us subservient to govt.

The Blacks who once owned their own land in my district under their own leadership APART from the govt
started by European settlers HAD THEIR LAND TAKEN AWAY BY EMINENT DOMAIN.

The NATIVE AMERICANS all had most of their land taken away, and the ones who do claim ownership are still fighting to this day to restore their original sovereignty, but to this day are still under the mercy of federal govt.

(B) Blacks who have had a DISRUPTION in their family lines due to the genocidal acts of slavery that involved RAPE and wiping out any connection they had with their ancestral lineage and FAMILY NAMES/HERITAGE,
have MORE to overcome to get to an EQUAL level with people who didn't have GENOCIDE in their history.

So if you consider the Black family lines that are 150 years BEHIND on the learning curve of owning and managing property, this is NOT EQUAL.

The Irish may be have been enslaved and raped as slaves, but these were a minority among Europeans.
There are not as many Americans of European heritage with as close a family history tied to the slave trade, genocide and forced rapes as there are Blacks who have grandparents or great grandparents from the days of slavery.

If you can imagine the recovery time it takes to move from BEING property of other people
to OWNING property, that makes sense why it might take 2-3 generations if not 4 or more.

Now, if you compare THAT cultural background of being OWNED and SOLD as property,
plus the period of segregation where blacks were legally rejected and not considered equal citizens,
to what WHITE people have who have GENERATIONS of ownership in their family history,
how do you expect people to be equal?

(C) what we NEED is a system where people CAN experience the SAME PROCESS
the Founding Fathers did of establishing their own land, country and govt from the ground up.

If all people had that learning experience, such as setting up campus districts in each state, and/or along the border, where business and govt leaders in training can manage their own programs, property and entire administrative and financial system WITHOUT BEING UNDER the current system that was set up and passed down from the Founding Fathers, then maybe people COULD EXPERIENCE EQUAL OWNERSHIP and equal control in government.

Until we have something like that, too many people never experience direct control and ownership. So they keep depending on "other people" to run the businesses, govt, economy, etc. because it's "already under the current govt and corporate system" that was put in place by "other people."

Regardless if this "dominating class" is labeled in terms of race, black or white or whatever,
the CLASS system is based on who has knowledge of laws and ownership
and who remains a victim dependent on other people's management and decisions.

A lot of the minority classes feel left out and unequal
because they never had the same change to inherit ACTUAL OWNERSHIP.

NOT just buying and renting houses and commercial property UNDER THE CURRENT SYSTEM because the tax laws make you beholden to CURRENT GOVT that takes your land if you don't pay your taxes. So it's already under the control of some pre-existing collective authority.

When the European immigrants who built America ran into this issue of "pre-existent" taxing authority that controlled everything, this was coming from Great Britain, and America broke free from that, and set up a separate country.

So the people who never had that experience and never inherited it from previous generations in their family would benefit from being able to set up their own systems in their local towns, cities, counties and states where they have a chance to experience the same level of liberation from other people's control by direct ownership that ISN'T ALREADY under the given system that has been handed down to us.

Maybe we need some places that people can learn to own and manage from scratch
in order to experience full control and autonomy.

I don't see how we can be equal if we don't experience the same levels of ownership and control.

It seems whole generations get stuck in a victim mentality mode of being constantly under
the jurisdiction of other systems we can never control or fully participate in as equals.

So yes, in a way, we are ALL in the same boat because we're ALL under this current system as is.

But for people who feel a connection GENERATIONALLY to the Founding Fathers and descendants of that cultural class and lineage,
that isn't going to be equal to people who have inherited the legacy of Native Americans, Black and other minority cultures that came from slavery and oppression to try to restore their natural original state that WASN'T under the jurisdiction of Govt based on European dominated leadership and laws.
 
INFphoto_3081895-1.jpg

...
January 13, 2016
Hillary Clinton describes what it is like to be white

By Ed Straker

For those of my readers who are not white, you may be wondering what it is like to have gorgeously white Caucasian skin that absolutely sparkles in natural sunlight. Well, wonder no more, because Hillary Clinton has provided the answer:

Her question in full: "Can you tell us what white privilege means to you and can you give me an example from your life or career when you think you have benefitted from it?"

The prompt ushered in cheers from the crowd.

"I think it is hard when you are swimming in the ocean to know exactly what is happening around you so much as it is when you're standing on the shore perhaps watching," Clinton responded.
So, for Hillary, being white is swimming in an ocean while black people are watching on the beach. Or perhaps being white is like being a great pelican, flapping your arms while watching coconut trees sway in the breeze. Or being white could be like playing with a toy train, while it rains outside and somewhere in China merchants are selling tea.

But Hillary was not yet done rambling:

Clinton then said she considered herself a "lucky person" growing up and listed a few examples of when that luck came into play in her early years.
"I was born white, middle-class, in the middle of America. I went to good public schools. I had a very strong, supportive family. I had a lot of great experiences growing up. I went to a wonderful college. I went to law school," Clinton said.
...

Read more: http://www.americanthinker.com/blog/2016/01/hillary_clinton_describes_what_it_is_like_to_be_white.html#ixzz3x8jIzpcB


That don't look like a pelican to me, looks like
an old beached whale...
I'm just responding to the photo and quote: "Sometimes not even Viagra can help you bone up."
If you think your significant other or spouse is going to look like Beyoncé or Jennifer Lopez when she's 68, dream on. The wrinkles (major ones) sink in, metabolism slows down and the weight gets added on. By 70 or above, everyone looks like crap.
 
Interracial White Privilege is the Left's Hot New Hate
White privilege, it’s not just for white people anymore.
March 7, 2016
Daniel Greenfield

zoe-saldana_1.jpg


...

The left sowed its vicious intersectional racial conflicts to divide and conquer, to create hierarchies of privilege under their control by pitting people against each other. This was never going to stop with pitting white people and black people against each other. Pitting black people against each other has become the new social justice that turns every aspect of human diversity into human enmity.

Social justice crybullies chant about diversity and yet they viscerally hate it. Instead interracial people are accused of having Eurocentric white privilege and cultural exchange is denounced as appropriation. These are not the actions and attitudes of a movement that seeks diversity, but of a supremacist movement aching to stoke hatreds and erect racial boundaries to protect its fragile sense of superiority.

The intersectional left loathes the exchanges that actually lead to diversity because its investment in the identity politics of individual groups is so extreme that it adopts their supremacist positions. While claiming to be advocates of tolerance, the left venerates racist hate groups such as the Black Panthers and La Raza, and makes common cause with the Islamic fundamentalists of the Muslim Brotherhood.

The left is brimming over with the seething bigotries of its integrated hate groups. The deeper it sinks into that swamp, the worse the hatred becomes. The interracial controversy centers around Zoe Saldana being attacked for playing Nina Simone, a racist who boasted, “I don’t like white people”. Her fan base doesn’t like interracial people who had a white ancestor somewhere along the way either. Why should that be a surprise? Racism has its own ugly racial logic and hate has no natural stopping point.

Liberals who have gotten in the business of carrying water for the black supremacist hatred of white people, must stick around for Rwanda-style intraracial hatreds among black people, and must take the side of racial purity over interracial miscegenation and the side of darker skinned black people over the lighter skinned black people. Anything else would be bad intersectional form and allyship.

This is the sad, sick and twisted racist mess that the civil rights movement has become. Two generations later, the newly anti-racist Democratic Party is back to its old job of fighting against miscegenation. But this time the opposition to “race-mixing” is a politically correct campaign against “white supremacy”.

Specifically the type of white supremacy contained in the veins of some racially impure black people.

Forget, “I have a dream that my four little children will one day live in a nation where they will not be judged by the color of their skin, but by the content of their character.” Two generations later, the left decries that quote as “controversial” and instead seeks to judge children not by the color of their skin, but by the exact shade of the color of their skin turning back the clock not to the era of segregation, but to a degree of racist insanity that even segregationists would have blanched at.

In this bold new utopia of tolerance, each year ushers in new extremes of politically correct racism. This may be the year when the left moves beyond hating white people to officially hating interracial people.

And then we can join people of all shades and colors in checking our “light-skinned privilege”.

Interracial White Privilege is the Left's Hot New Hate
 
Interracial White Privilege is the Left's Hot New Hate
White privilege, it’s not just for white people anymore.
March 7, 2016
Daniel Greenfield

zoe-saldana_1.jpg


...

The left sowed its vicious intersectional racial conflicts to divide and conquer, to create hierarchies of privilege under their control by pitting people against each other. This was never going to stop with pitting white people and black people against each other. Pitting black people against each other has become the new social justice that turns every aspect of human diversity into human enmity.

Social justice crybullies chant about diversity and yet they viscerally hate it. Instead interracial people are accused of having Eurocentric white privilege and cultural exchange is denounced as appropriation. These are not the actions and attitudes of a movement that seeks diversity, but of a supremacist movement aching to stoke hatreds and erect racial boundaries to protect its fragile sense of superiority.

The intersectional left loathes the exchanges that actually lead to diversity because its investment in the identity politics of individual groups is so extreme that it adopts their supremacist positions. While claiming to be advocates of tolerance, the left venerates racist hate groups such as the Black Panthers and La Raza, and makes common cause with the Islamic fundamentalists of the Muslim Brotherhood.

The left is brimming over with the seething bigotries of its integrated hate groups. The deeper it sinks into that swamp, the worse the hatred becomes. The interracial controversy centers around Zoe Saldana being attacked for playing Nina Simone, a racist who boasted, “I don’t like white people”. Her fan base doesn’t like interracial people who had a white ancestor somewhere along the way either. Why should that be a surprise? Racism has its own ugly racial logic and hate has no natural stopping point.

Liberals who have gotten in the business of carrying water for the black supremacist hatred of white people, must stick around for Rwanda-style intraracial hatreds among black people, and must take the side of racial purity over interracial miscegenation and the side of darker skinned black people over the lighter skinned black people. Anything else would be bad intersectional form and allyship.

This is the sad, sick and twisted racist mess that the civil rights movement has become. Two generations later, the newly anti-racist Democratic Party is back to its old job of fighting against miscegenation. But this time the opposition to “race-mixing” is a politically correct campaign against “white supremacy”.

Specifically the type of white supremacy contained in the veins of some racially impure black people.

Forget, “I have a dream that my four little children will one day live in a nation where they will not be judged by the color of their skin, but by the content of their character.” Two generations later, the left decries that quote as “controversial” and instead seeks to judge children not by the color of their skin, but by the exact shade of the color of their skin turning back the clock not to the era of segregation, but to a degree of racist insanity that even segregationists would have blanched at.

In this bold new utopia of tolerance, each year ushers in new extremes of politically correct racism. This may be the year when the left moves beyond hating white people to officially hating interracial people.

And then we can join people of all shades and colors in checking our “light-skinned privilege”.

Interracial White Privilege is the Left's Hot New Hate









Of course. democrats have never changed.
 
well, I cant blame the teacher, its true.

My father told me at a young age, as a white male I have certain privileges in this country and I need to be respectful and sensitive to those privileges.


Sage advice.
white privilege is a way to silence anybody who is not of color. It is just a bullshit leftist term that means shut up because you are not a member of a minority group, a privileged minority group in the leftist space. It's racism against white's. you're basically saying to white people who aren't racist and you can't find any proof of their racism that they must be racist because they're white that is called racism
 
Only You can Stop Whiteness
Whiteness takes over the 17th Annual White Privilege Conference.
April 22, 2016
Daniel Greenfield
wpclogo.jpg


A specter is haunting America. The specter of white privilege, white supremacy and whiteness. What is whiteness? If you ask the radical education activists at the 17th Annual White Privilege Conference,”whiteness” is the source of all human evil. Also it’s the race of the majority of the country.

The conference with its 2,500 teachers, school administrators and counselors is a bizarre throwback to National Socialism’s ideological indoctrination of every part of society on the evils of one single race. Attendees wore the conference’s version of Nazi armbands with wristbands reading “Got Privilege”.

But not even the 17th Annual White Privilege Conference was safe from the scourge of “whiteness”.

The hashtag #WPCSoWhite was unleashed complaining about how white the anti-white conference was. Is there any better evidence that white supremacy is so much a part of our lives that white people dominate even anti-white conferences? How are anti-white racists of color supposed to find their voices when they are being stifled by the white supremacist Rachel Dolezals and Shaun Kings out there?

...

The White Privilege Conference seeks to replace education with indoctrination. It wants to displace the traditional elements of education to teach activism. And the more incapable its graduates are of functioning in the real world, the more activists and protesters the left will net for its movement.

But the White Privilege Conference wasn’t just about denouncing white people. Occasionally it also took a break to denounce Christianity.

...

White people dominate an anti-white conference. And even its denunciations of Christianity are sponsored by the Pennsylvania Council of Churches. There’s no escape from the great menace.

We have met the enemy and he is us. And therefore we must wear the armband of shame to confess our privilege.

Can anyone except Rachel Dolezal stop “whiteness” before it takes over America just like it took over the 17th Annual White Privilege Conference?

Only You can Stop Whiteness
 

Forum List

Back
Top