Lysistrata
Platinum Member
- Oct 11, 2017
- 17,484
- 6,537
- 360
Ever heard of little things like...
- Attorney-client privilege
- The 5th Amendment
- Executive privilege
?????????????
None of which applies in the impeachment proceeding.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
Ever heard of little things like...
- Attorney-client privilege
- The 5th Amendment
- Executive privilege
?????????????
That's not fact, that's total bullshit.
Hiding behind the 5th
It's cute how douchebag Dims are so desperate to have Trump volunteer to participate in his own lynching.You knew the fat orange fuck wasn't going to participate when he said he was "strongly considering testifying at the impeachment hearings". LOL.Not acting like fat donnie is innocent, is he?
It's another perjury trap!!! LOL.
The scumbag couldn't tell the truth if his life depended on it.
When did Congress vote to conduct an impeachment proceeding?Ever heard of little things like...
- Attorney-client privilege
- The 5th Amendment
- Executive privilege
?????????????
None of which applies in the impeachment proceeding.
"A chance to participate?" Why would he want to participate in his own lynching?Gee...he sure acts like an innocent man, doesn't he?So trump whines about his lawyers not being able to be at the hearings. Then Nadler invites trump's lawyers to be at the hearing.
trump's lawyers refuse to be at the first hearing. They said they might be at later ones but we all know that's just a line. We have listened to trump whine about how unfair this is, how he's not allowed to participate, how no vote was taken.
He even said he would cooperate when they had a vote for the inquiry. That vote was held weeks ago. trump still doesn't cooperate. So if anyone actually believes that trump wants to participate or have any lawyer of his there, I have a bridge to sell you cheap. Along with some ocean front property in Kansas.
White House won't participate in first Judiciary impeachment hearing
He sure likes to whine and bitch about how mean the democrats are being. How unfair all this is.
He has been given the chance to participate yet he won't.
He demands a vote on the inquiry. He gets his vote then doesn't keep his word to cooperate.
The republicans and trump are making a joke of our government and justice system.
Why would an innocent man "come forth" to participate in a Soviet show trial?Why does the orange whore constantly act as a guilty man? He and his cronies should come forth to clear their names. They obviously have exculpatory evidence that they refuse to share with the public.
Why would an innocent man "come forth" to participate in a Soviet show trial?Why does the orange whore constantly act as a guilty man? He and his cronies should come forth to clear their names. They obviously have exculpatory evidence that they refuse to share with the public.
No they wouldn't, douchebag. Americans don't participate in Stalinist show trials. What law is he hiding from? In case you don't recall, Eric Holder defied a couple of subpoenas.Why would an innocent man "come forth" to participate in a Soviet show trial?Why does the orange whore constantly act as a guilty man? He and his cronies should come forth to clear their names. They obviously have exculpatory evidence that they refuse to share with the public.
A "Soviet show trial"? The orange whore is a Russian puppet. If he and his cronies were Americans, they would be up there on Capitol Hill, not hiding from U.S. law. Why would an American who has nothing to hide defy a subpoena?
No they wouldn't, douchebag. Americans don't participate in Stalinist show trials. What law is he hiding from? In case you don't recall, Eric Holder defied a couple of subpoenas.Why would an innocent man "come forth" to participate in a Soviet show trial?Why does the orange whore constantly act as a guilty man? He and his cronies should come forth to clear their names. They obviously have exculpatory evidence that they refuse to share with the public.
A "Soviet show trial"? The orange whore is a Russian puppet. If he and his cronies were Americans, they would be up there on Capitol Hill, not hiding from U.S. law. Why would an American who has nothing to hide defy a subpoena?
Everything you post is a lie. You're a servile Stalinist douchebag.
Why? Because I want to label you accurately.No they wouldn't, douchebag. Americans don't participate in Stalinist show trials. What law is he hiding from? In case you don't recall, Eric Holder defied a couple of subpoenas.Why would an innocent man "come forth" to participate in a Soviet show trial?Why does the orange whore constantly act as a guilty man? He and his cronies should come forth to clear their names. They obviously have exculpatory evidence that they refuse to share with the public.
A "Soviet show trial"? The orange whore is a Russian puppet. If he and his cronies were Americans, they would be up there on Capitol Hill, not hiding from U.S. law. Why would an American who has nothing to hide defy a subpoena?
Everything you post is a lie. You're a servile Stalinist douchebag.
Why the "Stalinist"? Why the "servile"? Why the "douchebag"? What are you hiding behind your filthy mouth?
Moreover, were the Clinton and Nixon impeachment proceedings "Stalinist show trials"? Millions were spent getting Clinton on some sexual misconduct, and millions were spent on Nixon's connection to the break-in at the Watergate apartments. The impeachment proceedings here involve misconduct with foreign governments and misconduct in foreign policy. The current proceedings are far more important.
So wait, there is another hearing going over all the same stuff?So trump whines about his lawyers not being able to be at the hearings. Then Nadler invites trump's lawyers to be at the hearing.
trump's lawyers refuse to be at the first hearing. They said they might be at later ones but we all know that's just a line. We have listened to trump whine about how unfair this is, how he's not allowed to participate, how no vote was taken.
He even said he would cooperate when they had a vote for the inquiry. That vote was held weeks ago. trump still doesn't cooperate. So if anyone actually believes that trump wants to participate or have any lawyer of his there, I have a bridge to sell you cheap. Along with some ocean front property in Kansas.
White House won't participate in first Judiciary impeachment hearing
Shut Up Troll!Ever heard of little things like...
- Attorney-client privilege
- The 5th Amendment
- Executive privilege
?????????????
First we have to vote for the pre-inquiry to see what is in it, before we can have the inquiry which follows the pre-inquiry in to Russian Collusion before we had the Investigation in to Russian Collusion, and after the Pre-Impeachment,. Pre-Impeachment, Pre-Impeachment, Pre-Impeachment inquiry, we can vote on an Impeachment, and Articles of Impeachment, at which case, we have to send that to The Senate to actually get to an Actual Impeachment.Why? Because I want to label you accurately.No they wouldn't, douchebag. Americans don't participate in Stalinist show trials. What law is he hiding from? In case you don't recall, Eric Holder defied a couple of subpoenas.Why would an innocent man "come forth" to participate in a Soviet show trial?Why does the orange whore constantly act as a guilty man? He and his cronies should come forth to clear their names. They obviously have exculpatory evidence that they refuse to share with the public.
A "Soviet show trial"? The orange whore is a Russian puppet. If he and his cronies were Americans, they would be up there on Capitol Hill, not hiding from U.S. law. Why would an American who has nothing to hide defy a subpoena?
Everything you post is a lie. You're a servile Stalinist douchebag.
Why the "Stalinist"? Why the "servile"? Why the "douchebag"? What are you hiding behind your filthy mouth?
Moreover, were the Clinton and Nixon impeachment proceedings "Stalinist show trials"? Millions were spent getting Clinton on some sexual misconduct, and millions were spent on Nixon's connection to the break-in at the Watergate apartments. The impeachment proceedings here involve misconduct with foreign governments and misconduct in foreign policy. The current proceedings are far more important.
The Clinton and Nixon impeachments weren't show trials because they didn't follow the kangaroo court rules that Schiff and Nadler are observing, dumbfuck. The nature of the charge is irrelevant to the nature of the proceedings.
Although I doubt you would learn anything, you really ought to take a course in logic.
What you just did in your post is called a "non sequitur." Look it up.
What do you suppose the Dims are going to do after the Senate shoots this down and Trump gets reelected?First we have to vote for the pre-inquiry to see what is in it, before we can have the inquiry which follows the pre-inquiry in to Russian Collusion before we had the Investigation in to Russian Collusion, and after the Pre-Impeachment,. Pre-Impeachment, Pre-Impeachment, Pre-Impeachment inquiry, we can vote on an Impeachment, and Articles of Impeachment, at which case, we have to send that to The Senate to actually get to an Actual Impeachment.Why? Because I want to label you accurately.No they wouldn't, douchebag. Americans don't participate in Stalinist show trials. What law is he hiding from? In case you don't recall, Eric Holder defied a couple of subpoenas.Why would an innocent man "come forth" to participate in a Soviet show trial?
A "Soviet show trial"? The orange whore is a Russian puppet. If he and his cronies were Americans, they would be up there on Capitol Hill, not hiding from U.S. law. Why would an American who has nothing to hide defy a subpoena?
Everything you post is a lie. You're a servile Stalinist douchebag.
Why the "Stalinist"? Why the "servile"? Why the "douchebag"? What are you hiding behind your filthy mouth?
Moreover, were the Clinton and Nixon impeachment proceedings "Stalinist show trials"? Millions were spent getting Clinton on some sexual misconduct, and millions were spent on Nixon's connection to the break-in at the Watergate apartments. The impeachment proceedings here involve misconduct with foreign governments and misconduct in foreign policy. The current proceedings are far more important.
The Clinton and Nixon impeachments weren't show trials because they didn't follow the kangaroo court rules that Schiff and Nadler are observing, dumbfuck. The nature of the charge is irrelevant to the nature of the proceedings.
Although I doubt you would learn anything, you really ought to take a course in logic.
What you just did in your post is called a "non sequitur." Look it up.
At any Rate, we thought we'd let you know about this Impeachment because we like saying the word Impeachment for the last three years and hope to keep saying it for 5 more years!
Impeachment.....it's not just for breakfast, lunch and dinner anymore!
Why? Because I want to label you accurately.No they wouldn't, douchebag. Americans don't participate in Stalinist show trials. What law is he hiding from? In case you don't recall, Eric Holder defied a couple of subpoenas.Why would an innocent man "come forth" to participate in a Soviet show trial?Why does the orange whore constantly act as a guilty man? He and his cronies should come forth to clear their names. They obviously have exculpatory evidence that they refuse to share with the public.
A "Soviet show trial"? The orange whore is a Russian puppet. If he and his cronies were Americans, they would be up there on Capitol Hill, not hiding from U.S. law. Why would an American who has nothing to hide defy a subpoena?
Everything you post is a lie. You're a servile Stalinist douchebag.
Why the "Stalinist"? Why the "servile"? Why the "douchebag"? What are you hiding behind your filthy mouth?
Moreover, were the Clinton and Nixon impeachment proceedings "Stalinist show trials"? Millions were spent getting Clinton on some sexual misconduct, and millions were spent on Nixon's connection to the break-in at the Watergate apartments. The impeachment proceedings here involve misconduct with foreign governments and misconduct in foreign policy. The current proceedings are far more important.
The Clinton and Nixon impeachments weren't show trials because they didn't follow the kangaroo court rules that Schiff and Nadler are observing, dumbfuck. The nature of the charge is irrelevant to the nature of the proceedings.
Although I doubt you would learn anything, you really ought to take a course in logic.
What you just did in your post is called a "non sequitur." Look it up.
Irony alert. Trump obstructed the Mueller probe and is now obstructing the impeachment inquiry.The far Left is going to want to obstruct
All they're going to be doing at that first hearing is hashing out Constitutionality of aspects of the hearing. The President's lawyers feel they've "got" that and have no need to participate.Ever heard of little things like...
- Attorney-client privilege
- The 5th Amendment
- Executive privilege
?????????????