Which was worst Assad or Saddam.. 5,000 killed or 800,000 killed?

[JakeStarkey]

The following is a complete list of Security Council Resolutions (SCRs) involving Iraq.
The overwhelming majority of resolution since 1990 relate to Iraq's invasion of Kuwait and subsequent developments. The resolutions deemed particularly important are indicated in bold. A full list of SCRs is available here. Guides to the SCRs relating to Iraq are maintained by the Federation of American Scientists (here) and the UN's Office of the Iraq Programme (here); a further compilation of SCRs on Iraq is maintained by Saleh Iraq site (here). The Office of the Spokesman for the Secretary-General has a brief guide to the resolutions on all the UN sanctions regimes, Use of sanctions under Chapter VII of the UN Charter.

2004 | 2003 | 2002 | 2001 | 2000 | 1999 | 1998 | 1997 | 1996 | 1995 | 1994 | 1993 | 1992 | 1991 | 1990 | pre-1990 resolutions on Iraq | Zimbabwe resolutions

UN Security Council resolutions relating to Iraq

Doesn't matter. We were not empowered to enforce the resolutions for the UN.

We did not have the legal support of the UN when we invaded Iraq.

 

[JWBooth]

Either way, not our problem.

 

[JakeStarkey]

The neo-cons have clearly demonstrated why 21st century American imperlalism would lead to the country's collapse.

The dems ran them out of their party, and we must do the same in our GoP: neo-cons gotta go.

 

[paulitician]

The neo-cons have clearly demonstrated why 21st century American imperlalism would lead to the country's collapse.

The dems ran them out of their party, and we must do the same in our GoP: neo-cons gotta go.

No, the Socialist/Progressive Globalists and the Neocon Globalists gotta go. They both agree on much more than they would ever admit. Their policies are just about identical in the end. We need real Hope & Change to happen in both political parties.

 

[JakeStarkey]

No, paulitician, you libertarians have to go as well, buncha wacks.

 

[rightwinger]

Right...
Why did we invade France in WWI
Why did we "invade" France in WWII?
Why did we "invade" Korea in 1950s?

Neither one of them invaded the USA nor killed any American!

What was the difference???

OK....let's talk Iraq again
That's always fun


Iraq was no threat to anon outside Iraq, Iraq was under control for ten years, Iraq was not involved in 9-11, Iraq did not have WMDs

IRAQ was NO THREAT

You do not waste 5500 American lives for no threat

Hmmm. LBJ and Kennedy wasted 60,000 lives and there was no threat. Probably just a slight omission on your part.

Not at all.....I am the first to admit that VietNam was an unnecessary cluster fuck and am appalled that Bush ignored the lesson we learned in VietNam

 

[rightwinger]

AGAIN BUSH's BIGGEST MISTAKE IN IRAQ was trusting traitorous Americans like ALL of you that can NOT see how these words ENCOURAGED Terrorists!
I mean do you idiots that supported these words UNDERSTAND THE POWER of advertising?

I mean billions are spent on Advertising because they want to INFLUENCE people!
And when these words were repeated hundreds of times around the world.. MY GOD...
WHAT kind of image do you think the world would have then?
American troops are killers!
AMerican military bomb villages!
American military torture every prisoner!
American Military are the bad guys.. TERRORISTS that send kids with bombs to kill troops handing candy... THEY ARE THE GOOD guys!

With these words why would ANYONE want the US troops to win?
Why would ANY person in the military be proud of what they were doing?
AND you idiots THAT support these WORDS.. all I have for you is UTTER DISGUST!!!


Durbin (D) "must have been done by Nazis, Soviets --action of Americans
in the treatment of their prisoners.
Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid(D) "War is lost",
U.S. Rep. Murtha(D) "Our troops killed innocent civilians in cold blood,”
Senator Kerry(D) "American soldiers going into the homes of Iraqis in the
dead of night, terrorizing kids and children."
Senator Obama(D) .."troops are air-raiding villages and killing civilians,"

No, Bushs biggest mistake in Iraq is that he ignored the advice of the rest of the world and attacked anyway

The Bush decision to abandon the war on terror to engage in nation building in Iraq was one of the biggest blunders in US history

 

[paulitician]

Democrats had a Love/Hate relationship with ole Hussein. They loved him and defended him when the other side had the power. They hated him when their side had the power though. Clinton bombed Iraq continuously throughout his 8yrs. in office. It's all just 'Party before Country' for Democrats. So don't expect any honesty from them. It is what it is.

 

[francoHFW]

LBJ, like everyone else, believed we could win in Vietnam, but realized he'd been wrong and gave up. Nixon was the Peace candidate LOL with his secret plan- a cynical lying power grab that killed another 25K for NOTHING. Saddam's evil was supported by Raygun. Pubs suq EVERY TIME, with W. Bush the last and worst of the lot. Why ANYONE votes for them is a victory for Propaganda, arrogance, xenophobia, ignorance, and IDIOCY. GD ugly 'Merican morons.- Masters in History.

 

[rightwinger]

Democrats had a Love/Hate relationship with ole Hussein. They loved him and defended him when the other side had the power. They hated him when their side had the power though. Clinton bombed Iraq continuously throughout his 8yrs. in office. It's all just 'Party before Country' for Democrats. So don't expect any honesty from them. It is what it is.

It was Republicans that supported him and gave him weapons......ask Rumsfeld