Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Moral laws are part of the natural order.Moral laws?
My moral values were taught to me by my parents. "Treat everyone as you would want to be treated" is something heard I heard a lot while growing up.
Why not?Did moral laws exist before the BB?Moral laws are part of the natural order.Moral laws?
My moral values were taught to me by my parents. "Treat everyone as you would want to be treated" is something heard I heard a lot while growing up.
What would be your proof.Why not?Did moral laws exist before the BB?Moral laws are part of the natural order.Moral laws?
My moral values were taught to me by my parents. "Treat everyone as you would want to be treated" is something heard I heard a lot while growing up.
See OP.What would be your proof.Why not?Did moral laws exist before the BB?Moral laws are part of the natural order.Moral laws?
My moral values were taught to me by my parents. "Treat everyone as you would want to be treated" is something heard I heard a lot while growing up.
BOUAHAHAHAHAHAHA!!!Before space and time were created the laws of nature were already in place. The potential for all realities existed before space and time existed because those laws of nature were in place before space and time. Everything which has unfolded since space and time were created occurred because of the laws of nature. Moral Laws existed before beings that know and create existed. Moral Laws were waiting in time for beings that now and create to catch up to them, thus realizing its potential and fulfilling their role in progressing our conscience and consciousness. So where did the moral laws come from? They came from God who is existence itself; who s reality itself.
Yep.BOUAHAHAHAHAHAHA!!!Before space and time were created the laws of nature were already in place. The potential for all realities existed before space and time existed because those laws of nature were in place before space and time. Everything which has unfolded since space and time were created occurred because of the laws of nature. Moral Laws existed before beings that know and create existed. Moral Laws were waiting in time for beings that now and create to catch up to them, thus realizing its potential and fulfilling their role in progressing our conscience and consciousness. So where did the moral laws come from? They came from God who is existence itself; who s reality itself.
This is proof?
That's not even a good guess.Yep.BOUAHAHAHAHAHAHA!!!Before space and time were created the laws of nature were already in place. The potential for all realities existed before space and time existed because those laws of nature were in place before space and time. Everything which has unfolded since space and time were created occurred because of the laws of nature. Moral Laws existed before beings that know and create existed. Moral Laws were waiting in time for beings that now and create to catch up to them, thus realizing its potential and fulfilling their role in progressing our conscience and consciousness. So where did the moral laws come from? They came from God who is existence itself; who s reality itself.
This is proof?
That you are really linking weed?That's not even a good guess.Yep.BOUAHAHAHAHAHAHA!!!Before space and time were created the laws of nature were already in place. The potential for all realities existed before space and time existed because those laws of nature were in place before space and time. Everything which has unfolded since space and time were created occurred because of the laws of nature. Moral Laws existed before beings that know and create existed. Moral Laws were waiting in time for beings that now and create to catch up to them, thus realizing its potential and fulfilling their role in progressing our conscience and consciousness. So where did the moral laws come from? They came from God who is existence itself; who s reality itself.
This is proof?
What did I tell you about linking...
You can't prove the OP, which makes you a clown. Again.That you are really linking weed?That's not even a good guess.Yep.BOUAHAHAHAHAHAHA!!!Before space and time were created the laws of nature were already in place. The potential for all realities existed before space and time existed because those laws of nature were in place before space and time. Everything which has unfolded since space and time were created occurred because of the laws of nature. Moral Laws existed before beings that know and create existed. Moral Laws were waiting in time for beings that now and create to catch up to them, thus realizing its potential and fulfilling their role in progressing our conscience and consciousness. So where did the moral laws come from? They came from God who is existence itself; who s reality itself.
This is proof?
What did I tell you about linking...
Everything that has come to pass existed before space and time. Your opinion of my and the OP does not concern me.You can't prove the OP, which makes you a clown. Again.That you are really linking weed?That's not even a good guess.Yep.BOUAHAHAHAHAHAHA!!!Before space and time were created the laws of nature were already in place. The potential for all realities existed before space and time existed because those laws of nature were in place before space and time. Everything which has unfolded since space and time were created occurred because of the laws of nature. Moral Laws existed before beings that know and create existed. Moral Laws were waiting in time for beings that now and create to catch up to them, thus realizing its potential and fulfilling their role in progressing our conscience and consciousness. So where did the moral laws come from? They came from God who is existence itself; who s reality itself.
This is proof?
What did I tell you about linking...
As long as you realize that you never proved the OP, it's all good.Everything that has come to pass existed before space and time. Your opinion of my and the OP does not concern me.You can't prove the OP, which makes you a clown. Again.That you are really linking weed?That's not even a good guess.Yep.BOUAHAHAHAHAHAHA!!!
This is proof?
What did I tell you about linking...
But I did prove the OP, just not to your satisfaction.As long as you realize that you never proved the OP, it's all good.Everything that has come to pass existed before space and time. Your opinion of my and the OP does not concern me.You can't prove the OP, which makes you a clown. Again.That you are really linking weed?That's not even a good guess.Yep.
What did I tell you about linking...
You really don't understand the word "proof", especially "scientific proof". It's hard to take you seriously when you argue like you're in the third grade.But I did prove the OP, just not to your satisfaction.As long as you realize that you never proved the OP, it's all good.Everything that has come to pass existed before space and time. Your opinion of my and the OP does not concern me.You can't prove the OP, which makes you a clown. Again.That you are really linking weed?That's not even a good guess.
What did I tell you about linking...
No. I understand the concept of proof. If you really believed I didn't provide any, you wouldn't still be arguing about it.You really don't understand the word "proof", especially "scientific proof". It's hard to take you seriously when you argue like you're in the third grade.But I did prove the OP, just not to your satisfaction.As long as you realize that you never proved the OP, it's all good.Everything that has come to pass existed before space and time. Your opinion of my and the OP does not concern me.You can't prove the OP, which makes you a clown. Again.That you are really linking weed?
This is a debating board, I'm trying to teach you how to debate properly. But you're a stubbornly slow learner.No. I understand the concept of proof. If you really believed I didn't provide any, you wouldn't still be arguing about it.You really don't understand the word "proof", especially "scientific proof". It's hard to take you seriously when you argue like you're in the third grade.But I did prove the OP, just not to your satisfaction.As long as you realize that you never proved the OP, it's all good.Everything that has come to pass existed before space and time. Your opinion of my and the OP does not concern me.You can't prove the OP, which makes you a clown. Again.
You aren't very good at it.This is a debating board, I'm trying to teach you how to debate properly. But you're a stubbornly slow learner.No. I understand the concept of proof. If you really believed I didn't provide any, you wouldn't still be arguing about it.You really don't understand the word "proof", especially "scientific proof". It's hard to take you seriously when you argue like you're in the third grade.But I did prove the OP, just not to your satisfaction.As long as you realize that you never proved the OP, it's all good.Everything that has come to pass existed before space and time. Your opinion of my and the OP does not concern me.
The problem is is that you know what you're doing wrong but keep doing it. That, I don't understand, because instead of debating your topic, we just laugh at you.You aren't very good at it.This is a debating board, I'm trying to teach you how to debate properly. But you're a stubbornly slow learner.No. I understand the concept of proof. If you really believed I didn't provide any, you wouldn't still be arguing about it.You really don't understand the word "proof", especially "scientific proof". It's hard to take you seriously when you argue like you're in the third grade.But I did prove the OP, just not to your satisfaction.As long as you realize that you never proved the OP, it's all good.
I'm not doing anything wrong.The problem is is that you know what you're doing wrong but keep doing it. That, I don't understand, because instead of debating your topic, we just laugh at you.You aren't very good at it.This is a debating board, I'm trying to teach you how to debate properly. But you're a stubbornly slow learner.No. I understand the concept of proof. If you really believed I didn't provide any, you wouldn't still be arguing about it.You really don't understand the word "proof", especially "scientific proof". It's hard to take you seriously when you argue like you're in the third grade.But I did prove the OP, just not to your satisfaction.