When Did Congress Declare War On Russia

[NYcarbineer]

The difference between the old Cold War and the new Cold War?

In the old Cold War, American conservatives were on OUR side.

In the old Cold War, American conservatives were on OUR side.

"Our side"?

How did America survive?

Go back in history, look at where conservatives were on the issues, one decade to the next,

and tell us which ones the conservatives won on.

 

[mudwhistle]

Congressional libtardos running around railing TREASON are so fucking stupid they don't even know you can't be charged with treason because Russia hasn't been declared an enemy of war by Congress.

"Treason against the United States, shall consist only in levying War against them, or in adhering to their Enemies, giving them Aid and Comfort. No Person shall be convicted of Treason unless on the Testimony of two Witnesses to the same overt Act, or on Confession in open Court."

That shit didn't stick to the wall so the libtarded wet dream is out the window.

The lame stream media is railing campaign finance law violation.

In order to get that shit sandwich to stick you have to receive something of value and Trump Jr. got nothing from the meeting so no law was broken there. Unless you think the smell of a whore's perfume has some intrinsic value.

So now the petunia's are down to "intent to collude".

How in the hell do you draw this conclusion when there was obviously nothing to collude over.

Get these crybaby snowflakes some ketchup.

Ketchup for their Nothing Burger...ewww

 

[tinydancer]

When Did Congress Declare War On Russia



when Reagan was President.



you need to get out more Licky

I must have been overseas when that happened.

Got a link?

if you dont know congress authorized every dime Reagan spent fighting the Russian cold war a link wont help you.

It was the USSR for crying out loud.

 

[Auld Phart]

The difference between the old Cold War and the new Cold War?

In the old Cold War, American conservatives were on OUR side.

In the old Cold War, American conservatives were on OUR side.

"Our side"?

How did America survive?

Go back in history, look at where conservatives were on the issues, one decade to the next,

and tell us which ones the conservatives won on.

"List greatest conservative accomplishments last 20 years": The answer he

 

[Camp]

Congressional libtardos running around railing TREASON are so fucking stupid they don't even know you can't be charged with treason because Russia hasn't been declared an enemy of war by Congress.

"Treason against the United States, shall consist only in levying War against them, or in adhering to their Enemies, giving them Aid and Comfort. No Person shall be convicted of Treason unless on the Testimony of two Witnesses to the same overt Act, or on Confession in open Court."

Where in the constitutional definition of treason does it say the Congress must declare an enemy of war? What kind of declaration is your claim? Is this something like a declaration of war?
Tell us, what is an Official Declaration of Enemy look like and when has one ever been issued?

 

[Siete]

When Did Congress Declare War On Russia



when Reagan was President.



you need to get out more Licky

I must have been overseas when that happened.

Got a link?

if you dont know congress authorized every dime Reagan spent fighting the Russian cold war a link wont help you.

It was the USSR for crying out loud.

Soviet Union

 

[theHawk]

It's the left wing nuts that give aid and comfort to Islamists. .

Its the right wing nuts that complained when the United States was dropping bombs and hellfire missiles on Islamic terrorists.

Sad little snowflakes.

I've never complained about anyone dropping bombs on Muslims.

 

[easyt65]

When Did Congress Declare War On Russia



when Reagan was President.



you need to get out more Licky

Bwuhahahahaha....no.

It's amazing any 1 group of people could he so wrong about so much.

 

[Camp]

When Did Congress Declare War On Russia



when Reagan was President.



you need to get out more Licky

Bwuhahahahaha....no.

It's amazing any 1 group of people could he so wrong about so much.

Ya, like thinking a Declaration of War is needed to charge someone with treason. Makes the OP and thread look like dopey fools. And here you are jumping in on the jackassery.

 

[Wry Catcher]

Congressional libtardos running around railing TREASON are so fucking stupid they don't even know you can't be charged with treason because Russia hasn't been declared an enemy of war by Congress.

"Treason against the United States, shall consist only in levying War against them, or in adhering to their Enemies, giving them Aid and Comfort. No Person shall be convicted of Treason unless on the Testimony of two Witnesses to the same overt Act, or on Confession in open Court."

That shit didn't stick to the wall so the libtarded wet dream is out the window.

The lame stream media is railing campaign finance law violation.

In order to get that shit sandwich to stick you have to receive something of value and Trump Jr. got nothing from the meeting so no law was broken there. Unless you think the smell of a whore's perfume has some intrinsic value.

So now the petunia's are down to "intent to collude".

How in the hell do you draw this conclusion when there was obviously nothing to collude over.

Get these crybaby snowflakes some ketchup.

A premature conclusion ^^^, the definition of Treason is quoted correctly, the conclusion is way too early to determine. Let's wait and see how Mr. Mueller's investigation moves along, interviews elicit information which can conflict with the testimony of others or their prior statement(s), leading to inconsistencies and further inquiry.

Once a lie of omission or commission is established, pressure can be applied in terms a prison sentence, or of immunity from prosecution, or a lesser penalty.

 

[Geaux4it]

Congressional libtardos running around railing TREASON are so fucking stupid they don't even know you can't be charged with treason because Russia hasn't been declared an enemy of war by Congress.

"Treason against the United States, shall consist only in levying War against them, or in adhering to their Enemies, giving them Aid and Comfort. No Person shall be convicted of Treason unless on the Testimony of two Witnesses to the same overt Act, or on Confession in open Court."

That shit didn't stick to the wall so the libtarded wet dream is out the window.

The lame stream media is railing campaign finance law violation.

In order to get that shit sandwich to stick you have to receive something of value and Trump Jr. got nothing from the meeting so no law was broken there. Unless you think the smell of a whore's perfume has some intrinsic value.

So now the petunia's are down to "intent to collude".

How in the hell do you draw this conclusion when there was obviously nothing to collude over.

Get these crybaby snowflakes some ketchup.

A premature conclusion ^^^, the definition of Treason is quoted correctly, the conclusion is way too early to determine. Let's wait and see how Mr. Mueller's investigation moves along, interviews elicit information which can conflict with the testimony of others or their prior statement(s), leading to inconsistencies and further inquiry.

Once a lie of omission or commission is established, pressure can be applied in terms a prison sentence, or of immunity from prosecution, or a lesser penalty.

There is no crime so your wet dream is moot

-Geaux

 

[Wry Catcher]

Congressional libtardos running around railing TREASON are so fucking stupid they don't even know you can't be charged with treason because Russia hasn't been declared an enemy of war by Congress.

"Treason against the United States, shall consist only in levying War against them, or in adhering to their Enemies, giving them Aid and Comfort. No Person shall be convicted of Treason unless on the Testimony of two Witnesses to the same overt Act, or on Confession in open Court."

That shit didn't stick to the wall so the libtarded wet dream is out the window.

The lame stream media is railing campaign finance law violation.

In order to get that shit sandwich to stick you have to receive something of value and Trump Jr. got nothing from the meeting so no law was broken there. Unless you think the smell of a whore's perfume has some intrinsic value.

So now the petunia's are down to "intent to collude".

How in the hell do you draw this conclusion when there was obviously nothing to collude over.

Get these crybaby snowflakes some ketchup.

A premature conclusion ^^^, the definition of Treason is quoted correctly, the conclusion is way too early to determine. Let's wait and see how Mr. Mueller's investigation moves along, interviews elicit information which can conflict with the testimony of others or their prior statement(s), leading to inconsistencies and further inquiry.

Once a lie of omission or commission is established, pressure can be applied in terms a prison sentence, or of immunity from prosecution, or a lesser penalty.

There is no crime so your wet dream is moot

-Geaux

Sorry, your vulgarity was wasted on an ignorant comment.

 

[Geaux4it]

Congressional libtardos running around railing TREASON are so fucking stupid they don't even know you can't be charged with treason because Russia hasn't been declared an enemy of war by Congress.

"Treason against the United States, shall consist only in levying War against them, or in adhering to their Enemies, giving them Aid and Comfort. No Person shall be convicted of Treason unless on the Testimony of two Witnesses to the same overt Act, or on Confession in open Court."

That shit didn't stick to the wall so the libtarded wet dream is out the window.

The lame stream media is railing campaign finance law violation.

In order to get that shit sandwich to stick you have to receive something of value and Trump Jr. got nothing from the meeting so no law was broken there. Unless you think the smell of a whore's perfume has some intrinsic value.

So now the petunia's are down to "intent to collude".

How in the hell do you draw this conclusion when there was obviously nothing to collude over.

Get these crybaby snowflakes some ketchup.

A premature conclusion ^^^, the definition of Treason is quoted correctly, the conclusion is way too early to determine. Let's wait and see how Mr. Mueller's investigation moves along, interviews elicit information which can conflict with the testimony of others or their prior statement(s), leading to inconsistencies and further inquiry.

Once a lie of omission or commission is established, pressure can be applied in terms a prison sentence, or of immunity from prosecution, or a lesser penalty.

There is no crime so your wet dream is moot

-Geaux

Sorry, your vulgarity was wasted on an ignorant comment.

I apologize for assuming you can get wet.....

However, there is no crime here

-Geaux