Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
Thank God for that.Unfortunately at this stage it looks like the Remain camp will win....it will be a disaster for the UK which will remain being partially governed by the petty, dictatorial , left wing ,marxist ,One World Government bureaucrats and Ministers in the EU and EC.
The once mighty England, the greatest Empire in the world is now a mere shadow of itself.
About a week ago I took advantage of the polling and bought heavily into GBP. Up substantially already. I expect a change in a day or two but it won't make any further difference because I have already spent them at that rate on hotel bookings and railway tickets. Panic can be sooooo profitable!
Call that a "hedge"?
About a week ago I took advantage of the polling and bought heavily into GBP. Up substantially already. I expect a change in a day or two but it won't make any further difference because I have already spent them at that rate on hotel bookings and railway tickets. Panic can be sooooo profitable!
Call that a "hedge"?
Hope for your sake you spent those pounds.
Hope for your sake you spent those pounds.
The statement about ICJ is correct; however, it does not tell the whole story about possible prosecution of Israeli officials for crimes against Palestinians. UN rules and procedure allow for the creation of ad hoc courts to try such crimes. The most famous example is the International Criminal Tribunal for the former Yugoslavia or ICTY.Just because you keep repeating it doesn't make it true Dorothy.No, you are wrong. The reason cases involving Israel's crimes against humanity aren't taken to the ICJ is because that court can't hear them and has nothing to do with the validity of such cases. Sorry but you are going to have to find a new alibi to sooth your guilty conscience.The reason is that the ICJ is not a criminal court. It has no jurisdiction over Israel's crimes against humanity.
Actually it is a criminal court and it does have jurisdiction if it so chooses to exert it; enforcement is another issue. They choose not to because no valid cases can be brought against Israel, an they know it. The UN isn't a credible institution, and it's 'Resolutions' mean nothing, they aren't laws, and because a majority of its members are just vermin representing dictatorships and organized crime syndicates.
The International Court of Justice has no jurisdiction to try individuals accused of war crimes or crimes against humanity. As it is not a criminal court, it does not have a prosecutor able to initiate proceedings.
Frequently Asked Questions | International Court of Justice
I don't have a 'guilty conscience', that's just projection by those who have some sort of Joooos Fetish. The ICJ can handle all those cases, and make rulings, and as I said enforcement is a different issue, but there is nothing to prevent anybody from filing cases and having them ruled on. they don't, because they have nothing to file on and they know it, it's just propaganda and antisemitic gibberish.
You and Tommy can start a thread on it. Tommy of course is just a troll and of no interest.
The International Court of Justice has no jurisdiction to try individuals accused of war crimes or crimes against humanity. As it is not a criminal court, it does not have a prosecutor able to initiate proceedings.
Frequently Asked Questions | International Court of Justice
These courts are established by resolution of the UN Security Council. ICTY heard charges of breaches of the Geneva Conventions, violations of the laws or customs of war, genocide and crimes against humanity.
The politics of the establishing resolution make it far more likely that should the SC be prevented by nothing more than a US veto, the US would broker an agreement by Israel in return, i.e. a plea deal. Such an arrangement would require assent by other SC members and the Palestinian Authority. It would, in fact, be the "peace process" the US has been blathering about for fifty years.
Rather than bother with the propaganda above, the ICJ hears cases of criminality, and has since its inception, contrary to the claims above, between countries and peoples. The reason no cases have been brought against Israel is because they haven't violated any, it's that simple.
For instance:
List of All Cases | International Court of Justice
- Application for Revision of the Judgment of 11 July 1996 in the Case concerning Application of the Convention on the Prevention and Punishment of the Crime of Genocide (Bosnia and Herzegovina v. Yugoslavia), Preliminary Objections (Yugoslavia v. Bosnia and Herzegovina)
More...
2000- Arrest Warrant of 11 April 2000 (Democratic Republic of the Congo v. Belgium)
More...... and more. All kinds of cases involving violations of 'international law'. It just annoys antisemites that Israel exists, that's all. How many 'Resolutions' does the UN ever pass on Israel's 'neighbors', or genocidal gangsters like the current freely elected murderers in Gaza or the PA territories? It's ridiculous nonsense the ICJ can't rule on those disputes; they can, yet nobody ever brings such a case before them.
1999- Territorial and Maritime Dispute between Nicaragua and Honduras in the Caribbean Sea (Nicaragua v. Honduras)
More...- Aerial Incident of 10 August 1999 (Pakistan v. India)
More...- Application of the Convention on the Prevention and Punishment of the Crime of Genocide (Croatia v. Serbia)
More...- Armed Activities on the Territory of the Congo (Democratic Republic of the Congo v. Rwanda)
More...- Armed Activities on the Territory of the Congo (Democratic Republic of the Congo v. Uganda)
More...- Armed Activities on the Territory of the Congo (Democratic Republic of the Congo v. Burundi)
More...- Legality of Use of Force (Yugoslavia v. United States of America)
More...- Legality of Use of Force (Serbia and Montenegro v. United Kingdom)
More...- Legality of Use of Force (Yugoslavia v. Spain)
More...- Legality of Use of Force (Serbia and Montenegro v. Portugal)
More...- Legality of Use of Force (Serbia and Montenegro v. Netherlands)
More...- Legality of Use of Force (Serbia and Montenegro v. Italy)
More...- Legality of Use of Force (Serbia and Montenegro v. Germany)
More...- Legality of Use of Force (Serbia and Montenegro v. France)
More...- Legality of Use of Force (Serbia and Montenegro v. Canada)
More...- Legality of Use of Force (Serbia and Montenegro v. Belgium)
More...- LaGrand (Germany v. United States of America)
More...
And it is also why Tommy and the rest are terrified of starting a thread on it. lol
Rather than bother with the propaganda above, the ICJ hears cases of criminality, and has since its inception, contrary to the claims above, between countries and peoples. The reason no cases have been brought against Israel is because they haven't violated any, it's that simple.
For instance:
List of All Cases | International Court of Justice
- Application for Revision of the Judgment of 11 July 1996 in the Case concerning Application of the Convention on the Prevention and Punishment of the Crime of Genocide (Bosnia and Herzegovina v. Yugoslavia), Preliminary Objections (Yugoslavia v. Bosnia and Herzegovina)
More...
2000- Arrest Warrant of 11 April 2000 (Democratic Republic of the Congo v. Belgium)
More...... and more. All kinds of cases involving violations of 'international law'. It just annoys antisemites that Israel exists, that's all. How many 'Resolutions' does the UN ever pass on Israel's 'neighbors', or genocidal gangsters like the current freely elected murderers in Gaza or the PA territories? It's ridiculous nonsense the ICJ can't rule on those disputes; they can, yet nobody ever brings such a case before them.
1999- Territorial and Maritime Dispute between Nicaragua and Honduras in the Caribbean Sea (Nicaragua v. Honduras)
More...- Aerial Incident of 10 August 1999 (Pakistan v. India)
More...- Application of the Convention on the Prevention and Punishment of the Crime of Genocide (Croatia v. Serbia)
More...- Armed Activities on the Territory of the Congo (Democratic Republic of the Congo v. Rwanda)
More...- Armed Activities on the Territory of the Congo (Democratic Republic of the Congo v. Uganda)
More...- Armed Activities on the Territory of the Congo (Democratic Republic of the Congo v. Burundi)
More...- Legality of Use of Force (Yugoslavia v. United States of America)
More...- Legality of Use of Force (Serbia and Montenegro v. United Kingdom)
More...- Legality of Use of Force (Yugoslavia v. Spain)
More...- Legality of Use of Force (Serbia and Montenegro v. Portugal)
More...- Legality of Use of Force (Serbia and Montenegro v. Netherlands)
More...- Legality of Use of Force (Serbia and Montenegro v. Italy)
More...- Legality of Use of Force (Serbia and Montenegro v. Germany)
More...- Legality of Use of Force (Serbia and Montenegro v. France)
More...- Legality of Use of Force (Serbia and Montenegro v. Canada)
More...- Legality of Use of Force (Serbia and Montenegro v. Belgium)
More...- LaGrand (Germany v. United States of America)
More...
And it is also why Tommy and the rest are terrified of starting a thread on it. lol
From what I've read before, I gather that Tehon is Russian. Which explains his behavior, false claim that ICJ cannot rule, his implication of Israeli crimes (again false), it's all there like a writing on a wall...
Yes, but what is troublesome to me is that so many people didn't detect it. For the Russians among us here - it must be like shooting fish in a barrel. They tell people whatever they want to hear and suddenly Americans believe this is their new best friend (s).Rather than bother with the propaganda above, the ICJ hears cases of criminality, and has since its inception, contrary to the claims above, between countries and peoples. The reason no cases have been brought against Israel is because they haven't violated any, it's that simple.
For instance:
List of All Cases | International Court of Justice
- Application for Revision of the Judgment of 11 July 1996 in the Case concerning Application of the Convention on the Prevention and Punishment of the Crime of Genocide (Bosnia and Herzegovina v. Yugoslavia), Preliminary Objections (Yugoslavia v. Bosnia and Herzegovina)
More...
2000- Arrest Warrant of 11 April 2000 (Democratic Republic of the Congo v. Belgium)
More...... and more. All kinds of cases involving violations of 'international law'. It just annoys antisemites that Israel exists, that's all. How many 'Resolutions' does the UN ever pass on Israel's 'neighbors', or genocidal gangsters like the current freely elected murderers in Gaza or the PA territories? It's ridiculous nonsense the ICJ can't rule on those disputes; they can, yet nobody ever brings such a case before them.
1999- Territorial and Maritime Dispute between Nicaragua and Honduras in the Caribbean Sea (Nicaragua v. Honduras)
More...- Aerial Incident of 10 August 1999 (Pakistan v. India)
More...- Application of the Convention on the Prevention and Punishment of the Crime of Genocide (Croatia v. Serbia)
More...- Armed Activities on the Territory of the Congo (Democratic Republic of the Congo v. Rwanda)
More...- Armed Activities on the Territory of the Congo (Democratic Republic of the Congo v. Uganda)
More...- Armed Activities on the Territory of the Congo (Democratic Republic of the Congo v. Burundi)
More...- Legality of Use of Force (Yugoslavia v. United States of America)
More...- Legality of Use of Force (Serbia and Montenegro v. United Kingdom)
More...- Legality of Use of Force (Yugoslavia v. Spain)
More...- Legality of Use of Force (Serbia and Montenegro v. Portugal)
More...- Legality of Use of Force (Serbia and Montenegro v. Netherlands)
More...- Legality of Use of Force (Serbia and Montenegro v. Italy)
More...- Legality of Use of Force (Serbia and Montenegro v. Germany)
More...- Legality of Use of Force (Serbia and Montenegro v. France)
More...- Legality of Use of Force (Serbia and Montenegro v. Canada)
More...- Legality of Use of Force (Serbia and Montenegro v. Belgium)
More...- LaGrand (Germany v. United States of America)
More...
And it is also why Tommy and the rest are terrified of starting a thread on it. lol
From what I've read before, I gather that Tehon is Russian. Which explains his behavior, false claim that ICJ cannot rule, his implication of Israeli crimes (again false), it's all there like a writing on a wall...
It's just amazing how much old Soviet Cold War propaganda just keeps being recycled as 'fact' even today, especially by faux 'progressives' and Democrats in our own country.
Yes, but what is troublesome to me is that so many people didn't detect it. For the Russians among us here - it must be like shooting fish in a barrel. They tell people whatever they want to hear and suddenly Americans believe this is their new best friend (s).Rather than bother with the propaganda above, the ICJ hears cases of criminality, and has since its inception, contrary to the claims above, between countries and peoples. The reason no cases have been brought against Israel is because they haven't violated any, it's that simple.
For instance:
List of All Cases | International Court of Justice
- Application for Revision of the Judgment of 11 July 1996 in the Case concerning Application of the Convention on the Prevention and Punishment of the Crime of Genocide (Bosnia and Herzegovina v. Yugoslavia), Preliminary Objections (Yugoslavia v. Bosnia and Herzegovina)
More...
2000- Arrest Warrant of 11 April 2000 (Democratic Republic of the Congo v. Belgium)
More...... and more. All kinds of cases involving violations of 'international law'. It just annoys antisemites that Israel exists, that's all. How many 'Resolutions' does the UN ever pass on Israel's 'neighbors', or genocidal gangsters like the current freely elected murderers in Gaza or the PA territories? It's ridiculous nonsense the ICJ can't rule on those disputes; they can, yet nobody ever brings such a case before them.
1999- Territorial and Maritime Dispute between Nicaragua and Honduras in the Caribbean Sea (Nicaragua v. Honduras)
More...- Aerial Incident of 10 August 1999 (Pakistan v. India)
More...- Application of the Convention on the Prevention and Punishment of the Crime of Genocide (Croatia v. Serbia)
More...- Armed Activities on the Territory of the Congo (Democratic Republic of the Congo v. Rwanda)
More...- Armed Activities on the Territory of the Congo (Democratic Republic of the Congo v. Uganda)
More...- Armed Activities on the Territory of the Congo (Democratic Republic of the Congo v. Burundi)
More...- Legality of Use of Force (Yugoslavia v. United States of America)
More...- Legality of Use of Force (Serbia and Montenegro v. United Kingdom)
More...- Legality of Use of Force (Yugoslavia v. Spain)
More...- Legality of Use of Force (Serbia and Montenegro v. Portugal)
More...- Legality of Use of Force (Serbia and Montenegro v. Netherlands)
More...- Legality of Use of Force (Serbia and Montenegro v. Italy)
More...- Legality of Use of Force (Serbia and Montenegro v. Germany)
More...- Legality of Use of Force (Serbia and Montenegro v. France)
More...- Legality of Use of Force (Serbia and Montenegro v. Canada)
More...- Legality of Use of Force (Serbia and Montenegro v. Belgium)
More...- LaGrand (Germany v. United States of America)
More...
And it is also why Tommy and the rest are terrified of starting a thread on it. lol
From what I've read before, I gather that Tehon is Russian. Which explains his behavior, false claim that ICJ cannot rule, his implication of Israeli crimes (again false), it's all there like a writing on a wall...
It's just amazing how much old Soviet Cold War propaganda just keeps being recycled as 'fact' even today, especially by faux 'progressives' and Democrats in our own country.
I have decided to put him and the other ones on ignore to keep myself from temptation. I pray they be converted to Christ because apart from Jesus Christ they shall all perish. I cannot imagine being raised in the Soviet mindset of propaganda and lies. It will take a miracle to see them set free from it. One cannot live a life of deception, lies, hiding hatred in the heart without it eventually destroying them - even before they see hell.
And on the subject of hell..... there are many testimonies I have heard of people who had witnessed visions of people in hell who thought they would be rewarded for their service to Lucifer only to find that Jesus Christ holds the keys to hell and death and they've been duped. How could Satan reward anyone when he was stripped of his power at Calvary? Why would anyone believe Satan (or his workers) would keep his word or promise? Honesty is a virtue. Satan has no virtues. He is the Father of lies and those who serve him are living a lie that will eventually lead to their destruction. Sad but true.
