What's wrong with this political philosophy?

You do understand that money(cash) is a tool and value is something the beholder assigns. Of course, with the advent of merchants, the beholder is told not to ask for less than what is considered acceptable by the merchant!!

Also, even if BASIC NEED are met, the desire for more(want) will spur forward and entice people to overthrow such a system. Alas, it is also WANT that will encourage people to work at slave wages as we see in even the most ruthless of communists regimes. It is WANT that puts the prostitute on the streets of Scandanavian countries and cause riots to form in the capitals during economic down times. Want is the driver of crimes during economic Booms, during times when needs are met.

Want is the downfall of any Utopia. The fatal Human flaws of lust and greed. Until man can be successfully re-programmed to ignore his desires, the dreams of Idealists and their allies will never become a permanent situation. Their world like the temporal existance of a Moth. A winged creature that burns in its blinding ignorance of mankind!

Let's say my dream passion is to create TVs. I run a company that creates them. I give them away to anyone who wants them.

Any conceivable product you can think of in our current society, from mansions to leather seating to 50" screen 3-D TV's, to anything - is met. Of course, there is government oversight - making sure the products we buy are safe.

I don't think you have a full understanding of anarcho-communism. You wouldn't be running a company that makes tv's, and who would work for you if they're getting nothing out of it? Secondly, there'd be no government oversight because there'd be no government.
 
You do understand that money(cash) is a tool and value is something the beholder assigns. Of course, with the advent of merchants, the beholder is told not to ask for less than what is considered acceptable by the merchant!!

Also, even if BASIC NEED are met, the desire for more(want) will spur forward and entice people to overthrow such a system. Alas, it is also WANT that will encourage people to work at slave wages as we see in even the most ruthless of communists regimes. It is WANT that puts the prostitute on the streets of Scandanavian countries and cause riots to form in the capitals during economic down times. Want is the driver of crimes during economic Booms, during times when needs are met.

Want is the downfall of any Utopia. The fatal Human flaws of lust and greed. Until man can be successfully re-programmed to ignore his desires, the dreams of Idealists and their allies will never become a permanent situation. Their world like the temporal existance of a Moth. A winged creature that burns in its blinding ignorance of mankind!

Let's say my dream passion is to create TVs. I run a company that creates them. I give them away to anyone who wants them.

Any conceivable product you can think of in our current society, from mansions to leather seating to 50" screen 3-D TV's, to anything - is met. Of course, there is government oversight - making sure the products we buy are safe.

How would you cover the production costs? Will you group yourself with others like minded individuals that love to make TV's and are generous enough to hand out the fruits of their labor just because they are TV saints? Will you also recieve the raw materials in the making of such TV's from others that loves to make TV panel's, Knobs, transitors, Circuit boards, wiring and so forth--all in the specifications you asked for?

How does such an economy stay afloat? From sheer love of the work by the laborer?

Well, if we are going to build economies based on sheer love of work, then you start by working for me. Please, do not thank me for I can find greater rewards by selling your TV's!! Oh yes, I am not going to pay, but your sheer love of labor is all you need.

Listen, I already get 20th cent. communism. Brainwash people and make a killing!! Whats the point of trying to survive under capitalism when you could have a whole island to yourself with millions of servants at your disposal. All that is needed is a church to back you as King and you have set a nation back by a thousand years!!
 
Last edited:
A completely cashless/valueless society. No money, no wealth... people work as they need to in order to fulfill their needs. You're free to pursue whatever line of work you wish to - as all of your basic needs will be met to allow you to achieve a higher level of existence. Where you work because you want to, not because you have to. So what's wrong with this philosophy?



Our political theory stresses egalitarianism and the abolition of social hierarchy and class distinctions that arise from unequal wealth distribution, the abolition of capitalism and money, and the collective production and distribution of wealth by means of voluntary associations.


In our political theory, the state and property no longer exist. Each individual and group is free to contribute to production and to satisfy their needs based on their own choice. Systems of production and distribution are managed by their participants.


The abolition of wage labor is central to our political theory. With distribution of wealth being based on self-determined needs, people will be free to engage in whatever activities they find most fulfilling and will no longer have to engage in work for which they have neither the temperament nor the aptitude. We argue that there is no valid way of measuring the value of any one person's economic contributions because all wealth is a collective product of current and preceding generations.
We argue that any economic system based on wage labor and private property will require a coercive state apparatus to enforce property rights and to maintain the unequal economic relationships that will inevitably arise.


We reject the claim that wage labor is necessary because people are by "nature" lazy and selfish. They point out that even the so-called "idle rich" sometimes find useful things to do despite having all their needs satisfied by the labor of others.
We support our theory as a means for ensuring the greatest freedom and well-being for everyone, rather than only the wealthy and powerful. In this sense, our political theory is a profoundly egalitarian philosophy. We do not think that anyone has the right to be anyone else's boss.

Who picks up the garbage? It's an interesting theory but in a society where goods and services are developed to meet individual demand and the majority of those goods and services leading to meaningless mind numbing jobs I doubt it could ever work.

So long as we place value on our needs there will be unequal distribution and a need for money. In your world it may be the garbage man making 20M with stock options and the CEO at minimum wage but society and social injustuce would be just as skewed...
 
PeterS does pose a Good question

Who would work the mines?? In the idealistic circumstance, the people that would always wanted to work the mines. I would not think you could find many people to do that.

In a more pragmatic yet egalitarian sense--those who work the mine live closet to the mines. Yet, they either are in the process of changing jobs and moving o greener pastuers or they need incentive/access in order to learn a job/profession they can enjoy working.

The question is how to build incentive and how to ease access to better employment. After that, Time would improve the lives of the individual--although you will constantly see new individuals in the mines replacing the ones that left.

Communism is deader than disco. Too much idealism and not enough pragmatism.
 
Last edited:
Anarchist communism...

Shouldn't this thread be in the humor section? :lol:

It is exactly anarchist communism... which I used to think was an oxymoron.

It still is...

Ya see what makes the concepts antithetical is that compliance is essential to the entire thesis... and where those who choose not to comply ruin the 'experiment' it becomes necessary to enforce compliance and PRESTO... its just old fashion communism.

As I've told Ag in all of her various psuedonyms... Invalid theory remains invalid in practice...

It's akin to buying a Mustang while wishing upon HOPE that it was a Z28 Camaro... in the end, it's just a Mustang... even if ya slap a blower on it... they're either suckin' or blowin'...
 
cnt.gif


A SOCIALIST WORLD IS POSSIBLE!

55541.jpg

 
Won't work, many jobs won't be done unless people get paid for them, and the money is transmuted into things they want or like.

Many jobs won't be relevant in a cashless society. And many new types of jobs will become relevant. People can't just sit around and do nothing while all of their needs such as food and shelter are being met.




They do now DUmmie,, they do now!
 
Whoa, there David... are you turning into some sort of Anarchist??

I was trying not to use keywords that would automatically make people think that this is a terrible idea and not even read it.

I'm also not saying I believe in this, but I'd like to know what other people believe what's wrong with a society where everyone works for the common good of each other?

Example: I'm a farmer - I love to farm. I create fruits and vegetables for all to eat, including myself. Why do I need money for this if all of my basic needs are being met?
the problem is everyone dosen't work.. have you looked around??? hello?
 
Whoa, there David... are you turning into some sort of Anarchist??

I was trying not to use keywords that would automatically make people think that this is a terrible idea and not even read it.

I'm also not saying I believe in this, but I'd like to know what other people believe what's wrong with a society where everyone works for the common good of each other?

Example: I'm a farmer - I love to farm. I create fruits and vegetables for all to eat, including myself. Why do I need money for this if all of my basic needs are being met?

Can a hermit be self sufficient enough to basically live?? Yes... I don't think you want a nation of neanderthal type hermits or small communal families

There are many things wrong with this STUPID idea... but let's just go with a few biggies

1) Ambition - Humans have it... humans wish to have a value set on their accomplishments and abilities... you don't have the advancement of ambition when you try and trade your skill in computer networking for bushels of corn
2) Desire - People wish to have more things that make them happy, and not just the essentials. That is done thru ambition and advancement. That is also accomplished thru the production and invention of things that have no intrinsic value except to those who have the desire for it. There is no 'need' for the next World of Warcraft game. But there certainly is a desire for it. Hence there is a desire by some people to put their efforts into that, a desire by some to advance beyond farming to afford it for their leisure
3) Control - Value, and the perception of value instills a need and want for control. Government wishes to run and does not run well off of collecting fish or bags of rice. People wish to control their future thru advancement and the control of that comes from what they can demand for their skills.
4) Commonality. Not every video game store would want or need a bushel of corn to pay for a video game they sell. Putting value on something, I.E. money, gives a commonly beld value belief so that if 1 side does not have what the other side desires, they don't have to fucking waste time looking around for someone to trade their corn to, who in turn can trade that corn for a radial tire, who can trade that tire for a case of bathroom cleaner, who can trade that cleaner for house paint, who can trade that house paint for the video game.
5) Investment - You don't invest in a company or some person's efforts with basic good only.



The list can go on and on and on as to why this is about as stupid of an idea there is for a society
 
Won't work, many jobs won't be done unless people get paid for them, and the money is transmuted into things they want or like.

Many jobs won't be relevant in a cashless society. And many new types of jobs will become relevant. People can't just sit around and do nothing while all of their needs such as food and shelter are being met.

YES they can. And as noted we have had whole classes of people in MULTIPLE ethnicities and races do EXACTLY that. And we have our own worthless suck up tax payer money people in this country right now.
 
Many jobs won't be relevant in a cashless society. And many new types of jobs will become relevant. People can't just sit around and do nothing while all of their needs such as food and shelter are being met.

Why not? They do it now. It's called welfare.

I don't think you understand. Welfare is money. This is no money. Not one person has money. Need a car? A basic car is free. Need a home? A house is free. Need doctors? They're free. Medicine? Free. Everything is free. People work to better themselves as human beings, not to earn money.

Are you just ignorant? Someone has to build all that or grow all that , transport it around on systems someone builds and maintains.

It does not work because to many of the "things" one needs in a modern society can not be produced and maintained by a work force of " I work when I feel like it"
 
I wonder

Do these "Basic cars" have motors and seats?

Are the roof of this "basic House" made of cardboard?

But then, we could always imagine that is the ceiling of some magnificent cathedral----until the raindrops slap us into reality....
 
Oh my god!! He's even sporting the colours now too!! *high 5*

Next thing we know Dave's gonna be chaining himself to Palestinian villages! asidhado [/jk]

The truth is that we don't really need to do much to make that happen... it is a process that IS occurring. Just take a look at all the naysayers. 200 years ago they would've been up there defending the divine rights of kings. That's exactly what those people thought of the sort of democracy we have today. "People are stupid!" "It's unrealistic!" "It's human nature to be sheep!" The King was the only one with real "wisdom" the only one who could rule, who could command the entire hierarchy to his whim. Then the Nobles said, "Hey, fuck that!" and they forced the king to take their decisions into account. Then the people began moving to the cities, becoming rich and then the Bourgeoisie said "Hey, fuck that!" and they forced themselves into decision making, and the nobles had to give. And then the workers- and then hell, the entire male population demanded to be represented, and the elites had to give. And then the women, and then the minorities- because people refuse to be oppressed.

There's absolutely no reason to think this project of democratization is over. What if the American people had thought after the revolution "well, this is about as representative and decentralized as we should get"? Only white propertied males would be able to do anything. Now most people can vote, sure, but why are we to think that this is it, that it will just remain like this? Everything changes. As I said before "Anarchy is a dream, it's chaos," well, that is EXACTLY what the old Monarchs said about any sort of democracy. And surely some of the first efforts were chaotic, even catastrophic (France 1789, anybody?) but nevertheless here we are. So now we get to pick people to represent us, instead of being handed them from above. That's all well and good, but the fact is that every democracy we have today is imperfect, even in the U.S., but it will keep evolving- the only question is whether the tide of progress will be held back by the interest of the powerful or by the people, demanding a just and free society where we interact with each other in terms of equality and respect.

EDIT: That being said, it's obvious that we've still gone a long way to go (Just look around this thread). This transformation won't happen overnight, it won't fall on our laps, it won't simply explode all of a sudden, and if it did it would probably be bloody and catastrophic, but I'm fairly confident we're heading there, slowly but surely, and that's probably for the best.
 
Last edited:
Yeah--keep up your Eternal Revolution!! You will need something big yet constant to keep yon followers from asking "Where the hell are we?" and "Where the hell are we going??"
 
A completely cashless/valueless society. No money, no wealth... people work as they need to in order to fulfill their needs. You're free to pursue whatever line of work you wish to - as all of your basic needs will be met to allow you to achieve a higher level of existence. Where you work because you want to, not because you have to. So what's wrong with this philosophy?

Other than being based upon totally inaccurate assumptions of both human nature and how an economy works, its great.
 
Won't work, many jobs won't be done unless people get paid for them, and the money is transmuted into things they want or like.

Many jobs won't be relevant in a cashless society. And many new types of jobs will become relevant. People can't just sit around and do nothing while all of their needs such as food and shelter are being met.

Why not? They do it now. It's called welfare.

Or TRUSTFUNDERS.
 
A completely cashless/valueless society. No money, no wealth... people work as they need to in order to fulfill their needs. You're free to pursue whatever line of work you wish to - as all of your basic needs will be met to allow you to achieve a higher level of existence. Where you work because you want to, not because you have to. So what's wrong with this philosophy?



Our political theory stresses egalitarianism and the abolition of social hierarchy and class distinctions that arise from unequal wealth distribution, the abolition of capitalism and money, and the collective production and distribution of wealth by means of voluntary associations.


In our political theory, the state and property no longer exist. Each individual and group is free to contribute to production and to satisfy their needs based on their own choice. Systems of production and distribution are managed by their participants.


The abolition of wage labor is central to our political theory. With distribution of wealth being based on self-determined needs, people will be free to engage in whatever activities they find most fulfilling and will no longer have to engage in work for which they have neither the temperament nor the aptitude. We argue that there is no valid way of measuring the value of any one person's economic contributions because all wealth is a collective product of current and preceding generations.
We argue that any economic system based on wage labor and private property will require a coercive state apparatus to enforce property rights and to maintain the unequal economic relationships that will inevitably arise.


We reject the claim that wage labor is necessary because people are by "nature" lazy and selfish. They point out that even the so-called "idle rich" sometimes find useful things to do despite having all their needs satisfied by the labor of others.
We support our theory as a means for ensuring the greatest freedom and well-being for everyone, rather than only the wealthy and powerful. In this sense, our political theory is a profoundly egalitarian philosophy. We do not think that anyone has the right to be anyone else's boss.


Ahh Utopia... she's simply beautiful in the spring...

What's wrong with it, is it rejects human nature... but if you're planning on implementing this, on those who are NOT humans, I'd say go for it.

Otherwise, if you're limited to human beings, it's a non-starter.

Human's aren't auotomotons... people need pressure, they need impetus, a reason for being; a reason for doing and where such is not present, people tend to languish.

Now what you've described... "You're free to pursue whatever line of work you wish to - as all of your basic needs will be met to allow you to achieve a higher level of existence." is prison... anyone interested in 15-20 to explore your awakening? All your basic needs are met; food, shelter, clothing... thus freeing you to pursue whatever work you like, as long as your desires aren't beyond the scope of that system which provides for those basic needs...

See the problem? My basic needs extend well beyond what prison provides in terms of everything from food UP and that HOUSING? Forgedaboudit!

It's an untenable notion which would never have my compliance and without compliance it's dead... thus we begin to see how such a system must induce compliance and it's at THAT point where we begin to see the whole "PRISON" thing begin to take shape.

Also it doesn't really take into account greedy people or those who want to try to bend/exploit the system as much as possible and you can't ignore greed.

If I have everything provided for me what incentive is there for me to produce more than I have to or better quality then I have to?

Well in capitalism if you have all your basic needs met then the incentive is wealth.

Your society has no wealth, which to me doesn't make any sense, I mean if everyone all ready has their basic needs met why does it matter that wealthy people exist?.

No money makes no sense either as money is a lot better than the barter system.

But whatever how are we going to make sure there's no wealth?

The creator of Tetris lived in Soviet Russia and of course Tetris sold a lot and made the creator a lot of money, the Soviets took the extra money he made to give him the status quo.

Now let's say Tetris man was in your society how would you make sure he had no wealth if he wanted to keep it?

The only way I can think of is force, which as PI said is communism.

Oh and I'm not sure who said it but
"Government big enough to supply everything you need is big enough to take away everything you have."
 
Here's something to consider...

Productivity is up and so is unemployment and underemployment.

That is not mere coincidence.

As more and more people become redudant, thanks to advancing tecnology, what shall we do with the increasingly redundant population?


Please don't waste our time telling us that we retrain them.

Anything that these people can do, robots can (or soon will) do cheaper and better.

So what is the answer?

Bear in mind, while you thinking about this, that as technology makes doctors lawyers, engineers, software programmers, and the like dedundant, they too will be economically worthless in this market driven society.

What does mankind do when his machines make him DEDUNDANT?

Do we just all kill ourselves and let the machines produce goods for nobody, or what?
 
Last edited:

Forum List

Back
Top