Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
We do. That's the point. Many countries do not include and equally value the education of ALL students, including those with learning or other physical or mental disabilities. Most countries do not find themselves educating anywhere near as many students who are not native speakers of the dominant language of the country in question. To name just a few factors.Ok, simply or complicated, why don't the U.S. public schools educate all children? Is that not their mission?
....
Yet our public schools are obsessively focused on standardized testing to the severe detriment of children with learning disabilities, children who are English as a second language learners and children who are low income.We do. That's the point. Many countries do not include and equally value the education of ALL students, including those with learning or other physical or mental disabilities. Most countries do not find themselves educating anywhere near as many students who are not native speakers of the dominant language of the country in question. To name just a few factors.
Other countries do not have the minority population found in the US and a large immigrant population. I hope that clears things up for you!The public school system does work very well in other modern countries. It's still welfare, subject to go bad at any time with no free market to make natural corrections.
Why do other countries consistently beat American kids who attend liberal-dominated schools at standardized testing?
Education is vitally necessary. It is not vital that it be provided by the state, when the state demonstrates that it sucks at it.
The answer,of course, is no.
We have many workers being taken advantage of because they are functionally illiterate to the point that they cannot read their own public school diplomas. We have consumers being taken advantage of because they learned gender equity instead of math in public schools.
The answer,of course, is no.
We have many workers being taken advantage of because they are functionally illiterate to the point that they cannot read their own public school diplomas. We have consumers being taken advantage of because they learned gender equity instead of math in public schools.
Do consumers benefit by not learning math in school, because time is dedicated to gender equity issues?Another exaggeration bordering on an outright lie?
Please tell me what the problem truly is. I have a couple of decades as a Special Education teacher and leader in low-income public schools, but I would love to learn from you.There are some students that cannot read their own diploma,, but that number is exaggerated by people like you who are too lazy to see the problem as it truly is.
Do you speak English? Many students do not.Ok, simply or complicated, why don't the U.S. public schools educate all children? Is that not their mission?
I thought that was the entire justification for the tax-and-control ideas of public school - to educate all children, not just the children of the rich.
Asian immigrants push standardized scores up. So much so, that they are discriminated by Ivey leagues schools because those schools fear being over-whelmingly Asian.Other countries do not have the minority population found in the US and a large immigrant population. I hope that clears things up for you!
Proof of this is because our best students score the same as their best students.
That's the lie part. In my schools, students are required to take math classes up through Algebra II. I'll bet your school district has similar requirements. I have never seen a course in gender equity. You exaggerate.Do consumers benefit by not learning math in school, because time is dedicated to gender equity issues?
Black and Hispanics. They make up over 90% of our minorities, but you knew that, didn't youAsian immigrants push standardized scores up. So much so, that they are discriminated by Ivey leagues schools because those schools fear being over-whelmingly Asian.
Which immigrants and minorities do you believe push down our test scores?
If students are not learning math well enough to avoid being taken advantage of by creditors and employers, that should be a huge priority. We should be hearing nothing from elementary and educators about gender equity, critical race theory, or sexual orientation until our kids can understand simple and compound interest.That's the lie part. In my schools, students are required to take math classes up through Algebra II. I'll bet your school district has similar requirements. I have never seen a course in gender equity. You exaggerate.
Thanks for the correction. Public school graduate, here.Black and Hispanics. They make up over 90% of our minorities, but you knew that, didn't you
BTW, there is no 'e" in Ivy League schools.
All 3 of you are full of shit Public school is not FREE, parents and others pay for it through taxes and levies.A free public education is what made this country great
Florida had a "real" voucher program, so did Cleveland and Wisconsin. All three were abject failures.Yet our public schools are obsessively focused on standardized testing to the severe detriment of children with learning disabilities, children who are English as a second language learners and children who are low income.
Those kids commonly lose electives, are forced into after school tutoring and/or summer school, and held back grades, which is strongly correlated with dropping out. All as a punishment for low scores on standardized tests, no matter how hard they work.
Public school in the US is broken badly. If you want to keep it, you need to come up with some fixes and fast.
Sooner or later, no matter how loudly Weingarten shrieks, a real voucher program will be passed somewhere and when it works far bettervthsn the compulsary system voters everywhere will demand it.
Oh, come on! You know the answer is cultural.If students are not learning math well enough to avoid being taken advantage of by creditors and employers, that should be a huge priority. We should be hearing nothing from elementary and educators about gender equity, critical race theory, or sexual orientation until our kids can understand simple and compound interest.
Thanks for the correction. Public school graduate, here.
So, why do you think Blacks and Hispanics are the reason that our test scores are so low? Why would they be pulling them down and Asians raising them up?
All 3 of you are full of shit Public school is not FREE, parents and others pay for it through taxes and levies.
And what is failing it/us now...it made us great when academics were emphasized in the curriculum, now it is being hacked apart by a left wing "social education"! [one that requires a certain amount of birthdays to be accumulated to earn a diploma]A free public education is what made this country great
Such a Drama QueenAnd what is failing it/us now...it made us great when academics were emphasized in the curriculum, now it is being hacked apart by a left wing "social education"! [one that requires a certain amount of birthdays to be accumulated to earn a diploma]
I am a teacher by trade and a poker player by avocation. So when I think "Ivy," I think about Phil Ivey. I could have re-read it ten times and made the same mistake. Have we sufficiently dwelt on my spelling error, or do you have more?Florida had a "real" voucher program, so did Cleveland and Wisconsin. All three were abject failures.
I also suggest proofreading on your part.
I don't know that. I attribute it to poorer infant nutrition among poorer people who are disproportionately Black and Hispanic.Oh, come on! You know the answer is cultural.
