What would you like the state to do?

[SAYIT]

Marxist (the newly avowed anarcho-syndicalist) is now claiming he was taking literary license with the term "monopoly" and didn't mean it literally.
Riiiight.

In fact, your incessant stream of mendacious socialist BS has made you a useful tool, Princess ... you make a fine punching bag and you even seem to enjoy the abuse.

 

[Marxist]

Marxist (the newly avowed anarcho-syndicalist) is now claiming he was taking literary license with the term "monopoly" and didn't mean it literally.
Riiiight.

In fact, your incessant stream of mendacious socialist BS has made you a useful tool, Princess ... you make a fine punching bag and you even seem to enjoy the abuse.

 

[Marxist]

If you want to get extremely literal about everything, then I agree.

It's good to see you admit you lied about Walmart being a monopoly. You might want to revisit many of your old posts and clean up your own mess.

No, I don't use literal definitions when talking about a monopoly, if we did, a monopoly would never actually ever exist. Nah, you may need to though.

BINGO. In other words, you like to use meaningless words so you can bamboozle your audience. When you don't want to define your terms it's because you're a lying sack of shit.

Nope, again, if monopoly was ever used literally, a monopoly would never exist.

BS.
Nationalized industries all over the planet - often stolen from those who developed them - are absolutely monopolies.

Tell me the literal definition again.

 

[bripat9643]

Walmart is not a company that has exclusive control of any commodity or service. There are many companies offering the same services and product types as Walmart.
Anyway, I must be missing something. WTF are you talking about?

If you want to get extremely literal about everything, then I agree.

It's good to see you admit you lied about Walmart being a monopoly. You might want to revisit many of your old posts and clean up your own mess.

No, I don't use literal definitions when talking about a monopoly, if we did, a monopoly would never actually ever exist. Nah, you may need to though.

BINGO. In other words, you like to use meaningless words so you can bamboozle your audience. When you don't want to define your terms it's because you're a lying sack of shit.

Nope, again, if monopoly was ever used literally, a monopoly would never exist.

They don't. That's why lying turds like you don't want to use the actual definition.

 

[SAYIT]

BS. Nationalized industries all over the planet - often stolen from those who developed them - are absolutely monopolies.

Tell me the literal definition again.

You are capable of searching the term without my help, right Princess?

 

[Votto]

Well, obviously, I don't want the state to exist at all, but with the state still existing, I thought it'd be a good idea to get people's ideas on what they would want the state to do. Let's keep it civil.
Here are my ideas:
- Universal Healthcare
- Free Higher Level Education
- Food distribution centers in all major cities/areas with those poverty
- Full employment
- Higher taxes on the top 0.1%
- Reduced military spending, more focus on renewable energy programs/health/education
- Government program to provide housing to the homeless using the existing homes that are unoccupied, or homes that can never sell, etc, etc...
Many more, just a brief list.

What would I like the state to do? Pass some budgets like they are suppose to do and leave the rest of us the hell alone.

That means stop dividing America about stupid things like gay marriage, and do their jobs.

Of course, since they refuse to do their jobs they are dependent upon divisive social issues to keep the lemmings voting for them.

Then again, you can't really argue with success.

 

[Marxist]

Nope, again, if monopoly was ever used literally, a monopoly would never exist.

BS.
Nationalized industries all over the planet - often stolen from those who developed them - are absolutely monopolies.

Tell me the literal definition again.

You are capable of searching the term without my help, right Princess?[/QUOTE]

 

[Hossfly]

Nope, again, if monopoly was ever used literally, a monopoly would never exist.

BS.
Nationalized industries all over the planet - often stolen from those who developed them - are absolutely monopolies.

Tell me the literal definition again.

You are capable of searching the term without my help, right Princess?

[/QUOTE]

 

[LogikAndReazon]

Communes for the intellectuals !!!! Lol

 

[LogikAndReazon]

Who is the greedy F--k ?

Someone who earned their keep, or someone who expects others to provide it for them ?

Clear as day parasites, thanks for playing!

 

[Not2BSubjugated]

Walmart is not a company that has exclusive control of any commodity or service. There are many companies offering the same services and product types as Walmart.
Anyway, I must be missing something. WTF are you talking about?

If you want to get extremely literal about everything, then I agree.

It's good to see you admit you lied about Walmart being a monopoly. You might want to revisit many of your old posts and clean up your own mess.

No, I don't use literal definitions when talking about a monopoly, if we did, a monopoly would never actually ever exist. Nah, you may need to though.

Nice fallback, but wrong again. Bell Telephone, smart guy. Why am I not surprised that a self avowed anarcho-commie doesn't know much history?

And it's not that you're just using the term non literally, you're using it completely incorrectly. It's not an all-purpose synonym for big, greedy corporation. Even if a business isn't the only of its kind, you could still use the term loosely if they had cornered enough of their market to engage in price fixing. That's the key point: that the company has enough exclusivity to get away with gouging the consumer. Walmart has way too many competitors for that, that's why shit's so cheap there, and that's why you're not just non literal, you're breathtakingly out of your depth in any economic discussion.

 

[Not2BSubjugated]

If you want to get extremely literal about everything, then I agree.

It's good to see you admit you lied about Walmart being a monopoly. You might want to revisit many of your old posts and clean up your own mess.

No, I don't use literal definitions when talking about a monopoly, if we did, a monopoly would never actually ever exist. Nah, you may need to though.

BINGO. In other words, you like to use meaningless words so you can bamboozle your audience. When you don't want to define your terms it's because you're a lying sack of shit.

Nope, again, if monopoly was ever used literally, a monopoly would never exist.

They don't. That's why lying turds like you don't want to use the actual definition.

Haha, that's the dirty little secret that anti-capitalists and statist worshipers don't know or don't want you to know: monopolies cannot stand without government complicity. Freely operating competitors correct for price gouging when the government doesn't grant, for instance, companies like AT&T vague legal language by which to litigate small competitors out of business before they can become big competitors.

This monopoly threat that contributes to the capitalism is destructive narrative isn't actually a typical result of free markets. It generally requires the strong hand of government to keep others from entering the market.

 

[Marxist]

It's good to see you admit you lied about Walmart being a monopoly. You might want to revisit many of your old posts and clean up your own mess.

No, I don't use literal definitions when talking about a monopoly, if we did, a monopoly would never actually ever exist. Nah, you may need to though.

BINGO. In other words, you like to use meaningless words so you can bamboozle your audience. When you don't want to define your terms it's because you're a lying sack of shit.

Nope, again, if monopoly was ever used literally, a monopoly would never exist.

They don't. That's why lying turds like you don't want to use the actual definition.

Haha, that's the dirty little secret that anti-capitalists and statist worshipers don't know or don't want you to know: monopolies cannot stand without government complicity. Freely operating competitors correct for price gouging when the government doesn't grant, for instance, companies like AT&T vague legal language by which to litigate small competitors out of business before they can become big competitors.

This monopoly threat that contributes to the capitalism is destructive narrative isn't actually a typical result of free markets. It generally requires the strong hand of government to keep others from entering the market.

Somalia essentially has no government regulation, and is a prime example of capitalism like this

 

[dblack]

No, I don't use literal definitions when talking about a monopoly, if we did, a monopoly would never actually ever exist. Nah, you may need to though.

BINGO. In other words, you like to use meaningless words so you can bamboozle your audience. When you don't want to define your terms it's because you're a lying sack of shit.

Nope, again, if monopoly was ever used literally, a monopoly would never exist.

They don't. That's why lying turds like you don't want to use the actual definition.

Haha, that's the dirty little secret that anti-capitalists and statist worshipers don't know or don't want you to know: monopolies cannot stand without government complicity. Freely operating competitors correct for price gouging when the government doesn't grant, for instance, companies like AT&T vague legal language by which to litigate small competitors out of business before they can become big competitors.

This monopoly threat that contributes to the capitalism is destructive narrative isn't actually a typical result of free markets. It generally requires the strong hand of government to keep others from entering the market.

Somalia essentially has no government regulation, and is a prime example of capitalism like this

SOMALIA!!!!!

 

[Marxist]

BINGO. In other words, you like to use meaningless words so you can bamboozle your audience. When you don't want to define your terms it's because you're a lying sack of shit.

Nope, again, if monopoly was ever used literally, a monopoly would never exist.

They don't. That's why lying turds like you don't want to use the actual definition.

Haha, that's the dirty little secret that anti-capitalists and statist worshipers don't know or don't want you to know: monopolies cannot stand without government complicity. Freely operating competitors correct for price gouging when the government doesn't grant, for instance, companies like AT&T vague legal language by which to litigate small competitors out of business before they can become big competitors.

This monopoly threat that contributes to the capitalism is destructive narrative isn't actually a typical result of free markets. It generally requires the strong hand of government to keep others from entering the market.

Somalia essentially has no government regulation, and is a prime example of capitalism like this

SOMALIA!!!!!

Yeah, get over it.

 

[dblack]

Nope, again, if monopoly was ever used literally, a monopoly would never exist.

They don't. That's why lying turds like you don't want to use the actual definition.

Haha, that's the dirty little secret that anti-capitalists and statist worshipers don't know or don't want you to know: monopolies cannot stand without government complicity. Freely operating competitors correct for price gouging when the government doesn't grant, for instance, companies like AT&T vague legal language by which to litigate small competitors out of business before they can become big competitors.

This monopoly threat that contributes to the capitalism is destructive narrative isn't actually a typical result of free markets. It generally requires the strong hand of government to keep others from entering the market.

Somalia essentially has no government regulation, and is a prime example of capitalism like this

SOMALIA!!!!!

Yeah, get over it.

What do you mean?

 

[Marxist]

They don't. That's why lying turds like you don't want to use the actual definition.

Haha, that's the dirty little secret that anti-capitalists and statist worshipers don't know or don't want you to know: monopolies cannot stand without government complicity. Freely operating competitors correct for price gouging when the government doesn't grant, for instance, companies like AT&T vague legal language by which to litigate small competitors out of business before they can become big competitors.

This monopoly threat that contributes to the capitalism is destructive narrative isn't actually a typical result of free markets. It generally requires the strong hand of government to keep others from entering the market.

Somalia essentially has no government regulation, and is a prime example of capitalism like this

SOMALIA!!!!!

Yeah, get over it.

What do you mean?

Somalia is a prime example of what happens when capitalism goes unregulated.

 

[dblack]

Haha, that's the dirty little secret that anti-capitalists and statist worshipers don't know or don't want you to know: monopolies cannot stand without government complicity. Freely operating competitors correct for price gouging when the government doesn't grant, for instance, companies like AT&T vague legal language by which to litigate small competitors out of business before they can become big competitors.

This monopoly threat that contributes to the capitalism is destructive narrative isn't actually a typical result of free markets. It generally requires the strong hand of government to keep others from entering the market.

Somalia essentially has no government regulation, and is a prime example of capitalism like this

SOMALIA!!!!!

Yeah, get over it.

What do you mean?

Somalia is a prime example of what happens when capitalism goes unregulated.

That's what I was laffing about. Somalia is anarchy, not capitalism. Not libertarian in any sense. But fools fixate on it. You go!

 

[Marxist]

Somalia essentially has no government regulation, and is a prime example of capitalism like this

SOMALIA!!!!!

Yeah, get over it.

What do you mean?

Somalia is a prime example of what happens when capitalism goes unregulated.

That's what I was laffing about. Somalia is anarchy, not capitalism. Not libertarian in any sense. But fools fixate on it. You go!

Somalia is anarcho-capitalism, essentially, what happens when capitalism has no regulations.

 

[dblack]

SOMALIA!!!!!

Yeah, get over it.

What do you mean?

Somalia is a prime example of what happens when capitalism goes unregulated.

That's what I was laffing about. Somalia is anarchy, not capitalism. Not libertarian in any sense. But fools fixate on it. You go!

Somalia is anarcho-capitalism, essentially, what happens when capitalism has no regulations.

It's what happens when we lose track of the purpose of government.