what war since WWII protected our freedoms?

[Avatar4321]

He said invaded, those were not invasions.

How on earth are foreign militants entering US sovereignty to attack us not an invasion?

Invasion means landing forces and controlling US territory. Anybody can attack. Invasion takes a sustained occupying force

Not according to the dictionary. Occupying is completely irrelevant to the definition.

 

[WillowTree]

The wing nuts are the ones that think that ONLY an Invasion of the US proper would curtail US citizens freedoms and rights. The systematic loss of allies and free countries across the globe to the Soviets would have lost us trading partners and allies. This alone could have threatened American citizens.

Cuba intended to stop paying on debts owed, If they had grabbed enough Countries or scared them into acting as they wanted they could have brought down the western Banking system. That would have curtailed American freedoms all on its own.

You dumb asses do not even know what a threat is.

be patient. they are re-writing history.. remember Europe didn't need us it's hiphip hip hooooray for Russia.. and you do remember do you know that they lit up the Empire State Building last Christmas in Communist RED???

 

[rightwinger]

How on earth are foreign militants entering US sovereignty to attack us not an invasion?

Invasion means landing forces and controlling US territory. Anybody can attack. Invasion takes a sustained occupying force

Not according to the dictionary. Occupying is completely irrelevant to the definition.

In terms of military definition there is a huge difference between launching an attack and launching an invasion.

9-11 and Pearl Harbor were attacks.... there was never any threat of them actually occupying the territory.

D Day was an invasion. In addition to the military forces, there was a logistics support structure to sustain the invasion forces

 

[RetiredGySgt]

Invasion means landing forces and controlling US territory. Anybody can attack. Invasion takes a sustained occupying force

Not according to the dictionary. Occupying is completely irrelevant to the definition.

In terms of military definition there is a huge difference between launching an attack and launching an invasion.

9-11 and Pearl Harbor were attacks there was never any threat of them actually occupying the territory.

D Day was an invasion. In addition to the military forces, there was a logistics support structure to sustain the invasion forces

And again Invasion was and is not the only means to curtail our freedoms.

 

[rightwinger]

Not according to the dictionary. Occupying is completely irrelevant to the definition.

In terms of military definition there is a huge difference between launching an attack and launching an invasion.

9-11 and Pearl Harbor were attacks there was never any threat of them actually occupying the territory.

D Day was an invasion. In addition to the military forces, there was a logistics support structure to sustain the invasion forces

And again Invasion was and is not the only means to curtail our freedoms.

Please explain...i would really like to know which specific freedoms would have been lost in any of the conflicts you noted.

I would like to see direct cause and effect.

If we had not done this....then the following freedoms would have been lost

 

[WillowTree]

In terms of military definition there is a huge difference between launching an attack and launching an invasion.

9-11 and Pearl Harbor were attacks there was never any threat of them actually occupying the territory.

D Day was an invasion. In addition to the military forces, there was a logistics support structure to sustain the invasion forces

And again Invasion was and is not the only means to curtail our freedoms.

Please explain...i would really like to know which specific freedoms would have been lost in any of the conflicts you noted.

I would like to see direct cause and effect.

If we had not done this....then the following freedoms would have been lost

he already did that! what? is everybody stamped with stupid today??

 

[blu]

The wing nuts are the ones that think that ONLY an Invasion of the US proper would curtail US citizens freedoms and rights. The systematic loss of allies and free countries across the globe to the Soviets would have lost us trading partners and allies. This alone could have threatened American citizens.

Cuba intended to stop paying on debts owed, If they had grabbed enough Countries or scared them into acting as they wanted they could have brought down the western Banking system. That would have curtailed American freedoms all on its own.

You dumb asses do not even know what a threat is.

be patient. they are re-writing history.. remember Europe didn't need us it's hiphip hip hooooray for Russia.. and you do remember do you know that they lit up the Empire State Building last Christmas in Communist RED???

would we have reached the nest if russia wasn't fighting and requiring so many nazi troops on their frontline?

 

[rightwinger]

The wing nuts are the ones that think that ONLY an Invasion of the US proper would curtail US citizens freedoms and rights. The systematic loss of allies and free countries across the globe to the Soviets would have lost us trading partners and allies. This alone could have threatened American citizens.

Cuba intended to stop paying on debts owed, If they had grabbed enough Countries or scared them into acting as they wanted they could have brought down the western Banking system. That would have curtailed American freedoms all on its own.

You dumb asses do not even know what a threat is.

be patient. they are re-writing history.. remember Europe didn't need us it's hiphip hip hooooray for Russia.. and you do remember do you know that they lit up the Empire State Building last Christmas in Communist RED???

would we have reached the nest if russia wasn't fighting and requiring so many nazi troops on their frontline?

The Soviets killed 20 times the Germans we did. The US won the Pacific Theater but the Soviets carried most of the burden against Germany

Damn Liberals rewriting the history the Conservatives learned by watching war movies

 

[rightwinger]

And again Invasion was and is not the only means to curtail our freedoms.

Please explain...i would really like to know which specific freedoms would have been lost in any of the conflicts you noted.

I would like to see direct cause and effect.

If we had not done this....then the following freedoms would have been lost

he already did that! what? is everybody stamped with stupid today??

You explained nothing.....

only made unsubstantiated claims. Show a direct cause and effect

 

[Gunny]

simple question, what war since WWII, if not fought, would have lead to a loss of freedoms and/or safety by Americans.

Certainly not you and your ilk's war against individual liberty and thought. Normal, thinking human beings in this country appear to be losing that war because we have to work instead of spending all our time incessantly blathering propaganda and/or voting for the biggest idiot of the past two centuries to be President.

Sheep.

 

[Gunny]

The US has not been invaded since the War of 1812

Thanks, Capt Obvious.

The US has not been invaded by a foreign nation's military since the War of 1812. The internal invasion of leftwingnut fuckwits taking over the infrastructure and destroying what this nation is supposed to be has happened and is still happening nonetheless, because pussies like you can't stand up and be men. You need to have Big Brother feed you your ba-ba and diaper your ass, cradle to grave, and you don't care WHO you have to steal the money from.

We need another war. To get rid of titsuckers like you and that fuckwit blu. You and your ilk have turned this nation into something it was never meant to be.

 

[Gunny]

simple question, what war since WWII, if not fought, would have lead to a loss of freedoms and/or safety by Americans.

Well let's see... Despite the half measures and failures born of Leftist subversion; there's The Korean War, The Vietnam War, The Reagan covert war in Central America, The Invasion of Grenada and Panama... Desert Storm and the US Global War on Terror.

how have/did the wars in:

- korea
- vietnam
- reagan's war
- grenade/panama
- on an emotion

protect our freedoms or safety? please explain

Ah. And you leftwingtards call the right selfish. You don't think others should be protected from tyranny?

Too bad normal people here haven't protected us from the tyranny of the left instead.

 

[Gunny]

I guess we aren't supposed to pre-empt invasion. We're only allowed to defend ourself AFTER people are killed.

Take that reasoning and apply it to domestic violence victims and see how stupid it sounds.

Exactly. According to the left, you can shoot back only after you've been murdered.

 

[Gunny]

No war, including WW2, was fought for our freedoms since the Revolutionary War.

if russia and us did not confront hilter would he have not come after us like he already said he would?

Hitler never had the capability to invade the US. It takes something called a Navy. Hitler did not have the Naval power to invade England, how would he invade the US, 3000 miles away?

Russia was primarily responsible for defeating Hitler

Idiot. Hitler had the naval capability to invade the UK. He didn't use it when he had the advantage.

Try again. Use your fucked up brain this time, please.

 

[eots]

simple question, what war since WWII, if not fought, would have lead to a loss of freedoms and/or safety by Americans.

none of them in fact they helped create the terrorst and in doing so have dimished our freedoms and security

 

[Gunny]

Hitler never had the capability to invade the US. It takes something called a Navy. Hitler did not have the Naval power to invade England, how would he invade the US, 3000 miles away?

Russia was primarily responsible for defeating Hitler

Yeah for Russia hiphiphooooorayforRussia.. next?

The Soviets killed 20 times the number of Germans we did....next?

What's your point, 'tard? Anymore red herrings? Next ...

 

[Gunny]

I guess we aren't supposed to pre-empt invasion. We're only allowed to defend ourself AFTER people are killed.

Take that reasoning and apply it to domestic violence victims and see how stupid it sounds.

which of korea, vietnam, iraq, panama, etc would have attacked us?

Your premise is dishonest. Get one that matters or STFU and go home.

 

[elvis]

Hitler never had the capability to invade the US. It takes something called a Navy. Hitler did not have the Naval power to invade England, how would he invade the US, 3000 miles away?

Russia was primarily responsible for defeating Hitler

Yeah for Russia hiphiphooooorayforRussia.. next?

The Soviets killed 20 times the number of Germans we did....next?

how many would they have killed without American supplies?

 

[Gunny]

And the Germans would have taken over Europe if they hadn't.

We should have taken care of that mess before we were bombed, but because fucking pansy ass liberals essentially disarmed us and decimated our armed forces after WWI, we were frozen for years.

The biggest pussyassed liberal of them all, FDR lead the US to victory in WWII

The pussy Republicans were isolationists

FDR would spit on you and your ilk for what you have done to the Democratic Party. Get a fucking clue.

 

[Gunny]

And the Germans would have taken over Europe if they hadn't.

We should have taken care of that mess before we were bombed, but because fucking pansy ass liberals essentially disarmed us and decimated our armed forces after WWI, we were frozen for years.

The biggest pussyassed liberal of them all, FDR lead the US to victory in WWII

The pussy Republicans were isolationists

FDR didn't lead shit.

Sure he did. He created a whole subculture of retards that believe they are entitled to what those that earn have.