What the hell happened Truthers?

The internet is the best friend and worst enemy. Folks who wanted to argue about the Warren Report had to read the thing, something like 1500 pages. With the 9/11 stuff, each part of the discussion can be argued independently. Folks who want to argue it was a controlled demolition have to face the fact it looks nothing like a real controlled demolition, sounds nothing like a controlled demolition and there is the whole issue of stringing all that det cord around to make a controlled demolition happen with no one noticing. Also, there are examples of how the process works everywhere.

A real independent thinker can examine all kinds of evidence on their own, and most of the time that evidence makes trufers look like idiots

you look like an idiot..that doesn't know anything about explosives or controlled demolition


[ame=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=u5IgqJXyLbg]Tom Sullivan - Explosives Technician - Loader - AE911Truth.org - YouTube[/ame]

[ame=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=877gr6xtQIc]Danny Jowenko on WTC 7 controlled demolition - YouTube[/ame]

And there it is, your own "professional" telling us how the elevator cars need to be removed. I guess they forgot to edit him this time...............
 
The internet is the best friend and worst enemy. Folks who wanted to argue about the Warren Report had to read the thing, something like 1500 pages. With the 9/11 stuff, each part of the discussion can be argued independently. Folks who want to argue it was a controlled demolition have to face the fact it looks nothing like a real controlled demolition, sounds nothing like a controlled demolition and there is the whole issue of stringing all that det cord around to make a controlled demolition happen with no one noticing. Also, there are examples of how the process works everywhere.

A real independent thinker can examine all kinds of evidence on their own, and most of the time that evidence makes trufers look like idiots

you look like an idiot..that doesn't know anything about explosives or controlled demolition


[ame=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=u5IgqJXyLbg]Tom Sullivan - Explosives Technician - Loader - AE911Truth.org - YouTube[/ame]

[ame=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=877gr6xtQIc]Danny Jowenko on WTC 7 controlled demolition - YouTube[/ame]
To-morrow, and to-morrow, and to-morrow,
Creeps in this petty pace from day to day
To the last syllable of recorded time,
And all our yesterdays have lighted fools
The way to dusty death. Out, out, brief candle!
Life's but a walking shadow, a poor player
That struts and frets his hour upon the stage
And then is heard no more: it is a tale
Told by an idiot, full of sound and fury,
Signifying nothing.
 
the biggest jokes are those that reject the NIST report while having some even more half baked montage of a collapse theory like Ollie and friends'

There you go lying again.

I do not "reject" the NIST reports. I have never said that I reject them.

I have said and still say that they don't give enough credence to the damages caused by the fall of the 2nd Tower. Other than that they have all the main points correct.

Where does this reject shit come from?

what major points ?...you do not even begin to understand the" major points" you nit wit...if you did you would realize how retarded your "candy cornish" line is...what caused the intiation of the collapse sequence and how it progressed.. are the major points of the NIST report ...you jackass
neither one point to a thermite driven event..
nor does the alleged 2&1/4 seconds of "freefall" now who's an ass again?:eusa_whistle:
 
Eots's posts prove my point. Each person examines the evidence themselves, and even the evidence of the trufers works against them in the court of public opinion.

It may convince the trufers, but it convinces no one else
 
Looks like this is the last hurrah for the truthers..

Ten years and nothing to show for it. No evidence to support your theories, no groundswell of public support, no attention what so ever

After this 9-11 ......truthers will be irrelevant
 
Looks like this is the last hurrah for the truthers..

Ten years and nothing to show for it. No evidence to support your theories, no groundswell of public support, no attention what so ever

After this 9-11 ......truthers will be irrelevant


Were they ever relevant?
 
They will continue forever, until the next big conspiracy event. JFK conspiracy kooks are still going strong. They are some of the same people and show some of the same pathologies of misrepresentation and massage of the facts.

This will go on forever. And except for a few zanies, no one will care
 
They will continue forever, until the next big conspiracy event. JFK conspiracy kooks are still going strong. They are some of the same people and show some of the same pathologies of misrepresentation and massage of the facts.

This will go on forever. And except for a few zanies, no one will care

you are a zanie and a kook and most likely effeminate..just sayin
 
They will continue forever, until the next big conspiracy event. JFK conspiracy kooks are still going strong. They are some of the same people and show some of the same pathologies of misrepresentation and massage of the facts.

This will go on forever. And except for a few zanies, no one will care

you are a zanie and a kook and most likely effeminate..just sayin
Ten years and you got nothin'. Just sayin'.:lol::lol::lol:
 
Time is running out truthers....


9-11 will be on the world stage. Now is your time to put thousands of angry protesters in the streets screaming for justice. Where is your passion?

Otherwise.....you are just a bunch of whack-jobs posting from mommies basement
 
Last edited:
They will continue forever, until the next big conspiracy event. JFK conspiracy kooks are still going strong. They are some of the same people and show some of the same pathologies of misrepresentation and massage of the facts.

This will go on forever. And except for a few zanies, no one will care

Agreed, they'll never go away completely. Moon landing hoaxers, holocaust deniers, global warming deniers... For some people, no amount of overwhelming evidence will ever be enough. Too much emotional investment in their cause.
 
They will continue forever, until the next big conspiracy event. JFK conspiracy kooks are still going strong. They are some of the same people and show some of the same pathologies of misrepresentation and massage of the facts.

This will go on forever. And except for a few zanies, no one will care

Agreed, they'll never go away completely. Moon landing hoaxers, holocaust deniers, global warming deniers... For some people, no amount of overwhelming evidence will ever be enough. Too much emotional investment in their cause.

Nice attempt to add AGW skeptics to the list. The last catagory is nowhere close to the other two you mentioned.
 
They will continue forever, until the next big conspiracy event. JFK conspiracy kooks are still going strong. They are some of the same people and show some of the same pathologies of misrepresentation and massage of the facts.

This will go on forever. And except for a few zanies, no one will care

Agreed, they'll never go away completely. Moon landing hoaxers, holocaust deniers, global warming deniers... For some people, no amount of overwhelming evidence will ever be enough. Too much emotional investment in their cause.

Nice attempt to add AGW skeptics to the list. The last catagory is nowhere close to the other two you mentioned.

It takes a comparable leap of faith. It maintains a bigger following only because it has corporate sponsors.
 
Agreed, they'll never go away completely. Moon landing hoaxers, holocaust deniers, global warming deniers... For some people, no amount of overwhelming evidence will ever be enough. Too much emotional investment in their cause.

Nice attempt to add AGW skeptics to the list. The last catagory is nowhere close to the other two you mentioned.

It takes a comparable leap of faith. It maintains a bigger following only because it has corporate sponsors.

Bullshit. There is a huge gap between holocaust denial and not buying the party line on AGW and what our response to it should be.

Also AGW deniers fall into several catagories, ranging from full denial to those who only dispute the "MOAR GOVERNMENT" proposed response to it. Stop trying to equate not agreeing with you on AGW to holocaust denial and moon landing denial, or is your beleif in it so weak that you need to think that those that oppose you are conspiracy nutters?
 
They will continue forever, until the next big conspiracy event. JFK conspiracy kooks are still going strong. They are some of the same people and show some of the same pathologies of misrepresentation and massage of the facts.

This will go on forever. And except for a few zanies, no one will care

you are a zanie and a kook and most likely effeminate..just sayin
homophobic much...or in the closet!.......just sayin....
NoTalentAssClowns.jpg
 
They will continue forever, until the next big conspiracy event. JFK conspiracy kooks are still going strong. They are some of the same people and show some of the same pathologies of misrepresentation and massage of the facts.

This will go on forever. And except for a few zanies, no one will care

Agreed, they'll never go away completely. Moon landing hoaxers, holocaust deniers, global warming deniers... For some people, no amount of overwhelming evidence will ever be enough. Too much emotional investment in their cause.
Care to provide the evidence of man made global warming?...'cause that lie is continually being exposed.

New NASA Data Blow Gaping Hole In Global Warming Alarmism - Yahoo! News

Christ, you GW hoaxters (Algorebots) are as ignorant as the troofer idiots.
 
Truthers are generally a joke.........

the biggest jokes are those that reject the NIST report while having some even more half baked montage of a collapse theory like Ollie and friends'

the biggest jokes are the OCTA trolls who have the logic is does not matter what all these demolition experts,architects and engineers,first responders,firemen,experienced pilots,or retired high level intel officers say,the joke is how these OCTA trolls could care less what THEY say,only what corrupt government institutions such as NIST and the media say.:lol::lol::lol::lol::lol: their logic kills me everytime.:lol::lol::lol::lol:
 
The internet is the best friend and worst enemy. Folks who wanted to argue about the Warren Report had to read the thing, something like 1500 pages. With the 9/11 stuff, each part of the discussion can be argued independently. Folks who want to argue it was a controlled demolition have to face the fact it looks nothing like a real controlled demolition, sounds nothing like a controlled demolition and there is the whole issue of stringing all that det cord around to make a controlled demolition happen with no one noticing. Also, there are examples of how the process works everywhere.

A real independent thinker can examine all kinds of evidence on their own, and most of the time that evidence makes trufers look like idiots

you look like an idiot..that doesn't know anything about explosives or controlled demolition


[ame=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=u5IgqJXyLbg]Tom Sullivan - Explosives Technician - Loader - AE911Truth.org - YouTube[/ame]

[ame=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=877gr6xtQIc]Danny Jowenko on WTC 7 controlled demolition - YouTube[/ame]

trolls like Gomer Pyle Ollie,wicked idiot and this thread starter cover their ears and never watch these videos since EXPERTS views dont interest them.:lol::lol::lol:
 
Truthers are generally a joke.........

the biggest jokes are those that reject the NIST report while having some even more half baked montage of a collapse theory like Ollie and friends'

the biggest jokes are the OCTA trolls who have the logic is does not matter what all these demolition experts,architects and engineers,first responders,firemen,experienced pilots,or retired high level intel officers say,the joke is how these OCTA trolls could care less what THEY say,only what corrupt government institutions such as NIST and the media say.:lol::lol::lol::lol::lol: their logic kills me everytime.:lol::lol::lol::lol:

All these? really? like less than .01% of them? Why is it you tend to tune out the first responders who disagree with your theories? And why is it that everyone who disagrees with you are trolls or corrupt?

When you have some real evidence please let us know. So far everything you try to point at has been debunked by professionals. Some of it by your own professionals...
 
The internet is the best friend and worst enemy. Folks who wanted to argue about the Warren Report had to read the thing, something like 1500 pages. With the 9/11 stuff, each part of the discussion can be argued independently. Folks who want to argue it was a controlled demolition have to face the fact it looks nothing like a real controlled demolition, sounds nothing like a controlled demolition and there is the whole issue of stringing all that det cord around to make a controlled demolition happen with no one noticing. Also, there are examples of how the process works everywhere.

A real independent thinker can examine all kinds of evidence on their own, and most of the time that evidence makes trufers look like idiots

you look like an idiot..that doesn't know anything about explosives or controlled demolition


[ame=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=u5IgqJXyLbg]Tom Sullivan - Explosives Technician - Loader - AE911Truth.org - YouTube[/ame]

[ame=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=877gr6xtQIc]Danny Jowenko on WTC 7 controlled demolition - YouTube[/ame]

trolls like Gomer Pyle Ollie,wicked idiot and this thread starter cover their ears and never watch these videos since EXPERTS views dont interest them.:lol::lol::lol:

You fucking tard...

You don't have to convince us. You have two weeks to convince millions of Americans that your theories are not complete nonsense. You have been a failure at it for ten years......looks like you are irrelevant
 

Forum List

Back
Top