What lie does the other side spread about your party that's the most surprising and bizarre?

Well now, since you introduced the word "racists" I suppose it is only fair to point out that most of the claims liberals make about conservatives being racist are false.
It's surprising and bizarre that so many liberals believe it.

Let's add to that these:

Republicans want dirty air and water.
Republicans want kids with autism to fend for themselves.
Republicans want to push granny off a cliff.
Republicans want to burn black churches.
Republicans want to take away everyone's healthcare.
Republicans want no one to have a good job.

All lies, of course.
You said:

Republicans want dirty air and water.
Republicans want kids with autism to fend for themselves.
Republicans want to push granny off a cliff.
Republicans want to burn black churches.
Republicans want to take away everyone's healthcare.
Republicans want no one to have a good job.

All lies, of course.

---------------------------------------
It's all a matter of perspective.
Since the GOP has proposed abolishing the EPA, there must be an underlying goal. The end result would certainly be dirty air and water.

Republicans want everyone to fend for themselves. Anything else is (gasp) "Socialism)

Ending Social Security and Medicare would push granny off a cliff.

Republicans only see burning black churches as a last resort. In this day and age, they hope to chase away blacks peacefully. It's only the young ones they seem to want to track down and shoot.

I just found out that health care is a luxury.

Texas just cut education by 5 billion. So apparently, they don't want Republicans in Texas to have a good job. But don't worry, the governor is going to California and New York begging liberals to go to Texas and do the "skilled stuff" Republicans aren't qualified for. That's why they keep the kids from an education. So they won't be qualified either. At least that's what their actions are telling us.

So what is the "other" perspective? I really want to know.

a matter of perspective? Nonsense. It's a flat out lie. And you know it or you wouldn't be backpedaling
Backpedaling? Me? Hilarious. You might want to reread the post. Someone wrote out the GOP agenda thinking they were making a joke. I simply proved it was no joke. The only perspective is how you look at it. The results are the same.

Republicans want dirty air and water.
Republicans want kids with autism to fend for themselves.
Republicans want to push granny off a cliff.
Republicans want to burn black churches.
Republicans want to take away everyone's healthcare.
Republicans want no one to have a good job

The very stupidity of these claims is what makes reading them worth it.

I giggle every time I see Deaner post shit like this.

Now, read these in light of his OP......

The irony is beyond pale.
What I said was:

It's all a matter of perspective.
Since the GOP has proposed abolishing the EPA, there must be an underlying goal. The end result would certainly be dirty air and water.

Republicans want everyone to fend for themselves. Anything else is (gasp) "Socialism)

Ending Social Security and Medicare would push granny off a cliff.

Republicans only see burning black churches as a last resort. In this day and age, they hope to chase away blacks peacefully. It's only the young ones they seem to want to track down and shoot.

I just found out that health care is a luxury.

Texas just cut education by 5 billion. So apparently, they don't want Republicans in Texas to have a good job. But don't worry, the governor is going to California and New York begging liberals to go to Texas and do the "skilled stuff" Republicans aren't qualified for. That's why they keep the kids from an education. So they won't be qualified either. At least that's what their actions are telling us.

So what is the "other" perspective? I really want to know.

What you said was:

The very stupidity of these claims is what makes reading them worth it.

So which one is wrong and why?
 
Beat....???

The only thing you beat is attached to your body.

You claimed academia is liberal. I would agree. They don't live in the real world.

Engineers do.

You are a moron.
Every time you open your pie hole, you make yourself look more and more stupid. Who do you think engineers go to for answers? Do you think any engineer worth his salt makes fun of scientists? I let you go on for awhile, but you are making yourself look beyond stupid into somewhere between zany and insane.

You are one stupid jackass and everyone on the board knows it. Take a poll....see how popular you are.

Engineers make fun of scientists all the time. Scientists show up and say "This should work".....and the engineer says "You bet....we can always spend $1.00 to make $0.75". Moron. You are clearly not an engineer nor a scientist.

You telling someone else they are looking beyond stupid is the ultimate irony.

Whoever you paid to educated you...they ripped you off. I suggest you get your money back.
Hilarious. Some years ago I worked on a project that required an optics specialist, or as some called her, a "scientist". Why? Because the understanding necessary was way beyond the understanding of a regular engineer. So where did they find this scientist? NASA. She worked at NASA. So what she worked on were the reflective surfaces, the surface angles which were functions and not simply flat linear surfaces. And, as everyone knows, reflective surfaces could be either a straight reflection or scattered because scattered light produces an even distribution. Or a combination of the two. Which is what it turned out we needed.
Four types of engineers were needed to take the Doctor's vision and translate it into reality. Mechanical, Electrical, Electronic and Production. Do I have to explain what each one does? And when they have questions, who did they go to for answers? They figured it out? EEEEH, wrong. They went to the doctor for suggestions. The solutions came from the engineers. The direction came from the scientist.

Anyone with any brains will look at what I just wrote and know, without a doubt, that I know exactly what I'm talking about. There will be no debate. Because that's how it works.

And after reading what you wrote, and what I wrote, they will come to the conclusion that you are probably an ignorant tard with much too much unwarranted confidence. But there is a cure for what ails you. It's called "education". Then perhaps, you can stay away from the ridiculous.

Hey stupid ass.....

NASA does not exist to generate a profit......

Why don't you sit down and figure out what life is about first....you'll save the rest of us a lot of time rolling on the floor laughing our asses off at you.

You once worked on a project...I'll bet you were the janitor.

Notice you needed the engineers to turn it into hardware ? Did you get that ? Just what I said before.

We had a scientist from R&D show up a while ago and suggest we use a Chlor-Alkali process to generate caustic that could then be used to scrub power plant stack gas to capture CO2 (in the form of carbonate). I almost could not contain myself. I got to explain to them that Chlor Alkali is an electrochemical process that requires electricity...which comes from where ? Silly grin starts to appear.

Then I asked what they intended to do with the chlorine gas that was generated. The answer (with an even bigger silly grin) was to downhole it.

And this person had a PhD from an Ivy League school !

Go gettem Deaner.....take a poll and see who thinks you are smart. Please.....

If RDean worked on a project at NASA, it was to get the coffee and sweep the floors.

You said:
Hey stupid ass.....

NASA does not exist to generate a profit......

I posted:

NASA - Frequently Asked Questions

NASA Spinoff Homepage

18. How has NASA benefited the United States?

Information on spinoff technology resulting from NASA research can be found at: NASA Spinoff Homepage.

* The U.S. aerospace industry generates over $40 billion in annual exports and $30 billion in positive balance of trade each year.

* New industries have been built on space technology, including personal computers, advanced medical equipment, communications satellites, weather forecasting and natural resource mapping.

* NASA's high-technology research and development generates jobs, the demands for goods and services, and new technologies in the private sector.

* Many NASA technologies contribute to research in education, transportation, pollution control, rain forest protection and health care. For a sample of these see the NASA publication, Spinoff.

My bitch slap hand is getting sore from learnin' these ignorant twits.

You are an idiot.

NASA is not the areospace industry.

NASA is funded by the government. Period.

What part of that don't you understand ?

Oh yeah......all of it.
 
Let's add to that these:

Republicans want dirty air and water.
Republicans want kids with autism to fend for themselves.
Republicans want to push granny off a cliff.
Republicans want to burn black churches.
Republicans want to take away everyone's healthcare.
Republicans want no one to have a good job.

All lies, of course.
You said:

Republicans want dirty air and water.
Republicans want kids with autism to fend for themselves.
Republicans want to push granny off a cliff.
Republicans want to burn black churches.
Republicans want to take away everyone's healthcare.
Republicans want no one to have a good job.

All lies, of course.

---------------------------------------
It's all a matter of perspective.
Since the GOP has proposed abolishing the EPA, there must be an underlying goal. The end result would certainly be dirty air and water.

Republicans want everyone to fend for themselves. Anything else is (gasp) "Socialism)

Ending Social Security and Medicare would push granny off a cliff.

Republicans only see burning black churches as a last resort. In this day and age, they hope to chase away blacks peacefully. It's only the young ones they seem to want to track down and shoot.

I just found out that health care is a luxury.

Texas just cut education by 5 billion. So apparently, they don't want Republicans in Texas to have a good job. But don't worry, the governor is going to California and New York begging liberals to go to Texas and do the "skilled stuff" Republicans aren't qualified for. That's why they keep the kids from an education. So they won't be qualified either. At least that's what their actions are telling us.

So what is the "other" perspective? I really want to know.

a matter of perspective? Nonsense. It's a flat out lie. And you know it or you wouldn't be backpedaling
Backpedaling? Me? Hilarious. You might want to reread the post. Someone wrote out the GOP agenda thinking they were making a joke. I simply proved it was no joke. The only perspective is how you look at it. The results are the same.

Republicans want dirty air and water.
Republicans want kids with autism to fend for themselves.
Republicans want to push granny off a cliff.
Republicans want to burn black churches.
Republicans want to take away everyone's healthcare.
Republicans want no one to have a good job

The very stupidity of these claims is what makes reading them worth it.

I giggle every time I see Deaner post shit like this.

Now, read these in light of his OP......

The irony is beyond pale.
What I said was:

It's all a matter of perspective.
Since the GOP has proposed abolishing the EPA, there must be an underlying goal. The end result would certainly be dirty air and water.

Republicans want everyone to fend for themselves. Anything else is (gasp) "Socialism)

Ending Social Security and Medicare would push granny off a cliff.

Republicans only see burning black churches as a last resort. In this day and age, they hope to chase away blacks peacefully. It's only the young ones they seem to want to track down and shoot.

I just found out that health care is a luxury.

Texas just cut education by 5 billion. So apparently, they don't want Republicans in Texas to have a good job. But don't worry, the governor is going to California and New York begging liberals to go to Texas and do the "skilled stuff" Republicans aren't qualified for. That's why they keep the kids from an education. So they won't be qualified either. At least that's what their actions are telling us.

So what is the "other" perspective? I really want to know.

What you said was:

The very stupidity of these claims is what makes reading them worth it.

So which one is wrong and why?

Please show where current republicans want to "end" Social Security.

You are wrong there.

Please show me how ending Social Security would throw granny over the cliff.....which means you would have to prove that there is no other program that could be put in place that would take care of granny.

The answer is that you can't....and so you are wrong there too.

Game, set, match.....moron.
 
Beat....???

The only thing you beat is attached to your body.

You claimed academia is liberal. I would agree. They don't live in the real world.

Engineers do.

You are a moron.
Every time you open your pie hole, you make yourself look more and more stupid. Who do you think engineers go to for answers? Do you think any engineer worth his salt makes fun of scientists? I let you go on for awhile, but you are making yourself look beyond stupid into somewhere between zany and insane.

You are one stupid jackass and everyone on the board knows it. Take a poll....see how popular you are.

Engineers make fun of scientists all the time. Scientists show up and say "This should work".....and the engineer says "You bet....we can always spend $1.00 to make $0.75". Moron. You are clearly not an engineer nor a scientist.

You telling someone else they are looking beyond stupid is the ultimate irony.

Whoever you paid to educated you...they ripped you off. I suggest you get your money back.
Hilarious. Some years ago I worked on a project that required an optics specialist, or as some called her, a "scientist". Why? Because the understanding necessary was way beyond the understanding of a regular engineer. So where did they find this scientist? NASA. She worked at NASA. So what she worked on were the reflective surfaces, the surface angles which were functions and not simply flat linear surfaces. And, as everyone knows, reflective surfaces could be either a straight reflection or scattered because scattered light produces an even distribution. Or a combination of the two. Which is what it turned out we needed.
Four types of engineers were needed to take the Doctor's vision and translate it into reality. Mechanical, Electrical, Electronic and Production. Do I have to explain what each one does? And when they have questions, who did they go to for answers? They figured it out? EEEEH, wrong. They went to the doctor for suggestions. The solutions came from the engineers. The direction came from the scientist.

Anyone with any brains will look at what I just wrote and know, without a doubt, that I know exactly what I'm talking about. There will be no debate. Because that's how it works.

And after reading what you wrote, and what I wrote, they will come to the conclusion that you are probably an ignorant tard with much too much unwarranted confidence. But there is a cure for what ails you. It's called "education". Then perhaps, you can stay away from the ridiculous.

Hey stupid ass.....

NASA does not exist to generate a profit......

Why don't you sit down and figure out what life is about first....you'll save the rest of us a lot of time rolling on the floor laughing our asses off at you.

You once worked on a project...I'll bet you were the janitor.

Notice you needed the engineers to turn it into hardware ? Did you get that ? Just what I said before.

We had a scientist from R&D show up a while ago and suggest we use a Chlor-Alkali process to generate caustic that could then be used to scrub power plant stack gas to capture CO2 (in the form of carbonate). I almost could not contain myself. I got to explain to them that Chlor Alkali is an electrochemical process that requires electricity...which comes from where ? Silly grin starts to appear.

Then I asked what they intended to do with the chlorine gas that was generated. The answer (with an even bigger silly grin) was to downhole it.

And this person had a PhD from an Ivy League school !

Go gettem Deaner.....take a poll and see who thinks you are smart. Please.....

If RDean worked on a project at NASA, it was to get the coffee and sweep the floors.

You said: And this person had a PhD from an Ivy League school !

Ivy League schools are known for Social Science and the Humanities. Cornell has an OK science program I guess. I'm surprised you didn't know that.

Oh
My
God.

You mean you don't know the difference between "Social Science" and "Science"?

Cornell has a very good engineering program.

This is from Yale's website:

How strong are Yale s science and engineering programs Yale College Admissions

In a word, very. Yale is one of the world’s foremost research universities. Its faculty of outstanding scholars in the sciences, mathematics, and engineering includes more than 60 members of the National Academy of Sciences. About one-third of Yale’s entering class each year plans to major in the natural sciences, mathematics, computer science, or engineering.

Oh
My
Gosh.

You don't know shit.
 
Well,

Deaner....you can take consolation in the fact you've lost no credibility with your posts.

Because you never had any to begin with......
 
Every time you open your pie hole, you make yourself look more and more stupid. Who do you think engineers go to for answers? Do you think any engineer worth his salt makes fun of scientists? I let you go on for awhile, but you are making yourself look beyond stupid into somewhere between zany and insane.

You are one stupid jackass and everyone on the board knows it. Take a poll....see how popular you are.

Engineers make fun of scientists all the time. Scientists show up and say "This should work".....and the engineer says "You bet....we can always spend $1.00 to make $0.75". Moron. You are clearly not an engineer nor a scientist.

You telling someone else they are looking beyond stupid is the ultimate irony.

Whoever you paid to educated you...they ripped you off. I suggest you get your money back.
Hilarious. Some years ago I worked on a project that required an optics specialist, or as some called her, a "scientist". Why? Because the understanding necessary was way beyond the understanding of a regular engineer. So where did they find this scientist? NASA. She worked at NASA. So what she worked on were the reflective surfaces, the surface angles which were functions and not simply flat linear surfaces. And, as everyone knows, reflective surfaces could be either a straight reflection or scattered because scattered light produces an even distribution. Or a combination of the two. Which is what it turned out we needed.
Four types of engineers were needed to take the Doctor's vision and translate it into reality. Mechanical, Electrical, Electronic and Production. Do I have to explain what each one does? And when they have questions, who did they go to for answers? They figured it out? EEEEH, wrong. They went to the doctor for suggestions. The solutions came from the engineers. The direction came from the scientist.

Anyone with any brains will look at what I just wrote and know, without a doubt, that I know exactly what I'm talking about. There will be no debate. Because that's how it works.

And after reading what you wrote, and what I wrote, they will come to the conclusion that you are probably an ignorant tard with much too much unwarranted confidence. But there is a cure for what ails you. It's called "education". Then perhaps, you can stay away from the ridiculous.

Hey stupid ass.....

NASA does not exist to generate a profit......

Why don't you sit down and figure out what life is about first....you'll save the rest of us a lot of time rolling on the floor laughing our asses off at you.

You once worked on a project...I'll bet you were the janitor.

Notice you needed the engineers to turn it into hardware ? Did you get that ? Just what I said before.

We had a scientist from R&D show up a while ago and suggest we use a Chlor-Alkali process to generate caustic that could then be used to scrub power plant stack gas to capture CO2 (in the form of carbonate). I almost could not contain myself. I got to explain to them that Chlor Alkali is an electrochemical process that requires electricity...which comes from where ? Silly grin starts to appear.

Then I asked what they intended to do with the chlorine gas that was generated. The answer (with an even bigger silly grin) was to downhole it.

And this person had a PhD from an Ivy League school !

Go gettem Deaner.....take a poll and see who thinks you are smart. Please.....

If RDean worked on a project at NASA, it was to get the coffee and sweep the floors.

You said:
Hey stupid ass.....

NASA does not exist to generate a profit......

I posted:

NASA - Frequently Asked Questions

NASA Spinoff Homepage

18. How has NASA benefited the United States?

Information on spinoff technology resulting from NASA research can be found at: NASA Spinoff Homepage.

* The U.S. aerospace industry generates over $40 billion in annual exports and $30 billion in positive balance of trade each year.

* New industries have been built on space technology, including personal computers, advanced medical equipment, communications satellites, weather forecasting and natural resource mapping.

* NASA's high-technology research and development generates jobs, the demands for goods and services, and new technologies in the private sector.

* Many NASA technologies contribute to research in education, transportation, pollution control, rain forest protection and health care. For a sample of these see the NASA publication, Spinoff.

My bitch slap hand is getting sore from learnin' these ignorant twits.

You are an idiot.

NASA is not the areospace industry.

NASA is funded by the government. Period.

What part of that don't you understand ?

Oh yeah......all of it.
You fucking turd. That's right off the NASA home page. I'm sure they know who they are. And we all know you are a stooge.
 
Every time you open your pie hole, you make yourself look more and more stupid. Who do you think engineers go to for answers? Do you think any engineer worth his salt makes fun of scientists? I let you go on for awhile, but you are making yourself look beyond stupid into somewhere between zany and insane.

You are one stupid jackass and everyone on the board knows it. Take a poll....see how popular you are.

Engineers make fun of scientists all the time. Scientists show up and say "This should work".....and the engineer says "You bet....we can always spend $1.00 to make $0.75". Moron. You are clearly not an engineer nor a scientist.

You telling someone else they are looking beyond stupid is the ultimate irony.

Whoever you paid to educated you...they ripped you off. I suggest you get your money back.
Hilarious. Some years ago I worked on a project that required an optics specialist, or as some called her, a "scientist". Why? Because the understanding necessary was way beyond the understanding of a regular engineer. So where did they find this scientist? NASA. She worked at NASA. So what she worked on were the reflective surfaces, the surface angles which were functions and not simply flat linear surfaces. And, as everyone knows, reflective surfaces could be either a straight reflection or scattered because scattered light produces an even distribution. Or a combination of the two. Which is what it turned out we needed.
Four types of engineers were needed to take the Doctor's vision and translate it into reality. Mechanical, Electrical, Electronic and Production. Do I have to explain what each one does? And when they have questions, who did they go to for answers? They figured it out? EEEEH, wrong. They went to the doctor for suggestions. The solutions came from the engineers. The direction came from the scientist.

Anyone with any brains will look at what I just wrote and know, without a doubt, that I know exactly what I'm talking about. There will be no debate. Because that's how it works.

And after reading what you wrote, and what I wrote, they will come to the conclusion that you are probably an ignorant tard with much too much unwarranted confidence. But there is a cure for what ails you. It's called "education". Then perhaps, you can stay away from the ridiculous.

Hey stupid ass.....

NASA does not exist to generate a profit......

Why don't you sit down and figure out what life is about first....you'll save the rest of us a lot of time rolling on the floor laughing our asses off at you.

You once worked on a project...I'll bet you were the janitor.

Notice you needed the engineers to turn it into hardware ? Did you get that ? Just what I said before.

We had a scientist from R&D show up a while ago and suggest we use a Chlor-Alkali process to generate caustic that could then be used to scrub power plant stack gas to capture CO2 (in the form of carbonate). I almost could not contain myself. I got to explain to them that Chlor Alkali is an electrochemical process that requires electricity...which comes from where ? Silly grin starts to appear.

Then I asked what they intended to do with the chlorine gas that was generated. The answer (with an even bigger silly grin) was to downhole it.

And this person had a PhD from an Ivy League school !

Go gettem Deaner.....take a poll and see who thinks you are smart. Please.....

If RDean worked on a project at NASA, it was to get the coffee and sweep the floors.

You said: And this person had a PhD from an Ivy League school !

Ivy League schools are known for Social Science and the Humanities. Cornell has an OK science program I guess. I'm surprised you didn't know that.

Oh
My
God.

You mean you don't know the difference between "Social Science" and "Science"?

Cornell has a very good engineering program.

This is from Yale's website:

How strong are Yale s science and engineering programs Yale College Admissions

In a word, very. Yale is one of the world’s foremost research universities. Its faculty of outstanding scholars in the sciences, mathematics, and engineering includes more than 60 members of the National Academy of Sciences. About one-third of Yale’s entering class each year plans to major in the natural sciences, mathematics, computer science, or engineering.

Oh
My
Gosh.

You don't know shit.
I have to admit, I love your link. Here is what it says:

Science and quantitative reasoning are integral parts of a liberal education and Yale College is committed to providing undergraduates with a strong SQR foundation through scholarship and original research. Explore the academic, programmatic, and research opportunities currently available to our students.

And I really liked looking their website. And the fact they describe their science curriculum as "natural science". What do you think that means?

So what is a "Conservative Education"? Is that one where you make fun of your co-workers and laugh at a PhD?

You said:

We had a scientist from R&D show up a while ago and suggest we use.......
I almost could not contain myself. I got to explain to them.....
Silly grin starts to appear.
The answer (with an even bigger silly grin) was.........
And this person had a PhD from an Ivy League school !

And then you said:

Go gettem Deaner.....take a poll and see who thinks you are smart. Please.....

Well, I can tell you this. I'm smart enough to know better than mocking and laughing at my co-workers. And making fun of a PhD? I bet behind your back, you are the most hated person where ever it is you work. Clearly you have no conception of "team work". Which is something that is very, very important on any project. Fortunately, from what you wrote, it appears you only clean. So make sure you are wearing your rubber gloves.
 
Science and quantitative reasoning are integral parts of a liberal education and Yale College is committed to providing undergraduates with a strong SQR foundation through scholarship and original research. Explore the academic, programmatic, and research opportunities currently available to our students.
If you had an education beyond high school you would have known what that meant (although liberal arts colleges are biased towards political liberalism, that isn't the meaning of the term).

Liberal arts - Definition and More from the Free Merriam-Webster Dictionary
College or university curriculum aimed at imparting general knowledge and developing general intellectual capacities, in contrast to a professional, vocational, or technical curriculum.
 
You are one stupid jackass and everyone on the board knows it. Take a poll....see how popular you are.

Engineers make fun of scientists all the time. Scientists show up and say "This should work".....and the engineer says "You bet....we can always spend $1.00 to make $0.75". Moron. You are clearly not an engineer nor a scientist.

You telling someone else they are looking beyond stupid is the ultimate irony.

Whoever you paid to educated you...they ripped you off. I suggest you get your money back.
Hilarious. Some years ago I worked on a project that required an optics specialist, or as some called her, a "scientist". Why? Because the understanding necessary was way beyond the understanding of a regular engineer. So where did they find this scientist? NASA. She worked at NASA. So what she worked on were the reflective surfaces, the surface angles which were functions and not simply flat linear surfaces. And, as everyone knows, reflective surfaces could be either a straight reflection or scattered because scattered light produces an even distribution. Or a combination of the two. Which is what it turned out we needed.
Four types of engineers were needed to take the Doctor's vision and translate it into reality. Mechanical, Electrical, Electronic and Production. Do I have to explain what each one does? And when they have questions, who did they go to for answers? They figured it out? EEEEH, wrong. They went to the doctor for suggestions. The solutions came from the engineers. The direction came from the scientist.

Anyone with any brains will look at what I just wrote and know, without a doubt, that I know exactly what I'm talking about. There will be no debate. Because that's how it works.

And after reading what you wrote, and what I wrote, they will come to the conclusion that you are probably an ignorant tard with much too much unwarranted confidence. But there is a cure for what ails you. It's called "education". Then perhaps, you can stay away from the ridiculous.

Hey stupid ass.....

NASA does not exist to generate a profit......

Why don't you sit down and figure out what life is about first....you'll save the rest of us a lot of time rolling on the floor laughing our asses off at you.

You once worked on a project...I'll bet you were the janitor.

Notice you needed the engineers to turn it into hardware ? Did you get that ? Just what I said before.

We had a scientist from R&D show up a while ago and suggest we use a Chlor-Alkali process to generate caustic that could then be used to scrub power plant stack gas to capture CO2 (in the form of carbonate). I almost could not contain myself. I got to explain to them that Chlor Alkali is an electrochemical process that requires electricity...which comes from where ? Silly grin starts to appear.

Then I asked what they intended to do with the chlorine gas that was generated. The answer (with an even bigger silly grin) was to downhole it.

And this person had a PhD from an Ivy League school !

Go gettem Deaner.....take a poll and see who thinks you are smart. Please.....

If RDean worked on a project at NASA, it was to get the coffee and sweep the floors.

You said: And this person had a PhD from an Ivy League school !

Ivy League schools are known for Social Science and the Humanities. Cornell has an OK science program I guess. I'm surprised you didn't know that.

Oh
My
God.

You mean you don't know the difference between "Social Science" and "Science"?

Cornell has a very good engineering program.

This is from Yale's website:

How strong are Yale s science and engineering programs Yale College Admissions

In a word, very. Yale is one of the world’s foremost research universities. Its faculty of outstanding scholars in the sciences, mathematics, and engineering includes more than 60 members of the National Academy of Sciences. About one-third of Yale’s entering class each year plans to major in the natural sciences, mathematics, computer science, or engineering.

Oh
My
Gosh.

You don't know shit.
I have to admit, I love your link. Here is what it says:

Science and quantitative reasoning are integral parts of a liberal education and Yale College is committed to providing undergraduates with a strong SQR foundation through scholarship and original research. Explore the academic, programmatic, and research opportunities currently available to our students.

And I really liked looking their website. And the fact they describe their science curriculum as "natural science". What do you think that means?

So what is a "Conservative Education"? Is that one where you make fun of your co-workers and laugh at a PhD?

You said:

We had a scientist from R&D show up a while ago and suggest we use.......
I almost could not contain myself. I got to explain to them.....
Silly grin starts to appear.
The answer (with an even bigger silly grin) was.........
And this person had a PhD from an Ivy League school !

And then you said:

Go gettem Deaner.....take a poll and see who thinks you are smart. Please.....

Well, I can tell you this. I'm smart enough to know better than mocking and laughing at my co-workers. And making fun of a PhD? I bet behind your back, you are the most hated person where ever it is you work. Clearly you have no conception of "team work". Which is something that is very, very important on any project. Fortunately, from what you wrote, it appears you only clean. So make sure you are wearing your rubber gloves.

Actually, you are not that smart.

And you know nothing.

I just owned your ass. Yale specifically mentioned engineering. You lose dickweed.

You'll bet........

Actually, now....my PhD friend is now sharing more ideas up front as part of a screening process. He is smart, which was never in question (but you aren't so you can't see the difference). He simply (as I pointed out) was in his Ivory Tower not paying attention to what the real world demands in order for something to succeed.

But you know only what you read in magazines (not that you comprehend it).

And you'd probably be O.K. with trying to downhole several thousand pounds an hour of liquid chlorine.

You are beyond stupid.
 
Last edited:
Todays Repubs praise the Gipper even though he'd be excluded from one of their own Primaries today rdean

k7q2gXS.jpg
 
The left is so good telling the right what it would do.....

Lost 9 seats in the senate this last go around.
 
Hilarious. Some years ago I worked on a project that required an optics specialist, or as some called her, a "scientist". Why? Because the understanding necessary was way beyond the understanding of a regular engineer. So where did they find this scientist? NASA. She worked at NASA. So what she worked on were the reflective surfaces, the surface angles which were functions and not simply flat linear surfaces. And, as everyone knows, reflective surfaces could be either a straight reflection or scattered because scattered light produces an even distribution. Or a combination of the two. Which is what it turned out we needed.
Four types of engineers were needed to take the Doctor's vision and translate it into reality. Mechanical, Electrical, Electronic and Production. Do I have to explain what each one does? And when they have questions, who did they go to for answers? They figured it out? EEEEH, wrong. They went to the doctor for suggestions. The solutions came from the engineers. The direction came from the scientist.

Anyone with any brains will look at what I just wrote and know, without a doubt, that I know exactly what I'm talking about. There will be no debate. Because that's how it works.

And after reading what you wrote, and what I wrote, they will come to the conclusion that you are probably an ignorant tard with much too much unwarranted confidence. But there is a cure for what ails you. It's called "education". Then perhaps, you can stay away from the ridiculous.

Hey stupid ass.....

NASA does not exist to generate a profit......

Why don't you sit down and figure out what life is about first....you'll save the rest of us a lot of time rolling on the floor laughing our asses off at you.

You once worked on a project...I'll bet you were the janitor.

Notice you needed the engineers to turn it into hardware ? Did you get that ? Just what I said before.

We had a scientist from R&D show up a while ago and suggest we use a Chlor-Alkali process to generate caustic that could then be used to scrub power plant stack gas to capture CO2 (in the form of carbonate). I almost could not contain myself. I got to explain to them that Chlor Alkali is an electrochemical process that requires electricity...which comes from where ? Silly grin starts to appear.

Then I asked what they intended to do with the chlorine gas that was generated. The answer (with an even bigger silly grin) was to downhole it.

And this person had a PhD from an Ivy League school !

Go gettem Deaner.....take a poll and see who thinks you are smart. Please.....

If RDean worked on a project at NASA, it was to get the coffee and sweep the floors.

You said: And this person had a PhD from an Ivy League school !

Ivy League schools are known for Social Science and the Humanities. Cornell has an OK science program I guess. I'm surprised you didn't know that.

Oh
My
God.

You mean you don't know the difference between "Social Science" and "Science"?

Cornell has a very good engineering program.

This is from Yale's website:

How strong are Yale s science and engineering programs Yale College Admissions

In a word, very. Yale is one of the world’s foremost research universities. Its faculty of outstanding scholars in the sciences, mathematics, and engineering includes more than 60 members of the National Academy of Sciences. About one-third of Yale’s entering class each year plans to major in the natural sciences, mathematics, computer science, or engineering.

Oh
My
Gosh.

You don't know shit.
I have to admit, I love your link. Here is what it says:

Science and quantitative reasoning are integral parts of a liberal education and Yale College is committed to providing undergraduates with a strong SQR foundation through scholarship and original research. Explore the academic, programmatic, and research opportunities currently available to our students.

And I really liked looking their website. And the fact they describe their science curriculum as "natural science". What do you think that means?

So what is a "Conservative Education"? Is that one where you make fun of your co-workers and laugh at a PhD?

You said:

We had a scientist from R&D show up a while ago and suggest we use.......
I almost could not contain myself. I got to explain to them.....
Silly grin starts to appear.
The answer (with an even bigger silly grin) was.........
And this person had a PhD from an Ivy League school !

And then you said:

Go gettem Deaner.....take a poll and see who thinks you are smart. Please.....

Well, I can tell you this. I'm smart enough to know better than mocking and laughing at my co-workers. And making fun of a PhD? I bet behind your back, you are the most hated person where ever it is you work. Clearly you have no conception of "team work". Which is something that is very, very important on any project. Fortunately, from what you wrote, it appears you only clean. So make sure you are wearing your rubber gloves.

Actually, you are not that smart.

And you know nothing.

I just owned your ass. Yale specifically mentioned engineering. You lose dickweed.

You'll bet........

Actually, now....my PhD friend is now sharing more ideas up front as part of a screening process. He is smart, which was never in question (but you aren't so you can't see the difference). He simply (as I pointed out) was in his Ivory Tower not paying attention to what the real world demands in order for something to succeed.

But you know only what you read in magazines (not that you comprehend it).

And you'd probably be O.K. with trying to downhole several thousand pounds an hour of liquid chlorine.

You are beyond stupid.
From the previous post:

You said:

We had a scientist from R&D show up a while ago and suggest we use.......
I almost could not contain myself. I got to explain to them.....
Silly grin starts to appear.
The answer (with an even bigger silly grin) was.........
And this person had a PhD from an Ivy League school !

And then you said:

Go gettem Deaner.....take a poll and see who thinks you are smart. Please.....

Well, I can tell you this. I'm smart enough to know better than mocking and laughing at my co-workers. And making fun of a PhD? I bet behind your back, you are the most hated person where ever it is you work. Clearly you have no conception of "team work". Which is something that is very, very important on any project. Fortunately, from what you wrote, it appears you only clean. So make sure you are wearing your rubber gloves.

And then you said this:

Actually, now....my PhD friend is now sharing more ideas up front as part of a screening process. He is smart, which was never in question (but you aren't so you can't see the difference). He simply (as I pointed out) was in his Ivory Tower not paying attention to what the real world demands in order for something to succeed.

===================================

So suddenly it's your "PhD friend"? You went from mocking and laughing at him and rolling your eyes with a silly grin to "friends"???? And why is he suddenly friends? Because you laughed at him and mocked him so it made him realize that he must come DOWN to your "level"???? You were able to tell him he was "uppity" and he realized how smart you are and how you understand the "proper way to act"????

I knew if I could keep you going you would expose yourself. Your kind can't help it. You are a legend in your own delusional mind.

I work with two PhD's in optics, one in Mechanical Engineering and one in Electronics. None of them act the way you say. And if you have that kind of personal intrigue going on where you work, then your manager and your company is fucked up. Who has time for eye rolling and laughing at co-workers???? What the fuck is wrong with you? And you keep on with this delusion that you are so smart. You don't hear me talking like that. It's retarded. If you have to tell others how smart you are, then you aren't smart. You're a moron.

I seriously can't imagine working with someone like you. People don't act that way in real life. And if they do, they don't last long. Companies today don't put up with silly grins, eye rolling, making fun of other engineers and especially mocking PhD's.
 
Hey stupid ass.....

NASA does not exist to generate a profit......

Why don't you sit down and figure out what life is about first....you'll save the rest of us a lot of time rolling on the floor laughing our asses off at you.

You once worked on a project...I'll bet you were the janitor.

Notice you needed the engineers to turn it into hardware ? Did you get that ? Just what I said before.

We had a scientist from R&D show up a while ago and suggest we use a Chlor-Alkali process to generate caustic that could then be used to scrub power plant stack gas to capture CO2 (in the form of carbonate). I almost could not contain myself. I got to explain to them that Chlor Alkali is an electrochemical process that requires electricity...which comes from where ? Silly grin starts to appear.

Then I asked what they intended to do with the chlorine gas that was generated. The answer (with an even bigger silly grin) was to downhole it.

And this person had a PhD from an Ivy League school !

Go gettem Deaner.....take a poll and see who thinks you are smart. Please.....

If RDean worked on a project at NASA, it was to get the coffee and sweep the floors.

You said: And this person had a PhD from an Ivy League school !

Ivy League schools are known for Social Science and the Humanities. Cornell has an OK science program I guess. I'm surprised you didn't know that.

Oh
My
God.

You mean you don't know the difference between "Social Science" and "Science"?

Cornell has a very good engineering program.

This is from Yale's website:

How strong are Yale s science and engineering programs Yale College Admissions

In a word, very. Yale is one of the world’s foremost research universities. Its faculty of outstanding scholars in the sciences, mathematics, and engineering includes more than 60 members of the National Academy of Sciences. About one-third of Yale’s entering class each year plans to major in the natural sciences, mathematics, computer science, or engineering.

Oh
My
Gosh.

You don't know shit.
I have to admit, I love your link. Here is what it says:

Science and quantitative reasoning are integral parts of a liberal education and Yale College is committed to providing undergraduates with a strong SQR foundation through scholarship and original research. Explore the academic, programmatic, and research opportunities currently available to our students.

And I really liked looking their website. And the fact they describe their science curriculum as "natural science". What do you think that means?

So what is a "Conservative Education"? Is that one where you make fun of your co-workers and laugh at a PhD?

You said:

We had a scientist from R&D show up a while ago and suggest we use.......
I almost could not contain myself. I got to explain to them.....
Silly grin starts to appear.
The answer (with an even bigger silly grin) was.........
And this person had a PhD from an Ivy League school !

And then you said:

Go gettem Deaner.....take a poll and see who thinks you are smart. Please.....

Well, I can tell you this. I'm smart enough to know better than mocking and laughing at my co-workers. And making fun of a PhD? I bet behind your back, you are the most hated person where ever it is you work. Clearly you have no conception of "team work". Which is something that is very, very important on any project. Fortunately, from what you wrote, it appears you only clean. So make sure you are wearing your rubber gloves.

Actually, you are not that smart.

And you know nothing.

I just owned your ass. Yale specifically mentioned engineering. You lose dickweed.

You'll bet........

Actually, now....my PhD friend is now sharing more ideas up front as part of a screening process. He is smart, which was never in question (but you aren't so you can't see the difference). He simply (as I pointed out) was in his Ivory Tower not paying attention to what the real world demands in order for something to succeed.

But you know only what you read in magazines (not that you comprehend it).

And you'd probably be O.K. with trying to downhole several thousand pounds an hour of liquid chlorine.

You are beyond stupid.
From the previous post:

You said:

We had a scientist from R&D show up a while ago and suggest we use.......
I almost could not contain myself. I got to explain to them.....
Silly grin starts to appear.
The answer (with an even bigger silly grin) was.........
And this person had a PhD from an Ivy League school !

And then you said:

Go gettem Deaner.....take a poll and see who thinks you are smart. Please.....

Well, I can tell you this. I'm smart enough to know better than mocking and laughing at my co-workers. And making fun of a PhD? I bet behind your back, you are the most hated person where ever it is you work. Clearly you have no conception of "team work". Which is something that is very, very important on any project. Fortunately, from what you wrote, it appears you only clean. So make sure you are wearing your rubber gloves.

And then you said this:

Actually, now....my PhD friend is now sharing more ideas up front as part of a screening process. He is smart, which was never in question (but you aren't so you can't see the difference). He simply (as I pointed out) was in his Ivory Tower not paying attention to what the real world demands in order for something to succeed.

===================================

So suddenly it's your "PhD friend"? You went from mocking and laughing at him and rolling your eyes with a silly grin to "friends"???? And why is he suddenly friends? Because you laughed at him and mocked him so it made him realize that he must come DOWN to your "level"???? You were able to tell him he was "uppity" and he realized how smart you are and how you understand the "proper way to act"????

I knew if I could keep you going you would expose yourself. Your kind can't help it. You are a legend in your own delusional mind.

I work with two PhD's in optics, one in Mechanical Engineering and one in Electronics. None of them act the way you say. And if you have that kind of personal intrigue going on where you work, then your manager and your company is fucked up. Who has time for eye rolling and laughing at co-workers???? What the fuck is wrong with you? And you keep on with this delusion that you are so smart. You don't hear me talking like that. It's retarded. If you have to tell others how smart you are, then you aren't smart. You're a moron.

I seriously can't imagine working with someone like you. People don't act that way in real life. And if they do, they don't last long. Companies today don't put up with silly grins, eye rolling, making fun of other engineers and especially mocking PhD's.

You continue to show just how ignorant you are.

You really think a "lecture" like this is meaningful.

Way to funny.

Let me know when you'd like to have a go in bullring. Mr. Bullshit.

Professionals know how to work together....

We work together and are friends.

You are a dick.
 
Last edited:
Hilarious. Some years ago I worked on a project that required an optics specialist, or as some called her, a "scientist". Why? Because the understanding necessary was way beyond the understanding of a regular engineer. So where did they find this scientist? NASA. She worked at NASA. So what she worked on were the reflective surfaces, the surface angles which were functions and not simply flat linear surfaces. And, as everyone knows, reflective surfaces could be either a straight reflection or scattered because scattered light produces an even distribution. Or a combination of the two. Which is what it turned out we needed.
Four types of engineers were needed to take the Doctor's vision and translate it into reality. Mechanical, Electrical, Electronic and Production. Do I have to explain what each one does? And when they have questions, who did they go to for answers? They figured it out? EEEEH, wrong. They went to the doctor for suggestions. The solutions came from the engineers. The direction came from the scientist.

Anyone with any brains will look at what I just wrote and know, without a doubt, that I know exactly what I'm talking about. There will be no debate. Because that's how it works.

And after reading what you wrote, and what I wrote, they will come to the conclusion that you are probably an ignorant tard with much too much unwarranted confidence. But there is a cure for what ails you. It's called "education". Then perhaps, you can stay away from the ridiculous.

Hey stupid ass.....

NASA does not exist to generate a profit......

Why don't you sit down and figure out what life is about first....you'll save the rest of us a lot of time rolling on the floor laughing our asses off at you.

You once worked on a project...I'll bet you were the janitor.

Notice you needed the engineers to turn it into hardware ? Did you get that ? Just what I said before.

We had a scientist from R&D show up a while ago and suggest we use a Chlor-Alkali process to generate caustic that could then be used to scrub power plant stack gas to capture CO2 (in the form of carbonate). I almost could not contain myself. I got to explain to them that Chlor Alkali is an electrochemical process that requires electricity...which comes from where ? Silly grin starts to appear.

Then I asked what they intended to do with the chlorine gas that was generated. The answer (with an even bigger silly grin) was to downhole it.

And this person had a PhD from an Ivy League school !

Go gettem Deaner.....take a poll and see who thinks you are smart. Please.....

If RDean worked on a project at NASA, it was to get the coffee and sweep the floors.

You said: And this person had a PhD from an Ivy League school !

Ivy League schools are known for Social Science and the Humanities. Cornell has an OK science program I guess. I'm surprised you didn't know that.

Oh
My
God.

You mean you don't know the difference between "Social Science" and "Science"?

Cornell has a very good engineering program.

This is from Yale's website:

How strong are Yale s science and engineering programs Yale College Admissions

In a word, very. Yale is one of the world’s foremost research universities. Its faculty of outstanding scholars in the sciences, mathematics, and engineering includes more than 60 members of the National Academy of Sciences. About one-third of Yale’s entering class each year plans to major in the natural sciences, mathematics, computer science, or engineering.

Oh
My
Gosh.

You don't know shit.
I have to admit, I love your link. Here is what it says:

Science and quantitative reasoning are integral parts of a liberal education and Yale College is committed to providing undergraduates with a strong SQR foundation through scholarship and original research. Explore the academic, programmatic, and research opportunities currently available to our students.

And I really liked looking their website. And the fact they describe their science curriculum as "natural science". What do you think that means?

So what is a "Conservative Education"? Is that one where you make fun of your co-workers and laugh at a PhD?

You said:

We had a scientist from R&D show up a while ago and suggest we use.......
I almost could not contain myself. I got to explain to them.....
Silly grin starts to appear.
The answer (with an even bigger silly grin) was.........
And this person had a PhD from an Ivy League school !

And then you said:

Go gettem Deaner.....take a poll and see who thinks you are smart. Please.....

Well, I can tell you this. I'm smart enough to know better than mocking and laughing at my co-workers. And making fun of a PhD? I bet behind your back, you are the most hated person where ever it is you work. Clearly you have no conception of "team work". Which is something that is very, very important on any project. Fortunately, from what you wrote, it appears you only clean. So make sure you are wearing your rubber gloves.

Actually, you are not that smart.

And you know nothing.

I just owned your ass. Yale specifically mentioned engineering. You lose dickweed.

You'll bet........

Actually, now....my PhD friend is now sharing more ideas up front as part of a screening process. He is smart, which was never in question (but you aren't so you can't see the difference). He simply (as I pointed out) was in his Ivory Tower not paying attention to what the real world demands in order for something to succeed.

But you know only what you read in magazines (not that you comprehend it).

And you'd probably be O.K. with trying to downhole several thousand pounds an hour of liquid chlorine.

You are beyond stupid.


Too bad nobody can believe you since you are not an honest person
 
Hey stupid ass.....

NASA does not exist to generate a profit......

Why don't you sit down and figure out what life is about first....you'll save the rest of us a lot of time rolling on the floor laughing our asses off at you.

You once worked on a project...I'll bet you were the janitor.

Notice you needed the engineers to turn it into hardware ? Did you get that ? Just what I said before.

We had a scientist from R&D show up a while ago and suggest we use a Chlor-Alkali process to generate caustic that could then be used to scrub power plant stack gas to capture CO2 (in the form of carbonate). I almost could not contain myself. I got to explain to them that Chlor Alkali is an electrochemical process that requires electricity...which comes from where ? Silly grin starts to appear.

Then I asked what they intended to do with the chlorine gas that was generated. The answer (with an even bigger silly grin) was to downhole it.

And this person had a PhD from an Ivy League school !

Go gettem Deaner.....take a poll and see who thinks you are smart. Please.....

If RDean worked on a project at NASA, it was to get the coffee and sweep the floors.

You said: And this person had a PhD from an Ivy League school !

Ivy League schools are known for Social Science and the Humanities. Cornell has an OK science program I guess. I'm surprised you didn't know that.

Oh
My
God.

You mean you don't know the difference between "Social Science" and "Science"?

Cornell has a very good engineering program.

This is from Yale's website:

How strong are Yale s science and engineering programs Yale College Admissions

In a word, very. Yale is one of the world’s foremost research universities. Its faculty of outstanding scholars in the sciences, mathematics, and engineering includes more than 60 members of the National Academy of Sciences. About one-third of Yale’s entering class each year plans to major in the natural sciences, mathematics, computer science, or engineering.

Oh
My
Gosh.

You don't know shit.
I have to admit, I love your link. Here is what it says:

Science and quantitative reasoning are integral parts of a liberal education and Yale College is committed to providing undergraduates with a strong SQR foundation through scholarship and original research. Explore the academic, programmatic, and research opportunities currently available to our students.

And I really liked looking their website. And the fact they describe their science curriculum as "natural science". What do you think that means?

So what is a "Conservative Education"? Is that one where you make fun of your co-workers and laugh at a PhD?

You said:

We had a scientist from R&D show up a while ago and suggest we use.......
I almost could not contain myself. I got to explain to them.....
Silly grin starts to appear.
The answer (with an even bigger silly grin) was.........
And this person had a PhD from an Ivy League school !

And then you said:

Go gettem Deaner.....take a poll and see who thinks you are smart. Please.....

Well, I can tell you this. I'm smart enough to know better than mocking and laughing at my co-workers. And making fun of a PhD? I bet behind your back, you are the most hated person where ever it is you work. Clearly you have no conception of "team work". Which is something that is very, very important on any project. Fortunately, from what you wrote, it appears you only clean. So make sure you are wearing your rubber gloves.

Actually, you are not that smart.

And you know nothing.

I just owned your ass. Yale specifically mentioned engineering. You lose dickweed.

You'll bet........

Actually, now....my PhD friend is now sharing more ideas up front as part of a screening process. He is smart, which was never in question (but you aren't so you can't see the difference). He simply (as I pointed out) was in his Ivory Tower not paying attention to what the real world demands in order for something to succeed.

But you know only what you read in magazines (not that you comprehend it).

And you'd probably be O.K. with trying to downhole several thousand pounds an hour of liquid chlorine.

You are beyond stupid.


Too bad nobody can believe you since you are not an honest person

The Yale website is a lie.

Too much.
 
One of the many things Democrats say about Republicans that make no sense to me is this idea that Republicans only care about the rich.

Not only does it not make a lot of sense, but it's sort of a rhetorical sleight-of-hand bait-and-switch argument. Because Republicans support pro-business policies and lower taxes doesn't mean they're in the tank for the rich. People think "pro-business" just means lining the pockets of people who already have a lot of money. It also means supporting policies that encourage economic growth and risk-taking that creates jobs and wealth for this country. When you levy high taxes and over-regulate it makes the market shrink instead of expand. It causes businesses to seek out more business-friendly areas and/or outsource, which means fewer American jobs, which means more reliance on the government to take care of you and your family. Case in point: California.

It's hard to understand why liberals don't seem to understand basic economics and how groups work, yet they seem to politick that they're in tune with the common, working man. Seriously, if Republicans are the party of the rich like so many Democrats believe, why do most of the richest areas in the country vote Democratic in each election?
OK, go ahead and name some of those successful policies. GOP deregulation led to bringing down the world economy because of their bundles and derivative based schemes. So it wasn't that.
The deficit creating Bush tax cuts cost three trillion and didn't create jobs. Unless creating jobs in China was the goal. Then it worked.
The richest areas in the country vote Democrat because that's where business, the best schools and universities and research and technology are. That's why GOP governors like Rick Perry go to states like New York, California and Illinois looking for skilled workers.

The GOP can't have it both ways. The Democrats have the best of everything yet are the most stupid? If you look at what is being created in Blue States and the FACT that the GOP won't invest in their own people, then clearly, it's conservatives, excuse me, ignorant conservatives who are the problem. Come on. Does it take a bitch slap to recognize the obvious?

And speaking of California:

california economy bounces back - Google Search

Thank God for a Democratic Governor.
yea speaking of California.....where will they get the money for all those unfunded liabilities?.....well over a 100 billion.....thank god for Gov Davis and all those deals he made during his time.....
 

Forum List

Back
Top