Mr.Nick
VIP Member
- May 10, 2011
- 9,604
- 719
- 83
Why wouldn't the numbers be true? Surveys are easy to conduct for each demographic. You know Republicans have done surveys of which groups do not have IDs
Personally, I think everyone should be issued a free national ID with biometrics linked to facial recognition, DNA, retinal scan and fingerprint. The ID would serve as drivers license, social security card, credit card have all your medical information and financial data. It could even take the place of money
It would also make it easier for the police to positively identify you Nick
No surveys are NOT easy to conduct...
I highly doubt they called every person in the state, asked them their race and then asked them if they had a valid Wisconsin ID (which without question would confuse the typical retard)...
The majority of surveys are focused on central areas.
For example If I did a survey in Green Bay and one in Milwaukee but asked the residents of the two difference cities the same questions - I would get drastically different results.
Not to mention most surveys are limited to only a fraction of the population.
If I really wanted to I could come up with a preconceived outcome and then target certain base(s) to prove the outcome I wanted and call THAT a study or survey..
Few studies or surveys are actually conducted from an objective perspective..
I mean, if you believed that idiots numbers - then that would mean that a good 40% of drivers in Wisconsin don't even possess a drivers license - do you believe that???
I see black folks and Mexican folks driving all the time in Wisconsin - I guess the majority don't even have valid drivers licenses going by his data.
Not to mention one needs to have a valid ID to get a job..
I suppose the majority of Wisconsin residents don't have jobs...
I could PROVE the guy wrong given Wisconsins demographics / population.
Dishonest Surveys Are easy to conduct.
Kinda like the one UC Berkley just did..
They did a "study" and allegedly found that the "rich are more greedy than most."
You know what the defining factor of "rich" was?? the type of car the individual was driving...
I know assholes who drive $50,000 dollar luxury vehicles and are paying 600 bucks a month to lease them and they cant even afford to buy a microwave burrito after their useless aesthetics take all their money... But hey, they need to look like they're "rich" living beyond their means.... They're all also staunch progressives to boot. Realistically they're the greedy ones for living beyond their means, buying stuff and driving cars they cant afford..
But I suppose if you drive a BMW 7 series you're automatically "rich" according to that survey..
Last edited: