R
rdean
Guest
- Thread starter
- #161
They didn't wreck the economy. That's what they did that was so good.
Where is the Democrat budget? They held total control until January of this year so why was there no budget?
Ah, but they did wreck the economy. Like I said, it takes years for bad policy to affect an economy as large as ours. Moving the mortgage market to Wall Street, the trillions in tax cuts while waging two wars, the scandalous prescription drugs for votes bill Republicans passed through reconciliation, moving millions of jobs to China, these things take years before they bring down and economy as large as ours. Then it takes years to dig us out of this mess.
Really, if the Left thinks Papa Obama is going to win reelection
They are going to need more than "Bush Did It"
Wars- again the Left needs some new material
Under President Obama, government will spend more on welfare in a single year than President George W. Bush spent on the war in Iraq during his entire presidency. According to the Congressional Research Service, the cost of the Iraq war through the end of the Bush Administration was around $622 billion. By contrast, annual federal and state means-tested welfare spending will reach $888 billion in FY 2010. Federal welfare spending alone will equal $697 billion in that y
It is bad enough Papa Obama has to do this when his teleprompter breaks
I can see you're getting pissed being proven wrong again and again. The Iraq war was only $622 billion? No wonder you didn't link to that. You can't just look at the cost of the military, you have to look at the cost of Rebuilding the country of Iraq, the cost of taking care of tens of thousands of wounded Americans, the cost of replacing our hardware. Include all that and the cost skyrockets into trillions and trillions, all of which Obama was left with.
What else is there to say?