gingrich isn't reagan. people liked reagan.
people hate gingrich.
people hate gingrich.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
gingrich isn't reagan. people liked reagan.
people hate gingrich.
I think a Newt Win will have the following effects-
First and foremost, it will make him the only "Not Romney" standing. Santorum will figure he's made his point and he's had his fun. I never thought Santorum was running for anything other than redemption, and having made it this far, outlasting Perry, Bachmann, Cain and Pawlenty. He's got that now, he can go back to Fox News and demand a lot more money as an analyst.
So what you have in the GOP race is about 30% who have bought into Romney and the 70% who would really like someone else. Discounting the 12% who want Ron Paul, that still leaves Gingirch with about 58% of the GOP electorate to work with.
The other end result is that Romney has FINALLY gotten the scrutiny he should have gotten three months ago about his business dealings, what his real positions are and his whackadoo religion. When you get past the platitudes about "electablity" and "inevitability", what you have is a candidate who is personally very unappealling, isn't in sync with where most Republicans are, has no empathy with real Americans and their worries and belongs to a religion that is just plain strange.
Again, this should have happened three months ago, but the MSM avoided talking about it, but they can't keep pushing it off. They had every intent of talking about it in the general, but it's all coming up now because Newt brought these things to the table. (Except the Mormon thing.)
gingrich isn't reagan. people liked reagan.
people hate gingrich.
I have to assume you are too young to have been around in the 1980's.
There was hatred toward Reagan from the left that was unimaginable. Nobody has ever claimed that Gingrich is going to blow up the world, but that was a common complaint against Reagan. We were all goign to die because Reagan wasn't going to surrender to the USSR.
And he wanted poor people to die.
Jesus, I'm getting old.
gingrich isn't reagan. people liked reagan.
people hate gingrich.
I have to assume you are too young to have been around in the 1980's.
There was hatred toward Reagan from the left that was unimaginable. Nobody has ever claimed that Gingrich is going to blow up the world, but that was a common complaint against Reagan. We were all goign to die because Reagan wasn't going to surrender to the USSR.
And he wanted poor people to die.
Jesus, I'm getting old.
I think it is hialrious that the Party of Morals is clinging to the Master of Immorals as their "anyone but Mitt" alternative. It makes me crack up laughing!
The Dems at the WH must be rolling in the isles. I heard this morning that even the Tea Party moralists are lining up behind Newt. He is soon to be known as the Champion Snake Oil Salesman of all time!
GO NEWT!
clap2:
Again, maybe I'm getting old, but I remember liberals in 1980 saying, "Please Nominate Ronald Reagan and not George Bush, because Bush is electable and Reagan is so far off to the right he can't ever get elected. "
Need a reminder of how that turned out for you?
I think you also miss the whole point of "morals". We know people aren't perfect. We know marriages fail. Sorry, they just do, sometimes. Nobody really faulted John Kerry for his ex-wife. Or John McCain. They traded up.
gingrich isn't reagan. people liked reagan.
people hate gingrich.
I have to assume you are too young to have been around in the 1980's.
There was hatred toward Reagan from the left that was unimaginable. Nobody has ever claimed that Gingrich is going to blow up the world, but that was a common complaint against Reagan. We were all goign to die because Reagan wasn't going to surrender to the USSR.
And he wanted poor people to die.
Jesus, I'm getting old.
I think a Newt Win will have the following effects-
First and foremost, it will make him the only "Not Romney" standing. Santorum will figure he's made his point and he's had his fun. I never thought Santorum was running for anything other than redemption, and having made it this far, outlasting Perry, Bachmann, Cain and Pawlenty. He's got that now, he can go back to Fox News and demand a lot more money as an analyst.
So what you have in the GOP race is about 30% who have bought into Romney and the 70% who would really like someone else. Discounting the 12% who want Ron Paul, that still leaves Gingirch with about 58% of the GOP electorate to work with.
The other end result is that Romney has FINALLY gotten the scrutiny he should have gotten three months ago about his business dealings, what his real positions are and his whackadoo religion. When you get past the platitudes about "electablity" and "inevitability", what you have is a candidate who is personally very unappealling, isn't in sync with where most Republicans are, has no empathy with real Americans and their worries and belongs to a religion that is just plain strange.
Again, this should have happened three months ago, but the MSM avoided talking about it, but they can't keep pushing it off. They had every intent of talking about it in the general, but it's all coming up now because Newt brought these things to the table. (Except the Mormon thing.)
I agree completely.
Are you a professional political operative?
Yeah... I was a teenager living the home of a Democrat union member
Holy shit my dad did not like him AT ALL.... I myself never understood it.
I was a christian and thought Reagan was a great man, even back then, I loved him as I do now.
then Florida will take center stage.
We can see all you libturds quaking in your boots.
Please nominate Newt Gingrich.
Democrats in 1980...
"Please nominate Ronald Reagan."
Whoops.
Please nominate Newt Gingrich.
Democrats in 1980...
"Please nominate Ronald Reagan."
Whoops.
You're forgetting what a Terrible year 1980 was. And how badly carter screwed up in one year.
A win here in SC for Newt means now a step closer to a win for Obama, which I believe is what Joe wants.
A win here in SC for Newt means now a step closer to a win for Obama, which I believe is what Joe wants.
I want Romney to lose. How that happens is irrelevent to me.
I'd rather have Gingrich beat him than Obama beat him. At least then the GOP will kind of get it that Plutocracy isn't America's future.
A win here in SC for Newt means now a step closer to a win for Obama, which I believe is what Joe wants.
I want Romney to lose. How that happens is irrelevent to me.
I'd rather have Gingrich beat him than Obama beat him. At least then the GOP will kind of get it that Plutocracy isn't America's future.
A win here in SC for Newt means now a step closer to a win for Obama, which I believe is what Joe wants.
I want Romney to lose. How that happens is irrelevent to me.
I'd rather have Gingrich beat him than Obama beat him. At least then the GOP will kind of get it that Plutocracy isn't America's future.
Obama in the RCP today is 11 points ahead of Newt. It will only grow.
I was right: you are an atheist, secular leftist plant.
I want Romney to lose. How that happens is irrelevent to me.
I'd rather have Gingrich beat him than Obama beat him. At least then the GOP will kind of get it that Plutocracy isn't America's future.
Obama in the RCP today is 11 points ahead of Newt. It will only grow.
I was right: you are an atheist, secular leftist plant.
don't blame him on the left.
A win here in SC for Newt means now a step closer to a win for Obama, which I believe is what Joe wants.
I want Romney to lose. How that happens is irrelevent to me.
I'd rather have Gingrich beat him than Obama beat him. At least then the GOP will kind of get it that Plutocracy isn't America's future.
That should be Obama's re-election slogan.
Plutocracy isn't America's future.
And remember McCain was terrified of Obama...wouldn't even say his full name...Again, maybe I'm getting old, but I remember liberals in 1980 saying, "Please Nominate Ronald Reagan and not George Bush, because Bush is electable and Reagan is so far off to the right he can't ever get elected. "
Need a reminder of how that turned out for you?
I think you also miss the whole point of "morals". We know people aren't perfect. We know marriages fail. Sorry, they just do, sometimes. Nobody really faulted John Kerry for his ex-wife. Or John McCain. They traded up.
The Republicans already tried running a RINO against Obama, and look how that turned out for them. Why would anyone vote for a me-too liberal when they can have the genuine article? When true conservatism is on the ballot, it wins.