What happens if you "don't believe in evolution"?

[anynameyouwish]

Do you get raped by the Flying Spaghetti Monster and his gang of pirates? Discuss.

If not, then there's no reason to not believe in it, (assuming that elective belief is a thing).

In fact, it's probably one of the ugliest theories to be particularly invested in to begin with, with one's level of enthusiasm for evolutionary theory often being "inversely" proportional to their actual mating success, making one even wonder if it would better to "not" believe in it than to do so, as superstitious as the notion of "believing" in any body of theory or abstraction is to begin with.

I'd much rather study music theory, than evolutionary theory, to be honest, even as a scientific theory, it's entirely overrated, physics being much more fundamental than biology, and a hell of a lot cooler (in physics, you get to learn about black holes, in evolution you get to learn about cows humping each other).

And it seems to be common knowledge that musicians, whether Bach or Rock tend to do a lot more actual sexual reproduction than the average, overweight, white, male evolution fetishist on the internet does, likely having more in common with the mating and hygiene habits of a lesser ape than the average non-socially maladjusted person does, and much like an animal, likely isn't able to tell the difference between a Waifu and and actual woman, other than maybe when she pulls out the pepper spray - which a Waifu, of course can't do.

Hehehe

Evolution? My ass. More like devolution? Science? Nah, more like a failed HS science experiment come to life.

I don't think this strapping young fellow is particularly concerned about regurgitating ugly, banal factoids about evolution, and if anything he and his lovers are evolutionarily speaking, the better for it. Seems to work in reverse - the less you know about evolution, the more actual evolution you and the ladies end up doing. Mhmm.

Pathetic.

What happens if you dont believe in the periodic table? Or the co-formation theory in astronomy? Nothing...its irrelevant for most people though being intellectually curious would hopefully come into play.
But its been made a shibboleth because the Puritan Atheists among us believe it negates God.
It doesnt.

"
But its been made a shibboleth because the Puritan Atheists among us believe it negates God.
It doesnt"


I don't feel the need to disprove something that YOU can NOT prove.

I'll make a deal with you; for every logical bit of evidence you provide of the evidence of god I will provide one proving there is NO god.

perhaps I will even provide reasons why the god that you worship (who doesn't exist) is really not a very nice guy at all.

 

[DOTR]

I don't feel the need to disprove something that YOU can NOT prove.
l.

Oh you feel the need. It seems to be deep seated.

 

[Fort Fun Indiana]

Just your kids will look at you like a moron

To be fair: they are going to do that anyway.

 

[anynameyouwish]

I don't feel the need to disprove something that YOU can NOT prove.
l.

Oh you feel the need. It seems to be deep seated.

yawn

 

[Fort Fun Indiana]

I don't feel the need to disprove something that YOU can NOT prove.
l.

Oh you feel the need. It seems to be deep seated.

yawn

Carry on....

 

[anynameyouwish]

I don't feel the need to disprove something that YOU can NOT prove.
l.

Oh you feel the need. It seems to be deep seated.

yawn

So, let's get some clarity regarding your insanity.

Do you claim that the overwhelming majority of all scientists on the planet, across every field of physical science, are engaged in a dishonest conspiracy to prop of the theory of evolution?

Please start your response with the word "yes" or the word "no". Thanks.

I'm pretty sure you couldn't have intended that for me.

?

 

[Fort Fun Indiana]

I don't feel the need to disprove something that YOU can NOT prove.
l.

Oh you feel the need. It seems to be deep seated.

yawn

So, let's get some clarity regarding your insanity.

Do you claim that the overwhelming majority of all scientists on the planet, across every field of physical science, are engaged in a dishonest conspiracy to prop of the theory of evolution?

Please start your response with the word "yes" or the word "no". Thanks.

I'm pretty sure you couldn't have intended that for me.

?

My bad! I confused you with another poster. I will try that again.

 

[anynameyouwish]

I don't feel the need to disprove something that YOU can NOT prove.
l.

Oh you feel the need. It seems to be deep seated.

yawn

So, let's get some clarity regarding your insanity.

Do you claim that the overwhelming majority of all scientists on the planet, across every field of physical science, are engaged in a dishonest conspiracy to prop of the theory of evolution?

Please start your response with the word "yes" or the word "no". Thanks.

I'm pretty sure you couldn't have intended that for me.

?

My bad! I confused you with another poster. I will try that again.

it's ok

I get that all the time!

 

[Fort Fun Indiana]

But its been made a shibboleth because the Puritan Atheists among us believe it negates God.

Of course it doesn't. But it most certainly negates precious young earth creationist dogma.

 

[Frannie]

I already posted the days of creation chart multiple times already. What good would it do you? Instead, your evolution charts show the same monkeys that we are familiar with today. Your scientists used the same pictures because that is what they said earlier. Yet, creationists found contradictions such as the "present is the key to the past," i.e. uniformitarianism, and that today's monkeys do not walk bipedal, so past monkeys did not walk bipedal. That blows up a huge example of macroevolution as shown in the chart above. Furthermore, we do not see tailed monkeys become tailless nor gorillas and chimps mating. Thus, the common ancestor hypothesis does not happen and did not happen. We do not even have a billions of years old Earth as you assume.

Moreover, creationists have found fraud in the evolution. It is laid out in the chart above. Ernst Haeckel also made up drawings in order to show evolution in embryos, but they were shown to be fake. He also was exposed as a racist. Certainly, your side has had some shady characters in order to further your atheist "faith-based" beliefs.

Are those the facts you were talking about?

Thank you

Common ancestor

Nah. Forget the goofy attempted connection between humans and apes.

There should be thousands, if not millions of intermediate transitional species throughout the entire planet, and throughout the entire fossil record. Instead there is none. In fact, we should be able to find more transitional species, than we find non-transitional.

Instead.... none.

Why?
Who says evolution works like that?

Similar species may breed together and intermediates disappear

What are the similar species that may breed together?

Homo Sapiens and Neanderthals

They were as different as American Indians and Irish or Chinese and Italian. Not different species, the fact that we all have Neanderthal DNA proves that we are not different species

 

[james bond]

Why should monkeys walk?
They are on a different evolutionary track

Nah. You guys use the same pics for now and earlier. None of it happened.

Tell us how all creatures were created by magic

Poof....there is a fish
Poof....there is a bird
Poof......look everyone...a dinosaur
Poof....there is a man
Wait, let me take a rib and poof.....there is a woman

I already posted the days of creation chart multiple times already. What good would it do you? Instead, your evolution charts show the same monkeys that we are familiar with today. Your scientists used the same pictures because that is what they said earlier. Yet, creationists found contradictions such as the "present is the key to the past," i.e. uniformitarianism, and that today's monkeys do not walk bipedal, so past monkeys did not walk bipedal. That blows up a huge example of macroevolution as shown in the chart above. Furthermore, we do not see tailed monkeys become tailless nor gorillas and chimps mating. Thus, the common ancestor hypothesis does not happen and did not happen. We do not even have a billions of years old Earth as you assume.

Moreover, creationists have found fraud in the evolution. It is laid out in the chart above. Ernst Haeckel also made up drawings in order to show evolution in embryos, but they were shown to be fake. He also was exposed as a racist. Certainly, your side has had some shady characters in order to further your atheist "faith-based" beliefs.

Are those the facts you were talking about?

Thank you

Common ancestor

Thank you

Common ancestor

You're welcome.

Which does not happen.

 

[james bond]

You are clearly wrong as God made all of his works with the ability to evolve or change their selves to better suit the environment so that they could be successful. God made evolution, thus the drawings are not as wrong as you perceive

Boy, you are really mixed up . No need for you to answer my questions. Just go to the back of the class.

 

[gtopa1]

Another Evolution thread? lol. OK; what most people think about Evolution is WRONG. It is common sense to state that, if life started as single celled organisms then somehow complexity entered the development of higher organisms. My own view is that this occurred through the mechanism of genetic mutations etc; pretty modern understanding. Most people, especially those who "believe" have no idea about that. And frankly it really doesn't particularly matter. We're here.

Greg

 

[Frannie]

You are clearly wrong as God made all of his works with the ability to evolve or change their selves to better suit the environment so that they could be successful. God made evolution, thus the drawings are not as wrong as you perceive

Boy, you are really mixed up . No need for you to answer my questions. Just go to the back of the class.

Says the emoji king turd who believes the Earth is 6000 years old.

Moron

Tell us how God made everything not to change?

 

[james bond]

You are clearly wrong as God made all of his works with the ability to evolve or change their selves to better suit the environment so that they could be successful. God made evolution, thus the drawings are not as wrong as you perceive

Boy, you are really mixed up . No need for you to answer my questions. Just go to the back of the class.

Says the emoji king turd who believes the Earth is 6000 years old.

Moron

Tell us how God made everything not to change?

Ad hominem attack does not make you right and is for the losers. First, creation scientists have RATE who have found C14 still remaining in coal and diamonds that were supposedly hundreds of millions or billions of years old. They were able to radiocarbon date these same coal and diamonds to around 40,000 years. Much younger than the millions or billions.

Moreover, I already pointed out evos were wrong about common ancestor. They base the "present is the key to the past" and we find this is not so. Darwin's explanations of evolution has been mostly wrong. The only thing he was right about was natural selection, but creationist Alfred Russel Wallace came up with it first. He should've stuck to his guns and maybe the racist POS Darwin would not have caused the Holocaust and social Darwinism.

 

[ChemEngineer]

Gravity is just a theory too.

(giggle, giggle) Physicists NEVER EVER compare gravity to Darwin's Magic Wand and say "Gravity is as factual as evolution." Nor are there tens of thousands of scientists and millions of well educated adults who challenge Darwin's Tautology - "they survive because they're fit and they're fit because they survive"! woot
That's anti-science at its worst. But you bathe in it because your handlers tell you that such beliefs make you smart. Hint: They really don't.

“A growing number of respectable scientists are defecting from the evolutionist camp…..moreover, for the most part these “experts” have abandoned Darwinism, not on the basis of religious faith or biblical persuasions, but on strictly scientific grounds, and in some instances, regretfully.” (Dr. Wolfgang Smith, physicist and mathematician)

“It must be significant that nearly all the evolutionary stories I learned as a student….have now been debunked.” (Dr. Derek V. Ager, Department of Geology, Imperial College, London)

 

[22lcidw]

Nah. You guys use the same pics for now and earlier. None of it happened.

Tell us how all creatures were created by magic

Poof....there is a fish
Poof....there is a bird
Poof......look everyone...a dinosaur
Poof....there is a man
Wait, let me take a rib and poof.....there is a woman

I already posted the days of creation chart multiple times already. What good would it do you? Instead, your evolution charts show the same monkeys that we are familiar with today. Your scientists used the same pictures because that is what they said earlier. Yet, creationists found contradictions such as the "present is the key to the past," i.e. uniformitarianism, and that today's monkeys do not walk bipedal, so past monkeys did not walk bipedal. That blows up a huge example of macroevolution as shown in the chart above. Furthermore, we do not see tailed monkeys become tailless nor gorillas and chimps mating. Thus, the common ancestor hypothesis does not happen and did not happen. We do not even have a billions of years old Earth as you assume.

Moreover, creationists have found fraud in the evolution. It is laid out in the chart above. Ernst Haeckel also made up drawings in order to show evolution in embryos, but they were shown to be fake. He also was exposed as a racist. Certainly, your side has had some shady characters in order to further your atheist "faith-based" beliefs.

Are those the facts you were talking about?

Thank you

Common ancestor

Nah. Forget the goofy attempted connection between humans and apes.

There should be thousands, if not millions of intermediate transitional species throughout the entire planet, and throughout the entire fossil record. Instead there is none. In fact, we should be able to find more transitional species, than we find non-transitional.

Instead.... none.

Why?
Who says evolution works like that?

Similar species may breed together and intermediates disappear

Beastiality?

 

[ChemEngineer]

Tell us how all creatures were created by magic

Poof....there is a fish
Poof....there is a bird
Poof......look everyone...a dinosaur
Poof....there is a man
Wait, let me take a rib and poof.....there is a woman

I already posted the days of creation chart multiple times already. What good would it do you? Instead, your evolution charts show the same monkeys that we are familiar with today. Your scientists used the same pictures because that is what they said earlier. Yet, creationists found contradictions such as the "present is the key to the past," i.e. uniformitarianism, and that today's monkeys do not walk bipedal, so past monkeys did not walk bipedal. That blows up a huge example of macroevolution as shown in the chart above. Furthermore, we do not see tailed monkeys become tailless nor gorillas and chimps mating. Thus, the common ancestor hypothesis does not happen and did not happen. We do not even have a billions of years old Earth as you assume.

Moreover, creationists have found fraud in the evolution. It is laid out in the chart above. Ernst Haeckel also made up drawings in order to show evolution in embryos, but they were shown to be fake. He also was exposed as a racist. Certainly, your side has had some shady characters in order to further your atheist "faith-based" beliefs.

Are those the facts you were talking about?

Thank you

Common ancestor

Nah. Forget the goofy attempted connection between humans and apes.

There should be thousands, if not millions of intermediate transitional species throughout the entire planet, and throughout the entire fossil record. Instead there is none. In fact, we should be able to find more transitional species, than we find non-transitional.

Instead.... none.

Why?
Who says evolution works like that?

Similar species may breed together and intermediates disappear

Beastiality?

You misspelled the word. One "a."

 

[ChemEngineer]

CORRECTION: Physicists NEVER EVER compare gravity to Darwin's Magic Wand and say "Gravity is as factual as evolution." Nor are there tens of thousands of scientists and millions of well educated adults who challenge gravity as they do Darwin's Tautology - "they survive because they're fit and they're fit because they survive"!

My apologies for the egregious mistake. Let it be known that I have made bigger mistakes, however.

 

[bripat9643]

I can't believe in something that remains nothing more than just a theory.

However, I can and do believe it's a theory. That evolution is a theory is a fact.

You're confusing yourself.

Evolution is a fact. Speciation due to evolution is a fact. Evolution prodicing all species, ever,from a common ancestor is a fact. These are physical mechanisms governed by natural laws, just like an electrical current, or star formation. Electrical currents and star formation are facts.

The explanation of the processes involved and how they led from the first common ancestor of all species to all species which ever lived is the Theory of Evolution. And that is the highest value/regard a scientific explanation can achieve, due to being supported by mountains of evidence. Which is an understatement, in the case of the theory of evolution.

Nope... sorry, but thanks for playing.

Evolution is a theory. Always has been, always will be. That fact will never change, ever, period, end of story.

Haha, sure. As has been pointed out, it doesn't matter if you believe it or not. It will remain a fact long after you are dead and gone.

Again, you're clueless as to what facts are.

Evolutionary theory is not a "fact", it is a theory built from facts or from mathematics, as presumably all theories or abstractions, scientific or otherwise are - facts are merely pieces of information which can be used to construct presumably infinite variety of theories.

Evolution is as much a fact as gravity is a fact.