What does the Right stand for?

[PLYMCO_PILGRIM]

Then tell us what you stand FOR.

Not what you are against , what you are for.

I can tell you what i'm for, but i may not be representative of "The new right"

1) Small government with only the powers granted in the constitution
2) Fiscally responsible government
3) Low Taxes (that means lower than what they are now by at least 25%)
4) Personal Liberty (that means if I want an abortion I can get one and If I dont wanna wear a helmet on my bicycle thats ok too)
5) NO DEFECIT SPENDING. No more debt, stop adding and start paying it down.
6) Spending freezes to acheive debt reduction. Sorry world no more aid money, sorry countries with US bases we are closing them and coming home.


I'm sure i have more.

 

[uscitizen]

Apparently they stand for Butt fruking?

 

[007]

PR, the right-wing and the republicans spit on the constitution all the time. They're statists who work to make the Fd bigger and stronger just like the Dems

The right wing stands on the constitution a hell of a lot more than the liberals do. Just ask obama what he thinks the constitution is.

"Constitution deeply flawed"... yup... and that's just the way the left sees it too...

[ame]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=11OhmY1obS4[/ame]

 

[☭proletarian☭]

Then tell us what you stand FOR.

Not what you are against , what you are for.

I can tell you what i'm for, but i may not be representative of "The new right"

1) Small government with only the powers granted in the constitution
2) Fiscally responsible government
3) Low Taxes (that means lower than what they are now by at least 25%)
4) Personal Liberty (that means if I want an abortion I can get one and If I dont wanna wear a helmet on my bicycle thats ok too)
5) NO DEFECIT SPENDING. No more debt, stop adding and start paying it down.
6) Spending freezes to acheive debt reduction. Sorry world no more aid money, sorry countries with US bases we are closing them and coming home.


I'm sure i have more.

2, 3 , 5, and 6 can me merged into 'fiscal conservatism

1 and 4 can be merged into 'Personal liberty with a minimal government that protects those liberties'

 

[☭proletarian☭]

The right wing stands on the constitution a hell of a lot more than the liberals do.

'we're better than the other pieces of shit' is not a valid defense. It just means you both have to go.

 

[WillowTree]

Wry Catcher and other asswipes of his ilk always post DUmbass questions like this so they can start a rightwing bash.. but it's the dems who have crapped all over your playground..

 

[Bern80]

Then tell us what you stand FOR.

Not what you are against , what you are for.

I can tell you what i'm for, but i may not be representative of "The new right"

1) Small government with only the powers granted in the constitution
2) Fiscally responsible government
3) Low Taxes (that means lower than what they are now by at least 25%)
4) Personal Liberty (that means if I want an abortion I can get one and If I dont wanna wear a helmet on my bicycle thats ok too)
5) NO DEFECIT SPENDING. No more debt, stop adding and start paying it down.
6) Spending freezes to acheive debt reduction. Sorry world no more aid money, sorry countries with US bases we are closing them and coming home.


I'm sure i have more.

2, 3 , 5, and 6 can me merged into 'fiscal conservatism

1 and 4 can be merged into 'Personal liberty with a minimal government that protects those liberties'

Fair enough. We're all about quality, not quantity anyway. I'd stand by that list as well.

 

[WillowTree]

Then tell us what you stand FOR.

Not what you are against , what you are for.

I can tell you what i'm for, but i may not be representative of "The new right"

1) Small government with only the powers granted in the constitution
2) Fiscally responsible government
3) Low Taxes (that means lower than what they are now by at least 25%)
4) Personal Liberty (that means if I want an abortion I can get one and If I dont wanna wear a helmet on my bicycle thats ok too)
5) NO DEFECIT SPENDING. No more debt, stop adding and start paying it down.
6) Spending freezes to acheive debt reduction. Sorry world no more aid money, sorry countries with US bases we are closing them and coming home.


I'm sure i have more.

2, 3 , 5, and 6 can me merged into 'fiscal conservatism

1 and 4 can be merged into 'Personal liberty with a minimal government that protects those liberties'

did you want a fucking list? or a fucking arguement?

 

[uscitizen]

Both have to go? I think that is impossible in the short term. Defections might happen and a 3rd party will come up a bit. However the same idiots will be in the slots and the same idiots punditing and supporting them.

WE need to change. Not our government.
If we change the govt will as well.

 

[Darkwind]

Then tell us what you stand FOR.

Not what you are against , what you are for.

 

[Liability]

I believe I know what they oppose:
No to Federal regulations;
No to gun controls;
No to taxes;
No to abortion;
No to gay/lesbian marriage;
No to single payer universal health care
No to stem cell research;
No to deficit spending;
No to campaign finance restrictions
No to sex education at any age;
No to welfare;
No to Medicare;
No to Social Security;
No to the Democratic Party;
No to the Republican Party.

If this is an accuate description of the new right, what do they support? And, what would our society look like if they prevailed?

Nice attempt at regurgitating baseless left wing slogan points again

An excellent example of bitch-slapping a liberoidal troll with the truth!

Good form!

 

[Truthmatters]

Thank you!

Then tell us what you stand FOR.

Not what you are against , what you are for.

I can tell you what i'm for, but i may not be representative of "The new right"

1) Small government with only the powers granted in the constitutionSmall is not a very discipitive word , could you discribe the areas that you feel the government should stay out of? We already follow the constitution.
2) Fiscally responsible government.I think we all agree on this one, now define what that means to you.
3) Low Taxes (that means lower than what they are now by at least 25%)what are you willing to give up to get there?
4) Personal Liberty (that means if I want an abortion I can get one and If I dont wanna wear a helmet on my bicycle thats ok too)This abortion stance in niot in line with most other Rs, the helmet laws are there to protect the person who would have to pay to give you medical care due to your negligence. Vehicles are not a right and you must follow the laws to get the privledge to use them.
5) NO DEFECIT SPENDING. No more debt, stop adding and start paying it down.Again what are you willing give up to get there?
6) Spending freezes to acheive debt reduction. Sorry world no more aid money, sorry countries with US bases we are closing them and coming home.This again is not in line with most Rs.


I'm sure i have more.

Thank you for answering

 

[WillowTree]

I believe I know what they oppose:
No to Federal regulations;
No to gun controls;
No to taxes;
No to abortion;
No to gay/lesbian marriage;
No to single payer universal health care
No to stem cell research;
No to deficit spending;
No to campaign finance restrictions
No to sex education at any age;
No to welfare;
No to Medicare;
No to Social Security;
No to the Democratic Party;
No to the Republican Party.

If this is an accuate description of the new right, what do they support? And, what would our society look like if they prevailed?

Nice attempt at regurgitating baseless left wing slogan points again

An excellent example of bitch-slapping a liberoidal troll with the truth!

Good form!

this libtard wry catching nothing has only started about a zillion of these stupid partisan hack lists.. broken record kool aid drinking basement dwelling mama's boy with zero originality! Merry Christmas.

 

[Truthmatters]

PR, the right-wing and the republicans spit on the constitution all the time. They're statists who work to make the Fd bigger and stronger just like the Dems

The right wing stands on the constitution a hell of a lot more than the liberals do. Just ask obama what he thinks the constitution is.

"Constitution deeply flawed"... yup... and that's just the way the left sees it too...

[ame]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=11OhmY1obS4[/ame]

If the original constitution was flawless why did the founding fathers set up a system in which the people could alter it?

 

[WillowTree]

Thank you!

Then tell us what you stand FOR.

Not what you are against , what you are for.

I can tell you what i'm for, but i may not be representative of "The new right"

1) Small government with only the powers granted in the constitutionSmall is not a very discipitive word , could you discribe the areas that you feel the government should stay out of? We already follow the constitution.
2) Fiscally responsible government.I think we all agree on this one, now define what that means to you.
3) Low Taxes (that means lower than what they are now by at least 25%)what are you willing to give up to get there?
4) Personal Liberty (that means if I want an abortion I can get one and If I dont wanna wear a helmet on my bicycle thats ok too)This abortion stance in niot in line with most other Rs, the helmet laws are there to protect the person who would have to pay to give you medical care due to your negligence. Vehicles are a right and you must follow the laws to get the privledge to use them.
5) NO DEFECIT SPENDING. No more debt, stop adding and start paying it down.Again what are you willing give up to get there?
6) Spending freezes to acheive debt reduction. Sorry world no more aid money, sorry countries with US bases we are closing them and coming home.This again is not in line with most Rs.


I'm sure i have more.

Thank you for answering

It takes a moron to ask for a list, then said moron proceeds to argue with said list.

 

[Truthmatters]

This is a political discussion site willow.

WTF do you think we are here for?

 

[☭proletarian☭]

WTF are you babbling about, Willow?

Thusfar, Bern and Plymco have argued classical liberalism/libertarianism. interestingly, socialism, social democracy, and communism have the exact same goals. The difference is in the details and how to achieve those goals.

For instance, a libertarian or classical liberal would generally oppose a program by which an injured worker can receive compensation during recovery. A libertarian would support the Union in demanding that the company provide such compensation as a condition of the terms of employment. If the company is too small to provide that, a social democrat or a socialist would generally support using tax dollars to provide such workers' comp (althought there's always room to argue ho much for how long).

Thus, it's important not only to state your objectives but what methods you believe are best for achieving them.

 

[WillowTree]

This is a political discussion site willow.

WTF do you think we are here for?

you don't ask someone for a list what they stand for, belittle them for not providing one, then when they do start argueing about what they stand for.. moron. that's the way dishonest fucks act

 

[☭proletarian☭]

Then tell us what you stand FOR.

Not what you are against , what you are for.

as written (with only land-owning rights being able to vote and blacks being less than human with no possibility of getting rids of slavery for a time) or with the modifications the liberals have made, like women's suffrage and abolition?'

You see, you've answered nothing. All you've done is refer to what amounts to a holy text, which implies that you're unable to actually articulate any real principles.

 

[Truthmatters]

This is a political discussion site willow.

WTF do you think we are here for?

you don't ask someone for a list what they stand for, belittle them for not providing one, then when they do start argueing about what they stand for.. moron. that's the way dishonest fucks act

Leave the site if you dont wish to have your ideas challenged or discussed.