Darkwind
Diamond Member
- Jun 18, 2009
- 35,382
- 20,152
- 1,915
I answered using a picture so as not to confuse the OP with large words. When people continually take the intent and beliefs and dreams that the founders had when they wrote that document, and deny that the founders offered ways to improve upon it, they really do not offer up an argument.☭proletarian☭;1830016 said:Then tell us what you stand FOR.
Not what you are against , what you are for.
as written (with only land-owning rights being able to vote and blacks being less than human with no possibility of getting rids of slavery for a time) or with the modifications the liberals have made, like women's suffrage and abolition?'
You see, you've answered nothing. All you've done is refer to what amounts to a holy text, which implies that you're unable to actually articulate any real principles.
The argument comes when people who think they know what they are talking to when they see the U.S. Constitution and then argue for programs and other entitlements that do not belong to the Federal Government but to the states.
Be sure you understand ALL of the Constitution and where government interventionism should be applied.
I stand for the Constitution and the Bill of Rights as it was written, in the spirit it was written with all the attendant powers given to the people to take control of their destiny.
Modern day liberalism and how it is applied to our society is a disease. To oppose it is not taking a stand against things. It is taking a stand for our society.