- Oct 20, 2013
- 55,729
- 17,705
- 2,250
That's an easy question. Both are anti-protectionist, anti-populist, anti-Trump GLOBALISTS. How strange to hear someone pretending to be a conservative, spouting anti-American worker, anti-American values on the radio.
EARTH TO LEVIN, BECK, et al: Globalism does not CONSERVE American jobs, and economic strength. It does not put America's money into American pockets, to be spent in American stores (AKA the US economy), and buy things, thereby CONSERVING the strength of the American economy.
As a former business owner in America, I know that businesses need customers with money in their pockets to buy their stuff. They don't get that money by seeing their jobs going to China and Mexico. And they don't get it from domestic outsourcing either (cheap, foreign labor inside the US).
Pretty amazing to see talk show hosts agreeing with Hillary Clinton (America's # 1 outsourcer), and claiming to be conservative. Dudes: Globalism is not conservative, and it never has been. Protectionism conserves jobs, purchasing power, and economic strength, just like Eisenhower did when he deported millions of illegal aliens in 1954, with Operation Wetback.
Maybe Levin, and Beck can compare how much stock$ they have in China, Mexico, India et al, and see who comes out on top. Whoever it is, that would be the bottom of conservatism. These guys need to find a new line of work. Maybe they could hook up with Hillary's people at the Trilateral Commission, the Council on Foreign Relations, La Raza, or some other open border, globalist organizations - ie. orgs that spurn American allegiance, and the conservative, patriotic principle of America first.
Whatever they do, they should see Trump's resounding victory to be a clear statement of what American conservatives see conservatism to be, rather than some globalist brand of psuedo-conservatism, which is dead as a doornail.
EARTH TO LEVIN, BECK, et al: Globalism does not CONSERVE American jobs, and economic strength. It does not put America's money into American pockets, to be spent in American stores (AKA the US economy), and buy things, thereby CONSERVING the strength of the American economy.
As a former business owner in America, I know that businesses need customers with money in their pockets to buy their stuff. They don't get that money by seeing their jobs going to China and Mexico. And they don't get it from domestic outsourcing either (cheap, foreign labor inside the US).
Pretty amazing to see talk show hosts agreeing with Hillary Clinton (America's # 1 outsourcer), and claiming to be conservative. Dudes: Globalism is not conservative, and it never has been. Protectionism conserves jobs, purchasing power, and economic strength, just like Eisenhower did when he deported millions of illegal aliens in 1954, with Operation Wetback.
Maybe Levin, and Beck can compare how much stock$ they have in China, Mexico, India et al, and see who comes out on top. Whoever it is, that would be the bottom of conservatism. These guys need to find a new line of work. Maybe they could hook up with Hillary's people at the Trilateral Commission, the Council on Foreign Relations, La Raza, or some other open border, globalist organizations - ie. orgs that spurn American allegiance, and the conservative, patriotic principle of America first.
Whatever they do, they should see Trump's resounding victory to be a clear statement of what American conservatives see conservatism to be, rather than some globalist brand of psuedo-conservatism, which is dead as a doornail.