What Do Mark Levin and Hillary Clinton Have In Common ?

[DigitalDrifter]

Levin is a fraud and coward....Michael Savage exposed him for what he is

Explain.

 

[protectionist]

That's an easy question. Both are anti-protectionist, anti-populist, anti-Trump GLOBALISTS. How strange to hear someone pretending to be a conservative, spouting anti-American worker, anti-American values on the radio.
EARTH TO LEVIN, BECK, et al: Globalism does not CONSERVE American jobs, and economic strength. It does not put America's money into American pockets, to be spent in American stores (AKA the US economy), and buy things, thereby CONSERVING the strength of the American economy.

As a former business owner in America, I know that businesses need customers with money in their pockets to buy their stuff. They don't get that money by seeing their jobs going to China and Mexico. And they don't get it from domestic outsourcing either (cheap, foreign labor inside the US).

Pretty amazing to see talk show hosts agreeing with Hillary Clinton (America's # 1 outsourcer), and claiming to be conservative. Dudes: Globalism is not conservative, and it never has been. Protectionism conserves jobs, purchasing power, and economic strength, just like Eisenhower did when he deported millions of illegal aliens in 1954, with Operation Wetback.

Maybe Levin, and Beck can compare how much stock$ they have in China, Mexico, India et al, and see who comes out on top. Whoever it is, that would be the bottom of conservatism. These guys need to find a new line of work. Maybe they could hook up with Hillary's people at the Trilateral Commission, the Council on Foreign Relations, La Raza, or some other open border, globalist organizations - ie. orgs that spurn American allegiance, and the conservative, patriotic principle of America first.

Whatever they do, they should see Trump's resounding victory to be a clear statement of what American conservatives see conservatism to be, rather than some globalist brand of psuedo-conservatism, which is dead as a doornail.

I can see why you are a former business owner. Your ignorance is astounding. The US is still one of the largest producers of goods in the world. Thanks to global trade Americans have access to more goods than ever before and our standard of living has increased as a result.

You claim to be a conservative yet you want the government managing the economy. Protectionism is big government. And what about the tariffs and taxes America has which are the result of crony capitalism. Americans pay more than they should for sugar and milk because the government keeps prices high.

Trump's victory shows that he was less hated than Clinton. His low approval ratings show that. It also shows how much hate exists in the so-called conservative movement.

Your notion about conservatism is dead as a doornail. Millions of Americans have suffered immensely because of your globalist idiocy. It's not coming back. The idea that government is all bad, and that business should be able to do ANYTHING it wants, is pure idiocy. When American workers go back to work, spend money in America stores (AKA the US economy), thereby strengthening the economy, it will all show the truth of the validity protectionist economics, and as a cornerstone of conservatism. Nothing CONSERVES US jobs, and makes a healthy US economy better than stopping globalist recklessness.

Protectionism is pure conservatism (and always has been) whether it is protecting the American people from terrorists or free traders.

 

[The Sage of Main Street]

That's an easy question. Both are anti-protectionist, anti-populist, anti-Trump GLOBALISTS. How strange to hear someone pretending to be a conservative, spouting anti-American worker, anti-American values on the radio.
EARTH TO LEVIN, BECK, et al: Globalism does not CONSERVE American jobs, and economic strength. It does not put America's money into American pockets, to be spent in American stores (AKA the US economy), and buy things, thereby CONSERVING the strength of the American economy.

As a former business owner in America, I know that businesses need customers with money in their pockets to buy their stuff. They don't get that money by seeing their jobs going to China and Mexico. And they don't get it from domestic outsourcing either (cheap, foreign labor inside the US).

Pretty amazing to see talk show hosts agreeing with Hillary Clinton (America's # 1 outsourcer), and claiming to be conservative. Dudes: Globalism is not conservative, and it never has been. Protectionism conserves jobs, purchasing power, and economic strength, just like Eisenhower did when he deported millions of illegal aliens in 1954, with Operation Wetback.

Maybe Levin, and Beck can compare how much stock$ they have in China, Mexico, India et al, and see who comes out on top. Whoever it is, that would be the bottom of conservatism. These guys need to find a new line of work. Maybe they could hook up with Hillary's people at the Trilateral Commission, the Council on Foreign Relations, La Raza, or some other open border, globalist organizations - ie. orgs that spurn American allegiance, and the conservative, patriotic principle of America first.

Whatever they do, they should see Trump's resounding victory to be a clear statement of what American conservatives see conservatism to be, rather than some globalist brand of psuedo-conservatism, which is dead as a doornail.

Let's say you make bottled water. You purchase plastic bottles from Mexico and caps from Japan. You spend $0.70 for the bottles and $0.05 for the caps. You're contributing to the trade deficit but you're going to add $0.02 worth of water and create a product you will sell for $1.50. Now, let's say the government steps in and says... you're gonna make those bottles and caps here or you're going to pay a tariff. So now, your bottles are going to cost $1 each and caps will cost $0.25... either by paying more to produce them here or by paying more in tariffs. Add your water at $0.02 and now you have $1.27 cost and can't sell your product and make a decent profit at $1.50 anymore. There is no market for $2 bottles of water, so your company goes out of business. All the people you once employed are out of a job but you've reduced the trade deficit.

Walking Tall by Walking All Over People

Why are businessmen divinely entitled to make the highest profit possible at the expense of their fellow countrymen? What is "indecent" about the profit being 23 cents a bottle and how is it possible that such a profit would put him out of business? Your slippery logic makes it sound like he's now taking a 50 cent loss because when, like Judas, he betrayed the country, he was raking in 73 cents per bottle. Treason requires confiscation of all property and selling it to a patriot. Severe punishment is the only way to stop these GreedHead zombies.

 

[Boss]

Walking Tall by Walking All Over People

Why are businessmen divinely entitled to make the highest profit possible at the expense of their fellow countrymen? What is "indecent" about the profit being 23 cents a bottle and how is it possible that such a profit would put him out of business? Your slippery logic makes it sound like he's now taking a 50 cent loss because when, like Judas, he betrayed the country, he was raking in 73 cents per bottle. Treason requires confiscation of all property and selling it to a patriot. Severe punishment is the only way to stop these GreedHead zombies.

There is no room for greed in a true free market capitalist system. I've explained this before. When you have free market competition, a greedy free market capitalist soon discovers a less greedy free market capitalists is willing to take his market share...so the greedy free market capitalist simply doesn't last very long.

The problem is when capitalism colludes with government that has too much power. That's corporatism and it's a big problem. The solution is to limit the power of government so there is nothing to exploit or lobby for.

You're asking about my bottled water example and naively believing there is a 23 cent profit because the cost of materials is the only cost of business you're counting. You don't seem to comprehend there are thousands of expenses someone has to pay. All free market capitalists are in business to make profit, that's how they remain in business.

No one is ever "walked over" in a free market system. When you go to the store, is someone there with a gun to your head making you purchase their products? You always have the voluntary choice whether to do business with any free market capitalist.

 

[HereWeGoAgain]

That's an easy question. Both are anti-protectionist, anti-populist, anti-Trump GLOBALISTS. How strange to hear someone pretending to be a conservative, spouting anti-American worker, anti-American values on the radio.
EARTH TO LEVIN, BECK, et al: Globalism does not CONSERVE American jobs, and economic strength. It does not put America's money into American pockets, to be spent in American stores (AKA the US economy), and buy things, thereby CONSERVING the strength of the American economy.

As a former business owner in America, I know that businesses need customers with money in their pockets to buy their stuff. They don't get that money by seeing their jobs going to China and Mexico. And they don't get it from domestic outsourcing either (cheap, foreign labor inside the US).

Pretty amazing to see talk show hosts agreeing with Hillary Clinton (America's # 1 outsourcer), and claiming to be conservative. Dudes: Globalism is not conservative, and it never has been. Protectionism conserves jobs, purchasing power, and economic strength, just like Eisenhower did when he deported millions of illegal aliens in 1954, with Operation Wetback.

Maybe Levin, and Beck can compare how much stock$ they have in China, Mexico, India et al, and see who comes out on top. Whoever it is, that would be the bottom of conservatism. These guys need to find a new line of work. Maybe they could hook up with Hillary's people at the Trilateral Commission, the Council on Foreign Relations, La Raza, or some other open border, globalist organizations - ie. orgs that spurn American allegiance, and the conservative, patriotic principle of America first.

Whatever they do, they should see Trump's resounding victory to be a clear statement of what American conservatives see conservatism to be, rather than some globalist brand of psuedo-conservatism, which is dead as a doornail.

I was going to say they both have a voice that makes me want to jam ice picks into my ears.....

 

[owebo]

That's an easy question. Both are anti-protectionist, anti-populist, anti-Trump GLOBALISTS. How strange to hear someone pretending to be a conservative, spouting anti-American worker, anti-American values on the radio.
EARTH TO LEVIN, BECK, et al: Globalism does not CONSERVE American jobs, and economic strength. It does not put America's money into American pockets, to be spent in American stores (AKA the US economy), and buy things, thereby CONSERVING the strength of the American economy.

As a former business owner in America, I know that businesses need customers with money in their pockets to buy their stuff. They don't get that money by seeing their jobs going to China and Mexico. And they don't get it from domestic outsourcing either (cheap, foreign labor inside the US).

Pretty amazing to see talk show hosts agreeing with Hillary Clinton (America's # 1 outsourcer), and claiming to be conservative. Dudes: Globalism is not conservative, and it never has been. Protectionism conserves jobs, purchasing power, and economic strength, just like Eisenhower did when he deported millions of illegal aliens in 1954, with Operation Wetback.

Maybe Levin, and Beck can compare how much stock$ they have in China, Mexico, India et al, and see who comes out on top. Whoever it is, that would be the bottom of conservatism. These guys need to find a new line of work. Maybe they could hook up with Hillary's people at the Trilateral Commission, the Council on Foreign Relations, La Raza, or some other open border, globalist organizations - ie. orgs that spurn American allegiance, and the conservative, patriotic principle of America first.

Whatever they do, they should see Trump's resounding victory to be a clear statement of what American conservatives see conservatism to be, rather than some globalist brand of psuedo-conservatism, which is dead as a doornail.

Except levin isn't a fascist......

 

[TomParks]

That's an easy question. Both are anti-protectionist, anti-populist, anti-Trump GLOBALISTS. How strange to hear someone pretending to be a conservative, spouting anti-American worker, anti-American values on the radio.
EARTH TO LEVIN, BECK, et al: Globalism does not CONSERVE American jobs, and economic strength. It does not put America's money into American pockets, to be spent in American stores (AKA the US economy), and buy things, thereby CONSERVING the strength of the American economy.

As a former business owner in America, I know that businesses need customers with money in their pockets to buy their stuff. They don't get that money by seeing their jobs going to China and Mexico. And they don't get it from domestic outsourcing either (cheap, foreign labor inside the US).

Pretty amazing to see talk show hosts agreeing with Hillary Clinton (America's # 1 outsourcer), and claiming to be conservative. Dudes: Globalism is not conservative, and it never has been. Protectionism conserves jobs, purchasing power, and economic strength, just like Eisenhower did when he deported millions of illegal aliens in 1954, with Operation Wetback.

Maybe Levin, and Beck can compare how much stock$ they have in China, Mexico, India et al, and see who comes out on top. Whoever it is, that would be the bottom of conservatism. These guys need to find a new line of work. Maybe they could hook up with Hillary's people at the Trilateral Commission, the Council on Foreign Relations, La Raza, or some other open border, globalist organizations - ie. orgs that spurn American allegiance, and the conservative, patriotic principle of America first.

Whatever they do, they should see Trump's resounding victory to be a clear statement of what American conservatives see conservatism to be, rather than some globalist brand of psuedo-conservatism, which is dead as a doornail.

Except levin isn't a fascist......

No, but he is a snake.....I was reading he fired Mark Steyn from his CRTV online network and Steyn has filed a lawsuit.

Levin TV fires Mark Steyn

 

[Rob37]

Both are people who's opinions I don't give a fuck about

Goddamn! Grandpa, you are one grumpy bastard. I love it!

 

[BluesLegend]

Both cried like a bitch on election night.

 

[The Original Tree]

Did Levine get a cut of The $145 Million Russia gave to Hillary Clinton for selling them our Uranium?

 

[boedicca]

Neither one of them are president?

I was going to suggest that they are both Carbon Based Lifeforms....but in hiLIARy's case, that is somewhat questionable.

 

[The Sage of Main Street]

Walking Tall by Walking All Over People

Why are businessmen divinely entitled to make the highest profit possible at the expense of their fellow countrymen? What is "indecent" about the profit being 23 cents a bottle and how is it possible that such a profit would put him out of business? Your slippery logic makes it sound like he's now taking a 50 cent loss because when, like Judas, he betrayed the country, he was raking in 73 cents per bottle. Treason requires confiscation of all property and selling it to a patriot. Severe punishment is the only way to stop these GreedHead zombies.

There is no room for greed in a true free market capitalist system. I've explained this before. When you have free market competition, a greedy free market capitalist soon discovers a less greedy free market capitalists is willing to take his market share...so the greedy free market capitalist simply doesn't last very long.

The problem is when capitalism colludes with government that has too much power. That's corporatism and it's a big problem. The solution is to limit the power of government so there is nothing to exploit or lobby for.

You're asking about my bottled water example and naively believing there is a 23 cent profit because the cost of materials is the only cost of business you're counting. You don't seem to comprehend there are thousands of expenses someone has to pay. All free market capitalists are in business to make profit, that's how they remain in business.

No one is ever "walked over" in a free market system. When you go to the store, is someone there with a gun to your head making you purchase their products? You always have the voluntary choice whether to do business with any free market capitalist.

Aynal-Retentive Lizardtarians

There is always a way to cheat the corrections of your imaginary free market. If someone overcharges, his competitors can take advantage of that by raising their own prices. If the system collapses, its Libretardian flacks can try to escape the public's revenge by making up the excuse that it was "Corporatism, not Capitalism." Communism is state Capitalism, Capitalism is Communism for the rich.

If an unmotivating educational system doesn't produce enough skilled workers, the cheaters can import foreign workers instead of changing the indentured-servitude system into highly paid training.

 

[Boss]

There is always a way to cheat the corrections of your imaginary free market. If someone overcharges, his competitors can take advantage of that by raising their own prices.

Except this contradicts simple logic and reason. There is no advantage gained in raising your price to that of your over-charging competitor. You can't increase your market share that way because there is no motivation for the consumer. Competition is about gaining market share.

However, in a free market, you are perfectly free to attempt this parasitic strategy, in fact, several free market competitors may get together and agree on a price they will all sell at regardless of supply and demand or profit margins. This is why I often talk about the Free Market SYSTEM. A system has components and a "free market system" contains the components of free market capitalism and several other things. One of those things is often overlooked by Marxist-Socialists.... Free Enterprise. In a Free Market SYSTEM we have Free Enterprise! What that meas is, a group of other competitors come along and ask... Why pay $5 for your widgets from that Widget Coalition? OUR new coalition sells them for much less, everyday!

I caught your backhanded slap about the free market being imaginary. It's not worthy of reply because MOST rational people, whether they live here and experience this or not, understand that it's real and it built the greatest and most powerful nation in the world. Of course, your tired old Socialist argument is, the "free market" is not pure. But nothing is ever pure. There are restrictions on our free market, it's not "unbridled" as so many opponents like to whine about. The SYSTEM contains another component, The Constitution. Again, Free Markets are part of the Free Market System. The concept here is not to keep them pure but to try and keep them as free as possible.

 

[The Sage of Main Street]

There is always a way to cheat the corrections of your imaginary free market. If someone overcharges, his competitors can take advantage of that by raising their own prices.

Except this contradicts simple logic and reason. There is no advantage gained in raising your price to that of your over-charging competitor. You can't increase your market share that way because there is no motivation for the consumer. Competition is about gaining market share.

However, in a free market, you are perfectly free to attempt this parasitic strategy, in fact, several free market competitors may get together and agree on a price they will all sell at regardless of supply and demand or profit margins. This is why I often talk about the Free Market SYSTEM. A system has components and a "free market system" contains the components of free market capitalism and several other things. One of those things is often overlooked by Marxist-Socialists.... Free Enterprise. In a Free Market SYSTEM we have Free Enterprise! What that meas is, a group of other competitors come along and ask... Why pay $5 for your widgets from that Widget Coalition? OUR new coalition sells them for much less, everyday!

I caught your backhanded slap about the free market being imaginary. It's not worthy of reply because MOST rational people, whether they live here and experience this or not, understand that it's real and it built the greatest and most powerful nation in the world. Of course, your tired old Socialist argument is, the "free market" is not pure. But nothing is ever pure. There are restrictions on our free market, it's not "unbridled" as so many opponents like to whine about. The SYSTEM contains another component, The Constitution. Again, Free Markets are part of the Free Market System. The concept here is not to keep them pure but to try to keep them as free as possible

Socialists Are Spoiled Brats Who Hate Their Capitalist Fathers

You are desperately trying to push a self-serving plutocratic fantasy. Whether they push Capitalism or Socialism, utopian fanatics share the same power-hungry character trait.

 

[Boss]

Socialists Are Spoiled Brats Who Hate Their Capitalist Fathers

You are desperately trying to push a self-serving plutocratic fantasy. Whether they push Capitalism or Socialism, utopian fanatics share the same power-hungry character trait.

Awww.. I this where "the sage" realizes he's been schooled and now must cleverly retreat to sneering sarcastic cynicism? Nice move, butterfly, but it won't save you here.

I know it's a problem.... All the wealth and prosperity free market systems produce. Lifting millions out of poverty, creating more millionaires and billionaires than any system ever devised by man, achieving levels of power on a scale the world has never known. It's such a massive burden to bear, having to constantly excuse and defend our enormous success.

If only we could lose more, fail more and cause mass starvation or genocide at the hands of a tyrant... then and only then could we stand shoulder square with Socialism. How dare we brag about all our wealthy, self-made millionaires and billionaires.