What A White America Would Mean

No more wars for jews

Jews fight our own wars, thank you very much ... and we actually manage to win ours.

Israeli-Soldiers-Jerusalem-1967-890x400.jpg


4000f918093c82a0a391f82fad248432.jpg
 
Sadly , many Whites have perished for or by the tribe . Yahweh being the First.

Again , if the joos wish an ethno state ; they need to defend themselves and not rely on Whites as in previous WWars.
 
Diversity? Leftist nonsense.

There is no tangible benefit to diversity - much the contrary. Would you rather be treated in a hospital that prides itself in its "diversity" or one that prides itself in employing only the best doctors, regardless of gender, race, or ethnicity? Same for a private company. Would you want to work for a company that prides itself on promoting a diverse group of managers, or one that prides itself on being a pure meritocracy?

Same for a school. There is not a single, measurable academic outcome that is improved by campaigns to increase diversity. Who benefits when AP classes are populated by minorities who don't actually meet the criteria to be in them?

What happens to elite universities when they start admitting significant numbers of unqualified "minority" students? They have to start offering remedial classes to incoming Freshmen. They have to offer courses and even majors that have low academic rigor, because if they don't then the minorities they have admitted will all start failing. Is the school any "better" because of the presence of minorities who can't really cut it? Does it even help those who have been admitted on that basis? They are not so stupid as not to realize that they are at the bottom of the academic barrel.

White people run the entire gamut from brilliant to retarded, virtuous to diabolical. But look around the world at countries that heretofore had ethnic uniformity and now have "diversity." Look at Scandanavia, Germany, France, and to a lesser extent Great Britain. In all cases, their societies and cultures have suffered with the influx of outsiders who are - broadly speaking - intellectually and culturally inferior.

As for "White America," there is not now and never could be such a country. But it is interesting to imagine how the U.S. would allofasudden look a hell of a lot better in international comparisons if only white people were counted, and the averages were not polluted by "minorities" who are less intelligent, less diligent, culturally deficient, and disproportionately criminal.
 
Diversity? Leftist nonsense.

There is no tangible benefit to diversity - much the contrary. Would you rather be treated in a hospital that prides itself in its "diversity" or one that prides itself in employing only the best doctors, regardless of gender, race, or ethnicity? Same for a private company. Would you want to work for a company that prides itself on promoting a diverse group of managers, or one that prides itself on being a pure meritocracy?

Same for a school. There is not a single, measurable academic outcome that is improved by campaigns to increase diversity. Who benefits when AP classes are populated by minorities who don't actually meet the criteria to be in them?

What happens to elite universities when they start admitting significant numbers of unqualified "minority" students? They have to start offering remedial classes to incoming Freshmen. They have to offer courses and even majors that have low academic rigor, because if they don't then the minorities they have admitted will all start failing. Is the school any "better" because of the presence of minorities who can't really cut it? Does it even help those who have been admitted on that basis? They are not so stupid as not to realize that they are at the bottom of the academic barrel.

White people run the entire gamut from brilliant to retarded, virtuous to diabolical. But look around the world at countries that heretofore had ethnic uniformity and now have "diversity." Look at Scandanavia, Germany, France, and to a lesser extent Great Britain. In all cases, their societies and cultures have suffered with the influx of outsiders who are - broadly speaking - intellectually and culturally inferior.

As for "White America," there is not now and never could be such a country. But it is interesting to imagine how the U.S. would allofasudden look a hell of a lot better in international comparisons if only white people were counted, and the averages were not polluted by "minorities" who are less intelligent, less diligent, culturally deficient, and disproportionately criminal.

White superiority, it's so obvious.

rcc-45a7b80b48511Hillbillies2.jpg
 
for today's Leftists, "race" means anything you want it to mean.

Don't like Mexicans? You are a "racist"!

Don't like Muslims? You are a "racist"!

Don't like Jews? You are a "racist"!

Immigrants? "Racist'!

Don't like WASP's?

Well, maybe then you are just a bigot.
 
Diversity? Leftist nonsense.

There is no tangible benefit to diversity - much the contrary. Would you rather be treated in a hospital that prides itself in its "diversity" or one that prides itself in employing only the best doctors, regardless of gender, race, or ethnicity? Same for a private company. Would you want to work for a company that prides itself on promoting a diverse group of managers, or one that prides itself on being a pure meritocracy?

Same for a school. There is not a single, measurable academic outcome that is improved by campaigns to increase diversity. Who benefits when AP classes are populated by minorities who don't actually meet the criteria to be in them?

What happens to elite universities when they start admitting significant numbers of unqualified "minority" students? They have to start offering remedial classes to incoming Freshmen. They have to offer courses and even majors that have low academic rigor, because if they don't then the minorities they have admitted will all start failing. Is the school any "better" because of the presence of minorities who can't really cut it? Does it even help those who have been admitted on that basis? They are not so stupid as not to realize that they are at the bottom of the academic barrel.

White people run the entire gamut from brilliant to retarded, virtuous to diabolical. But look around the world at countries that heretofore had ethnic uniformity and now have "diversity." Look at Scandanavia, Germany, France, and to a lesser extent Great Britain. In all cases, their societies and cultures have suffered with the influx of outsiders who are - broadly speaking - intellectually and culturally inferior.

As for "White America," there is not now and never could be such a country. But it is interesting to imagine how the U.S. would allofasudden look a hell of a lot better in international comparisons if only white people were counted, and the averages were not polluted by "minorities" who are less intelligent, less diligent, culturally deficient, and disproportionately criminal.
The left do not want diversity. They want uniformity of thought. That is their perverted vision of equality. I actually went looking for racial breakdowns of European countries. Surprising they don't publish that data, lol. The closest I got was this.

Countries Compared by People > Ethnic groups. International Statistics at NationMaster.com

America on the other hand does publish that data.

upload_2017-2-6_19-27-54.jpeg
 
Diversity? Leftist nonsense.

There is no tangible benefit to diversity - much the contrary. Would you rather be treated in a hospital that prides itself in its "diversity" or one that prides itself in employing only the best doctors, regardless of gender, race, or ethnicity? Same for a private company. Would you want to work for a company that prides itself on promoting a diverse group of managers, or one that prides itself on being a pure meritocracy?

Same for a school. There is not a single, measurable academic outcome that is improved by campaigns to increase diversity. Who benefits when AP classes are populated by minorities who don't actually meet the criteria to be in them?

What happens to elite universities when they start admitting significant numbers of unqualified "minority" students? They have to start offering remedial classes to incoming Freshmen. They have to offer courses and even majors that have low academic rigor, because if they don't then the minorities they have admitted will all start failing. Is the school any "better" because of the presence of minorities who can't really cut it? Does it even help those who have been admitted on that basis? They are not so stupid as not to realize that they are at the bottom of the academic barrel.

White people run the entire gamut from brilliant to retarded, virtuous to diabolical. But look around the world at countries that heretofore had ethnic uniformity and now have "diversity." Look at Scandanavia, Germany, France, and to a lesser extent Great Britain. In all cases, their societies and cultures have suffered with the influx of outsiders who are - broadly speaking - intellectually and culturally inferior.

As for "White America," there is not now and never could be such a country. But it is interesting to imagine how the U.S. would allofasudden look a hell of a lot better in international comparisons if only white people were counted, and the averages were not polluted by "minorities" who are less intelligent, less diligent, culturally deficient, and disproportionately criminal.
You are wrong about diversity. All one has to do is to study the important role that diversity plays in nature to understand the error of your statement.
 
In the 80s lots of people wanted a white America.

Cocaine.jpg

I can think of worse vises.
vKaRPlzK.jpeg
Me too..........

160630-kkk-after-150-embed-2.jpg

That's quite an old picture. Now we have buildings burning in Furgusun and Baltimore, liquor stores and pharmacies looted, and people getting killed in the streets.
So nothing's changed..... Got it. :thup:
You mean besides the fact that they voluntarily stay on the plantation now?
 
In the 80s lots of people wanted a white America.

Cocaine.jpg

I can think of worse vises.
vKaRPlzK.jpeg
Me too..........

160630-kkk-after-150-embed-2.jpg

That's quite an old picture. Now we have buildings burning in Furgusun and Baltimore, liquor stores and pharmacies looted, and people getting killed in the streets.
So nothing's changed..... Got it. :thup:
You mean besides the fact that they voluntarily stay on the plantation now?
:eusa_eh:
 
A Firey Cross ;to light the Christian Soul. Crosses are lit rather than burned. To light the Cross on other than private Klan property is forbidden through Klankraft. One will see the Lit Cross is also the sign of the Methodist church as well. First emulated by Scottish Christians . FGRN.
 
A Firey Cross ;to light the Christian Soul. Crosses are lit rather than burned. To light the Cross on other than private Klan property is forbidden through Klankraft. One will see the Lit Cross is also the sign of the Methodist church as well. First emulated by Scottish Christians . FGRN.
Yeah, I know. To fight the enemy one must understand the enemy....... Other than that who the fuck cares?
 

Forum List

Back
Top