Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
No one is clear on WHO "JOHN" of the NT was-------he wrote in GREEK and long after Jesus died. Theologians agree that 'JOHN' was "several people" An issue which fascinates me is the statement attributed to Jesus "YOU ARE TRYING TO KILL ME"---------if DA JOOOOS wanted to kill Jesus-----what was stopping them? The romans would not have cared
Obviously this was wrote by Hellenistic Jews, how could they make such a grave error. We all know the exodus was not based on truth as Israel loves to claim. Don't try and change the subject matter.
It was HISTORICALLY written decades after Jesus died -----by unknown persons
COLLECTIVELY called "JOHN" The writings of the "JOHNS" conform
to the concepts of the ROMAN EMPEROR-----Constantine. There is no
possible way to IDENTIFY unknown persons as "OBVIOUSLY HELLENISTIC JEWS" ---------but it is possible that some or most or all of them were
Hellenistic jews-----------as was PAUL (actually a convert greek) SO? what
is your point? As to the claim "we all know that exodus was not based on
truth" -------is an utterly idiotic statement. For millennia people believed that
the ODYSSEY was not based on "truth" ------until HEINRICH SCHLIEMANN---found the ruins of TROY. There is clear evidence that jews migrated to Egypt and---
fairly suddenly LEFT -----the lack of evidence that some "talking burning bush"
happened somewhere------is a moot point. BUDDHA was a real person too
Few Hebrews even spoke Hebrew in Jesus's day, it was a religious language. Most didn't have any OT or Torah, they got their teachings from the elders who taught the Talmud composed in Babylon. There was no exodus.
Aramaic was the language of the street. Jews had significant levels of literacy in
Hebrew at that time, as did Jesus if the accounts of his youth in the NT are true.
The Aramaic that jews SPOKE at that time was an Hebraized form or Aramaic----written in the standard Hebrew script of the time and containing lots of Hebrew words and expressions and poetic allusions.
Unlike you-------jews were GENERALLY literate at that time and did leave significant, still extant, writings. The dead sea scrolls are written to a large extent in standard modern Hebrew------even I can stumble thru lots of it, Talmud was written both in Babylon and in Israel-----
Did your catechism whore actually tell you that the NT account of Jesus is a BIG LIE?-------Jesus READ in the synagogue------he did not READ in French, Greek or Latin or Aramaic-----he READ ---that is ---PERFORMED THE READING,
IN HEBREW----not from the "catechism" or SUPER MAN comics------he READ parts of the torah scroll and-----some other stuff from -----other writings----like PSALMS , Prophets----etc. Public reading of the TORAH and--the other stuff was MANDATORY at that time---for ALL MALES OVER THE AGE OF 13------quite a horror if anyone could not handle it-----a social failure for his WHOLE COMMUNITY.
Persons who dismiss the historic basis of scriptural writings are
very dim. Even the ODYSSEY is based on historic realities and real events.
Jesus liked to quote HILLEL-----he was a Talmudist of the Israel part who died
just about the time that ---according to the NT----Jesus was born. Since Hebraized Aramaic was the language of the street at that time and the Talmud is
commentary on the torah------it was written in ARAMAIC----mostly.-----so EVERYONE ---even the most uneducated----could understand it. Had you lived
in "JUDEA" at that time------you would probably have known how to speak in
Aramaic-----but not write
No they weren't. The got the alphabet from Phoenicians and Canaanites, they also spoke Canaanite language. The exodus is not historic and its time to admit it.
Actually, this was a very bold lie these folks were speaking. At that very time they were in bondage under Roman rule.
They were under Roman rule but not in bondage. They were allowed freedom of movement and were not slaves.
Depends upon one's definition of freedom. They were a conquered people and under Roman rule and government.
We're all under rules, either democrat or republican. Before Rome, Greeks were in control and before them Persians . There were treated well under all 3, except for when they rebelled.
I grew up in a USA town full of jerks like you-------in the 50s and 60s they INSISTED that DA NIGRAS were treated well in the southern plantations unless they
WERE UPPITY AND UNGRATEFUL . Actually, the Persians never ruled
Judea------the greeks were in an out a bit but gave up------the romans were the
barbarians that liked to feed people to lions for lunch. The whole area was in
a constant state of warfare from EGYPT THRU MESOPOTAMIA-----onto Greece
and into PERSIA----for millennia-------you should learn some history
They had Rome do the dirty deed as they were not allowed.or did they just forget? Hard thing to forget. Maybe they didn't understand Jesus's meant they were a slave to sin.
John 8:33-40King James Version (KJV)
33 They answered him, We be Abraham's seed, and were never in bondage to any man: how sayest thou, Ye shall be made free?
(apparently they always thought of themselves as free)
she is still quoting the catechism whore
No that is the new testament wrote by jews. What do you think now, they were never taught about the exodus or just forgot their history of 430 years of slavery in Egypt.
No one is clear on WHO "JOHN" of the NT was-------he wrote in GREEK and long after Jesus died. Theologians agree that 'JOHN' was "several people" An issue which fascinates me is the statement attributed to Jesus "YOU ARE TRYING TO KILL ME"---------if DA JOOOOS wanted to kill Jesus-----what was stopping them? The romans would not have cared
Penelope does not seem to know why DA JOOOS did not kill Jesus
Actually, this was a very bold lie these folks were speaking. At that very time they were in bondage under Roman rule.
They were under Roman rule but not in bondage. They were allowed freedom of movement and were not slaves.
Depends upon one's definition of freedom. They were a conquered people and under Roman rule and government.
We're all under rules, either democrat or republican. Before Rome, Greeks were in control and before them Persians . There were treated well under all 3, except for when they rebelled.
I grew up in a USA town full of jerks like you-------in the 50s and 60s they INSISTED that DA NIGRAS were treated well in the southern plantations unless they
WERE UPPITY AND UNGRATEFUL . Actually, the Persians never ruled
Judea------the greeks were in an out a bit but gave up------the romans were the
barbarians that liked to feed people to lions for lunch. The whole area was in
a constant state of warfare from EGYPT THRU MESOPOTAMIA-----onto Greece
and into PERSIA----for millennia-------you should learn some history
No the Romans were actually very holy people. They never kicked the Hebrews out of Palestine either. The Greeks were the smart ones. King Cyrus comes to mind as the Persian King who captured Babylon and allowed Jews to return to Judah , another sugar daddy of the Hebrews. Yes there is a lot of history there, everyone fighting for the coastline. There was never a time when Hebrews controlled Israel as it is today, its all fantasy, as we know the tribes fought amongst themselves.
Obviously this was wrote by Hellenistic Jews, how could they make such a grave error. We all know the exodus was not based on truth as Israel loves to claim. Don't try and change the subject matter.
It was HISTORICALLY written decades after Jesus died -----by unknown persons
COLLECTIVELY called "JOHN" The writings of the "JOHNS" conform
to the concepts of the ROMAN EMPEROR-----Constantine. There is no
possible way to IDENTIFY unknown persons as "OBVIOUSLY HELLENISTIC JEWS" ---------but it is possible that some or most or all of them were
Hellenistic jews-----------as was PAUL (actually a convert greek) SO? what
is your point? As to the claim "we all know that exodus was not based on
truth" -------is an utterly idiotic statement. For millennia people believed that
the ODYSSEY was not based on "truth" ------until HEINRICH SCHLIEMANN---found the ruins of TROY. There is clear evidence that jews migrated to Egypt and---
fairly suddenly LEFT -----the lack of evidence that some "talking burning bush"
happened somewhere------is a moot point. BUDDHA was a real person too
Few Hebrews even spoke Hebrew in Jesus's day, it was a religious language. Most didn't have any OT or Torah, they got their teachings from the elders who taught the Talmud composed in Babylon. There was no exodus.
Aramaic was the language of the street. Jews had significant levels of literacy in
Hebrew at that time, as did Jesus if the accounts of his youth in the NT are true.
The Aramaic that jews SPOKE at that time was an Hebraized form or Aramaic----written in the standard Hebrew script of the time and containing lots of Hebrew words and expressions and poetic allusions.
Unlike you-------jews were GENERALLY literate at that time and did leave significant, still extant, writings. The dead sea scrolls are written to a large extent in standard modern Hebrew------even I can stumble thru lots of it, Talmud was written both in Babylon and in Israel-----
Did your catechism whore actually tell you that the NT account of Jesus is a BIG LIE?-------Jesus READ in the synagogue------he did not READ in French, Greek or Latin or Aramaic-----he READ ---that is ---PERFORMED THE READING,
IN HEBREW----not from the "catechism" or SUPER MAN comics------he READ parts of the torah scroll and-----some other stuff from -----other writings----like PSALMS , Prophets----etc. Public reading of the TORAH and--the other stuff was MANDATORY at that time---for ALL MALES OVER THE AGE OF 13------quite a horror if anyone could not handle it-----a social failure for his WHOLE COMMUNITY.
Persons who dismiss the historic basis of scriptural writings are
very dim. Even the ODYSSEY is based on historic realities and real events.
Jesus liked to quote HILLEL-----he was a Talmudist of the Israel part who died
just about the time that ---according to the NT----Jesus was born. Since Hebraized Aramaic was the language of the street at that time and the Talmud is
commentary on the torah------it was written in ARAMAIC----mostly.-----so EVERYONE ---even the most uneducated----could understand it. Had you lived
in "JUDEA" at that time------you would probably have known how to speak in
Aramaic-----but not write
No they weren't. The got the alphabet from Phoenicians and Canaanites, they also spoke Canaanite language. The exodus is not historic and its time to admit it.
what is CANAANITE LANGUAGE------what is CANAAN? There is NO DOUBT that jews lived back then for a time IN EGYPT as a community and then ABRUPTLY LEFT------that is the HISTORIC EXODUS ---------and not at all a singular story for the time-----LOTS OF PEOPLES migrated about because of
incessant wars and issues of climate and famine
They had Rome do the dirty deed as they were not allowed.
she is still quoting the catechism whore
No that is the new testament wrote by jews. What do you think now, they were never taught about the exodus or just forgot their history of 430 years of slavery in Egypt.
No one is clear on WHO "JOHN" of the NT was-------he wrote in GREEK and long after Jesus died. Theologians agree that 'JOHN' was "several people" An issue which fascinates me is the statement attributed to Jesus "YOU ARE TRYING TO KILL ME"---------if DA JOOOOS wanted to kill Jesus-----what was stopping them? The romans would not have cared
Penelope does not seem to know why DA JOOOS did not kill Jesus
They were under Roman rule but not in bondage. They were allowed freedom of movement and were not slaves.
Depends upon one's definition of freedom. They were a conquered people and under Roman rule and government.
We're all under rules, either democrat or republican. Before Rome, Greeks were in control and before them Persians . There were treated well under all 3, except for when they rebelled.
I grew up in a USA town full of jerks like you-------in the 50s and 60s they INSISTED that DA NIGRAS were treated well in the southern plantations unless they
WERE UPPITY AND UNGRATEFUL . Actually, the Persians never ruled
Judea------the greeks were in an out a bit but gave up------the romans were the
barbarians that liked to feed people to lions for lunch. The whole area was in
a constant state of warfare from EGYPT THRU MESOPOTAMIA-----onto Greece
and into PERSIA----for millennia-------you should learn some history
No the Romans were actually very holy people. They never kicked the Hebrews out of Palestine either. The Greeks were the smart ones. King Cyrus comes to mind as the Persian King who captured Babylon and allowed Jews to return to Judah , another sugar daddy of the Hebrews. Yes there is a lot of history there, everyone fighting for the coastline. There was never a time when Hebrews controlled Israel as it is today, its all fantasy, as we know the tribes fought amongst themselves.
who is "WE" you and your fellow SLUTS?---------"there was never a time when
Hebrews controlled Israel as it is today"---<<<<< what a brilliant STATEMENT---so true------not as much VEHICULAR TRAFFIC on the streets of Jerusalem and lots of
places to park the donkey. No airport. BUT DALLAS REMAINS UNCHANGED FOR EONS, No one should be surprised that PENELOPE adores people who entertained their sluts by bringing them to BIG TIME ENTERTAINMENT-----grown men forced to fight each other to the death followed by LIONS eating men, women and children to the ORGIASTIC JOY OF HOLY ROMAN "women"
It was HISTORICALLY written decades after Jesus died -----by unknown persons
COLLECTIVELY called "JOHN" The writings of the "JOHNS" conform
to the concepts of the ROMAN EMPEROR-----Constantine. There is no
possible way to IDENTIFY unknown persons as "OBVIOUSLY HELLENISTIC JEWS" ---------but it is possible that some or most or all of them were
Hellenistic jews-----------as was PAUL (actually a convert greek) SO? what
is your point? As to the claim "we all know that exodus was not based on
truth" -------is an utterly idiotic statement. For millennia people believed that
the ODYSSEY was not based on "truth" ------until HEINRICH SCHLIEMANN---found the ruins of TROY. There is clear evidence that jews migrated to Egypt and---
fairly suddenly LEFT -----the lack of evidence that some "talking burning bush"
happened somewhere------is a moot point. BUDDHA was a real person too
Few Hebrews even spoke Hebrew in Jesus's day, it was a religious language. Most didn't have any OT or Torah, they got their teachings from the elders who taught the Talmud composed in Babylon. There was no exodus.
Aramaic was the language of the street. Jews had significant levels of literacy in
Hebrew at that time, as did Jesus if the accounts of his youth in the NT are true.
The Aramaic that jews SPOKE at that time was an Hebraized form or Aramaic----written in the standard Hebrew script of the time and containing lots of Hebrew words and expressions and poetic allusions.
Unlike you-------jews were GENERALLY literate at that time and did leave significant, still extant, writings. The dead sea scrolls are written to a large extent in standard modern Hebrew------even I can stumble thru lots of it, Talmud was written both in Babylon and in Israel-----
Did your catechism whore actually tell you that the NT account of Jesus is a BIG LIE?-------Jesus READ in the synagogue------he did not READ in French, Greek or Latin or Aramaic-----he READ ---that is ---PERFORMED THE READING,
IN HEBREW----not from the "catechism" or SUPER MAN comics------he READ parts of the torah scroll and-----some other stuff from -----other writings----like PSALMS , Prophets----etc. Public reading of the TORAH and--the other stuff was MANDATORY at that time---for ALL MALES OVER THE AGE OF 13------quite a horror if anyone could not handle it-----a social failure for his WHOLE COMMUNITY.
Persons who dismiss the historic basis of scriptural writings are
very dim. Even the ODYSSEY is based on historic realities and real events.
Jesus liked to quote HILLEL-----he was a Talmudist of the Israel part who died
just about the time that ---according to the NT----Jesus was born. Since Hebraized Aramaic was the language of the street at that time and the Talmud is
commentary on the torah------it was written in ARAMAIC----mostly.-----so EVERYONE ---even the most uneducated----could understand it. Had you lived
in "JUDEA" at that time------you would probably have known how to speak in
Aramaic-----but not write
No they weren't. The got the alphabet from Phoenicians and Canaanites, they also spoke Canaanite language. The exodus is not historic and its time to admit it.
what is CANAANITE LANGUAGE------what is CANAAN? There is NO DOUBT that jews lived back then for a time IN EGYPT as a community and then ABRUPTLY LEFT------that is the HISTORIC EXODUS ---------and not at all a singular story for the time-----LOTS OF PEOPLES migrated about because of
incessant wars and issues of climate and famine
Egyptian Empire was in Gaza and encompassed much of Palestine. I think Moses got kicked out along with the lepers and they stayed in the desert just south of Gaza until they were cleansed and then entered in again from the east of the Jordan river. Such is the need for a new set of laws, food laws and cleanliness laws. Its hard to set up a new society. (I mean if there was a Moses, or a man like Moses)
Like Jesus said its not what goes into the mouth that makes one unclean but what comes out. They worked tirelessly keeping dishes separated , they had no refrigeration. Leprosy was a huge thing in those days. Hey I just think the story is nice, but its not the truth and I think the time has come for truth , not this imaginary history. Everyone except the Jews were bad in the OT , and that is not the case.
Depends upon one's definition of freedom. They were a conquered people and under Roman rule and government.
We're all under rules, either democrat or republican. Before Rome, Greeks were in control and before them Persians . There were treated well under all 3, except for when they rebelled.
I grew up in a USA town full of jerks like you-------in the 50s and 60s they INSISTED that DA NIGRAS were treated well in the southern plantations unless they
WERE UPPITY AND UNGRATEFUL . Actually, the Persians never ruled
Judea------the greeks were in an out a bit but gave up------the romans were the
barbarians that liked to feed people to lions for lunch. The whole area was in
a constant state of warfare from EGYPT THRU MESOPOTAMIA-----onto Greece
and into PERSIA----for millennia-------you should learn some history
No the Romans were actually very holy people. They never kicked the Hebrews out of Palestine either. The Greeks were the smart ones. King Cyrus comes to mind as the Persian King who captured Babylon and allowed Jews to return to Judah , another sugar daddy of the Hebrews. Yes there is a lot of history there, everyone fighting for the coastline. There was never a time when Hebrews controlled Israel as it is today, its all fantasy, as we know the tribes fought amongst themselves.
who is "WE" you and your fellow SLUTS?---------"there was never a time when
Hebrews controlled Israel as it is today"---<<<<< what a brilliant STATEMENT---so true------not as much VEHICULAR TRAFFIC on the streets of Jerusalem and lots of
places to park the donkey. No airport. BUT DALLAS REMAINS UNCHANGED FOR EONS, No one should be surprised that PENELOPE adores people who entertained their sluts by bringing them to BIG TIME ENTERTAINMENT-----grown men forced to fight each other to the death followed by LIONS eating men, women and children to the ORGIASTIC JOY OF HOLY ROMAN "women"
I'm talking the land area. There were lots of different people living there, its the Palestinians there that stayed throughout history, most likely your Hebrew brothers.
Depends upon one's definition of freedom. They were a conquered people and under Roman rule and government.
We're all under rules, either democrat or republican. Before Rome, Greeks were in control and before them Persians . There were treated well under all 3, except for when they rebelled.
I grew up in a USA town full of jerks like you-------in the 50s and 60s they INSISTED that DA NIGRAS were treated well in the southern plantations unless they
WERE UPPITY AND UNGRATEFUL . Actually, the Persians never ruled
Judea------the greeks were in an out a bit but gave up------the romans were the
barbarians that liked to feed people to lions for lunch. The whole area was in
a constant state of warfare from EGYPT THRU MESOPOTAMIA-----onto Greece
and into PERSIA----for millennia-------you should learn some history
No the Romans were actually very holy people. They never kicked the Hebrews out of Palestine either. The Greeks were the smart ones. King Cyrus comes to mind as the Persian King who captured Babylon and allowed Jews to return to Judah , another sugar daddy of the Hebrews. Yes there is a lot of history there, everyone fighting for the coastline. There was never a time when Hebrews controlled Israel as it is today, its all fantasy, as we know the tribes fought amongst themselves.
who is "WE" you and your fellow SLUTS?---------"there was never a time when
Hebrews controlled Israel as it is today"---<<<<< what a brilliant STATEMENT---so true------not as much VEHICULAR TRAFFIC on the streets of Jerusalem and lots of
places to park the donkey. No airport. BUT DALLAS REMAINS UNCHANGED FOR EONS, No one should be surprised that PENELOPE adores people who entertained their sluts by bringing them to BIG TIME ENTERTAINMENT-----grown men forced to fight each other to the death followed by LIONS eating men, women and children to the ORGIASTIC JOY OF HOLY ROMAN "women"
I'm talking the land area. There were lots of different people living there, its the Palestinians there that stayed throughout history, most likely your Hebrew brothers.
We're all under rules, either democrat or republican. Before Rome, Greeks were in control and before them Persians . There were treated well under all 3, except for when they rebelled.
I grew up in a USA town full of jerks like you-------in the 50s and 60s they INSISTED that DA NIGRAS were treated well in the southern plantations unless they
WERE UPPITY AND UNGRATEFUL . Actually, the Persians never ruled
Judea------the greeks were in an out a bit but gave up------the romans were the
barbarians that liked to feed people to lions for lunch. The whole area was in
a constant state of warfare from EGYPT THRU MESOPOTAMIA-----onto Greece
and into PERSIA----for millennia-------you should learn some history
No the Romans were actually very holy people. They never kicked the Hebrews out of Palestine either. The Greeks were the smart ones. King Cyrus comes to mind as the Persian King who captured Babylon and allowed Jews to return to Judah , another sugar daddy of the Hebrews. Yes there is a lot of history there, everyone fighting for the coastline. There was never a time when Hebrews controlled Israel as it is today, its all fantasy, as we know the tribes fought amongst themselves.
who is "WE" you and your fellow SLUTS?---------"there was never a time when
Hebrews controlled Israel as it is today"---<<<<< what a brilliant STATEMENT---so true------not as much VEHICULAR TRAFFIC on the streets of Jerusalem and lots of
places to park the donkey. No airport. BUT DALLAS REMAINS UNCHANGED FOR EONS, No one should be surprised that PENELOPE adores people who entertained their sluts by bringing them to BIG TIME ENTERTAINMENT-----grown men forced to fight each other to the death followed by LIONS eating men, women and children to the ORGIASTIC JOY OF HOLY ROMAN "women"
I'm talking the land area. There were lots of different people living there, its the Palestinians there that stayed throughout history, most likely your Hebrew brothers.
of course there were lots of people living there-------as it is clearly recorded in the OT------try reading the book. People get "CLEANSED OF LEPROSY" by living
in the desert? --------------you read that in your textbook of medicine for psychotic
health care providers?
I grew up in a USA town full of jerks like you-------in the 50s and 60s they INSISTED that DA NIGRAS were treated well in the southern plantations unless they
WERE UPPITY AND UNGRATEFUL . Actually, the Persians never ruled
Judea------the greeks were in an out a bit but gave up------the romans were the
barbarians that liked to feed people to lions for lunch. The whole area was in
a constant state of warfare from EGYPT THRU MESOPOTAMIA-----onto Greece
and into PERSIA----for millennia-------you should learn some history
who was kicked out of Gaza? -------one of your criminal ancestors? or was that out of England?
No the Romans were actually very holy people. They never kicked the Hebrews out of Palestine either. The Greeks were the smart ones. King Cyrus comes to mind as the Persian King who captured Babylon and allowed Jews to return to Judah , another sugar daddy of the Hebrews. Yes there is a lot of history there, everyone fighting for the coastline. There was never a time when Hebrews controlled Israel as it is today, its all fantasy, as we know the tribes fought amongst themselves.
who is "WE" you and your fellow SLUTS?---------"there was never a time when
Hebrews controlled Israel as it is today"---<<<<< what a brilliant STATEMENT---so true------not as much VEHICULAR TRAFFIC on the streets of Jerusalem and lots of
places to park the donkey. No airport. BUT DALLAS REMAINS UNCHANGED FOR EONS, No one should be surprised that PENELOPE adores people who entertained their sluts by bringing them to BIG TIME ENTERTAINMENT-----grown men forced to fight each other to the death followed by LIONS eating men, women and children to the ORGIASTIC JOY OF HOLY ROMAN "women"
I'm talking the land area. There were lots of different people living there, its the Palestinians there that stayed throughout history, most likely your Hebrew brothers.
of course there were lots of people living there-------as it is clearly recorded in the OT------try reading the book. People get "CLEANSED OF LEPROSY" by living
in the desert? --------------you read that in your textbook of medicine for psychotic
health care providers?
Hey they were kicked out of Egypt. I should say todays Gaza.
Isn't that cute that she thinks Jews wrote the NT?
Yeah like a Jew is gonna get the Hebrew Gender for Lineage of
Bethlehem Ephratah (a person) wrong when recanting Micah 5 in Matthew and confuse it for a town.
Or a Jew is gonna call his messiah the morning star (lucifer)-rev 22:16 when Jews knew morning star was the son of baal and the nemesis of Shalem (Evening Star) the one the JEWISH holy city is dedicated to AND DAVID NAMED HIS SON AFTER.
Now fess up HaShev , admit there was no exodus. Hellenistic Jews made an error in Maevidencett as well or they did it on purpose since Greeks and Romans believed in demigods.
Isn't that cute that she thinks Jews wrote the NT?
Yeah like a Jew is gonna get the Hebrew Gender for Lineage of
Bethlehem Ephratah (a person) wrong when recanting Micah 5 in Matthew and confuse it for a town.
Or a Jew is gonna call his messiah the morning star (lucifer)-rev 22:16 when Jews knew morning star was the son of baal and the nemesis of Shalem (Evening Star) the one the JEWISH holy city is dedicated to AND DAVID NAMED HIS SON AFTER.
Now fess up HaShev , admit there was no exodus. Hellenistic Jews made an error in Maevidencett as well or they did it on purpose since Greeks and Romans believed in demigods.
There is actually plenty of evidence of the Exodus through archeology and Egyptian accounts on hieroglyphs outside Jewish accounts. But now you set a standard in which you destroyed the self testified NT which has no historical Jesus or events especially the Herod killing Babies accounts which have been soundly debunked.
If you are gonna remake history using propaganda try using events without evidence, and try pulling it on uneducated people and try burning books that might out your scam-oops we just described Christianity.
Few Hebrews even spoke Hebrew in Jesus's day, it was a religious language. Most didn't have any OT or Torah, they got their teachings from the elders who taught the Talmud composed in Babylon. There was no exodus.
Isn't that cute that she thinks Jews wrote the NT?
Yeah like a Jew is gonna get the Hebrew Gender for Lineage of
Bethlehem Ephratah (a person) wrong when recanting Micah 5 in Matthew and confuse it for a town.
Or a Jew is gonna call his messiah the morning star (lucifer)-rev 22:16 when Jews knew morning star was the son of baal and the nemesis of Shalem (Evening Star) the one the JEWISH holy city is dedicated to AND DAVID NAMED HIS SON AFTER.
Now fess up HaShev , admit there was no exodus. Hellenistic Jews made an error in Maevidencett as well or they did it on purpose since Greeks and Romans believed in demigods.
There is actually plenty of evidence of the Exodus through archeology and Egyptian accounts on hieroglyphs outside Jewish accounts. But now you set a standard in which you destroyed the self testified NT which has no historical Jesus or events especially the Herod killing Babies accounts which have been soundly debunked.
If you are gonna remake history using propaganda try using events without evidence, and try pulling it on uneducated people and try burning books that might out your scam-oops we just described Christianity.
Not only is there no evidence for Exodus, but there is evidence that the Jews we know and love were already in Canaan and simply rewrote their own history.
The Bible's Buried Secrets
Isn't that cute that she thinks Jews wrote the NT?
Yeah like a Jew is gonna get the Hebrew Gender for Lineage of
Bethlehem Ephratah (a person) wrong when recanting Micah 5 in Matthew and confuse it for a town.
Or a Jew is gonna call his messiah the morning star (lucifer)-rev 22:16 when Jews knew morning star was the son of baal and the nemesis of Shalem (Evening Star) the one the JEWISH holy city is dedicated to AND DAVID NAMED HIS SON AFTER.
Now fess up HaShev , admit there was no exodus. Hellenistic Jews made an error in Maevidencett as well or they did it on purpose since Greeks and Romans believed in demigods.
There is actually plenty of evidence of the Exodus through archeology and Egyptian accounts on hieroglyphs outside Jewish accounts. But now you set a standard in which you destroyed the self testified NT which has no historical Jesus or events especially the Herod killing Babies accounts which have been soundly debunked.
If you are gonna remake history using propaganda try using events without evidence, and try pulling it on uneducated people and try burning books that might out your scam-oops we just described Christianity.
Not only is there no evidence for Exodus, but there is evidence that the Jews we know and love were already in Canaan and simply rewrote their own history.
The Bible's Buried Secrets
Isn't that cute that she thinks Jews wrote the NT?
Yeah like a Jew is gonna get the Hebrew Gender for Lineage of
Bethlehem Ephratah (a person) wrong when recanting Micah 5 in Matthew and confuse it for a town.
Or a Jew is gonna call his messiah the morning star (lucifer)-rev 22:16 when Jews knew morning star was the son of baal and the nemesis of Shalem (Evening Star) the one the JEWISH holy city is dedicated to AND DAVID NAMED HIS SON AFTER.
Now fess up HaShev , admit there was no exodus. Hellenistic Jews made an error in Maevidencett as well or they did it on purpose since Greeks and Romans believed in demigods.
There is actually plenty of evidence of the Exodus through archeology and Egyptian accounts on hieroglyphs outside Jewish accounts. But now you set a standard in which you destroyed the self testified NT which has no historical Jesus or events especially the Herod killing Babies accounts which have been soundly debunked.
If you are gonna remake history using propaganda try using events without evidence, and try pulling it on uneducated people and try burning books that might out your scam-oops we just described Christianity.
Not only is there no evidence for Exodus, but there is evidence that the Jews we know and love were already in Canaan and simply rewrote their own history.
The Bible's Buried Secrets
Thinking all Jews were in Egypt is like thinking all people of color were in the U.S. South, so Yes Jews (Hebrews) and yet to become Jews (Shalemite Canaanites) existed in Canaan, most likely with Noahide laws not yet the laws of Moses to become more fully complete (Shalem).
Saying there is no evidence while showing no evidence of your bizzarre comment is ironic.
Few Hebrews even spoke Hebrew in Jesus's day, it was a religious language. Most didn't have any OT or Torah, they got their teachings from the elders who taught the Talmud composed in Babylon. There was no exodus.
That would be a pretty good feat, Since the Mishna was written 200 years after Jesus, and tge Gemara 300 years after that.
