Were 4 Americans sacrificed at Benghazi so Obama could fake having defeated Al Qaeda?

[Little-Acorn]

Back to the subject:
What happened after the attacks, and who lied to whom and how, is less important than why security there was left to deteriorate for months, even while attacks were going on, bombs were blowing 12-foot holes in the consulate walls, and Amb. Stevens was pleading for months for more security.

That summer, Obama was crowing over "Bin Laden is dead and GM is alive!". He was desperately trying to fool American voters into thinking he had defeated Al Qaeda and they were "on the run". And the increasing attacks by Al Qaeda were not fitting into the glossy image he was trying to project.

Sending MORE security into areas like Benghazi, Cairo etc. would have done even more harm to his story... so he simply didn't do it. Instead he reduced security, pulled out American agents, and in some cases substituted Libyan personnel for the American security troops. He was hoping this would look good to American voters who weren't paying much attention.

By the first week in September 2012, there were exactly three American security personnel at the consulate in Benghazi. The gate guards and patrols had been replaced by Libyans... and they were unarmed, with nothing but whistles and batons.

Obama hopes fervently that people will keep complaining about Susan Rice and lies about a video afterward... because then they aren't complaining about what killed Amb. Stevens and three other Americans: Months of fatal, flagrant neglect of consulate security for the purpose of gaining votes.

 

[Care4all]

lil Acorn, when you say:

4 Americans sacrificed at Benghazi, so that obama could FAKE HAVING DEFEATED ALqaeda....

Are you not saying Obama did not care if another attack happened at Benghazi....?

He just did not care if another attack happened at Benghazi, those 4 dead would be worth sacrificing, just to not increase security at Benghazi, so he could 'say' the war against Alqaeda is over?

(Which he NEVER said, but you all have said he's said)

I don't think you are thinking this conspiracy theory of yours through...

 

[Little-Acorn]

Obama did not care if another attack happened at Benghazi....?

Poor desperate bankrupt liberals. They are incapable of doing anything but lying about what conservatives said, in hopes that the conservatives will be diverted from discussing the truth.

Why do you say that Obama did not care if another attack happened at Benghazi? Nobody else on this thread has said such a ridiculous lie. Only you.

Back to the subject:
What happened after the attacks, and who lied to whom and how, is less important than why security there was left to deteriorate for months, even while attacks were going on, bombs were blowing 12-foot holes in the consulate walls, and Amb. Stevens was pleading for months for more security.

That summer, Obama was crowing over "Bin Laden is dead and GM is alive!". He was desperately trying to fool American voters into thinking he had defeated Al Qaeda and they were "on the run". And the increasing attacks by Al Qaeda were not fitting into the glossy image he was trying to project.

Sending MORE security into areas like Benghazi, Cairo etc. would have done even more harm to his story... so he simply didn't do it. Instead he reduced security, pulled out American agents, and in some cases substituted Libyan personnel for the American security troops. He was hoping this would look good to American voters who weren't paying much attention.

By the first week in September 2012, there were exactly three American security personnel at the consulate in Benghazi. The gate guards and patrols had been replaced by Libyans... and they were unarmed, with nothing but whistles and batons.

Obama hopes fervently that people will keep complaining about Susan Rice and lies about a video afterward... because then they aren't complaining about what killed Amb. Stevens and three other Americans: Months of fatal, flagrant neglect of consulate security for the purpose of gaining votes.

 

[konradv]

The leftist fanatics have been driven from the argument, and are reduced to posting silly pictures, lying about what conservatives said, and drawing clown faces.

Leave it to a little nut to declare victory without evidence. You've been lying. How many times do we have to repeat the same things before we just get tired of talking to a wall? You haven't won, you've just succeeded in making everyone realize you're hopeless.

 

[Dragonlady]

So according to this conspiracy theory, Obama reduced the security in Benghazi, to make it easier for al Qaeda to kill Americans there, because if al Qaeda killed Americans in Benghazi it would prove that Obama had defeated al Qaeda.

As usual, when the desperate leftist fanatics can't refute what a conservative said, they pretend he "said" something else instead.

Why do you say Obama reduced security "to make it easier for al Qaeda to kill Americans"?

Nobody else in the thread has told such a silly fib. Only you. Don't you ever wonder why the only way you can make your agenda look good, is to lie?

You have a REPUBLICAN saying that the Administration ignore the June 6th attack. Facts say otherwise. Ambassador Stevens believed that the Libyans would protect him because he was considered a friend of the Libyan people, and he declined extra security that day.

All American Middle Eastern embassies and outposts were put on high alert for the 10th anniversary of 9-11, and yet you clowns continue to try to find some evidence of conspiracy. The more information that comes out about Benghazi, the more desperate and partisan you appear. Even the Republican lead investigations can find no evidence of a coverup, lies or failure on the part of the administration to act.

Talk about beating a dead horse.

 

[Little-Acorn]

The leftist fanatics have been driven from the argument, and are reduced to posting silly pictures, lying about what conservatives said, and drawing clown faces.

You've been lying.

See?

These poor, desperate leftist fanatics want you to believe that the Obama admin never pushed the line, "Bin Laden is dead and GM is alive".

Or that they did not progressively reduce security at the Benghazi compound and other facilities.

Or that terrorist attacks increased in frequency and scope while they were doing all this.

Or something.

(Liberals never identify exactly what the "lies" were supposed to be, because they are afraid of getting refuted, so they hide behind vagueness and subject-changing instead of giving details).

These poor sick people have been doing nothing but hide, bluster, call names, and smear people instead of straightforwardly presenting their case... because they know they have no case.

Back to the subject:
What happened after the attacks, and who lied to whom and how, is less important than why security there was left to deteriorate for months, even while attacks were going on, bombs were blowing 12-foot holes in the consulate walls, and Amb. Stevens was pleading for months for more security.

That summer, Obama was crowing over "Bin Laden is dead and GM is alive!". He was desperately trying to fool American voters into thinking he had defeated Al Qaeda and they were "on the run". And the increasing attacks by Al Qaeda were not fitting into the glossy image he was trying to project.

Sending MORE security into areas like Benghazi, Cairo etc. would have done even more harm to his story... so he simply didn't do it. Instead he reduced security, pulled out American agents, and in some cases substituted Libyan personnel for the American security troops. He was hoping this would look good to American voters who weren't paying much attention.

By the first week in September 2012, there were exactly three American security personnel at the consulate in Benghazi. The gate guards and patrols had been replaced by Libyans... and they were unarmed, with nothing but whistles and batons.

Obama hopes fervently that people will keep complaining about Susan Rice and lies about a video afterward... because then they aren't complaining about what killed Amb. Stevens and three other Americans: Months of fatal, flagrant neglect of consulate security for the purpose of gaining votes.

 

[Clementine]

Originally written May 2013

Finally, after puttering around with stories and videos and lies after the attacks, Congress is beginning to get at the real scandal in Benghazi.

What happened after the attacks, and who lied to whom and how, is less important than why security there was left to deteriorate for months, even while attacks were going on, bombs were blowing 12-foot holes in the consulate walls, and Amb. Stevens was pleading for months for more security.

That summer, Obama was crowing over "Bin Laden is dead and GM is alive!". He was desperately trying to fool American voters into thinking he had defeated Al Qaeda and they were "on the run". And the increasing attacks by Al Qaeda were not fitting into the glossy image he was trying to project.

Sending MORE security into areas like Benghazi, Cairo etc. would have done even more harm to his story... so he simply didn't do it. Instead he reduced security, pulled out American agents, and in some cases substituted Libyan personnel for the American security troops. He was hoping this would look good to American voters who weren't paying much attention.

By the first week in September 2012, there were exactly three American security personnel at the consulate in Benghazi. The gate guards and patrols had been replaced by Libyans... and they were unarmed, with nothing but whistles and batons. And so, when the major attack came on Sept. 11, 2012, the people in the consulate didn't have much chance.

Basically, the lives of Ambassador Stevens and three other Americans, were sacrificed so that Obama could get more votes three weeks later in the November, 2012 election.

And that is the real scandal of Benghazi. Obama hopes fervently that people will keep complaining about Susan Rice and lies about a video afterward... because then they aren't complaining about what killed Amb. Stevens and three other Americans: Months of fatal, flagrant neglect of consulate security for the purpose of gaining votes.

------------------------------------------------------

CBS News - Breaking News, U.S., World, Business, Entertainment & Video

The Obama administration -- and the State Department in particular -- has been accused by Republican lawmakers and some former U.S. officials who worked in Libya of ignoring warning signs and even rejecting pleas for increased security around American offices in the country ahead of the Sept. 11 attack in Benghazi, which left U.S. Ambassador Christopher Stevens and three others dead.

The House Oversight Committee will begin questioning three senior State Department staff on Capitol Hill Wednesday over claims that dozens of U.S. security personnel were removed from Libya in the six months leading up to the attack, in spite of alleged requests to increase personnel levels from American officials on the ground.

According to one of the key witnesses expected to testify before the committee this week, even Ambassador Stevens himself had repeatedly requested more security personnel, but was turned down.

Lt. Col. Andy Wood, the former head of a U.S. Special Forces "Site Security Team" in Libya, has told CBS News correspondent Sharyl Attkisson that he and many other senior staff at the U.S. Embassy in Tripoli, "felt we needed more, not less" security personnel in the country, but were told "to do with less.

For what reasons, I don't know."

This begins to get at the real scandal in Benghazi.

Stevens and the others could have been quietly evacuated and there would not have been murders. It would have been better to do that after all the threats against the embassy and the personal threats against Stevens. No one would ever have heard of Benghazi if someone had put the safety of our people first.

 

[westwall]

Originally written May 2013

Finally, after puttering around with stories and videos and lies after the attacks, Congress is beginning to get at the real scandal in Benghazi.

What happened after the attacks, and who lied to whom and how, is less important than why security there was left to deteriorate for months, even while attacks were going on, bombs were blowing 12-foot holes in the consulate walls, and Amb. Stevens was pleading for months for more security.

That summer, Obama was crowing over "Bin Laden is dead and GM is alive!". He was desperately trying to fool American voters into thinking he had defeated Al Qaeda and they were "on the run". And the increasing attacks by Al Qaeda were not fitting into the glossy image he was trying to project.

Sending MORE security into areas like Benghazi, Cairo etc. would have done even more harm to his story... so he simply didn't do it. Instead he reduced security, pulled out American agents, and in some cases substituted Libyan personnel for the American security troops. He was hoping this would look good to American voters who weren't paying much attention.

By the first week in September 2012, there were exactly three American security personnel at the consulate in Benghazi. The gate guards and patrols had been replaced by Libyans... and they were unarmed, with nothing but whistles and batons. And so, when the major attack came on Sept. 11, 2012, the people in the consulate didn't have much chance.

Basically, the lives of Ambassador Stevens and three other Americans, were sacrificed so that Obama could get more votes three weeks later in the November, 2012 election.

And that is the real scandal of Benghazi. Obama hopes fervently that people will keep complaining about Susan Rice and lies about a video afterward... because then they aren't complaining about what killed Amb. Stevens and three other Americans: Months of fatal, flagrant neglect of consulate security for the purpose of gaining votes.

------------------------------------------------------

CBS News - Breaking News, U.S., World, Business, Entertainment & Video

The Obama administration -- and the State Department in particular -- has been accused by Republican lawmakers and some former U.S. officials who worked in Libya of ignoring warning signs and even rejecting pleas for increased security around American offices in the country ahead of the Sept. 11 attack in Benghazi, which left U.S. Ambassador Christopher Stevens and three others dead.

The House Oversight Committee will begin questioning three senior State Department staff on Capitol Hill Wednesday over claims that dozens of U.S. security personnel were removed from Libya in the six months leading up to the attack, in spite of alleged requests to increase personnel levels from American officials on the ground.

According to one of the key witnesses expected to testify before the committee this week, even Ambassador Stevens himself had repeatedly requested more security personnel, but was turned down.

Lt. Col. Andy Wood, the former head of a U.S. Special Forces "Site Security Team" in Libya, has told CBS News correspondent Sharyl Attkisson that he and many other senior staff at the U.S. Embassy in Tripoli, "felt we needed more, not less" security personnel in the country, but were told "to do with less.

For what reasons, I don't know."

This begins to get at the real scandal in Benghazi.

No, they were sacrificed so that the under the table dealings of Hillary could be kept secret. She and ole Sidney were trying to make some serious cash out of that little region of the world.

 

[Clementine]

So according to this conspiracy theory, Obama reduced the security in Benghazi, to make it easier for al Qaeda to kill Americans there, because if al Qaeda killed Americans in Benghazi it would prove that Obama had defeated al Qaeda.

As usual, when the desperate leftist fanatics can't refute what a conservative said, they pretend he "said" something else instead.

Why do you say Obama reduced security "to make it easier for al Qaeda to kill Americans"?

Nobody else in the thread has told such a silly fib. Only you. Don't you ever wonder why the only way you can make your agenda look good, is to lie?

You have a REPUBLICAN saying that the Administration ignore the June 6th attack. Facts say otherwise. Ambassador Stevens believed that the Libyans would protect him because he was considered a friend of the Libyan people, and he declined extra security that day.

All American Middle Eastern embassies and outposts were put on high alert for the 10th anniversary of 9-11, and yet you clowns continue to try to find some evidence of conspiracy. The more information that comes out about Benghazi, the more desperate and partisan you appear. Even the Republican lead investigations can find no evidence of a coverup, lies or failure on the part of the administration to act.

Talk about beating a dead horse.

Why have the explanations and excuses by the administration changed so many times?

 

[HenryBHough]

Fortunately for liberals Obama's "expanded Medicaid" pays generously for those suffering ruptures whilst carrying His water.

 

[Moonglow]

Fortunately for liberals Obama's "expanded Medicaid" pays generously for those suffering ruptures whilst carrying His water.

Good thing bread is lighter than water...

 

[LoneLaugher]

Originally written May 2013

Finally, after puttering around with stories and videos and lies after the attacks, Congress is beginning to get at the real scandal in Benghazi.

What happened after the attacks, and who lied to whom and how, is less important than why security there was left to deteriorate for months, even while attacks were going on, bombs were blowing 12-foot holes in the consulate walls, and Amb. Stevens was pleading for months for more security.

That summer, Obama was crowing over "Bin Laden is dead and GM is alive!". He was desperately trying to fool American voters into thinking he had defeated Al Qaeda and they were "on the run". And the increasing attacks by Al Qaeda were not fitting into the glossy image he was trying to project.

Sending MORE security into areas like Benghazi, Cairo etc. would have done even more harm to his story... so he simply didn't do it. Instead he reduced security, pulled out American agents, and in some cases substituted Libyan personnel for the American security troops. He was hoping this would look good to American voters who weren't paying much attention.

By the first week in September 2012, there were exactly three American security personnel at the consulate in Benghazi. The gate guards and patrols had been replaced by Libyans... and they were unarmed, with nothing but whistles and batons. And so, when the major attack came on Sept. 11, 2012, the people in the consulate didn't have much chance.

Basically, the lives of Ambassador Stevens and three other Americans, were sacrificed so that Obama could get more votes three weeks later in the November, 2012 election.

And that is the real scandal of Benghazi. Obama hopes fervently that people will keep complaining about Susan Rice and lies about a video afterward... because then they aren't complaining about what killed Amb. Stevens and three other Americans: Months of fatal, flagrant neglect of consulate security for the purpose of gaining votes.

------------------------------------------------------

CBS News - Breaking News, U.S., World, Business, Entertainment & Video

The Obama administration -- and the State Department in particular -- has been accused by Republican lawmakers and some former U.S. officials who worked in Libya of ignoring warning signs and even rejecting pleas for increased security around American offices in the country ahead of the Sept. 11 attack in Benghazi, which left U.S. Ambassador Christopher Stevens and three others dead.

The House Oversight Committee will begin questioning three senior State Department staff on Capitol Hill Wednesday over claims that dozens of U.S. security personnel were removed from Libya in the six months leading up to the attack, in spite of alleged requests to increase personnel levels from American officials on the ground.

According to one of the key witnesses expected to testify before the committee this week, even Ambassador Stevens himself had repeatedly requested more security personnel, but was turned down.

Lt. Col. Andy Wood, the former head of a U.S. Special Forces "Site Security Team" in Libya, has told CBS News correspondent Sharyl Attkisson that he and many other senior staff at the U.S. Embassy in Tripoli, "felt we needed more, not less" security personnel in the country, but were told "to do with less.

For what reasons, I don't know."

This begins to get at the real scandal in Benghazi.

No, they were sacrificed so that the under the table dealings of Hillary could be kept secret. She and ole Sidney were trying to make some serious cash out of that little region of the world.

WoooooooooHooooooooo! It's a new conspiracy! Just IMAGINE what could have been going on! If only we had ALL OF THE EMAILS, we'd know it all!!

 

[westwall]

Originally written May 2013

Finally, after puttering around with stories and videos and lies after the attacks, Congress is beginning to get at the real scandal in Benghazi.

What happened after the attacks, and who lied to whom and how, is less important than why security there was left to deteriorate for months, even while attacks were going on, bombs were blowing 12-foot holes in the consulate walls, and Amb. Stevens was pleading for months for more security.

That summer, Obama was crowing over "Bin Laden is dead and GM is alive!". He was desperately trying to fool American voters into thinking he had defeated Al Qaeda and they were "on the run". And the increasing attacks by Al Qaeda were not fitting into the glossy image he was trying to project.

Sending MORE security into areas like Benghazi, Cairo etc. would have done even more harm to his story... so he simply didn't do it. Instead he reduced security, pulled out American agents, and in some cases substituted Libyan personnel for the American security troops. He was hoping this would look good to American voters who weren't paying much attention.

By the first week in September 2012, there were exactly three American security personnel at the consulate in Benghazi. The gate guards and patrols had been replaced by Libyans... and they were unarmed, with nothing but whistles and batons. And so, when the major attack came on Sept. 11, 2012, the people in the consulate didn't have much chance.

Basically, the lives of Ambassador Stevens and three other Americans, were sacrificed so that Obama could get more votes three weeks later in the November, 2012 election.

And that is the real scandal of Benghazi. Obama hopes fervently that people will keep complaining about Susan Rice and lies about a video afterward... because then they aren't complaining about what killed Amb. Stevens and three other Americans: Months of fatal, flagrant neglect of consulate security for the purpose of gaining votes.

------------------------------------------------------

CBS News - Breaking News, U.S., World, Business, Entertainment & Video

The Obama administration -- and the State Department in particular -- has been accused by Republican lawmakers and some former U.S. officials who worked in Libya of ignoring warning signs and even rejecting pleas for increased security around American offices in the country ahead of the Sept. 11 attack in Benghazi, which left U.S. Ambassador Christopher Stevens and three others dead.

The House Oversight Committee will begin questioning three senior State Department staff on Capitol Hill Wednesday over claims that dozens of U.S. security personnel were removed from Libya in the six months leading up to the attack, in spite of alleged requests to increase personnel levels from American officials on the ground.

According to one of the key witnesses expected to testify before the committee this week, even Ambassador Stevens himself had repeatedly requested more security personnel, but was turned down.

Lt. Col. Andy Wood, the former head of a U.S. Special Forces "Site Security Team" in Libya, has told CBS News correspondent Sharyl Attkisson that he and many other senior staff at the U.S. Embassy in Tripoli, "felt we needed more, not less" security personnel in the country, but were told "to do with less.

For what reasons, I don't know."

This begins to get at the real scandal in Benghazi.

No, they were sacrificed so that the under the table dealings of Hillary could be kept secret. She and ole Sidney were trying to make some serious cash out of that little region of the world.

WoooooooooHooooooooo! It's a new conspiracy! Just IMAGINE what could have been going on! If only we had ALL OF THE EMAILS, we'd know it all!!

Yes, just imagine if you weren't a mindless drone, supporting the people who screw the poor and middle class every chance they get, you might have a modicum of curiosity why Hillary would hire ole Sid on the side after he was banned by Obama from having anything to do with the State Dept. Proving that at least Obama has more sense than you do.

So, do you use lube when she takes your behind, or do you just take it straight?

 

[LoneLaugher]

Originally written May 2013

Finally, after puttering around with stories and videos and lies after the attacks, Congress is beginning to get at the real scandal in Benghazi.

What happened after the attacks, and who lied to whom and how, is less important than why security there was left to deteriorate for months, even while attacks were going on, bombs were blowing 12-foot holes in the consulate walls, and Amb. Stevens was pleading for months for more security.

That summer, Obama was crowing over "Bin Laden is dead and GM is alive!". He was desperately trying to fool American voters into thinking he had defeated Al Qaeda and they were "on the run". And the increasing attacks by Al Qaeda were not fitting into the glossy image he was trying to project.

Sending MORE security into areas like Benghazi, Cairo etc. would have done even more harm to his story... so he simply didn't do it. Instead he reduced security, pulled out American agents, and in some cases substituted Libyan personnel for the American security troops. He was hoping this would look good to American voters who weren't paying much attention.

By the first week in September 2012, there were exactly three American security personnel at the consulate in Benghazi. The gate guards and patrols had been replaced by Libyans... and they were unarmed, with nothing but whistles and batons. And so, when the major attack came on Sept. 11, 2012, the people in the consulate didn't have much chance.

Basically, the lives of Ambassador Stevens and three other Americans, were sacrificed so that Obama could get more votes three weeks later in the November, 2012 election.

And that is the real scandal of Benghazi. Obama hopes fervently that people will keep complaining about Susan Rice and lies about a video afterward... because then they aren't complaining about what killed Amb. Stevens and three other Americans: Months of fatal, flagrant neglect of consulate security for the purpose of gaining votes.

------------------------------------------------------

CBS News - Breaking News, U.S., World, Business, Entertainment & Video

The Obama administration -- and the State Department in particular -- has been accused by Republican lawmakers and some former U.S. officials who worked in Libya of ignoring warning signs and even rejecting pleas for increased security around American offices in the country ahead of the Sept. 11 attack in Benghazi, which left U.S. Ambassador Christopher Stevens and three others dead.

The House Oversight Committee will begin questioning three senior State Department staff on Capitol Hill Wednesday over claims that dozens of U.S. security personnel were removed from Libya in the six months leading up to the attack, in spite of alleged requests to increase personnel levels from American officials on the ground.

According to one of the key witnesses expected to testify before the committee this week, even Ambassador Stevens himself had repeatedly requested more security personnel, but was turned down.

Lt. Col. Andy Wood, the former head of a U.S. Special Forces "Site Security Team" in Libya, has told CBS News correspondent Sharyl Attkisson that he and many other senior staff at the U.S. Embassy in Tripoli, "felt we needed more, not less" security personnel in the country, but were told "to do with less.

For what reasons, I don't know."

This begins to get at the real scandal in Benghazi.

No, they were sacrificed so that the under the table dealings of Hillary could be kept secret. She and ole Sidney were trying to make some serious cash out of that little region of the world.

WoooooooooHooooooooo! It's a new conspiracy! Just IMAGINE what could have been going on! If only we had ALL OF THE EMAILS, we'd know it all!!

Yes, just imagine if you weren't a mindless drone, supporting the people who screw the poor and middle class every chance they get, you might have a modicum of curiosity why Hillary would hire ole Sid on the side after he was banned by Obama from having anything to do with the State Dept. Proving that at least Obama has more sense than you do.

So, do you use lube when she takes your behind, or do you just take it straight?

Weeeeeeee! Drones....Hillary and ass fucking humor!! It's a true USMB nutter trifecta!

 

[westwall]

Originally written May 2013

Finally, after puttering around with stories and videos and lies after the attacks, Congress is beginning to get at the real scandal in Benghazi.

What happened after the attacks, and who lied to whom and how, is less important than why security there was left to deteriorate for months, even while attacks were going on, bombs were blowing 12-foot holes in the consulate walls, and Amb. Stevens was pleading for months for more security.

That summer, Obama was crowing over "Bin Laden is dead and GM is alive!". He was desperately trying to fool American voters into thinking he had defeated Al Qaeda and they were "on the run". And the increasing attacks by Al Qaeda were not fitting into the glossy image he was trying to project.

Sending MORE security into areas like Benghazi, Cairo etc. would have done even more harm to his story... so he simply didn't do it. Instead he reduced security, pulled out American agents, and in some cases substituted Libyan personnel for the American security troops. He was hoping this would look good to American voters who weren't paying much attention.

By the first week in September 2012, there were exactly three American security personnel at the consulate in Benghazi. The gate guards and patrols had been replaced by Libyans... and they were unarmed, with nothing but whistles and batons. And so, when the major attack came on Sept. 11, 2012, the people in the consulate didn't have much chance.

Basically, the lives of Ambassador Stevens and three other Americans, were sacrificed so that Obama could get more votes three weeks later in the November, 2012 election.

And that is the real scandal of Benghazi. Obama hopes fervently that people will keep complaining about Susan Rice and lies about a video afterward... because then they aren't complaining about what killed Amb. Stevens and three other Americans: Months of fatal, flagrant neglect of consulate security for the purpose of gaining votes.

------------------------------------------------------

CBS News - Breaking News, U.S., World, Business, Entertainment & Video

The Obama administration -- and the State Department in particular -- has been accused by Republican lawmakers and some former U.S. officials who worked in Libya of ignoring warning signs and even rejecting pleas for increased security around American offices in the country ahead of the Sept. 11 attack in Benghazi, which left U.S. Ambassador Christopher Stevens and three others dead.

The House Oversight Committee will begin questioning three senior State Department staff on Capitol Hill Wednesday over claims that dozens of U.S. security personnel were removed from Libya in the six months leading up to the attack, in spite of alleged requests to increase personnel levels from American officials on the ground.

According to one of the key witnesses expected to testify before the committee this week, even Ambassador Stevens himself had repeatedly requested more security personnel, but was turned down.

Lt. Col. Andy Wood, the former head of a U.S. Special Forces "Site Security Team" in Libya, has told CBS News correspondent Sharyl Attkisson that he and many other senior staff at the U.S. Embassy in Tripoli, "felt we needed more, not less" security personnel in the country, but were told "to do with less.

For what reasons, I don't know."

This begins to get at the real scandal in Benghazi.

No, they were sacrificed so that the under the table dealings of Hillary could be kept secret. She and ole Sidney were trying to make some serious cash out of that little region of the world.

WoooooooooHooooooooo! It's a new conspiracy! Just IMAGINE what could have been going on! If only we had ALL OF THE EMAILS, we'd know it all!!

Yes, just imagine if you weren't a mindless drone, supporting the people who screw the poor and middle class every chance they get, you might have a modicum of curiosity why Hillary would hire ole Sid on the side after he was banned by Obama from having anything to do with the State Dept. Proving that at least Obama has more sense than you do.

So, do you use lube when she takes your behind, or do you just take it straight?

Weeeeeeee! Drones....Hillary and ass fucking humor!! It's a true USMB nutter trifecta!

So. You don't use lube. Got it!

 

[NYcarbineer]

Op it was just because Obama wanted to win, nothing more, he declared the Iraq war over, he declared Alquadi was losing. So he had rice go on television saying it was just about a stupid video

Its that simple

The Iraq war was over. Is over. We were there, right or wrong, to depose Saddam, dispose of his (non-existent) WMDs, and 'liberate' the Iraqis to enable them the power of self-determination.

Saddam is gone, the imaginary WMD's are gone, Iraq has a constitution and an elected government.

We were done. That the Iraqi's don't have the will to defend themselves is no concern of ours, or at least it shouldn't be.

It was bad enough we wrongly invaded; it's far worse that we may make that mistake a THIRD time.

 

[kiwiman127]

How,many 100's of threads are we going to have about Benghazi? Two, plus years, millions of tax payer dollars and nothing.
I guess folks aren't happy with the Armed Services Committee investigation's results. They want blood no matter what the Armed Services Committee determines.

 

[Little-Acorn]

That summer, Obama was crowing over "Bin Laden is dead and GM is alive!". He was desperately trying to fool American voters into thinking he had defeated Al Qaeda and they were "on the run". And the increasing attacks by Al Qaeda were not fitting into the glossy image he was trying to project.

He's still trying to fake what is going on in various parts of the world, to fool Americans into believing he's done a good job.

"Something's wrong": Military-report-altering extends up into Obama's inner circle | US Message Board - Political Discussion Forum

 

[NYcarbineer]

 

[Clementine]

That summer, Obama was crowing over "Bin Laden is dead and GM is alive!". He was desperately trying to fool American voters into thinking he had defeated Al Qaeda and they were "on the run". And the increasing attacks by Al Qaeda were not fitting into the glossy image he was trying to project.

He's still trying to fake what is going on in various parts of the world, to fool Americans into believing he's done a good job.

"Something's wrong": Military-report-altering extends up into Obama's inner circle | US Message Board - Political Discussion Forum

Most recently, 50 undercover agents claim that the administration altered their reports to make the ISIS threat look smaller.

Ignoring the threats from radical Muslims and leading from behind is the biggest cause of recent problems. Never heard of ISIS till a few years ago. While there are an estimated 300 million radical Muslims, they have become more emboldened and better financed during the Obama years.