Wendy Davis ad goes too far! ad uses wheelchair to criticize paralyzed foe Abbott

[Jarhead]

Stickin with Wendy ay? Come on man!

You haven't shown me a reason of why I shouldn't. As I said before, a photo of an empty wheelchair is far less offensive than Abbott railroading other amputees and a rape victim.

And you don't seem to be able to dispute that.

Perhaps you are correct.

Byu

Stickin with Wendy ay? Come on man!

You haven't shown me a reason of why I shouldn't. As I said before, a photo of an empty wheelchair is far less offensive than Abbott railroading other amputees and a rape victim.

And you don't seem to be able to dispute that.

So I must believe it is an educated guess when I say you would NEVER support Hillary Clinton for President.

Or are you one of those that have no idea of who SHE represented when she was a young attorney?

I prefer Bernie Sanders.

Okay, shoot. Who did Hillary defend? You're not going to repeat the lie that she defended one of the Black Panthers, are you?

I thought you were on top of things.

What does Hillary s laughing rape defense audio mean TheHill
AUDIO Hillary Clinton Speaks of Defense of Child Rapist in Newly Unearthed Tapes Washington Free Beacon

I can only pick apart one lie at a time.

Before I start, I want you to know that I find it interesting that you need a blog to tell you what Hillary's taped interview means, as if you can't think for yourself. And I suppose you can't.

I listed to the tape, and she was in no way laughing at the rape victim. She laughed about the absurdity of the case itself.

Hillary didn't want the case and tried to get out of doing it.

Did Hillary Clinton ask to be relieved from representing an accused rapist in 1970s PolitiFact

Also, it was her JOB to defend the man. That's what public defenders do.

Gideon v. Wainwright ruled that the Sixth Amendment of the Bill of Rights requires the government to provide free legal counsel to indigent defendants in criminal cases

So, is your big beef that she was good at her job? And do you think she should have sabotaged the case, just in case she might one day run for President?

She took the case.
No one HAS to EVER take a case. Especially when it comes to defending an alleged child rapist. She took the case because she did not want to jeopardize her career by denying it. Any moron would recognize it.
As for her lauging about it. I really don't care if she did it didn't. I don't pay attention to "opinions"....

It is all about the fact that she took the case and defended an alleged rapist.

Yet, for some reason, you forgive her.

Good for you.

You are a hypocrite.

 

[Jarhead]

Slick's interns were young women. Young. Hillary displayed not the least upset at his abuse of them. Ergo, she's into that sort of molestation. OK, so you're prefer to believe otherwise. That's your religion and you're entitled to it.

Monica Lewinsky was indeed young, but at 23, she was a consenting adult. I don't know how Hillary felt about his affair.

There must be a reason you and Jughead can't stay on topic.

Jughead? Quite mature.

No public defender is obligated to take a case. If it interferes with their personal beliefs, or if they believe the defendant to be guilty, it is the responsibility of the judge to grant their request to be taken off the case.

She opted to stick with it.

Just as Abbott did with those he represented.

Yet you criticized Abbott....but not Clinton.

Tells me you are a child.

FYI....That IS staying on topic.

Pay attention, child.

 

[Uncensored2008]

Lets not let any facts get in your way.

Yeah, like you've ever offered a fact...

So Carla, what "facts" do you want to share with the class?

 

[Uncensored2008]

Lying leftist trash.

You flatter Carla, there is no greater complement to be given to a democrat.

 

[Carla_Danger]

She is a piece of shit like you and she will lose next month, loser.

Using a wheelchair in an ad attacking someone in a wheelchair is a personal attack and from the start loses the audience.

Only stupid fuck scum like you like the video.

Your bitch is going to lose wasting millions of your fellow scum's money....

Of course. Good thing her ad didn't do that, eh?

She told the truth about him, that's what I know. I also know wingnut dickheads like you can't change that so you focus on a few seconds of a wheelchair. Shove your fauxrage up your wingnut ass.

Dumbass Texans vote against themselves every time.

Oh the times they are a changin.

Soon the big cities in Texas will have more votes than the rural areas and we'll turn the whole state blue.

Plus the angry old white dudes are not producing enough angry young white dudes, so it's just a matter of time.

I hope you're right.

Hey, they vote against themselves in my state too, which is possibly more red than Texas.

 

[Carla_Danger]

Lying leftist trash.

You flatter Carla, there is no greater complement to be given to a democrat.

Considering the source, a lying dingbat, you are correct.

 

[Carla_Danger]

A couple of hours ago, you said you were going to follow up on the details. Has that been a problem for you?

I got busy, but here is one that I looked up. I have more and will post them when I have time.

Greg Abbott did "nothing" to pursue reports of the sexual abuse of boys at a West Texas state-run school.
— Wendy Davis on Monday, September 15th, 2014 in a TV ad


MOSTLY FALSE– The statement contains an element of truth but ignores critical facts that would give a different impression.

http://www.politifact.com/texas/sta...avis-claims-greg-abbott-didnt-act-allegation/

I can dig up half truths stated from any politician, but we're talking about her ad.

Did you read the article where Abbot got numerous convictions? Mostly false is not even close to half truths. It actually is a nice way of saying 'mostly lies.'

BTW, what do you call this?

Greg Abbott did "nothing" to pursue reports of the sexual abuse of boys at a West Texas state-run school.
— Wendy Davis on Monday, September 15th, 2014 in a TV ad

Unsubstantiated: Greg Abbott attributes 3,000 murders to immigrants here illegally


PANTS ON FIRE – The statement is not accurate and makes a ridiculous claim.

Unsubstantiated Greg Abbott attributes 3 000 murders to immigrants here illegally PolitiFact Texas

Abbott got his information from a supposedly reliable source that turned out not to be factual. I don't consider quoting something in writing with a graph showing numbers lying. A serious mistake, yes!

Oh, I'm sure that's also what happened to Wendy. lol

 

[Carla_Danger]

You haven't shown me a reason of why I shouldn't. As I said before, a photo of an empty wheelchair is far less offensive than Abbott railroading other amputees and a rape victim.

And you don't seem to be able to dispute that.

Perhaps you are correct.

Byu

You haven't shown me a reason of why I shouldn't. As I said before, a photo of an empty wheelchair is far less offensive than Abbott railroading other amputees and a rape victim.

And you don't seem to be able to dispute that.

So I must believe it is an educated guess when I say you would NEVER support Hillary Clinton for President.

Or are you one of those that have no idea of who SHE represented when she was a young attorney?

I prefer Bernie Sanders.

Okay, shoot. Who did Hillary defend? You're not going to repeat the lie that she defended one of the Black Panthers, are you?

I thought you were on top of things.

What does Hillary s laughing rape defense audio mean TheHill
AUDIO Hillary Clinton Speaks of Defense of Child Rapist in Newly Unearthed Tapes Washington Free Beacon

I can only pick apart one lie at a time.

Before I start, I want you to know that I find it interesting that you need a blog to tell you what Hillary's taped interview means, as if you can't think for yourself. And I suppose you can't.

I listed to the tape, and she was in no way laughing at the rape victim. She laughed about the absurdity of the case itself.

Hillary didn't want the case and tried to get out of doing it.

Did Hillary Clinton ask to be relieved from representing an accused rapist in 1970s PolitiFact

Also, it was her JOB to defend the man. That's what public defenders do.

Gideon v. Wainwright ruled that the Sixth Amendment of the Bill of Rights requires the government to provide free legal counsel to indigent defendants in criminal cases

So, is your big beef that she was good at her job? And do you think she should have sabotaged the case, just in case she might one day run for President?

She took the case.
No one HAS to EVER take a case. Especially when it comes to defending an alleged child rapist. She took the case because she did not want to jeopardize her career by denying it. Any moron would recognize it.
As for her lauging about it. I really don't care if she did it didn't. I don't pay attention to "opinions"....

It is all about the fact that she took the case and defended an alleged rapist.

Yet, for some reason, you forgive her.

Good for you.

You are a hypocrite.

She did her job, you idiot. She was a public defender. That's what they do.

 

[Carla_Danger]

Slick's interns were young women. Young. Hillary displayed not the least upset at his abuse of them. Ergo, she's into that sort of molestation. OK, so you're prefer to believe otherwise. That's your religion and you're entitled to it.

Monica Lewinsky was indeed young, but at 23, she was a consenting adult. I don't know how Hillary felt about his affair.

There must be a reason you and Jughead can't stay on topic.

Jughead? Quite mature.

No public defender is obligated to take a case. If it interferes with their personal beliefs, or if they believe the defendant to be guilty, it is the responsibility of the judge to grant their request to be taken off the case.

She opted to stick with it.

Just as Abbott did with those he represented.

Yet you criticized Abbott....but not Clinton.

Tells me you are a child.

FYI....That IS staying on topic.

Pay attention, child.

Hillary Clinton has nothing to do with this thread, Jughead.

 

[Uncensored2008]

Considering the source, a lying dingbat, you are correct.

To purge oneself of that last hint of honor and integrity is the goal of every leftist. A goal you have achieved.

 

[Ibentoken]

Perhaps you are correct.

Byu
So I must believe it is an educated guess when I say you would NEVER support Hillary Clinton for President.

Or are you one of those that have no idea of who SHE represented when she was a young attorney?

I prefer Bernie Sanders.

Okay, shoot. Who did Hillary defend? You're not going to repeat the lie that she defended one of the Black Panthers, are you?

I thought you were on top of things.

What does Hillary s laughing rape defense audio mean TheHill
AUDIO Hillary Clinton Speaks of Defense of Child Rapist in Newly Unearthed Tapes Washington Free Beacon

I can only pick apart one lie at a time.

Before I start, I want you to know that I find it interesting that you need a blog to tell you what Hillary's taped interview means, as if you can't think for yourself. And I suppose you can't.

I listed to the tape, and she was in no way laughing at the rape victim. She laughed about the absurdity of the case itself.

Hillary didn't want the case and tried to get out of doing it.

Did Hillary Clinton ask to be relieved from representing an accused rapist in 1970s PolitiFact

Also, it was her JOB to defend the man. That's what public defenders do.

Gideon v. Wainwright ruled that the Sixth Amendment of the Bill of Rights requires the government to provide free legal counsel to indigent defendants in criminal cases

So, is your big beef that she was good at her job? And do you think she should have sabotaged the case, just in case she might one day run for President?

She took the case.
No one HAS to EVER take a case. Especially when it comes to defending an alleged child rapist. She took the case because she did not want to jeopardize her career by denying it. Any moron would recognize it.
As for her lauging about it. I really don't care if she did it didn't. I don't pay attention to "opinions"....

It is all about the fact that she took the case and defended an alleged rapist.

Yet, for some reason, you forgive her.

Good for you.

You are a hypocrite.

She did her job, you idiot. She was a public defender. That's what they do.

She has no integrity. That's why she is losing support.

 

[Carla_Danger]

I prefer Bernie Sanders.

Okay, shoot. Who did Hillary defend? You're not going to repeat the lie that she defended one of the Black Panthers, are you?

I thought you were on top of things.

What does Hillary s laughing rape defense audio mean TheHill
AUDIO Hillary Clinton Speaks of Defense of Child Rapist in Newly Unearthed Tapes Washington Free Beacon

I can only pick apart one lie at a time.

Before I start, I want you to know that I find it interesting that you need a blog to tell you what Hillary's taped interview means, as if you can't think for yourself. And I suppose you can't.

I listed to the tape, and she was in no way laughing at the rape victim. She laughed about the absurdity of the case itself.

Hillary didn't want the case and tried to get out of doing it.

Did Hillary Clinton ask to be relieved from representing an accused rapist in 1970s PolitiFact

Also, it was her JOB to defend the man. That's what public defenders do.

Gideon v. Wainwright ruled that the Sixth Amendment of the Bill of Rights requires the government to provide free legal counsel to indigent defendants in criminal cases

So, is your big beef that she was good at her job? And do you think she should have sabotaged the case, just in case she might one day run for President?

She took the case.
No one HAS to EVER take a case. Especially when it comes to defending an alleged child rapist. She took the case because she did not want to jeopardize her career by denying it. Any moron would recognize it.
As for her lauging about it. I really don't care if she did it didn't. I don't pay attention to "opinions"....

It is all about the fact that she took the case and defended an alleged rapist.

Yet, for some reason, you forgive her.

Good for you.

You are a hypocrite.

She did her job, you idiot. She was a public defender. That's what they do.

She has no integrity. That's why she is losing support.

How so?

 

[Ibentoken]

I thought you were on top of things.

What does Hillary s laughing rape defense audio mean TheHill
AUDIO Hillary Clinton Speaks of Defense of Child Rapist in Newly Unearthed Tapes Washington Free Beacon

I can only pick apart one lie at a time.

Before I start, I want you to know that I find it interesting that you need a blog to tell you what Hillary's taped interview means, as if you can't think for yourself. And I suppose you can't.

I listed to the tape, and she was in no way laughing at the rape victim. She laughed about the absurdity of the case itself.

Hillary didn't want the case and tried to get out of doing it.

Did Hillary Clinton ask to be relieved from representing an accused rapist in 1970s PolitiFact

Also, it was her JOB to defend the man. That's what public defenders do.

Gideon v. Wainwright ruled that the Sixth Amendment of the Bill of Rights requires the government to provide free legal counsel to indigent defendants in criminal cases

So, is your big beef that she was good at her job? And do you think she should have sabotaged the case, just in case she might one day run for President?

She took the case.
No one HAS to EVER take a case. Especially when it comes to defending an alleged child rapist. She took the case because she did not want to jeopardize her career by denying it. Any moron would recognize it.
As for her lauging about it. I really don't care if she did it didn't. I don't pay attention to "opinions"....

It is all about the fact that she took the case and defended an alleged rapist.

Yet, for some reason, you forgive her.

Good for you.

You are a hypocrite.

She did her job, you idiot. She was a public defender. That's what they do.

She has no integrity. That's why she is losing support.

How so?

People don't like dumb blondes. What's your theory why she is falling behind?

 

[Carla_Danger]

I can only pick apart one lie at a time.

Before I start, I want you to know that I find it interesting that you need a blog to tell you what Hillary's taped interview means, as if you can't think for yourself. And I suppose you can't.

I listed to the tape, and she was in no way laughing at the rape victim. She laughed about the absurdity of the case itself.

Hillary didn't want the case and tried to get out of doing it.

Did Hillary Clinton ask to be relieved from representing an accused rapist in 1970s PolitiFact

Also, it was her JOB to defend the man. That's what public defenders do.

Gideon v. Wainwright ruled that the Sixth Amendment of the Bill of Rights requires the government to provide free legal counsel to indigent defendants in criminal cases

So, is your big beef that she was good at her job? And do you think she should have sabotaged the case, just in case she might one day run for President?

She took the case.
No one HAS to EVER take a case. Especially when it comes to defending an alleged child rapist. She took the case because she did not want to jeopardize her career by denying it. Any moron would recognize it.
As for her lauging about it. I really don't care if she did it didn't. I don't pay attention to "opinions"....

It is all about the fact that she took the case and defended an alleged rapist.

Yet, for some reason, you forgive her.

Good for you.

You are a hypocrite.

She did her job, you idiot. She was a public defender. That's what they do.

She has no integrity. That's why she is losing support.

How so?

People don't like dumb blondes. What's your theory why she is falling behind?

Holy cow, you don't even know who we were talking about, do ya? We were talking about Hillary Clinton, because Jughead and Censored can't stay on topic.

 

[Ibentoken]

She took the case.
No one HAS to EVER take a case. Especially when it comes to defending an alleged child rapist. She took the case because she did not want to jeopardize her career by denying it. Any moron would recognize it.
As for her lauging about it. I really don't care if she did it didn't. I don't pay attention to "opinions"....

It is all about the fact that she took the case and defended an alleged rapist.

Yet, for some reason, you forgive her.

Good for you.

You are a hypocrite.

She did her job, you idiot. She was a public defender. That's what they do.

She has no integrity. That's why she is losing support.

How so?

People don't like dumb blondes. What's your theory why she is falling behind?

Holy cow, you don't even know who we were talking about, do ya? We were talking about Hillary Clinton, because Jughead and Censored can't stay on topic.

Hillary has no integrity either. No one on the left has integrity. You lie every day.

 

[Carla_Danger]

Slick's interns were young women. Young. Hillary displayed not the least upset at his abuse of them. Ergo, she's into that sort of molestation. OK, so you're prefer to believe otherwise. That's your religion and you're entitled to it.

Monica Lewinsky was indeed young, but at 23, she was a consenting adult. I don't know how Hillary felt about his affair.

There must be a reason you and Jughead can't stay on topic.

Jughead? Quite mature.

No public defender is obligated to take a case. If it interferes with their personal beliefs, or if they believe the defendant to be guilty, it is the responsibility of the judge to grant their request to be taken off the case.

She opted to stick with it.

Just as Abbott did with those he represented.

Yet you criticized Abbott....but not Clinton.

Tells me you are a child.

FYI....That IS staying on topic.

Pay attention, child.

She damn sure was obligated to take the case, you moron.

Asked to be relieved?

But did she try to get out of it?

Gibson, the Washington County prosecutor and one of the only people still alivewith knowledge of the case, has said emphatically over the years that she did.

In 2008, Gibson told Newsday that "Hillary told me she didn’t want to take that case. She made that very clear."

Recently, Gibson made similar comments to CNN. He said the judge, Maupin Cummings (now deceased), found Clinton on a list of lawyers who would represent low-income clients.

According to Gibson, Clinton called him and said, "I don't want to represent this guy. I just can't stand this. I don't want to get involved. Can you get me off?"

Here's the damn link again...

Did Hillary Clinton ask to be relieved from representing an accused rapist in 1970s PolitiFact

 

[Carla_Danger]

She did her job, you idiot. She was a public defender. That's what they do.

She has no integrity. That's why she is losing support.

How so?

People don't like dumb blondes. What's your theory why she is falling behind?

Holy cow, you don't even know who we were talking about, do ya? We were talking about Hillary Clinton, because Jughead and Censored can't stay on topic.

Hillary has no integrity either. No one on the left has integrity. You lie every day.

 

[Ibentoken]

She has no integrity. That's why she is losing support.

How so?

People don't like dumb blondes. What's your theory why she is falling behind?

Holy cow, you don't even know who we were talking about, do ya? We were talking about Hillary Clinton, because Jughead and Censored can't stay on topic.

Hillary has no integrity either. No one on the left has integrity. You lie every day.

I'm going to have a party on election day. What are you going to do?

 

[Carla_Danger]

How so?

People don't like dumb blondes. What's your theory why she is falling behind?

Holy cow, you don't even know who we were talking about, do ya? We were talking about Hillary Clinton, because Jughead and Censored can't stay on topic.

Hillary has no integrity either. No one on the left has integrity. You lie every day.

I'm going to have a party on election day. What are you going to do?

I'll probably watch you make an ass of yourself. LOL!

 

[TooTall]

I got busy, but here is one that I looked up. I have more and will post them when I have time.

Greg Abbott did "nothing" to pursue reports of the sexual abuse of boys at a West Texas state-run school.
— Wendy Davis on Monday, September 15th, 2014 in a TV ad


MOSTLY FALSE– The statement contains an element of truth but ignores critical facts that would give a different impression.

http://www.politifact.com/texas/sta...avis-claims-greg-abbott-didnt-act-allegation/

I can dig up half truths stated from any politician, but we're talking about her ad.

Did you read the article where Abbot got numerous convictions? Mostly false is not even close to half truths. It actually is a nice way of saying 'mostly lies.'

BTW, what do you call this?

Greg Abbott did "nothing" to pursue reports of the sexual abuse of boys at a West Texas state-run school.
— Wendy Davis on Monday, September 15th, 2014 in a TV ad

Unsubstantiated: Greg Abbott attributes 3,000 murders to immigrants here illegally


PANTS ON FIRE – The statement is not accurate and makes a ridiculous claim.

Unsubstantiated Greg Abbott attributes 3 000 murders to immigrants here illegally PolitiFact Texas

Abbott got his information from a supposedly reliable source that turned out not to be factual. I don't consider quoting something in writing with a graph showing numbers lying. A serious mistake, yes!

Oh, I'm sure that's also what happened to Wendy. lol

Wrong, Wendy just makes stuff up, lies a lot and twists the facts to suit her liberal agenda.