John Edgar Slow Horses
Diamond Member
- Apr 11, 2023
- 24,388
- 12,807
- 1,288
Can't rebut the obvious, can you?You seem like an AI bot with output settings programmed to STUPID.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
Can't rebut the obvious, can you?You seem like an AI bot with output settings programmed to STUPID.
Can't rebut the obvious, can you?
Again...who is it that a President NEEDS to tell? You never seem to be able to answer that but you're determined that he needed to tell someone!If he doesn’t tell anyone they’re declassified, then he has no right to complain when the documents are treated as classified by the government.
The point is that it makes absolutely no sense for him to declassify information without telling anyone.
I’ve answered it numerous times and you simply ignore it.Again...who is it that a President NEEDS to tell? You never seem to be able to answer that but you're determined that he needed to tell someone!
LIbs don't understand that the president has the right to access those documents.How is refusing to turn over documents that you have the legal right to possess in any way an "obstruction of justice"?
IAW the law, yes. He did not do that, then lied and denied and defied the law.LIbs don't understand that the president has the right to access those documents.
You've answered that? Who is it that a President is required to inform before he takes a document home with him?I’ve answered it numerous times and you simply ignore it.
By failing to tell anyone, he has not broken any law.
But he also will have to deal with the consequences of choosing (for absolutely no reason whatsoever) to keep it secret.
Those consequences include having the DoJ investigate you when they find he was keeping documents that everyone in government understood to be highly classified.
So you admit that he hasn't broken any law by taking documents but then you admit that another President's DOJ will be going after you for not breaking the law?I’ve answered it numerous times and you simply ignore it.
By failing to tell anyone, he has not broken any law.
But he also will have to deal with the consequences of choosing (for absolutely no reason whatsoever) to keep it secret.
Those consequences include having the DoJ investigate you when they find he was keeping documents that everyone in government understood to be highly classified.
He is not required to inform anyone.You've answered that? Who is it that a President is required to inform before he takes a document home with him?
That's not what I said at all. I said he is not breaking any law by deciding not to inform anyone he declassified documents.So you admit that he hasn't broken any law by taking documents but then you admit that another President's DOJ will be going after you for not breaking the law?
He didn't break any law because he's the ultimate authority on classification! You know this and yet you're STILL here trying to claim that he needed to tell someone! He didn't.That's not what I said at all. I said he is not breaking any law by deciding not to inform anyone he declassified documents.
We still haven't heard if he actually did declassify them.
As far as anyone knows, the documents were never declassified, therefore he is going to be prosecuted for illegally retaining classified documents.He didn't break any law because he's the ultimate authority on classification! You know this and yet you're STILL here trying to claim that he needed to tell someone! He didn't.
What you call "confusion" is the DOJ of another President sending an FBI Swat team to the home of his chief political rival armed with a search warrant so broad it allowed them to take ANYTHING in that home! That's not "confusion"...it's blatant abuse of power!He is not required to inform anyone.
However, if he chooses to not inform anyone, he is going to have to deal with the consequences of the confusion he has created by not doing so.
The confusion comes from no one knowing if Trump declassified those documents or not.What you call "confusion" is the DOJ of another President sending an FBI Swat team to the home of his chief political rival armed with a search warrant so broad it allowed them to take ANYTHING in that home! That's not "confusion"...it's blatant abuse of power!
As far as anyone knows...ALL the documents were declassified. You know as well as I do that he had that authority! That authority isn't something he had to declare...it wasn't something he needed permission to invoke...and the only person to blame for this travesty is Joe Biden...a President who used his DOJ against a political rival...FOR DOING SOMETHING THAT HE HIMSELF WAS FAR MORE GUILTY OF THAN TRUMP EVER WAS!!!As far as anyone knows, the documents were never declassified, therefore he is going to be prosecuted for illegally retaining classified documents.
He has no one to blame but himself.
So did the search warrant allow them to retrieve ONLY highly classified documents?The confusion comes from no one knowing if Trump declassified those documents or not.
Using a search warrant to retrieve highly classified documents is not abuse of power, it's exactly what anyone would expect to occur. Obviously.
The documents were clearly marked classified and the DoJ is legally required to protect classified information.As far as anyone knows...ALL the documents were declassified. You know as well as I do that he had that authority! That authority isn't something he had to declare...it wasn't something he needed permission to invoke...and the only person to blame for this travesty is Joe Biden...a President who used his DOJ against a political rival...FOR DOING SOMETHING THAT HE HIMSELF WAS FAR MORE GUILTY OF THAN TRUMP EVER WAS!!!