WCNSF: Wounded Child No Surviving Family

Israel is the occupying power in Gaza under international law.
Jews have effective control over land borders and coastal waters and Gazan airspace and population registry.
Jews have been coveting Gazan real estate since 1967, and they are now preparing to ethnically cleanse all non-Jews from their land just as they've been doing since 1948.
Only fascists and fools support the racist, apartheid state of Israel.

You have this odd notion that wiki is a source for international law.
 
They gave it back after taking it in Wars Idiot. Egypt had it and said fuck this. Now its a launching point for constant attacks.

Israel needs to finish it this time.
Israel needs to end its vicious, racist illegal occupation/blockade of Palestine. Your support for a genocide in the making makes me wonder how many Jewish babies you would kill "to finish it this time?"
1700262054093.jpeg
 
When was Gaza ever a part of Egypt?

Why don't/can't Israel unilaterally return Gaza to Egypt?.

"In 1978, as part of the Camp David accords, Israel agreed to give back the Sinai Peninsula and tried to make it a package deal including Gaza. Egypt refused the offer, saying Gaza was never part of Egypt."

Do you support Israel's current campaign of ethnic cleansing in Gaza? What moral law gives Jews the "right" to steal the land of non-Jews?
I support treating Gaza like Carthage.
 
There is no rationalizing any of this.....~S~
War is not Rational. Its when 2 peoples cannot peacefully come to any agreement. Then the only solution is to kill or be killed.

Those tunnels. Rockets. Hamas need to be gone. They been doing this crap for decades.

Time to end that BS.
 
You have this odd notion that wiki is a source for international law.
So far, you've proven inadequate (at least) at refuting any of Wikipedia's claims regarding Israel's deliberate ignoring of international law.

Maybe you can explain why the Jewish state feels entitled to ignore UNSC 242:

United Nations Security Council Resolution 242 - Wikipedia

"Operative Paragraph One 'Affirms that the fulfillment of Charter principles requires the establishment of a just and lasting peace in the Middle East which should include the application of both the following principles:'

(i) "'Withdrawal of Israeli armed forces from territories occupied in the recent conflict;(ii) Termination of all claims or states of belligerency and respect for and acknowledgment of the sovereignty, territorial integrity and political independence of every State in the area and their right to live in peace within secure and recognized boundaries free from threats or acts of force.'[4]"
 
Israel will "end it" by genocide?

Can you think of any reason why the US should pay for that crime against humanity?

Americans are Bankrolling Israel’s Unfolding Genocide in Gaza

"But, according to CCR, 'The United States has a duty under Article 1 of the Genocide Convention to prevent and punish acts of genocide, an obligation the U.S. Congress made law in 1988.'

"It’s not just the number of dead Palestinians that ought to result in a withholding of U.S. aid but the fact that Israeli officials have been overt about their genocidal aspirations.

"The lawsuit offers evidence of how various Israeli politicians have referred to Palestinians with dehumanizing language such as Defense Minister Yoav Gallant, who promised that the 'human animals' in Gaza would suffer the consequences of his order for 'a complete siege on the Gaza Strip,' resulting in 'no electricity, no food, no fuel.'"
 
So far, you've proven inadequate (at least) at refuting any of Wikipedia's claims regarding Israel's deliberate ignoring of international law.

Maybe you can explain why the Jewish state feels entitled to ignore UNSC 242:

United Nations Security Council Resolution 242 - Wikipedia

"Operative Paragraph One 'Affirms that the fulfillment of Charter principles requires the establishment of a just and lasting peace in the Middle East which should include the application of both the following principles:'

(i) "'Withdrawal of Israeli armed forces from territories occupied in the recent conflict;(ii) Termination of all claims or states of belligerency and respect for and acknowledgment of the sovereignty, territorial integrity and political independence of every State in the area and their right to live in peace within secure and recognized boundaries free from threats or acts of force.'[4]"
So far, you have been inadequate at offering anything but copy and paste from wiki, a blog which we know can be edited by anyone.
 
So far, you've proven inadequate (at least) at refuting any of Wikipedia's claims regarding Israel's deliberate ignoring of international law.

Maybe you can explain why the Jewish state feels entitled to ignore UNSC 242:

United Nations Security Council Resolution 242 - Wikipedia

"Operative Paragraph One 'Affirms that the fulfillment of Charter principles requires the establishment of a just and lasting peace in the Middle East which should include the application of both the following principles:'

(i) "'Withdrawal of Israeli armed forces from territories occupied in the recent conflict;(ii) Termination of all claims or states of belligerency and respect for and acknowledgment of the sovereignty, territorial integrity and political independence of every State in the area and their right to live in peace within secure and recognized boundaries free from threats or acts of force.'[4]"

Why would I refute your cutting and pasting from a blog that can be edited by anyone?

You can't defend anything you cut and paste from wiki so your only response is to cut and paste more volumes of wiki'eze.
 
So far, you've proven inadequate (at least) at refuting any of Wikipedia's claims regarding Israel's deliberate ignoring of international law.

Maybe you can explain why the Jewish state feels entitled to ignore UNSC 242:

United Nations Security Council Resolution 242 - Wikipedia

"Operative Paragraph One 'Affirms that the fulfillment of Charter principles requires the establishment of a just and lasting peace in the Middle East which should include the application of both the following principles:'

(i) "'Withdrawal of Israeli armed forces from territories occupied in the recent conflict;(ii) Termination of all claims or states of belligerency and respect for and acknowledgment of the sovereignty, territorial integrity and political independence of every State in the area and their right to live in peace within secure and recognized boundaries free from threats or acts of force.'[4]"
The UN can go to hell.... It's been complicit in the murders with it's silence.
 
Why would I refute your cutting and pasting from a blog that can be edited by anyone?

You can't defend anything you cut and paste from wiki so your only response is to cut and paste more volumes of wiki'eze.
Still can't find any evidence that Israel is fully complying with UNSC 242?

Palestinians speak out on anniversary of Resolution 242

"The Six-Day War in June 1967 culminated in Israel’s capture of the Gaza Strip, the Sinai Peninsula, the West Bank, including East Jerusalem, and the Golan Heights.

"Apart from the Sinai Peninsula, the territories remain occupied to this day."

"The United Nations Security Council adopted Resolution 242 on November 22, 1967, calling for the 'withdrawal of Israeli armed forces from territories occupied in the recent conflict'.

"It emphasised 'the inadmissibility of the acquisition of territory by war and the need to work for a just and lasting peace in the Middle East in which every State in the area can live in security'"
 
Still can't find any evidence that Israel is fully complying with UNSC 242?

Palestinians speak out on anniversary of Resolution 242

"The Six-Day War in June 1967 culminated in Israel’s capture of the Gaza Strip, the Sinai Peninsula, the West Bank, including East Jerusalem, and the Golan Heights.

"Apart from the Sinai Peninsula, the territories remain occupied to this day."

"The United Nations Security Council adopted Resolution 242 on November 22, 1967, calling for the 'withdrawal of Israeli armed forces from territories occupied in the recent conflict'.

"It emphasised 'the inadmissibility of the acquisition of territory by war and the need to work for a just and lasting peace in the Middle East in which every State in the area can live in security'"

What can you cut and paste from wiki?
 
The UN can go to hell.... It's been complicit in the murders with it's silence.
Which murders?
Those committed resisting an illegal occupation or those supporting Israel's illegal occupation of Palestine?

You might also consider the fact Israel would not even exist today without the support it received from the UK, US, and UN:

Milestones: 1945–1952 - Office of the Historian.

"On November 29, 1947 the United Nations adopted Resolution 181 (also known as the Partition Resolution) that would divide Great Britain’s former Palestinian mandate into Jewish and Arab states in May 1948 when the British mandate was scheduled to end."
 

Forum List

Back
Top