Toronado3800
Gold Member
- Nov 15, 2009
- 7,608
- 560
- 140
With the liberals on this board--most of which I assume are YOUNGSTERS....
Hey, maybe I voted for Ronald, George, against Bill, Bill, then for George, and George again and I like debt!
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
With the liberals on this board--most of which I assume are YOUNGSTERS....
With the liberals on this board--most of which I assume are YOUNGSTERS....
Hey, maybe I voted for Ronald, George, against Bill, Bill, then for George, and George again and I like debt!
Well then...you're right at home with Obama's current irresponsible fiscal policies aren't you???
With the liberals on this board--most of which I assume are YOUNGSTERS....
Hey, maybe I voted for Ronald, George, against Bill, Bill, then for George, and George again and I like debt!
Well then...you're right at home with Obama's current irresponsible fiscal policies aren't you???
Strange that a different group are complaining about the debt now that the office of the president is under different party control.
Hey, maybe I voted for Ronald, George, against Bill, Bill, then for George, and George again and I like debt!
Well then...you're right at home with Obama's current irresponsible fiscal policies aren't you???
Good. So we admit financial policies during the Clinton years were more responsible than the 12 previous or the 8 following.
If it were not for that debt we've inherited taxes could have been a bit lower the past few years. According to the IRS 8% of your 2006 taxes went to pay interest on the debt that year. (just what year's 1040 book I had handy)
Too bad the Dems controlled the senate in 2003, and could have stopped chimpola cold.Most Democrats voted against the war, btw. Read a paper or something once in awhile.
And they both try to blame the other side for what they do.I remember posting on some message board back in 2002 about the subject of the Iraq war. I simply said that if the US attacks Iraq and finds WMDs, who cares? They're no threat to us. Besides, we can't afford to go to war anyway. Both Republicans and Democrats slammed me for it. Of course, the Democrats pretended that they hadn't supported the war after no WMDs were found, but that seems to be a common theme with the two major political parties these days.
Too bad the Dems controlled the senate in 2003, and could have stopped chimpola cold.Most Democrats voted against the war, btw. Read a paper or something once in awhile.
'Congress' wasn't the issue you phoney bastard and you know it, the dems laid down like Persian rugs and let those assclowns invade a country for no valid reason.
And YOUR BOYS made it happen bull shit artist.
Ummmmm....you may want to check that statement....seems to me the Democrat controlled Senate voted FOR WAR in 2002 and are continuously supporting it TO THIS VERY DAY!
That's why they have a term called a 'half truth'. Democrats in Congress voted 147 to 110 AGAINST the Iraq authorization.
We have a bicameral legislature. You learn that in school.
That's the House...THE SENATE which was controlled by the Democrats voted in favor of war...regardless of the breakdown...it passed and here we are.
Read it and weep douchebag, I said BOTH of you asshole parties did it, the ones who cock you suck as just as guilty as the simp that was in the whitehouse who pulled the trigger, and all your bullshit will NEVER let you escape it warmonger.Too bad the Dems controlled the senate in 2003, and could have stopped chimpola cold.Most Democrats voted against the war, btw. Read a paper or something once in awhile.
'Congress' wasn't the issue you phoney bastard and you know it, the dems laid down like Persian rugs and let those assclowns invade a country for no valid reason.
And YOUR BOYS made it happen bull shit artist.
I love it when cons try to blame the Iraq war on the Democrats.
MOST DEMOCRATS VOTED AGAINST THE IRAQ WAR. PERIOD.
I'd like to hear a conservative tell me how to balance the budget if they
a. won't cut military spending and in fact would prefer to increase military spending
b. want to cut taxes and thus reduce revenues even more
...with Medicare cuts now off the table according to Republicans, Social Security is for all practical purposes off the table according to everyone...
how do you do it?
I'd like to hear a conservative tell me how to balance the budget if they
a. won't cut military spending and in fact would prefer to increase military spending
b. want to cut taxes and thus reduce revenues even more
...with Medicare cuts now off the table according to Republicans, Social Security is for all practical purposes off the table according to everyone...
how do you do it?
I'd like to see a dimocrat with the will to reduce the size of government.
Nothing should be off the table when it comes to cutting government spending.
NOTHING
I'd like to hear a conservative tell me how to balance the budget if they
a. won't cut military spending and in fact would prefer to increase military spending
b. want to cut taxes and thus reduce revenues even more
...with Medicare cuts now off the table according to Republicans, Social Security is for all practical purposes off the table according to everyone...
how do you do it?
I'd like to see a dimocrat with the will to reduce the size of government.
Nothing should be off the table when it comes to cutting government spending.
NOTHING
I'd like to see a rebutlicken with the will to reduce the size of government
I'd like to see a dimocrat with the will to reduce the size of government.
Nothing should be off the table when it comes to cutting government spending.
NOTHING
I'd like to see a rebutlicken with the will to reduce the size of government
so would I
but you can't seem to think out of the 2 party box can you?
FYI in case you can't grasp the concept from my posts which I'm sure you haven't read, I am no fan of either party and do not belong to a political party.
I, unlike you partisan sheep, think for myself and do not allow ideology, dogma and partisan bickering to define my political philosophies.
the fact is that both the repudlicans and dimocrats are destroying this country with out of control spending and expansion of government and its role in our daily lives.
Does anyone have a link to historical government spending rates as a % of GDP? I'm looking in all the wrong places. In particular I'm thinking about the Clinton terms vs Bush1 since the budget got balanced. That doesn't mean he lowered the comparable size of government though.There has not been any administration in my lifetime that spent less than its predecessor.
Darn right I like that factoid. I bounce around on the importance of it. Social Security is not a great investment for a healthy person who will work till they can't. Become disabled early though and "poof"! There you go. Its kind of an insurance policy against poor investments, random career pitfalls, and bad luck. Its worth it to me to keep old folks from living on the streets.what percentage of the annual U.S. budget pays for entitlement programs?
Does anyone have a link to historical government spending rates as a % of GDP? I'm looking in all the wrong places. In particular I'm thinking about the Clinton terms vs Bush1 since the budget got balanced. That doesn't mean he lowered the comparable size of government though.There has not been any administration in my lifetime that spent less than its predecessor.
IF it matters I'm not a member of either party. Mostly I vote for Democrats but do "break party lines" on a number of gun/military/death penalty issues.
Darn right I like that factoid. I bounce around on the importance of it. Social Security is not a great investment for a healthy person who will work till they can't. Become disabled early though and "poof"! There you go. Its kind of an insurance policy against poor investments, random career pitfalls, and bad luck. Its worth it to me to keep old folks from living on the streets.what percentage of the annual U.S. budget pays for entitlement programs?