Wave: GOP Voters At All-Time High...

[paulitician]

Just thought i'd post this for all the Dem-Bot nutters who keep posting their stupid "The Republican Party is Dead" threads.

According to new research released today by Rasmussen, more voters identify themselves as Republican than ever in the last 8 years. More importantly, by a 4 point margin, more voters identify as GOP than Democrat. This is the largest spread between the parties ever. Worse for Democrats, the number of voters who identify with their party is also approaching an historic low.

In August, 37.6% of voters identified themselves as Republican. That is up from 34.9% in July. By contrast, just 33.3% of voters identify themselves as Democrats. That is very near their historic low in February, when 32.4% of voters identified as Democrat. The 4.3 margin in favor of the GOP is the biggest gap ever between the parties. In November 2010, when the GOP won a landslide in the mid-term elections, their advantage was just 1.3 points.

Immediately prior to Obama's inauguration, the Democrat party held a nearly 9 point edge over Republicans. Over 41% of voters called themselves Democrats then, compared to around 32% who were Republicans. It is a stunning reversal as Obama heads into reelection.

The last time GOP was close to this level was September 2004. President Bush went on to win reelection two months later, with an electorate that was evenly split. Even then, more voters called themselves Democrats then, but the party's advantage over the GOP was just over 1 point.

Most of the polls this year are based on the assumption that the Democrats will have a numerical advantage on election day. Many media polls assume even that the electorate in November will be more Democrat than it was in 2008. Based on these results, that event is close to mathematically impossible...

Read More:
Wave: GOP Voters at All-Time High

 

[Jackson]

Reminiscent of the 2010 election....

 

[Stephanie]

Just thought i'd post this for all the Dem-Bot nutters who keep posting their stupid "The Republican Party is Dead" threads.

According to new research released today by Rasmussen, more voters identify themselves as Republican than ever in the last 8 years. More importantly, by a 4 point margin, more voters identify as GOP than Democrat. This is the largest spread between the parties ever. Worse for Democrats, the number of voters who identify with their party is also approaching an historic low.

In August, 37.6% of voters identified themselves as Republican. That is up from 34.9% in July. By contrast, just 33.3% of voters identify themselves as Democrats. That is very near their historic low in February, when 32.4% of voters identified as Democrat. The 4.3 margin in favor of the GOP is the biggest gap ever between the parties. In November 2010, when the GOP won a landslide in the mid-term elections, their advantage was just 1.3 points.

Immediately prior to Obama's inauguration, the Democrat party held a nearly 9 point edge over Republicans. Over 41% of voters called themselves Democrats then, compared to around 32% who were Republicans. It is a stunning reversal as Obama heads into reelection.

The last time GOP was close to this level was September 2004. President Bush went on to win reelection two months later, with an electorate that was evenly split. Even then, more voters called themselves Democrats then, but the party's advantage over the GOP was just over 1 point.

Most of the polls this year are based on the assumption that the Democrats will have a numerical advantage on election day. Many media polls assume even that the electorate in November will be more Democrat than it was in 2008. Based on these results, that event is close to mathematically impossible...

Read More:
Wave: GOP Voters at All-Time High

sorry dear, I already beat you with this..
didn't get much from the liberals on it, they probably don't want to believe it

 

[Sherry]

Just thought i'd post this for all the Dem-Bot nutters who keep posting their stupid "The Republican Party is Dead" threads.

According to new research released today by Rasmussen, more voters identify themselves as Republican than ever in the last 8 years. More importantly, by a 4 point margin, more voters identify as GOP than Democrat. This is the largest spread between the parties ever. Worse for Democrats, the number of voters who identify with their party is also approaching an historic low.

In August, 37.6% of voters identified themselves as Republican. That is up from 34.9% in July. By contrast, just 33.3% of voters identify themselves as Democrats. That is very near their historic low in February, when 32.4% of voters identified as Democrat. The 4.3 margin in favor of the GOP is the biggest gap ever between the parties. In November 2010, when the GOP won a landslide in the mid-term elections, their advantage was just 1.3 points.

Immediately prior to Obama's inauguration, the Democrat party held a nearly 9 point edge over Republicans. Over 41% of voters called themselves Democrats then, compared to around 32% who were Republicans. It is a stunning reversal as Obama heads into reelection.

The last time GOP was close to this level was September 2004. President Bush went on to win reelection two months later, with an electorate that was evenly split. Even then, more voters called themselves Democrats then, but the party's advantage over the GOP was just over 1 point.

Most of the polls this year are based on the assumption that the Democrats will have a numerical advantage on election day. Many media polls assume even that the electorate in November will be more Democrat than it was in 2008. Based on these results, that event is close to mathematically impossible...

Read More:
Wave: GOP Voters at All-Time High

sorry dear, I already beat you with this..
didn't get much from the liberals on it, they probably don't want to believe it

You mean they haven't tried to blame FOX News or the internet...damn free speech.

 

[paulitician]

Just thought i'd post this for all the Dem-Bot nutters who keep posting their stupid "The Republican Party is Dead" threads.

According to new research released today by Rasmussen, more voters identify themselves as Republican than ever in the last 8 years. More importantly, by a 4 point margin, more voters identify as GOP than Democrat. This is the largest spread between the parties ever. Worse for Democrats, the number of voters who identify with their party is also approaching an historic low.

In August, 37.6% of voters identified themselves as Republican. That is up from 34.9% in July. By contrast, just 33.3% of voters identify themselves as Democrats. That is very near their historic low in February, when 32.4% of voters identified as Democrat. The 4.3 margin in favor of the GOP is the biggest gap ever between the parties. In November 2010, when the GOP won a landslide in the mid-term elections, their advantage was just 1.3 points.

Immediately prior to Obama's inauguration, the Democrat party held a nearly 9 point edge over Republicans. Over 41% of voters called themselves Democrats then, compared to around 32% who were Republicans. It is a stunning reversal as Obama heads into reelection.

The last time GOP was close to this level was September 2004. President Bush went on to win reelection two months later, with an electorate that was evenly split. Even then, more voters called themselves Democrats then, but the party's advantage over the GOP was just over 1 point.

Most of the polls this year are based on the assumption that the Democrats will have a numerical advantage on election day. Many media polls assume even that the electorate in November will be more Democrat than it was in 2008. Based on these results, that event is close to mathematically impossible...

Read More:
Wave: GOP Voters at All-Time High

sorry dear, I already beat you with this..
didn't get much from the liberals on it, they probably don't want to believe it

Yeah, it fucks with their programming. They're probably off rebooting and receiving their DNC Talking Point update.

 

[beretta304]

Just thought i'd post this for all the Dem-Bot nutters who keep posting their stupid "The Republican Party is Dead" threads.

According to new research released today by Rasmussen, more voters identify themselves as Republican than ever in the last 8 years. More importantly, by a 4 point margin, more voters identify as GOP than Democrat. This is the largest spread between the parties ever. Worse for Democrats, the number of voters who identify with their party is also approaching an historic low.

In August, 37.6% of voters identified themselves as Republican. That is up from 34.9% in July. By contrast, just 33.3% of voters identify themselves as Democrats. That is very near their historic low in February, when 32.4% of voters identified as Democrat. The 4.3 margin in favor of the GOP is the biggest gap ever between the parties. In November 2010, when the GOP won a landslide in the mid-term elections, their advantage was just 1.3 points.

Immediately prior to Obama's inauguration, the Democrat party held a nearly 9 point edge over Republicans. Over 41% of voters called themselves Democrats then, compared to around 32% who were Republicans. It is a stunning reversal as Obama heads into reelection.

The last time GOP was close to this level was September 2004. President Bush went on to win reelection two months later, with an electorate that was evenly split. Even then, more voters called themselves Democrats then, but the party's advantage over the GOP was just over 1 point.

Most of the polls this year are based on the assumption that the Democrats will have a numerical advantage on election day. Many media polls assume even that the electorate in November will be more Democrat than it was in 2008. Based on these results, that event is close to mathematically impossible...

Read More:
Wave: GOP Voters at All-Time High

In reality the only place we need Republicans to outnumber the Dems are in the swing states. The "given" states are exactly why the Electoral College needs to be modified. Not to say that blue states can't go red and Reagan was proof of that... although even I agree that Romney is no Reagan.

 

[Stephanie]

Just thought i'd post this for all the Dem-Bot nutters who keep posting their stupid "The Republican Party is Dead" threads.

According to new research released today by Rasmussen, more voters identify themselves as Republican than ever in the last 8 years. More importantly, by a 4 point margin, more voters identify as GOP than Democrat. This is the largest spread between the parties ever. Worse for Democrats, the number of voters who identify with their party is also approaching an historic low.

In August, 37.6% of voters identified themselves as Republican. That is up from 34.9% in July. By contrast, just 33.3% of voters identify themselves as Democrats. That is very near their historic low in February, when 32.4% of voters identified as Democrat. The 4.3 margin in favor of the GOP is the biggest gap ever between the parties. In November 2010, when the GOP won a landslide in the mid-term elections, their advantage was just 1.3 points.

Immediately prior to Obama's inauguration, the Democrat party held a nearly 9 point edge over Republicans. Over 41% of voters called themselves Democrats then, compared to around 32% who were Republicans. It is a stunning reversal as Obama heads into reelection.

The last time GOP was close to this level was September 2004. President Bush went on to win reelection two months later, with an electorate that was evenly split. Even then, more voters called themselves Democrats then, but the party's advantage over the GOP was just over 1 point.

Most of the polls this year are based on the assumption that the Democrats will have a numerical advantage on election day. Many media polls assume even that the electorate in November will be more Democrat than it was in 2008. Based on these results, that event is close to mathematically impossible...

Read More:
Wave: GOP Voters at All-Time High

sorry dear, I already beat you with this..
didn't get much from the liberals on it, they probably don't want to believe it

Yeah, it fucks with their programming. They're probably off rebooting and receiving their DNC Talking Point update.

lol, probably so, but the DNC must be behind in getting it out to them..awfully quiet on this

 

[paulitician]

sorry dear, I already beat you with this..
didn't get much from the liberals on it, they probably don't want to believe it

Yeah, it fucks with their programming. They're probably off rebooting and receiving their DNC Talking Point update.

lol, probably so, but the DNC must be behind in getting it out to them..awfully quiet on this

Or they're busy pecking away at their keyboards posting another idiotic 'The Republican Party is Dead' thread.

 

[Stephanie]

Yeah, it fucks with their programming. They're probably off rebooting and receiving their DNC Talking Point update.

lol, probably so, but the DNC must be behind in getting it out to them..awfully quiet on this

Or they're busy pecking away at their keyboards posting another idiotic 'The Republican Party is Dead' thread.

or another one on how when "Republican party dies" all will be UTIOPIA

 

[Procrustes Stretched]

Who cares? GOP candidates need to win over Independents, not more wingnuts

 

[beretta304]

Who cares? GOP candidates need to win over Independents, not more wingnuts

And history says that Independents break for the challenger especially in a bad economic environment.

 

[LoneLaugher]

There, there.......do da widdle babies feel all better now?

 

[Procrustes Stretched]

Who cares? GOP candidates need to win over Independents, not more wingnuts

And history says that Independents break for the challenger especially in a bad economic environment.

either you believe the spin on this, or you are pushing spin without knowing it. Why are you leaving out what all the data shows on this? Is it because you are just posting what you've read without fully understanding?

Independents break for? Especially? History says?

The data shows. Sometimes. History, what history?

 

[paulitician]

Who cares? GOP candidates need to win over Independents, not more wingnuts

And history says that Independents break for the challenger especially in a bad economic environment.

either you believe the spin on this, or you are pushing spin without knowing it. Why are you leaving out what all the data shows on this? Is it because you are just posting what you've read without fully understanding?

Independents break for? Especially? History says?

The data shows. Sometimes. History, what history?

Oh calm down there dipshit. We know this fucks with your Obamabot programming, but there's still no need to become hysterical. Get a grip.

 

[Truthmatters]

Just thought i'd post this for all the Dem-Bot nutters who keep posting their stupid "The Republican Party is Dead" threads.

According to new research released today by Rasmussen, more voters identify themselves as Republican than ever in the last 8 years. More importantly, by a 4 point margin, more voters identify as GOP than Democrat. This is the largest spread between the parties ever. Worse for Democrats, the number of voters who identify with their party is also approaching an historic low.

In August, 37.6% of voters identified themselves as Republican. That is up from 34.9% in July. By contrast, just 33.3% of voters identify themselves as Democrats. That is very near their historic low in February, when 32.4% of voters identified as Democrat. The 4.3 margin in favor of the GOP is the biggest gap ever between the parties. In November 2010, when the GOP won a landslide in the mid-term elections, their advantage was just 1.3 points.

Immediately prior to Obama's inauguration, the Democrat party held a nearly 9 point edge over Republicans. Over 41% of voters called themselves Democrats then, compared to around 32% who were Republicans. It is a stunning reversal as Obama heads into reelection.

The last time GOP was close to this level was September 2004. President Bush went on to win reelection two months later, with an electorate that was evenly split. Even then, more voters called themselves Democrats then, but the party's advantage over the GOP was just over 1 point.

Most of the polls this year are based on the assumption that the Democrats will have a numerical advantage on election day. Many media polls assume even that the electorate in November will be more Democrat than it was in 2008. Based on these results, that event is close to mathematically impossible...

Read More:
Wave: GOP Voters at All-Time High

brietbart and rassmussen?


Ill wait for the non biased count.

 

[paulitician]

Just thought i'd post this for all the Dem-Bot nutters who keep posting their stupid "The Republican Party is Dead" threads.

According to new research released today by Rasmussen, more voters identify themselves as Republican than ever in the last 8 years. More importantly, by a 4 point margin, more voters identify as GOP than Democrat. This is the largest spread between the parties ever. Worse for Democrats, the number of voters who identify with their party is also approaching an historic low.

In August, 37.6% of voters identified themselves as Republican. That is up from 34.9% in July. By contrast, just 33.3% of voters identify themselves as Democrats. That is very near their historic low in February, when 32.4% of voters identified as Democrat. The 4.3 margin in favor of the GOP is the biggest gap ever between the parties. In November 2010, when the GOP won a landslide in the mid-term elections, their advantage was just 1.3 points.

Immediately prior to Obama's inauguration, the Democrat party held a nearly 9 point edge over Republicans. Over 41% of voters called themselves Democrats then, compared to around 32% who were Republicans. It is a stunning reversal as Obama heads into reelection.

The last time GOP was close to this level was September 2004. President Bush went on to win reelection two months later, with an electorate that was evenly split. Even then, more voters called themselves Democrats then, but the party's advantage over the GOP was just over 1 point.

Most of the polls this year are based on the assumption that the Democrats will have a numerical advantage on election day. Many media polls assume even that the electorate in November will be more Democrat than it was in 2008. Based on these results, that event is close to mathematically impossible...

Read More:
Wave: GOP Voters at All-Time High

brietbart and rassmussen?


Ill wait for the non biased count.

No you won't. You'll never accept this, because you're a dimwitted programmed Obamabot. It is what it is.

 

[Procrustes Stretched]

List of Presidents of the United States by time in office - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

For U.S. Presidents, Odds for a Second Term Are Surprisingly Long - The Daily Beast


Is it always about the economy? forget what the talking heads say, what does the data show?

When GHW Bush ran in 1992 people and talking heads kept parroting the lines about war time Presidents and winning wars (Gulf War) made Bush's re-election a guaranteed win.

careful parroting the talking heads and conventional wisdom

 

[Procrustes Stretched]

And history says that Independents break for the challenger especially in a bad economic environment.

either you believe the spin on this, or you are pushing spin without knowing it. Why are you leaving out what all the data shows on this? Is it because you are just posting what you've read without fully understanding?

Independents break for? Especially? History says?

The data shows. Sometimes. History, what history?

Oh calm down there dipshit. We know this fucks with your Obamabot programming, but there's still no need to become hysterical. Get a grip.

hysterical? hysterical with over how pathetic wingnuts are when they project their thin-skinned emotions on others.

President Obama is looking good with Romney/Ryan as his opponent. The conventional wisdom had anyone but Obama winning, but look what the GOP primaries gave HOPE to.

 

[paulitician]

List of Presidents of the United States by time in office - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

For U.S. Presidents, Odds for a Second Term Are Surprisingly Long - The Daily Beast


Is it always about the economy? forget what the talking heads say, what does the data show?

When GHW Bush ran in 1992 people and talking heads kept parroting the lines about war time Presidents and winning wars (Gulf War) made Bush's re-election a guaranteed win.

careful parroting the talking heads and conventional wisdom

Times have changed. Reelection has become almost certain. The Dear Leader is actually in the driver's seat. But it's no lock. Romney still has a chance. Especially with the Independents still somwhat undecided. But i guess we'll see.

 

[paulitician]

either you believe the spin on this, or you are pushing spin without knowing it. Why are you leaving out what all the data shows on this? Is it because you are just posting what you've read without fully understanding?

Independents break for? Especially? History says?

The data shows. Sometimes. History, what history?

Oh calm down there dipshit. We know this fucks with your Obamabot programming, but there's still no need to become hysterical. Get a grip.

hysterical? hysterical with over how pathetic wingnuts are when they project their thin-skinned emotions on others.

President Obama is looking good with Romney/Ryan as his opponent. The conventional wisdom had anyone but Obama winning, but look what the GOP primaries gave HOPE to.

Yeah, but what does an ignorant dipshit like you know about wisdom? It's your Dear Leader who's actually been projected to be the landslide winner by most pundits. So clearly, you don't know shite about 'Conventional Wisdom.'