Was Shirley Sherrod Fired For Appearing On Glenn Beck's Show?

LibocalypseNow

Senior Member
Jul 30, 2009
12,337
1,368
48
Earlier interviews right after she was told to pull over and resign immediately showed Sherrod mentioning the conversation on the phone with the White House which included them accusing her of appearing on Beck's show that night. This seems pretty fishy to me. Why would they mention that to her while firing her? In my opinion this whole scandal may have been orchestrated by this White House to fire her for possibly appearing on Glenn Beck's show. They used the race angle to do this but of course it backfired on them. I don't understand why the MSM is ignoring this possibility. Mentioning Glenn Beck while firing her does seem a bit suspicious. I hope someone in the Media decides to pursue this angle. We may have all been duped on this one. It may have been all about Glenn Beck and not racism in the end. Oh well,something else to chew on i guess.
 
Last edited:
The more i look into this,the more i believe we were all duped on this one. It really may have been all about this White House's irrational hatred for Glenn Beck and not Racism. It looks like they tried to use the race angle to fire her. That obviously blew up in their faces though. This whole thing may have been orchestrated by this White House. I don't think race had much to do with this in the end.
 
Last edited:
The WH (or whoever) saying she was going to be on Beck on the 19th? Total made up bulll shit.

First minute covers it.

"She wasn't on that night (the 19th), I didn't have her booked, I never even mentioned the story that night".

[ame=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=V7wtqjCyl7s]YouTube - Glenn Beck-Sherrod[/ame]
 
Yea why did they even mention Glenn Beck at all while firing her? This White House does have a weird irrational hatred for Glenn Beck. I really do think we have all been duped on this. It looks like they tried to use the video footage to justify her firing instead of admitting why they were really firing her. They probably figured it would be a win/win for them. It backfired on them instead though. They likely orchestrated the whole race story. I really do hope someone in the Media pursues this angle. There is definitely more to this story.
 
Yea why did they even mention Glenn Beck at all while firing her? This White House does have a weird irrational hatred for Glenn Beck. I really do think we have all been duped on this. It looks like they tried to use the video footage to justify her firing instead of admitting why they were really firing her. They probably figured it would be a win/win for them. It backfired on them instead though. They likely orchestrated the whole race story. I really do hope someone in the Media pursues this angle. There is definitely more to this story.

Weird? Irrational? Good terms to use. Especially 'irrational'. They suppose to be all inclusive...don't they?
That is if of course you speak ILL of the Agenda.

This stuff is exploding in their faces and they're smarting from it.
 
First minute and a half . . she says that Cook told her she was going to be on Glenn Beck that night (Monday, July 19).

Beck says she wasn't booked to be on the show.

Sherrod also says that the White House/administration was behind her resignation.

Vilsack says WH/administration had nothing to do with it, that it was all his decision.

?????

[ame=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rsn4UTt9CuE&feature=player_embedded]YouTube - Sherrod CNN[/ame]
 
First minute and a half . . she says that Cook told her she was going to be on Glenn Beck that night (Monday, July 19).

Beck says she wasn't booked to be on the show.

Sherrod also says that the White House/administration was behind her resignation.

Vilsack says WH/administration had nothing to do with it, that it was all his decision.

?????

YouTube - Sherrod CNN

The old Axiom? For every finger that you point? There's three pointing back?

In this case? They're confused. They don't know where to point. Ms. Sherrod has the whole regime flummoxed. :lol:
 
For all you confused people.........

When she was told that they needed her resignation because she was going to be on Beck, they were talking about THE TAPE was going to be on, and Beck was going to use her to shred Obama for an hour.

THAT'S why they asked her to resign, not because she was going to be there in person.
 
For all you confused people.........

When she was told that they needed her resignation because she was going to be on Beck, they were talking about THE TAPE was going to be on, and Beck was going to use her to shred Obama for an hour.

THAT'S why they asked her to resign, not because she was going to be there in person.

That's one interpretation and it does make sense . . . . although that is NOT how it sounded when she said it. Beck didn't even mention the story Monday night.

They asked her to resign from what they saw of the clipped video on Breitbarts blog. Throwing in Beck was just panic. They didn't even bother to ask her for her side of the story, just 'pull over and resign'.
 
Yeah......Vilsack is the douchenozzle that did it. Personally? I think he was trying to save his job and fire her before Obama caught wind of it.

That way he could say "problem solved boss, she's outta here", but unfortunately for him, it wasn't.

Vilsack should be fired, Sherrod should be reinstated.

As far as Obama and the WH? Well, as soon as he caught wind of it, he CHECKED IT OUT, and then gave his apology to her. He tried to call her that night, but she didn't answer her cell phone, so he had to wait until the following morning to talk to her for 7 minutes.
 
Beck is on record as saying he didn't even KNOW about the story when he did his Monday story, let alone have plans to air the video that he didn't even have.
 
For all you confused people.........

When she was told that they needed her resignation because she was going to be on Beck, they were talking about THE TAPE was going to be on, and Beck was going to use her to shred Obama for an hour.

THAT'S why they asked her to resign, not because she was going to be there in person.

That's one interpretation and it does make sense . . . . although that is NOT how it sounded when she said it. Beck didn't even mention the story Monday night.

They asked her to resign from what they saw of the clipped video on Breitbarts blog. Throwing in Beck was just panic. They didn't even bother to ask her for her side of the story, just 'pull over and resign'.

I think they were just confused. It had been said on Hannity's Radio show that he was going to play the tape on TV at 9PM. It was never mentioned by Beck before this all broke.

They should have known better, Beck is a bomb thrower no Doubt, But so far every thing I have watched him do. Might have been radical, and controversial, But he was not making any of it up. He uses Cold Hard Facts about the things the People Obama Appoints, and is close to say and do to lay out his case that Obama is a far right Marxist that wants to Collapse the system from within and install his brand of Marxist Socialist Utopia. I do not always think he is right, and he is rather dramatic, But some of his arguments are very compelling for sure.
 
Last edited:
Earlier interviews right after she was told to pull over and resign immediately showed Sherrod mentioning the conversation on the phone with the White House which included them accusing her of appearing on Beck's show that night.
No....she was told that film-clip (that was "clipped") was gonna show-up on Porky Beck's show.

Ya' gotta pay-closer-attention. :rolleyes:

Besides.....I don't think FAUX would have been very welcoming.

margulies.jpg
 
Yea why did they even mention Glenn Beck at all while firing her? This White House does have a weird irrational hatred for Glenn Beck. I really do think we have all been duped on this. It looks like they tried to use the video footage to justify her firing instead of admitting why they were really firing her. They probably figured it would be a win/win for them. It backfired on them instead though. They likely orchestrated the whole race story. I really do hope someone in the Media pursues this angle. There is definitely more to this story.


Howard Dean is Stumbling all over himself to answer your questions.
 
Beck wouldn't know a fact if it bit him in the ass.

Really? Then why hasn't someone in Obama's administration bothered to call that red phone Beck has sitting and waiting just for them and straighten him out? Beck has said repeatedly that he may very well be wrong, misinterpreting things, etc. and for someone from the WH to call and give him the correct information, the correct meaning of such and such. So far, no takers.
 
Last edited:
For all you confused people.........

When she was told that they needed her resignation because she was going to be on Beck, they were talking about THE TAPE was going to be on, and Beck was going to use her to shred Obama for an hour.

THAT'S why they asked her to resign, not because she was going to be there in person.

I suppose that would make sense, if it were at all based on facts.

But Glenn wasnt going to play the video. He didn't play the video till the next day when he came out on Sherrod's side.

Funny how that works.
 
Beck wouldn't know a fact if it bit him in the ass.

Then why on earth is the White House worried?

If Glenn Beck "wouldn't know a fact if it bit him in the @$$" then why on earth would the White House fire Sherrod over the tape when it's obvious that it wasn't a fact?

So if your assessment is accurate, the WH is even more sinister for firing her over a tape they knew was phoney.
 
Beck wouldn't know a fact if it bit him in the ass.

Why is it that the only "facts" that the left criticizes Beck for are his mispronucniation of names....and I recall one time the WH cirticized him for referring to Van Jones as the "Green Czar"...As they pout it...The WH never appointed him as a Green Czar.

SO why is the left not pointing out all of the LIES Beck apparently is shovelling out to the public?
 

Forum List

Back
Top