Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
Condi isn't qualified, according to Conservatives.No matter who Romney does pick, the democrats will whine that he didn't pick Condi Rice because she's a black woman.
Very suddenly a black woman, because when she was Secretary of State she was Aunt Jemima.
Condi isn't qualified, according to Conservatives.No matter who Romney does pick, the democrats will whine that he didn't pick Condi Rice because she's a black woman.
Very suddenly a black woman, because when she was Secretary of State she was Aunt Jemima.
Right. Because we would never vote for a Black president or Vice-President. Ever.Condi isn't qualified, according to Conservatives.No matter who Romney does pick, the democrats will whine that he didn't pick Condi Rice because she's a black woman.
Very suddenly a black woman, because when she was Secretary of State she was Aunt Jemima.
She's pro choice so she isn't qualified. Liberals found her not qualified because she is black and stepped off the plantation.
Pro-choice.Condi isn't qualified, according to Conservatives.
She's pro choice so she isn't qualified. Liberals found her not qualified because she is black and stepped off the plantation.
Also, never worked a day in the sacred private sector.
Also, no executive experience.
Also, never held any elective office.
Pro-choice.She's pro choice so she isn't qualified. Liberals found her not qualified because she is black and stepped off the plantation.
Also, never worked a day in the sacred private sector.
Also, no executive experience.
Also, never held any elective office.
But do you and other women find her "Creepy" too?
The gutless rag known as The New York Slimes won't come right out and say it. But apparently they are doing their level best to suggest that the decision -- supposedly now reached by the Republican presidential nominee to be -- on who Mitt will be naming as his running mate is as good as done. They won't commit to it, but they like to subtly lay it between the lines.
They seem to believe it's Pawlenty.
http://www.nytimes.com/2012/07/16/us/politics/pawlenty-looked-at-as-romney-running-mate.html?_r=2
you seem to have a spelling error... that would be "times". just saying. slimes would be the washtimes rag.
as for pawlenty. he'd be a good choice. but i don't see willard picking someone as VP who is a superior candidate to him in every way possible.
but i guess you never know.
No. Then it wouldn't be The New York Slimes.
Then it would be The WASHINGTON Times.
Or maybe you meant The Washington COMPOST?
Condi isn't qualified, according to Conservatives.No matter who Romney does pick, the democrats will whine that he didn't pick Condi Rice because she's a black woman.
Very suddenly a black woman, because when she was Secretary of State she was Aunt Jemima.
She's pro choice so she isn't qualified. Liberals found her not qualified because she is black and stepped off the plantation.
I find her unqualified for NSA director, which was revealed when she failed to do her job and 3,000 Americans were murdered.Pro-choice.
Also, never worked a day in the sacred private sector.
Also, no executive experience.
Also, never held any elective office.
But do you and other women find her "Creepy" too?
VP Biden was more qualified in 2008 than President Obama (praise be unto Him!) was. He was my primary choice.Romney should at least think about using Obama's logic in VP pick and choose someone for comic relief, maybe Dane Cook?
VP Biden was more qualified in 2008 than President Obama (praise be unto Him!) was. He was my primary choice.Romney should at least think about using Obama's logic in VP pick and choose someone for comic relief, maybe Dane Cook?
you seem to have a spelling error... that would be "times". just saying. slimes would be the washtimes rag.
as for pawlenty. he'd be a good choice. but i don't see willard picking someone as VP who is a superior candidate to him in every way possible.
but i guess you never know.
No. Then it wouldn't be The New York Slimes.
Then it would be The WASHINGTON Times.
Or maybe you meant The Washington COMPOST?
And here I thought you might want to address the substance of my post
Portman was Bush's OMB - read: budget - director.Best option for what? To win an election, or to pick someone who is qualified to lead the country, if?
Sometimes they are not the same. See: McCain/Palin, GHW Bush/Quayle
Sometimes they are. See: Obama/Biden, Bush/Cheney
Bishop Romney doesn't have good options. Piyush and Portman are not, T-Paw perhaps is, McDonnell is a joke.
I think Portman would be fine. So woudl Pawlenty.
Jindal, yeah, he brings a whole level of religious crazy.
"Magic Underpants/Exorcist 2012! - Because what this country needs is more religious craziness!"
Bush and budget go together like Palin and sophistication.
Portman would have to answer for...how many extensions of the debt ceiling?Portman was Bush's OMB - read: budget - director.I think Portman would be fine. So woudl Pawlenty.
Jindal, yeah, he brings a whole level of religious crazy.
"Magic Underpants/Exorcist 2012! - Because what this country needs is more religious craziness!"
Bush and budget go together like Palin and sophistication.
Bush's budgets seem quite nice compared to Obama's... Sorry, this really isn't a discussion the Dems should ever want to have.
The gutless rag known as The New York Slimes won't come right out and say it. But apparently they are doing their level best to suggest that the decision -- supposedly now reached by the Republican presidential nominee to be -- on who Mitt will be naming as his running mate is as good as done. They won't commit to it, but they like to subtly lay it between the lines.
They seem to believe it's Pawlenty.
http://www.nytimes.com/2012/07/16/us/politics/pawlenty-looked-at-as-romney-running-mate.html?_r=2
Why are they gutless by suggesting that Romney has made a decision?
I'm quietly confident that Romney won't give a rat's ass what the NY Slime 'suggests'. But it's sweet that they think they're relevant.
awwwwwwww.......... glad you finally came out of the closet as full rightwingnut.
no doubt you'll get lots of rightwingnut rep for it.
Vice President Pawlenty?
The gutless rag known as The New York Slimes won't come right out and say it. But apparently they are doing their level best to suggest that the decision -- supposedly now reached by the Republican presidential nominee to be -- on who Mitt will be naming as his running mate is as good as done. They won't commit to it, but they like to subtly lay it between the lines.
They seem to believe it's Pawlenty.
http://www.nytimes.com/2012/07/16/us/politics/pawlenty-looked-at-as-romney-running-mate.html?_r=2
Why are they gutless by suggesting that Romney has made a decision?
When the Times is useful to the fringe right, they are the "paper of record". Today the "Slimes". Likewise, there are no more critiques, or analysis, just the fabricated term "debunked". People do not change their opinions, they "flip flop".
Christie will be the keynote speaker, which indicates the BLOB will not be VP. Romney could do worse than Pawlenty, but possibly better, particularly if Rice could somehow be convinced to change her mind.