320 Years of History
Gold Member
However, that which you just described is not the basis for nor the logic behind the "rape exception" either.
Okay, I'll bite. What is the basis/logic for the rape exception?
You weren't being baited but I would gladly give you the Constitutional arguments for the rape exception if you were already onboard with the personhood issue.
Because we are still so far apart on that and because you haven't been very receptive about the points made in this allegory. . . I don't feel like wasting my time with the rest.
I just want you to give or point me to a solid logical (not emotional) argument that presents the case for the rape exception. I know I can find one, but I want to read the one you think is most logically rigorous.
"Okay, I'll bite" was offered as a figure of speech, not to indicate I inferred that you were baiting me. Apologies if I misled you in that regard.
Like I said, it's not worth it when we can't even agree on the points I am trying to make with my allegory.
We agree on all of them except for when personhood commences.