Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
Actually the ABC's are CON$ervoFascists always lie about Liberals.
you mean liberals didn't spy for Stalin, give him the bomb, elect Obama, and generally oppose the basic principles of the Constitution.
And U-6 was 108.75% higher than before the Bush Depression when Bush handed it of to Obama. Only a certified America hater would see reducing a 108.75% increase to a 50% increase as a bad economy.Dearie, it is the U-4 rate that includes discouraged workers ans it is 6.4%. The U-6 rate includes more than just discouraged workers and people who are working.UE is 5.9% and when you add in discouraged workers it does not double, it is 6.4%.!
dear, hate to rock your world but u6 is about 12%. Sorry liberal.
See why it is said that there is no one slower than a CON$ervoFascist.
dear u6 is about 50% higher than before recession!! That explains why this is slowest recovery since Great Depression and why income is down 5% since Barry took over and why Barry will not campaign on his economic record.
Are you really trying to argue that this is a good economy? See why we say liberalism is based in pure ignorance?
Umm, we're almost at full employment. Mitt Romney said he needed until 2017 just to get the unemployment rate down to where Obama got it down to in 2014. Thank goodness we didn't elect Mitt, huh?Dearie, it is the U-4 rate that includes discouraged workers ans it is 6.4%. The U-6 rate includes more than just discouraged workers and people who are working.UE is 5.9% and when you add in discouraged workers it does not double, it is 6.4%.!
dear, hate to rock your world but u6 is about 12%. Sorry liberal.
See why it is said that there is no one slower than a CON$ervoFascist.
dear u6 is about 50% higher than before recession!! That explains why this is slowest recovery since Great Depression and why income is down 5% since Barry took over and why Barry will not campaign on his economic record.
Are you really trying to argue that this is a good economy? See why we say liberalism is based in pure ignorance?
LOL! YOu really believe that? Yeah, with record numbers of people out of the labor force we're at full employment. Tell that to the nearly 50% of college grads 25 and under who are unemployed or underemployed.Umm, we're almost at full employment. Mitt Romney said he needed until 2017 just to get the unemployment rate down to where Obama got it down to in 2014. Thank goodness we didn't elect Mitt, huh?Dearie, it is the U-4 rate that includes discouraged workers ans it is 6.4%. The U-6 rate includes more than just discouraged workers and people who are working.UE is 5.9% and when you add in discouraged workers it does not double, it is 6.4%.!
dear, hate to rock your world but u6 is about 12%. Sorry liberal.
See why it is said that there is no one slower than a CON$ervoFascist.
dear u6 is about 50% higher than before recession!! That explains why this is slowest recovery since Great Depression and why income is down 5% since Barry took over and why Barry will not campaign on his economic record.
Are you really trying to argue that this is a good economy? See why we say liberalism is based in pure ignorance?
50%, huh, forumLOL! YOu really believe that? Yeah, with record numbers of people out of the labor force we're at full employment. Tell that to the nearly 50% of college grads 25 and under who are unemployed or underemployed.Umm, we're almost at full employment. Mitt Romney said he needed until 2017 just to get the unemployment rate down to where Obama got it down to in 2014. Thank goodness we didn't elect Mitt, huh?Dearie, it is the U-4 rate that includes discouraged workers ans it is 6.4%. The U-6 rate includes more than just discouraged workers and people who are working.UE is 5.9% and when you add in discouraged workers it does not double, it is 6.4%.!
dear, hate to rock your world but u6 is about 12%. Sorry liberal.
See why it is said that there is no one slower than a CON$ervoFascist.
dear u6 is about 50% higher than before recession!! That explains why this is slowest recovery since Great Depression and why income is down 5% since Barry took over and why Barry will not campaign on his economic record.
Are you really trying to argue that this is a good economy? See why we say liberalism is based in pure ignorance?
Another cherry picked meaningless statistic from the same people who gave you "jobs saved or created."
jester?
Starting in Jan. 20, 2001, at the beginning of George W. Bush’s administration, the rate was 2.4 percent, but by the time he left in January 2009 it had reached 7 percent. The rate now is 5.9% and is on track to get even lower.
There have been a record number of people not in the labor force for all but 9 years since 1947 when the data starts. The population grows. The labor force is also at record levels. Doesn't mean things are great, just more people.LOL! YOu really believe that? Yeah, with record numbers of people out of the labor force we're at full employment.Umm, we're almost at full employment. Mitt Romney said he needed until 2017 just to get the unemployment rate down to where Obama got it down to in 2014. Thank goodness we didn't elect Mitt, huh?Dearie, it is the U-4 rate that includes discouraged workers ans it is 6.4%. The U-6 rate includes more than just discouraged workers and people who are working.UE is 5.9% and when you add in discouraged workers it does not double, it is 6.4%.!
dear, hate to rock your world but u6 is about 12%. Sorry liberal.
See why it is said that there is no one slower than a CON$ervoFascist.
dear u6 is about 50% higher than before recession!! That explains why this is slowest recovery since Great Depression and why income is down 5% since Barry took over and why Barry will not campaign on his economic record.
Are you really trying to argue that this is a good economy? See why we say liberalism is based in pure ignorance?
84% of those under 25 with a Bachelor's or higher are employed. Unemployment rate is 7,9% 14% of the employed are part time.Tell that to the nearly 50% of college grads 25 and under who are unemployed or underemployed.
No, it's not the same people: completely different agencies.Another cherry picked meaningless statistic from the same people who gave you "jobs saved or created."
Another idiot who can't read a graph. Note the source of the graph. I'd tend to believe the Fed instead.50%, huh, forumLOL! YOu really believe that? Yeah, with record numbers of people out of the labor force we're at full employment. Tell that to the nearly 50% of college grads 25 and under who are unemployed or underemployed.Umm, we're almost at full employment. Mitt Romney said he needed until 2017 just to get the unemployment rate down to where Obama got it down to in 2014. Thank goodness we didn't elect Mitt, huh?Dearie, it is the U-4 rate that includes discouraged workers ans it is 6.4%. The U-6 rate includes more than just discouraged workers and people who are working.dear, hate to rock your world but u6 is about 12%. Sorry liberal.
See why it is said that there is no one slower than a CON$ervoFascist.
dear u6 is about 50% higher than before recession!! That explains why this is slowest recovery since Great Depression and why income is down 5% since Barry took over and why Barry will not campaign on his economic record.
Are you really trying to argue that this is a good economy? See why we say liberalism is based in pure ignorance?
Another cherry picked meaningless statistic from the same people who gave you "jobs saved or created."
Try 16.8% ...
And apparently you can't read dates of articles or of data. Or you just didn't know what the current year is.Another idiot who can't read a graph. Note the source of the graph. I'd tend to believe the Fed instead.50%, huh, forumLOL! YOu really believe that? Yeah, with record numbers of people out of the labor force we're at full employment. Tell that to the nearly 50% of college grads 25 and under who are unemployed or underemployed.Umm, we're almost at full employment. Mitt Romney said he needed until 2017 just to get the unemployment rate down to where Obama got it down to in 2014. Thank goodness we didn't elect Mitt, huh?Dearie, it is the U-4 rate that includes discouraged workers ans it is 6.4%. The U-6 rate includes more than just discouraged workers and people who are working.
See why it is said that there is no one slower than a CON$ervoFascist.
dear u6 is about 50% higher than before recession!! That explains why this is slowest recovery since Great Depression and why income is down 5% since Barry took over and why Barry will not campaign on his economic record.
Are you really trying to argue that this is a good economy? See why we say liberalism is based in pure ignorance?
Another cherry picked meaningless statistic from the same people who gave you "jobs saved or created."
Try 16.8% ...
44 of Young College Grads Are Underemployed and That s Good News - The Atlantic
And apparently you can't read dates of articles or of data. Or you just didn't know what the current year is.Another idiot who can't read a graph. Note the source of the graph. I'd tend to believe the Fed instead.50%, huh, forumLOL! YOu really believe that? Yeah, with record numbers of people out of the labor force we're at full employment. Tell that to the nearly 50% of college grads 25 and under who are unemployed or underemployed.Umm, we're almost at full employment. Mitt Romney said he needed until 2017 just to get the unemployment rate down to where Obama got it down to in 2014. Thank goodness we didn't elect Mitt, huh?dear u6 is about 50% higher than before recession!! That explains why this is slowest recovery since Great Depression and why income is down 5% since Barry took over and why Barry will not campaign on his economic record.
Are you really trying to argue that this is a good economy? See why we say liberalism is based in pure ignorance?
Another cherry picked meaningless statistic from the same people who gave you "jobs saved or created."
Try 16.8% ...
44 of Young College Grads Are Underemployed and That s Good News - The Atlantic
And what's wrong with the source of the graph?
You really are the biggest retard here, jesterAnother idiot who can't read a graph. Note the source of the graph. I'd tend to believe the Fed instead.50%, huh, forumLOL! YOu really believe that? Yeah, with record numbers of people out of the labor force we're at full employment. Tell that to the nearly 50% of college grads 25 and under who are unemployed or underemployed.Umm, we're almost at full employment. Mitt Romney said he needed until 2017 just to get the unemployment rate down to where Obama got it down to in 2014. Thank goodness we didn't elect Mitt, huh?Dearie, it is the U-4 rate that includes discouraged workers ans it is 6.4%. The U-6 rate includes more than just discouraged workers and people who are working.
See why it is said that there is no one slower than a CON$ervoFascist.
dear u6 is about 50% higher than before recession!! That explains why this is slowest recovery since Great Depression and why income is down 5% since Barry took over and why Barry will not campaign on his economic record.
Are you really trying to argue that this is a good economy? See why we say liberalism is based in pure ignorance?
Another cherry picked meaningless statistic from the same people who gave you "jobs saved or created."
Try 16.8% ...
44 of Young College Grads Are Underemployed and That s Good News - The Atlantic
. You actually think a report from more than a year ago by a bank which seeks to redefine "underemployment" is the official source of unemployment data. I guess if you'll suck that cock, you'll suck any, eh? 
jester 
Um that would be you.And apparently you can't read dates of articles or of data. Or you just didn't know what the current year is.Another idiot who can't read a graph. Note the source of the graph. I'd tend to believe the Fed instead.50%, huh, forumLOL! YOu really believe that? Yeah, with record numbers of people out of the labor force we're at full employment. Tell that to the nearly 50% of college grads 25 and under who are unemployed or underemployed.Umm, we're almost at full employment. Mitt Romney said he needed until 2017 just to get the unemployment rate down to where Obama got it down to in 2014. Thank goodness we didn't elect Mitt, huh?
Another cherry picked meaningless statistic from the same people who gave you "jobs saved or created."
Try 16.8% ...
44 of Young College Grads Are Underemployed and That s Good News - The Atlantic
And what's wrong with the source of the graph?
RABBI(t) doesn't have an answer; he's dumbfounded. We knew he was dumb when we found him lurking about spewing nonsense on a topic he knew nothing about.
Your homoerotic fantasies about me are disturbing. Not unexpected, just disturbing.You really are the biggest retard here, jesterAnother idiot who can't read a graph. Note the source of the graph. I'd tend to believe the Fed instead.50%, huh, forumLOL! YOu really believe that? Yeah, with record numbers of people out of the labor force we're at full employment. Tell that to the nearly 50% of college grads 25 and under who are unemployed or underemployed.Umm, we're almost at full employment. Mitt Romney said he needed until 2017 just to get the unemployment rate down to where Obama got it down to in 2014. Thank goodness we didn't elect Mitt, huh?dear u6 is about 50% higher than before recession!! That explains why this is slowest recovery since Great Depression and why income is down 5% since Barry took over and why Barry will not campaign on his economic record.
Are you really trying to argue that this is a good economy? See why we say liberalism is based in pure ignorance?
Another cherry picked meaningless statistic from the same people who gave you "jobs saved or created."
Try 16.8% ...
44 of Young College Grads Are Underemployed and That s Good News - The Atlantic
Regardless of your slutiness, banks are not the official source for unemployment stats and the current underemployment rate is 16.8%, not nearly 50%.
"Tell that to the nearly 50% of college grads 25 and under who are unemployed or underemployed" - a brain-dead forum
The source of your information is a bank. I know you're eager to find the worst data you can find, and willing to accept it because you like the numbers, but that's more of a reflection on you. Still, the report you posted is more than a year old, says 44% is good news, and redefines "underemployment," which is actually defined as people who take part time jobs for economic reasons.Your homoerotic fantasies about me are disturbing. Not unexpected, just disturbing.You really are the biggest retard here, jesterAnother idiot who can't read a graph. Note the source of the graph. I'd tend to believe the Fed instead.50%, huh, forumLOL! YOu really believe that? Yeah, with record numbers of people out of the labor force we're at full employment. Tell that to the nearly 50% of college grads 25 and under who are unemployed or underemployed.Umm, we're almost at full employment. Mitt Romney said he needed until 2017 just to get the unemployment rate down to where Obama got it down to in 2014. Thank goodness we didn't elect Mitt, huh?
Another cherry picked meaningless statistic from the same people who gave you "jobs saved or created."
Try 16.8% ...
44 of Young College Grads Are Underemployed and That s Good News - The Atlantic
Regardless of your slutiness, banks are not the official source for unemployment stats and the current underemployment rate is 16.8%, not nearly 50%.
"Tell that to the nearly 50% of college grads 25 and under who are unemployed or underemployed" - a brain-dead forum
The rate is nearly 50%. It didnt decline from 50% to 16% in one year or less. Someone is playing tricks with the data. You understand what the source of my information is, right?
Tell me you dont really think the Federal Reserve is "a bank". Please tell meThe source of your information is a bank. I know you're eager to find the worst data you can find, and willing to accept it because you like the numbers, but that's more of a reflection on you. Still, the report you posted is more than a year old, says 44% is good news, and redefines "underemployment," which is actually defined as people who take part time jobs for economic reasons.Your homoerotic fantasies about me are disturbing. Not unexpected, just disturbing.You really are the biggest retard here, jesterAnother idiot who can't read a graph. Note the source of the graph. I'd tend to believe the Fed instead.50%, huh, forumLOL! YOu really believe that? Yeah, with record numbers of people out of the labor force we're at full employment. Tell that to the nearly 50% of college grads 25 and under who are unemployed or underemployed.
Another cherry picked meaningless statistic from the same people who gave you "jobs saved or created."
Try 16.8% ...
44 of Young College Grads Are Underemployed and That s Good News - The Atlantic
Regardless of your slutiness, banks are not the official source for unemployment stats and the current underemployment rate is 16.8%, not nearly 50%.
"Tell that to the nearly 50% of college grads 25 and under who are unemployed or underemployed" - a brain-dead forum
The rate is nearly 50%. It didnt decline from 50% to 16% in one year or less. Someone is playing tricks with the data. You understand what the source of my information is, right?
Holyfuckingshit!Tell me you dont really think the Federal Reserve is "a bank". Please tell meThe source of your information is a bank. I know you're eager to find the worst data you can find, and willing to accept it because you like the numbers, but that's more of a reflection on you. Still, the report you posted is more than a year old, says 44% is good news, and redefines "underemployment," which is actually defined as people who take part time jobs for economic reasons.Your homoerotic fantasies about me are disturbing. Not unexpected, just disturbing.You really are the biggest retard here, jesterAnother idiot who can't read a graph. Note the source of the graph. I'd tend to believe the Fed instead.50%, huh, forum
Try 16.8% ...
44 of Young College Grads Are Underemployed and That s Good News - The Atlantic
Regardless of your slutiness, banks are not the official source for unemployment stats and the current underemployment rate is 16.8%, not nearly 50%.
"Tell that to the nearly 50% of college grads 25 and under who are unemployed or underemployed" - a brain-dead forum
The rate is nearly 50%. It didnt decline from 50% to 16% in one year or less. Someone is playing tricks with the data. You understand what the source of my information is, right?
Undeemployment is not limited to people taking part time jobs for economic reasons. Please tell me you undestand this comment.
And of course you havent explained why the graph posted is wrong. Probably because you are an assclown.
OK. so you really are too stupid to engage.Holyfuckingshit!Tell me you dont really think the Federal Reserve is "a bank". Please tell meThe source of your information is a bank. I know you're eager to find the worst data you can find, and willing to accept it because you like the numbers, but that's more of a reflection on you. Still, the report you posted is more than a year old, says 44% is good news, and redefines "underemployment," which is actually defined as people who take part time jobs for economic reasons.Your homoerotic fantasies about me are disturbing. Not unexpected, just disturbing.You really are the biggest retard here, jesterAnother idiot who can't read a graph. Note the source of the graph. I'd tend to believe the Fed instead.
44 of Young College Grads Are Underemployed and That s Good News - The Atlantic
Regardless of your slutiness, banks are not the official source for unemployment stats and the current underemployment rate is 16.8%, not nearly 50%.
"Tell that to the nearly 50% of college grads 25 and under who are unemployed or underemployed" - a brain-dead forum
The rate is nearly 50%. It didnt decline from 50% to 16% in one year or less. Someone is playing tricks with the data. You understand what the source of my information is, right?
Undeemployment is not limited to people taking part time jobs for economic reasons. Please tell me you undestand this comment.
And of course you havent explained why the graph posted is wrong. Probably because you are an assclown.
You are too fucking stupid to deal with, jester. You didn't read the first line of the report you referenced, did you?
FEDERAL RESERVE BANK of NEW YORK
And yes, I explained why the chart is wrong. Aside from being more than a year old, underemployment is not measured by college graduates who work in fields that are not commensurate with their degree.
Hisses the forumOK. so you really are too stupid to engage.Holyfuckingshit!Tell me you dont really think the Federal Reserve is "a bank". Please tell meThe source of your information is a bank. I know you're eager to find the worst data you can find, and willing to accept it because you like the numbers, but that's more of a reflection on you. Still, the report you posted is more than a year old, says 44% is good news, and redefines "underemployment," which is actually defined as people who take part time jobs for economic reasons.Your homoerotic fantasies about me are disturbing. Not unexpected, just disturbing.You really are the biggest retard here, jester
Regardless of your slutiness, banks are not the official source for unemployment stats and the current underemployment rate is 16.8%, not nearly 50%.
"Tell that to the nearly 50% of college grads 25 and under who are unemployed or underemployed" - a brain-dead forum
The rate is nearly 50%. It didnt decline from 50% to 16% in one year or less. Someone is playing tricks with the data. You understand what the source of my information is, right?
Undeemployment is not limited to people taking part time jobs for economic reasons. Please tell me you undestand this comment.
And of course you havent explained why the graph posted is wrong. Probably because you are an assclown.
You are too fucking stupid to deal with, jester. You didn't read the first line of the report you referenced, did you?
FEDERAL RESERVE BANK of NEW YORK
And yes, I explained why the chart is wrong. Aside from being more than a year old, underemployment is not measured by college graduates who work in fields that are not commensurate with their degree.
Thanks for confirming.
jester who actually inferred the Federal Reserve BANK of New York is not a bank! Listen, assclown. If you think the Federal Reserve Bank is a) a bank, and b) the US's bank then you don't know enough to argue with.Hisses the forumOK. so you really are too stupid to engage.Holyfuckingshit!Tell me you dont really think the Federal Reserve is "a bank". Please tell meThe source of your information is a bank. I know you're eager to find the worst data you can find, and willing to accept it because you like the numbers, but that's more of a reflection on you. Still, the report you posted is more than a year old, says 44% is good news, and redefines "underemployment," which is actually defined as people who take part time jobs for economic reasons.Your homoerotic fantasies about me are disturbing. Not unexpected, just disturbing.
The rate is nearly 50%. It didnt decline from 50% to 16% in one year or less. Someone is playing tricks with the data. You understand what the source of my information is, right?
Undeemployment is not limited to people taking part time jobs for economic reasons. Please tell me you undestand this comment.
And of course you havent explained why the graph posted is wrong. Probably because you are an assclown.
You are too fucking stupid to deal with, jester. You didn't read the first line of the report you referenced, did you?
FEDERAL RESERVE BANK of NEW YORK
And yes, I explained why the chart is wrong. Aside from being more than a year old, underemployment is not measured by college graduates who work in fields that are not commensurate with their degree.
Thanks for confirming.
Holyfuckingshit!!!
Why on Earth would I take the idiotic word of the forumListen, assclown. If you think the Federal Reserve Bank is a) a bank, and b) the US's bank then you don't know enough to argue with.Hisses the forumOK. so you really are too stupid to engage.Holyfuckingshit!Tell me you dont really think the Federal Reserve is "a bank". Please tell meThe source of your information is a bank. I know you're eager to find the worst data you can find, and willing to accept it because you like the numbers, but that's more of a reflection on you. Still, the report you posted is more than a year old, says 44% is good news, and redefines "underemployment," which is actually defined as people who take part time jobs for economic reasons.
Undeemployment is not limited to people taking part time jobs for economic reasons. Please tell me you undestand this comment.
And of course you havent explained why the graph posted is wrong. Probably because you are an assclown.
You are too fucking stupid to deal with, jester. You didn't read the first line of the report you referenced, did you?
FEDERAL RESERVE BANK of NEW YORK
And yes, I explained why the chart is wrong. Aside from being more than a year old, underemployment is not measured by college graduates who work in fields that are not commensurate with their degree.
Thanks for confirming.
Holyfuckingshit!!!
jester over the Federal Reserve BANK of New York's own claim ...Holy fucking dogshit! I've been arguing with a retard all this time. Assclown, go use Google or Wiki to find out what exactly the Fed does.Why on Earth would I take the idiotic word of the forumListen, assclown. If you think the Federal Reserve Bank is a) a bank, and b) the US's bank then you don't know enough to argue with.Hisses the forumOK. so you really are too stupid to engage.Holyfuckingshit!Tell me you dont really think the Federal Reserve is "a bank". Please tell me
Undeemployment is not limited to people taking part time jobs for economic reasons. Please tell me you undestand this comment.
And of course you havent explained why the graph posted is wrong. Probably because you are an assclown.
You are too fucking stupid to deal with, jester. You didn't read the first line of the report you referenced, did you?
FEDERAL RESERVE BANK of NEW YORK
And yes, I explained why the chart is wrong. Aside from being more than a year old, underemployment is not measured by college graduates who work in fields that are not commensurate with their degree.
Thanks for confirming.
Holyfuckingshit!!!
serving as the banker for the U.S. government.
