- Nov 14, 2011
- 121,269
- 66,979
- 2,635
No, I get it -- now you're calling yourself an imbecile.You are an ignorant bastard. More people in the working population but lower participation now than when we had in July 2008Holyfuckingshit!66% of the population was working with fewer people in the populationThen why don't you post the number of people not in the labor force in July, 2008?Again your math of 1+1=5 is incorrect stop trying to say the sky is green when in fact it is blueYou'll have to show a specific example, with the math. I came up with the same unemployment rates and labor force participation rates as you did. So where are you claiming I was wrong?
Fact is the sun is up not the moon.
Now we have more people in the population with only 62.7% working
I asked you for the number of people who are not in the labor force, and you give me the participation rate. You don't fucking know the difference between the two, do you, dumbass? This is why you sound so fucking retarded spouting the nonsense you're spewing.
If that doesn't answer you god damn question your are to fucking to stupid to understand anything.
Now, you are [correctly] stating, "more people in the working population..." But that contradicts what you said earlier, "when Bush had 5.8% unemployment more people were in the workforce..."
But at least now we're in agreement -- you're an idiot.