So in the absence of any incentive to production--"Supply it, and they will buy it," sounds Soviet, somehow. Then in contrast, U. S. imposed sanctions against Russia. U.N. imposed sanctions against North Korea. North Korea wants to impose some nature of sanction against Guam(?). There are very few assumptions of a pre-existing scarcity shown. The idea does seem to be to keep people from buying things(?): En Masse.
To compare this with real life, even in Genesis, Humans emerge from the famous self-service forest: And do farming. That is about 5000 years ago. Jewish Israel puts the earth age at a human history countable, 6000 years, or so. According to most history, possibly Cain and Abel wandered into ancient Sumer(?), where one human could borrow three measures of barley, raise a crop, become a neighbor. The loan could be repaid four measures of barley. Accepting for the mythology of the deity, A stable food supply would have happened. Neighborhood identity happened. A kind of ,"First Ghetto." would have happened. According to the Deity--according to legend(?)--all because mom and dad had screwed up the original GPS, of all of history(?). All digression aside, easily, then barley beer was able to happen!
Repayment of the first loan, with the first usury: Was clearly civilizing. The arithmetic was simple. Beer was able to happen. Soon, people would even go to university(?).
Technically: That is not modern economics, developed with basis in a scarcity assumption, and with need of public works spending to bail out the participants, from the impact of the usury arithmetic. Like so many know already, Beer can be better.
Humans were not skilled at arithmetic. Code of Hammurabi creates a remedy for aggravated dads everywhere: To sell the (wife) and kids into slavery, to satisfy debts. So the wife and kids get fed, clothed, housed, "educated," and put to useful community activity. Welfare has happened, and after a few years there is freedom, into new productivity. Beer has already been noted to have happened.
Nothing scarce has happened. An arithmetic contrivance has happened. Since there is no scarcity, there is remedy, and greater creative productivity. It takes no Einstein to create an abundance assumption. Any economy of humanity happens because of abundance.
Moses was an educated man of Imperialist Egypt, skilled at all its arts, (Acts 7). He could denigrate, subjugate, eviscerate, flog, enslave, brutalize, demean, degrade, slaughter, infect(?), and spread it all around with the best of them! Indirectly, it is in the Bible. It is in Acts. . .awaiting the re-write.
So Israel was set to rejecting civilizing usury, and to charge it to everyone foreign, (Deut: 23:19-20). Repeating, according to the deity--at the mandatory direction of the deity--There is no usury allowed within the ghetto, all of a sudden, or maybe there never was supposed to be(?). It does, however, make sense to use the arithmetic: To screw everyone else, who is alive and prosperous, into subjugation. Subjugation would become the deity version of an entire right of all of Israel, and whatever the Holy Father calls it, and Her Majesty's Anglicans all call it.
Like so much already shown: That does not get directly so-stated! In Moses and Israel World: Atrocity and subjugation is the normal way of life, deity-directed. It is something the deity has offered a Chosen People. That does get so-stated, except not like that! The deity provided that everyone else could be conquered, or beset. Eventually, the male children would turn age 13: But the victims were not invited--unless they had money(?)!
Denigration becomes economics without so much as a decent, screaming, Republican Town Hall Meeting, if truth were to be told(?).
Jesus ben Joseph, Son of Mary, Called, "Oh Christ!" would demonstrate the arithmetic in Matthew 25:14-30: And effectively cement economics into. . .many would say, "accounting." The times were Roman, in the era of the creation of the Roman Empire. The Imperial arts of Egypt were famously widely admired. Jesus would set himself up as another Caesar-creature on the earth--destined to reign in heaven. Into subjugation went the poor, even in "The Kingdom of Heaven," in the story. The Moses Atrocity had so taken hold: That a basis of Christianity was created. It is followed, even now.
And so even now, the nations can Sanction one another, and promise "Fire and Fury," against one another. The same planet is there. The resources are suddenly scarce.
Famously, even in Israel people let the rabbis in the building, and celebrate some lethal concept of a deity.
"To the boxcars, they must go," all the peoples forever.
Alternative arithmetic, Matthew 20:1-16, shows a usury of community applied. Maybe grandma and the infants cannot be set to work all the day: But equally in the community they are participants alike--even at some blessed table.
"Is it me, Lord!?" "Is it me, Lord?" never comes up, even: Ranting Jesus screaming back at all the others!
So original usury gets a reputation with no basis in anything empirical. Mohammed would condemn any wealth from it. Adam Smith would regulate it. Karl Marx would ignore it completely. Keynes was gay, and could be said to have famously suggested that, "The people bend over and await the Public Works," as the outcome of usury. The inverse of usury--an equality of distribution to young, old, laboring, and disabled alike: Was not to be noted going forward.
"Crow, James Crow: Shaken, Not Stirred!"
("Fire and Fury" The Replay, maybe next: Which makes it a mistake all by itself!)
To compare this with real life, even in Genesis, Humans emerge from the famous self-service forest: And do farming. That is about 5000 years ago. Jewish Israel puts the earth age at a human history countable, 6000 years, or so. According to most history, possibly Cain and Abel wandered into ancient Sumer(?), where one human could borrow three measures of barley, raise a crop, become a neighbor. The loan could be repaid four measures of barley. Accepting for the mythology of the deity, A stable food supply would have happened. Neighborhood identity happened. A kind of ,"First Ghetto." would have happened. According to the Deity--according to legend(?)--all because mom and dad had screwed up the original GPS, of all of history(?). All digression aside, easily, then barley beer was able to happen!
Repayment of the first loan, with the first usury: Was clearly civilizing. The arithmetic was simple. Beer was able to happen. Soon, people would even go to university(?).
Technically: That is not modern economics, developed with basis in a scarcity assumption, and with need of public works spending to bail out the participants, from the impact of the usury arithmetic. Like so many know already, Beer can be better.
Humans were not skilled at arithmetic. Code of Hammurabi creates a remedy for aggravated dads everywhere: To sell the (wife) and kids into slavery, to satisfy debts. So the wife and kids get fed, clothed, housed, "educated," and put to useful community activity. Welfare has happened, and after a few years there is freedom, into new productivity. Beer has already been noted to have happened.
Nothing scarce has happened. An arithmetic contrivance has happened. Since there is no scarcity, there is remedy, and greater creative productivity. It takes no Einstein to create an abundance assumption. Any economy of humanity happens because of abundance.
Moses was an educated man of Imperialist Egypt, skilled at all its arts, (Acts 7). He could denigrate, subjugate, eviscerate, flog, enslave, brutalize, demean, degrade, slaughter, infect(?), and spread it all around with the best of them! Indirectly, it is in the Bible. It is in Acts. . .awaiting the re-write.
So Israel was set to rejecting civilizing usury, and to charge it to everyone foreign, (Deut: 23:19-20). Repeating, according to the deity--at the mandatory direction of the deity--There is no usury allowed within the ghetto, all of a sudden, or maybe there never was supposed to be(?). It does, however, make sense to use the arithmetic: To screw everyone else, who is alive and prosperous, into subjugation. Subjugation would become the deity version of an entire right of all of Israel, and whatever the Holy Father calls it, and Her Majesty's Anglicans all call it.
Like so much already shown: That does not get directly so-stated! In Moses and Israel World: Atrocity and subjugation is the normal way of life, deity-directed. It is something the deity has offered a Chosen People. That does get so-stated, except not like that! The deity provided that everyone else could be conquered, or beset. Eventually, the male children would turn age 13: But the victims were not invited--unless they had money(?)!
Denigration becomes economics without so much as a decent, screaming, Republican Town Hall Meeting, if truth were to be told(?).
Jesus ben Joseph, Son of Mary, Called, "Oh Christ!" would demonstrate the arithmetic in Matthew 25:14-30: And effectively cement economics into. . .many would say, "accounting." The times were Roman, in the era of the creation of the Roman Empire. The Imperial arts of Egypt were famously widely admired. Jesus would set himself up as another Caesar-creature on the earth--destined to reign in heaven. Into subjugation went the poor, even in "The Kingdom of Heaven," in the story. The Moses Atrocity had so taken hold: That a basis of Christianity was created. It is followed, even now.
And so even now, the nations can Sanction one another, and promise "Fire and Fury," against one another. The same planet is there. The resources are suddenly scarce.
Famously, even in Israel people let the rabbis in the building, and celebrate some lethal concept of a deity.
"To the boxcars, they must go," all the peoples forever.
Alternative arithmetic, Matthew 20:1-16, shows a usury of community applied. Maybe grandma and the infants cannot be set to work all the day: But equally in the community they are participants alike--even at some blessed table.
"Is it me, Lord!?" "Is it me, Lord?" never comes up, even: Ranting Jesus screaming back at all the others!
So original usury gets a reputation with no basis in anything empirical. Mohammed would condemn any wealth from it. Adam Smith would regulate it. Karl Marx would ignore it completely. Keynes was gay, and could be said to have famously suggested that, "The people bend over and await the Public Works," as the outcome of usury. The inverse of usury--an equality of distribution to young, old, laboring, and disabled alike: Was not to be noted going forward.
"Crow, James Crow: Shaken, Not Stirred!"
("Fire and Fury" The Replay, maybe next: Which makes it a mistake all by itself!)