Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
Two ex-Watergate prosecutors agree ‘there’s enough evidence right now to indict Donald Trump’
Wow, this nothingburger is piled high 10 feet high with every kind of meat you can think of. It is fucking juicy!!! Trump is fucking going down!
. Yes, that's exactly what they want... It's an all or nothing game for them, and on a side note I saw this Colin Kaepernick celebrating at Alcatraz or something on the news, but what really got my antenna up was when the crowd began celebrating after his speak, I heard the Islamist distinct war cry in the background. Now should that warrant an investigation by the FBI ? I think so. Is Kaepernick involved with terrorist now or is the Islamist backing Kaepernick ?? Ok back to the thread.Two ex-Watergate prosecutors agree ‘there’s enough evidence right now to indict Donald Trump’
Bob Brigham
24 Nov 2017 at 20:58 ET
AddThis Sharing Buttons
Share to FacebookFacebook2.7KShare to TumblrTumblrShare to MoreMore78
Former Watergate prosecutors Jill Wine-Banks and Nick Akerman joined MSNBC host Chris Hayes on Friday night to discuss the latest revelations about Michael Flynn potentially flipping and testifying against President Donald Trump.
Acknowledging her history, Hayes asked Wine-Banks whether there was enough evidence for an obstruction of justice charge against President Trump.
Two ex-Watergate prosecutors agree ‘there’s enough evidence right now to indict Donald Trump’
Wow, this nothingburger is piled high 10 feet high with every kind of meat you can think of. It is fucking juicy!!! Trump is fucking going down!
YOu impeach Trump and you will tear this country apart forever.
Is that really what you want?
If his tax records had anything incriminating the evidence would have already been leaked to the press. I doubt Muller will pull a Maddow and look like a complete fucking idiot.Mueller's got his tax records, plenty of juice there, and Ryan's turned, he doesn't want to follow Manafort. And he's got a trove of incriminating shit, you can bet!
I'll just crack a beer, settle back and watch the trainwreck.
Got a link ?. Didn't fire him for that. Comey couldn't investigate a local lemonade stand all due to his political corruption.Firing the FBI director who is investigating your and/or your people is obstruction of justice.There is no proof of obstruction.obstruction of justice.
emoluments clause.
that's just a start...
There is no evidence that he obstructed.
The fact that they've found zero evidence isn't proof of obstruction BTW.
Didn't Trump say he fired Comey because of the Russian investigation?
You people are so full of shit it is just incredible.Trump is tearing this country apart now: we need to get rid of him.Two ex-Watergate prosecutors agree ‘there’s enough evidence right now to indict Donald Trump’
Bob Brigham
24 Nov 2017 at 20:58 ET
AddThis Sharing Buttons
Share to FacebookFacebook2.7KShare to TumblrTumblrShare to MoreMore78
Former Watergate prosecutors Jill Wine-Banks and Nick Akerman joined MSNBC host Chris Hayes on Friday night to discuss the latest revelations about Michael Flynn potentially flipping and testifying against President Donald Trump.
Acknowledging her history, Hayes asked Wine-Banks whether there was enough evidence for an obstruction of justice charge against President Trump.
Two ex-Watergate prosecutors agree ‘there’s enough evidence right now to indict Donald Trump’
Wow, this nothingburger is piled high 10 feet high with every kind of meat you can think of. It is fucking juicy!!! Trump is fucking going down!
YOu impeach Trump and you will tear this country apart forever.
Is that really what you want?
Trump is doing nothing radical or extreme.
Your hysteria, panic and hate mongering are what is tearing this nation apart.
Push the investigation forward and make sure that it is conducted legally?Firing the guy who is investigating you is going to end up how? Think hard now!These morons believe that President Trump firing an incompetent Comey is somehow illegal.
Ok then we must go back and prosecute Obama for working with the russians to weaken NATO missile defence.Two ex-Watergate prosecutors agree ‘there’s enough evidence right now to indict Donald Trump’
Wow, this nothingburger is piled high 10 feet high with every kind of meat you can think of. It is fucking juicy!!! Trump is fucking going down!
YES, my friend.......while right wing, Trump cult members keep on harping that collusion with Russia is not a crime, Mueller has been concentrating on a building a case for OBSTRUCTION of Justice.
The MOST damaging evidence is, of course, what Trump told his Russian friends WHY he had to get rid of Comey and the sophomoric (and changing) excuses the Trump team conjured up to sustain the firing.
Maddow is in the public eye.If his tax records had anything incriminating the evidence would have already been leaked to the press. I doubt Muller will pull a Maddow and look like a complete fucking idiot.Mueller's got his tax records, plenty of juice there, and Ryan's turned, he doesn't want to follow Manafort. And he's got a trove of incriminating shit, you can bet!
I'll just crack a beer, settle back and watch the trainwreck.
Ok then we must go back and prosecute Obama for working with the russians to weaken NATO missile defence.
Sounds good.Ok then we must go back and prosecute Obama for working with the russians to weaken NATO missile defence.Two ex-Watergate prosecutors agree ‘there’s enough evidence right now to indict Donald Trump’
Wow, this nothingburger is piled high 10 feet high with every kind of meat you can think of. It is fucking juicy!!! Trump is fucking going down!
YES, my friend.......while right wing, Trump cult members keep on harping that collusion with Russia is not a crime, Mueller has been concentrating on a building a case for OBSTRUCTION of Justice.
The MOST damaging evidence is, of course, what Trump told his Russian friends WHY he had to get rid of Comey and the sophomoric (and changing) excuses the Trump team conjured up to sustain the firing.
“Indict” is simply a synonym for “accuse”.
Well, NOT quite.......To "accuse" is more a non-legal, layman's term readily used by anyone, while "indict" is a formal accusation BACKED UP by a grand jury.......
There is an OLD legal saying. "A good lawyer can indite a ham sandwich"
Convicted is a whole other story.
He schlonged HillaryWhat law did he break?
You impeach Trump, and you will have established that peaceful change is no longer possible.
YOu sure you want to do that?
A sitting president cannot be charged with a crime by any civilian authority's.There is an OLD legal saying. "A good lawyer can indite a ham sandwich"
Convicted is a whole other story.
You think by the time Trump gets to trial, anyone is going to still be supporting him.
His trial would take place in DC anyway, where they voted 96% for Mrs. Clinton. Have fun with that.
Because you're talking about collusion you can't ignore past administration actions in your pathological desire to get rid of Trump.Ok then we must go back and prosecute Obama for working with the russians to weaken NATO missile defence.
Sure.....go for it.......LOL
(How the hell did you got from Trump firing the FBI director for not giving Flynn a pass, to NATO's missile defense???)
There is an OLD legal saying. "A good lawyer can indite a ham sandwich"
Convicted is a whole other story.
You think by the time Trump gets to trial, anyone is going to still be supporting him.
His trial would take place in DC anyway, where they voted 96% for Mrs. Clinton. Have fun with that.
