Two death penalty cases in the news recently

Discussion in 'Law and Justice System' started by Quantum Windbag, Sep 22, 2011.

  1. Quantum Windbag
    Offline

    Quantum Windbag Gold Member

    Joined:
    May 9, 2010
    Messages:
    58,308
    Thanks Received:
    5,014
    Trophy Points:
    245
    Ratings:
    +5,221
    With all the news about Georgia executing Troy Davis last night when witnesses recanted and Texas about to execute Duane Buck, I thought I would supply some background to both discussions.

    Troy Davis was executed after a number of witnesses recanted their testimony, and all of this proves he is innocent. That is the broad claim made by death penalty activist and the media. Unfortunately, they are leaving out a few details.

    There Is No Travesty of Justice in Georgia. Execute Troy Davis | RedState

    As for Duane Buck and the testimony from a psychiatrist that the prosecution used to prove black people are more likely to commit more crimes, it seems there are a couple of details being missed there too.

    Pardons board rejects Buck's bid to avoid execution - Houston Chronicle

    The defense actually brought the guy in, and used him knowing his theories, and he actually argued that Buck was an exception.

    I oppose the death penalty, but rarely get involved in the merits of individual cases because the facts rarely get reported completely, and people end up focusing on the distortions.
     
  2. LAfrique
    Offline

    LAfrique VIP Member

    Joined:
    May 16, 2011
    Messages:
    1,416
    Thanks Received:
    66
    Trophy Points:
    83
    Ratings:
    +69

    Quantum, Troy Davis' case seemed to have been built around "shell casing." I do not understand how we can put anyone to death based on identical shell casing! And about "bloody" clothes, could it not be possible that the bloody clothes came from previous shooting allegedly committed by Davis?

    I just do not like the idea of putting people to death on a case so ridden with doubts, and a case in which even alleged eyewitnesses have recanted stories.

    As per Duane Buck: Duane Buck's case is very different from Troy Davis' case. I do not think anyone denies Buck's guilt. Buck's case is an open and shut case. I wish prosecutors or whoever had not made mention of race. I just hate to see taxpayers monies wasted for something so stupid and irrelevant to the case.
     
  3. signelect
    Offline

    signelect BANNED

    Joined:
    Dec 10, 2010
    Messages:
    1,863
    Thanks Received:
    216
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Location:
    Houston, TX
    Ratings:
    +216
    It always amazes me that when people look at a man who was involved in a brutal murder that they say, well he might not have done it. Has the bloody clothes, has done this kind of thing before, has the right gun, casing match. It is a shame that we have a group of people in our society who can't seem to obey the law and they need to be put away. I don't think we need to provide house, food and medical care for the rest of their sorry lives.
     
  4. Cecilie1200
    Offline

    Cecilie1200 Gold Member

    Joined:
    Nov 15, 2008
    Messages:
    26,879
    Thanks Received:
    3,720
    Trophy Points:
    280
    Ratings:
    +7,052
    Actually, Troy Davis's case was built around 34 witnesses against him, only two of whom ACTUALLY recanted, and both of which Davis and his attorney declined to use in court because they didn't believe the recantations would hold up under cross-examination.

    As I understand it, the guy pistol-whipped a guy in a crowded Burger King parking lot, and when the cop shouted at him to stop, shot him. THEN he walked over to where the cop was lying and shot him AGAIN. In full view of whole droves of witnesses.

    Am I wrong in any of the particulars here?
     
  5. Wiseacre
    Offline

    Wiseacre Retired USAF Chief Supporting Member

    Joined:
    Apr 8, 2011
    Messages:
    6,025
    Thanks Received:
    1,192
    Trophy Points:
    48
    Location:
    San Antonio, TX
    Ratings:
    +1,194

    Apparently not. To me it boils down to simple justice, if you deliberately take a life you should forfeit your own. Simple as that, don't care about statistics about deterrence.
     
  6. DiAnna
    Offline

    DiAnna Political Half-Breed

    Joined:
    Jul 7, 2011
    Messages:
    457
    Thanks Received:
    152
    Trophy Points:
    178
    Location:
    No Calif, in the Sierra Foothills
    Ratings:
    +155
    I'm not a fan of the death penalty, because too many people have been convicted on circumstantial evidence (or in some cases, prosecutorial misconduct) only to be exhonerated years later by DNA evidence. Executing innocents is not acceptable; death is forever.

    However, there are cases so heinous, where guilt has been proven beyond all doubt, where I do not oppose the death penalty. Examples would be Gacy, Bundy, Dahmer, and others where the bodies are literally found on the premises and incontrovertible DNA evidence exists.

    That was not the case in this instance. I am not convinced that Troy Davis was guilty beyond a reasonable doubt, especially since his alleged victim was a police officer. The murder of a police officer puts extreme presssure on the D.A. to charge and convict someone. The case against Davis was extremely weak, based solely on eye-witness testimony, which is actually the most flawed type of evidence, as men convicted of rape by the victims definitive identification only to be found innocent based on later DNA evidence proves.

    I don't feel good about this execution. The execution of Byrd's murderer, however, does not bother me in the least.
     
    Last edited: Sep 23, 2011

Share This Page