Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
Forget the stinking Democrats, the majority of Americans have had 456 bad days but good days are coming.Dems have had about 456 of their worst days since the election.
With hundreds more to come.
60% of Americans do not like what Trump is doing and that is increasing.
And the orange is the sane one ? The people he hires? Fox news? His crazy weird ass base ?You are completely deluded with your hate. The Russians most certainly did not hand Donald Trump the Presidency. That is the pablum that you have been spoon fed from a vengeful, angry Press that lost it's credibility and desperately wants it back.I said it when he was handed the presidency by the Russians....Trump will regret the day he decided to run for office...I wish hom the worst of the worst and that will drive his minions insane, those who voted for him are bunch of cowards and low lives.
Cohn not Manafort.So you do not feel that Cohn pleading guilty to felony illegal campaign donations he made under instructions of Donald Trump is not bad news for Trump?I do believe as I like.Nah. Its a bad day for Cohen and Manafort not Trump.
Of course you can believe as you like.
Time will prove how bad of a day this was for Trump.
Oh its a bad day for Cohen and Manafort but not Trump.
Do you realize that Trump is now an unindicted co conspirator to the charges. There is a very good chance if Trump was not protected by being President that there is a very good chance he would have been indicted yesterday.
Well since there were no illegal campaign funds then your point is moot.
In fact all eight are on another thread on this board. Look em up.
Look up the charges and who made them. That should tell you all you need to know.
I know it is tough keeping track of all of Trump's associates in legal troubles.
Typical Trump supporter who responds with an irrelevant insult because you say something you disagree with.The only ones having a bad set of days are obsessive types such as yourself based upon the endless delusional threads.Forget the stinking Democrats, the majority of Americans have had 456 bad days but good days are coming.Dems have had about 456 of their worst days since the election.
With hundreds more to come.
60% of Americans do not like what Trump is doing and that is increasing.
They're not.What if the antiTrumpsters are right.Imagine their disappointment on election day, and imagine all the fun we'll have playing new videos of their meltdowns.Today was Trump's worst day ever.
But there are worse days to come.
Nah. Its a bad day for Cohen and Manafort not Trump.
Of course you can believe as you like.
What will you do?
We will seeThey're not.What if the antiTrumpsters are right.Imagine their disappointment on election day, and imagine all the fun we'll have playing new videos of their meltdowns.Today was Trump's worst day ever.
But there are worse days to come.
Nah. Its a bad day for Cohen and Manafort not Trump.
Of course you can believe as you like.
What will you do?
Trump supporters do not want the truth, they live on alternative facts and the principle that the truth is not the truth.What you might have missed in the Cohen plea
In case you doubt the strength of the case: Did you notice all the other people implicated in Cohen’s plea? There is “Corporation-1,” presumably American Media Inc. (AMI), which owns the National Enquirer (“Magazine-1”). Members of Corporation-1 (including editor in chief, or “Editor-1”) would presumably have information and be able to corroborate Cohen’s account regarding the Karen McDougal payoff. The information document filed against Cohen also notes the existence of a text between Editor-1 and Cohen, corroboration of the arrangement to pay off a second woman, presumably Stormy Daniels. An encrypted phone call is also mentioned, as is an attorney (one more witness!) who represented both women. And let’s not forget the “executives of the Company” [Trump’s] who “grossed up” the reimbursement to Cohen; that’s two or more additional witnesses. We learn that “Executive-1” received the request or reimbursement and shared it with more executives. More witnesses. In Count 7, Cohen is accused of enabling Corporation-1 to make an illegal corporate campaign donation. That means the company and/or its executives might have liability as well. Count 8 mentions campaign executives (who might they be? how many?) who worked with Cohen to effectuate the scheme.
In sum, it’s not Cohen’s word against Trump’s, but rather a raft of witnesses whom prosecutors have or will be able to talk to (some to avoid liability of their own) and documents as well. There is, in short, a ton of evidence out there concerning the campaign finance scheme to make sure two women didn’t mess up Trump’s chances of getting elected. If Trump learned anything from the Paul Manafort trial, it should be that discrediting a single witness doesn’t eradicate piles of complementary evidence. Trump might try discrediting Cohen, but it’s Cohen who has the corroborating documents and witnesses to back him up.
Trump supporters do not want the truth, they live on alternative facts and the principle that the truth is not the truth.What you might have missed in the Cohen plea
In case you doubt the strength of the case: Did you notice all the other people implicated in Cohen’s plea? There is “Corporation-1,” presumably American Media Inc. (AMI), which owns the National Enquirer (“Magazine-1”). Members of Corporation-1 (including editor in chief, or “Editor-1”) would presumably have information and be able to corroborate Cohen’s account regarding the Karen McDougal payoff. The information document filed against Cohen also notes the existence of a text between Editor-1 and Cohen, corroboration of the arrangement to pay off a second woman, presumably Stormy Daniels. An encrypted phone call is also mentioned, as is an attorney (one more witness!) who represented both women. And let’s not forget the “executives of the Company” [Trump’s] who “grossed up” the reimbursement to Cohen; that’s two or more additional witnesses. We learn that “Executive-1” received the request or reimbursement and shared it with more executives. More witnesses. In Count 7, Cohen is accused of enabling Corporation-1 to make an illegal corporate campaign donation. That means the company and/or its executives might have liability as well. Count 8 mentions campaign executives (who might they be? how many?) who worked with Cohen to effectuate the scheme.
In sum, it’s not Cohen’s word against Trump’s, but rather a raft of witnesses whom prosecutors have or will be able to talk to (some to avoid liability of their own) and documents as well. There is, in short, a ton of evidence out there concerning the campaign finance scheme to make sure two women didn’t mess up Trump’s chances of getting elected. If Trump learned anything from the Paul Manafort trial, it should be that discrediting a single witness doesn’t eradicate piles of complementary evidence. Trump might try discrediting Cohen, but it’s Cohen who has the corroborating documents and witnesses to back him up.
It is scary how Trump's America is close to George Orwell's 1984. I doubt many Trump supporters have read it.
Countless times on this forum, I have quoted from that book in reference to the way Trumpies can reverse themselves on a dime. "We have always been at war with eastasia".Trump supporters do not want the truth, they live on alternative facts and the principle that the truth is not the truth.What you might have missed in the Cohen plea
In case you doubt the strength of the case: Did you notice all the other people implicated in Cohen’s plea? There is “Corporation-1,” presumably American Media Inc. (AMI), which owns the National Enquirer (“Magazine-1”). Members of Corporation-1 (including editor in chief, or “Editor-1”) would presumably have information and be able to corroborate Cohen’s account regarding the Karen McDougal payoff. The information document filed against Cohen also notes the existence of a text between Editor-1 and Cohen, corroboration of the arrangement to pay off a second woman, presumably Stormy Daniels. An encrypted phone call is also mentioned, as is an attorney (one more witness!) who represented both women. And let’s not forget the “executives of the Company” [Trump’s] who “grossed up” the reimbursement to Cohen; that’s two or more additional witnesses. We learn that “Executive-1” received the request or reimbursement and shared it with more executives. More witnesses. In Count 7, Cohen is accused of enabling Corporation-1 to make an illegal corporate campaign donation. That means the company and/or its executives might have liability as well. Count 8 mentions campaign executives (who might they be? how many?) who worked with Cohen to effectuate the scheme.
In sum, it’s not Cohen’s word against Trump’s, but rather a raft of witnesses whom prosecutors have or will be able to talk to (some to avoid liability of their own) and documents as well. There is, in short, a ton of evidence out there concerning the campaign finance scheme to make sure two women didn’t mess up Trump’s chances of getting elected. If Trump learned anything from the Paul Manafort trial, it should be that discrediting a single witness doesn’t eradicate piles of complementary evidence. Trump might try discrediting Cohen, but it’s Cohen who has the corroborating documents and witnesses to back him up.
It is scary how Trump's America is close to George Orwell's 1984. I doubt many Trump supporters have read it.
Today was Trump's worst day ever.
But there are worse days to come.
I know it is tough to watch your hero go down.Today was Trump's worst day ever.
But there are worse days to come.
Look! The day when someone watched CNN.
And got immediately confused.
Today was Trump's worst day ever.
But there are worse days to come.
I know it is tough to watch your hero go down.Today was Trump's worst day ever.
But there are worse days to come.
Look! The day when someone watched CNN.
And got immediately confused.
Trump is a false god for the poor Trump supporters.
So you do not feel that Cohn pleading guilty to felony illegal campaign donations he made under instructions of Donald Trump is not bad news for Trump?I do believe as I like.Today was Trump's worst day ever.
But there are worse days to come.
Nah. Its a bad day for Cohen and Manafort not Trump.
Of course you can believe as you like.
Time will prove how bad of a day this was for Trump.
Oh its a bad day for Cohen and Manafort but not Trump.
Do you realize that Trump is now an unindicted co conspirator to the charges. There is a very good chance if Trump was not protected by being President that there is a very good chance he would have been indicted yesterday.
Today was Trump's worst day ever.
But there are worse days to come.
I doubt it. I suspect that the days his father, mother and brother died were much worse..as were the days his first two marriages collapsed.
This is just another inside baseball Swamp Thang scandal du jour....soon to be replaced by a new one when the public shows it doesn't give a flying frell.
Trump supporters do not want the truth, they live on alternative facts and the principle that the truth is not the truth.What you might have missed in the Cohen plea
In case you doubt the strength of the case: Did you notice all the other people implicated in Cohen’s plea? There is “Corporation-1,” presumably American Media Inc. (AMI), which owns the National Enquirer (“Magazine-1”). Members of Corporation-1 (including editor in chief, or “Editor-1”) would presumably have information and be able to corroborate Cohen’s account regarding the Karen McDougal payoff. The information document filed against Cohen also notes the existence of a text between Editor-1 and Cohen, corroboration of the arrangement to pay off a second woman, presumably Stormy Daniels. An encrypted phone call is also mentioned, as is an attorney (one more witness!) who represented both women. And let’s not forget the “executives of the Company” [Trump’s] who “grossed up” the reimbursement to Cohen; that’s two or more additional witnesses. We learn that “Executive-1” received the request or reimbursement and shared it with more executives. More witnesses. In Count 7, Cohen is accused of enabling Corporation-1 to make an illegal corporate campaign donation. That means the company and/or its executives might have liability as well. Count 8 mentions campaign executives (who might they be? how many?) who worked with Cohen to effectuate the scheme.
In sum, it’s not Cohen’s word against Trump’s, but rather a raft of witnesses whom prosecutors have or will be able to talk to (some to avoid liability of their own) and documents as well. There is, in short, a ton of evidence out there concerning the campaign finance scheme to make sure two women didn’t mess up Trump’s chances of getting elected. If Trump learned anything from the Paul Manafort trial, it should be that discrediting a single witness doesn’t eradicate piles of complementary evidence. Trump might try discrediting Cohen, but it’s Cohen who has the corroborating documents and witnesses to back him up.
It is scary how Trump's America is close to George Orwell's 1984. I doubt many Trump supporters have read it.
Trump supporters do not want the truth, they live on alternative facts and the principle that the truth is not the truth.What you might have missed in the Cohen plea
In case you doubt the strength of the case: Did you notice all the other people implicated in Cohen’s plea? There is “Corporation-1,” presumably American Media Inc. (AMI), which owns the National Enquirer (“Magazine-1”). Members of Corporation-1 (including editor in chief, or “Editor-1”) would presumably have information and be able to corroborate Cohen’s account regarding the Karen McDougal payoff. The information document filed against Cohen also notes the existence of a text between Editor-1 and Cohen, corroboration of the arrangement to pay off a second woman, presumably Stormy Daniels. An encrypted phone call is also mentioned, as is an attorney (one more witness!) who represented both women. And let’s not forget the “executives of the Company” [Trump’s] who “grossed up” the reimbursement to Cohen; that’s two or more additional witnesses. We learn that “Executive-1” received the request or reimbursement and shared it with more executives. More witnesses. In Count 7, Cohen is accused of enabling Corporation-1 to make an illegal corporate campaign donation. That means the company and/or its executives might have liability as well. Count 8 mentions campaign executives (who might they be? how many?) who worked with Cohen to effectuate the scheme.
In sum, it’s not Cohen’s word against Trump’s, but rather a raft of witnesses whom prosecutors have or will be able to talk to (some to avoid liability of their own) and documents as well. There is, in short, a ton of evidence out there concerning the campaign finance scheme to make sure two women didn’t mess up Trump’s chances of getting elected. If Trump learned anything from the Paul Manafort trial, it should be that discrediting a single witness doesn’t eradicate piles of complementary evidence. Trump might try discrediting Cohen, but it’s Cohen who has the corroborating documents and witnesses to back him up.
It is scary how Trump's America is close to George Orwell's 1984. I doubt many Trump supporters have read it.
I have read Orwell's 1984, and it doesn't help your case at all. Your "facts" are mostly tea leaves, and you and your ilk have been misreading them. At best, Trump may be guilty of a campaign finance violation, and pay a fine. However, even that is a long shot.
I want accountability from my PresidentIf that was Donald Trump's worst day ever, then he and America have nothing but great days ahead. MAGA! That has been the focus since day one and based on the strong dollar, strong stock market, strong job market Donald Trump is doing great. You should be proud and supportive of your President rather than rooting for our foreign adversaries.
