Navigation
Install the app
How to install the app on iOS
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
More options
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
Trump's thinly veiled threats to attack Bill Clinton confirms he lost the debate
- Thread starter nat4900
- Start date
I wasn't aware of this rule. I've never heard Women's Rights advocates make such a distinction.Only if the accusations are capricious and maybe false.......Defending one's spouse regarding accusations is NOT a sin. Just ask poor Mrs. Vitter or Mrs. Craig.Is it okay to disparage women who have alleged rape?
Who decides when sexual accusations by multiple women about a guy who admitted having an affair with a young intern are "capricious and maybe false"?
And "maybe false"? That's enough now?
.
Last edited:
- Mar 31, 2009
- 94,573
- 71,017
- 3,605
I don't take a thing you say serious, nada, zilch, nothing.
Now THAT really hurt my feelings.....LOL
Deep down it probably did, given your desire to be viewed as intelligent and insightful. Sadly you're not.
Everyone feels he was too nice. But that was just to keep Hillary from bawling on national television in a sympathy move.Spin it any way you want, but the promised attacks by Trump on Bill's infidelity at the next debate shows that even he well knows that he did poorly on the first debate.
Objectively, if this clown really thought that he won (and only an idiot would conclude that), there would be NO reason to threaten that he needed to begin to sling mud.......
Hillary was rude and obnoxious. She felt she could get away with it, so she did it.
Most of America could see what she was doing.
Don't worry, Trump was stupid enough to show his hand, I'm certain the Clinton campaign will spend hours researching all of Donalds indescretions and practicing, practicing practicing the delivery.
So it's stupid to show his hand to hillary yet liberals want Trump to show his hand when it comes to fighting terrorism?
You people are nucken futs....
The VOR
Gold Member
- May 8, 2011
- 8,825
- 1,726
- 280
Then please explain why you respond to all of nat4900's posts. LOL.Have you seen the videos of her getting caught using hand signals to Holt?
Another lame "excuse' confirming that Trump lost....and lost badly. Thanks !!!
Except he didn't lose. Keep trying Twinkle Toes. I have some news for you.....I don't take a thing you say serious, nada, zilch, nothing.
- Aug 4, 2009
- 281,310
- 142,049
- 2,615
Don't worry, Trump was stupid enough to show his hand, I'm certain the Clinton campaign will spend hours researching all of Donalds indescretions and practicing, practicing practicing the delivery.
So it's stupid to show his hand to hillary yet liberals want Trump to show his hand when it comes to fighting terrorism?
You people are nucken futs....
You mean Trump has a secret plan to fight terrorism and he won't tell us?
The VOR
Gold Member
- May 8, 2011
- 8,825
- 1,726
- 280
Like Hillary said: trump's secret ISIS plan is that he doesn't have one. LOL.Don't worry, Trump was stupid enough to show his hand, I'm certain the Clinton campaign will spend hours researching all of Donalds indescretions and practicing, practicing practicing the delivery.
So it's stupid to show his hand to hillary yet liberals want Trump to show his hand when it comes to fighting terrorism?
You people are nucken futs....
- Aug 4, 2009
- 281,310
- 142,049
- 2,615
Like Hillary said: trump's secret ISIS plan is that he doesn't have one. LOL.Don't worry, Trump was stupid enough to show his hand, I'm certain the Clinton campaign will spend hours researching all of Donalds indescretions and practicing, practicing practicing the delivery.
So it's stupid to show his hand to hillary yet liberals want Trump to show his hand when it comes to fighting terrorism?
You people are nucken futs....
I think it has something to do with calling them "Radical Islamic Terrorists" They hate that
Yes....Telegraph your plans on fighting ISIS like a friggen idiot. Hillary put her plan up on her website. Brilliant. Then she claims he has no plans because he not foolish enough to do the same.Don't worry, Trump was stupid enough to show his hand, I'm certain the Clinton campaign will spend hours researching all of Donalds indescretions and practicing, practicing practicing the delivery.
So it's stupid to show his hand to hillary yet liberals want Trump to show his hand when it comes to fighting terrorism?
You people are nucken futs....
A lie of course.Like Hillary said: trump's secret ISIS plan is that he doesn't have one. LOL.Don't worry, Trump was stupid enough to show his hand, I'm certain the Clinton campaign will spend hours researching all of Donalds indescretions and practicing, practicing practicing the delivery.
So it's stupid to show his hand to hillary yet liberals want Trump to show his hand when it comes to fighting terrorism?
You people are nucken futs....
She proved to me while I was in Somalia that she's incompetent. Politics and military tactics don't mix well. It assures defeat or a quagmire at best.
I wasn't aware of this rule. I've never heard Women's Rights advocates make such a distinction.Only if the accusations are capricious and maybe false.......Defending one's spouse regarding accusations is NOT a sin. Just ask poor Mrs. Vitter or Mrs. Craig.Is it okay to disparage women who have alleged rape?
Who decides when accusations by multiple women are "capricious and maybe false"?
And "maybe false"? That's enough?
.
When the accusations come from bloggers, and other "alternative" sources, and are not made through police or the MSM, such allegations are not creditable. Most of these blogger allegations say that Clinton basically made a very clumsy pass at the women. The women said no and that was the end of it. Hardly anything to get excited about.
Anita Broaderick has signed and sworn an Affidavit that says that Bill Clinton did not rape her. What to believe - the bloggers, or her sworn Affidavit? I have to take the sworn affidavit over anything else.
The accusations against Bill Cosby all came from the MSM. The women sued. Much more creditable.
Iceweasel
Diamond Member
A clumsy pass?When the accusations come from bloggers, and other "alternative" sources, and are not made through police or the MSM, such allegations are not creditable. Most of these blogger allegations say that Clinton basically made a very clumsy pass at the women. The women said no and that was the end of it. Hardly anything to get excited about.
LOL
nat4900
Diamond Member
- Mar 3, 2015
- 42,021
- 5,964
- 1,870
- Thread starter
- Banned
- #54
I wasn't aware of this rule. I've never heard Women's Rights advocates make such a distinction.
Who decides when sexual accusations by multiple women about a guy who admitted having an affair with a young intern are "capricious and maybe false"?
And "maybe false"? That's enough now?
NO....you're misinterpreting what I stated (perhaps on purpose?)........I am NOT defending Bill Clinton's proclivity for womanizing....BUT almost 10% of sexual harassment allegations are proven false especially against some men (or women) in power and wealthy situations. Don’t assume a complainant’s prima facie case is sufficient proof of harassment, and a spouse's defending the other is not an ethical crime.
nat4900
Diamond Member
- Mar 3, 2015
- 42,021
- 5,964
- 1,870
- Thread starter
- Banned
- #55
So it's stupid to show his hand to hillary yet liberals want Trump to show his hand when it comes to fighting terrorism?
You people are nucken futs....
So, you're COMPARING a clown's "threat" to sling mud at his opponent to the mysterious plans to defeat ISIS??? Really ??
Last edited:
That's fine. My point is that women's rights groups don't make the distinction that you made. What you describe is very subjective, and that's just not the way we are expected to react to rape allegations as a culture.I wasn't aware of this rule. I've never heard Women's Rights advocates make such a distinction.
Who decides when sexual accusations by multiple women about a guy who admitted having an affair with a young intern are "capricious and maybe false"?
And "maybe false"? That's enough now?
NO....you're misinterpreting what I stated (perhaps on purpose?)........I am NOT defending Bill Clinton's proclivity for womanizing....BUT almost 10% of sexual harassment allegations are proven false especially
I think this is political. If a Republican lady said the same thing about women who accused a man (with an admitted history) such as Bill, the Left would crucify them. Would you deny that?
And this is coming from someone who is holding his nose and voting for Hillary. I'm just being honest.
.
Indeependent
Diamond Member
- Nov 19, 2013
- 73,633
- 28,500
- 2,250
Anything other than policy is irrelevant for either candidate.
AntonToo
Diamond Member
- Jun 13, 2016
- 30,556
- 8,828
- 1,340
The majority thinks he won. Keep trying.
Source?
Come on fucking shameless, thoughtless liar, produce the source for the claim.
- Mar 31, 2009
- 94,573
- 71,017
- 3,605
The majority thinks he won. Keep trying.
Source?
Google it, I don't do left loon demands.
Eaglewings
Platinum Member
At this time I don't give a shit who won...Hearing what they have to say is more important.
Similar threads
- Replies
- 95
- Views
- 2K
- Replies
- 14
- Views
- 1K
- Replies
- 26
- Views
- 285
- Replies
- 4
- Views
- 389
Latest Discussions
- Replies
- 70
- Views
- 342
- Replies
- 35
- Views
- 65
- Replies
- 24
- Views
- 88
Forum List
-
-
-
-
-
Political Satire 8068
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
ObamaCare 781
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Member Usernotes 471
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-