Trump Tower Meet....and Steele's dossier...

You want to talk about 'collusion' and 'treason'?!

1979 - Mayor Diane Feinstein creates / enters a 'Sister City' program with Shanghai's mayor. Trade, business, a relationship is forged. Both Mayors rose is politics. Trade grew. Personal Wealth grew.

Diane met her husband, a man who had already been doing business in China. Once she got in Congress she was put in positions to vote for and award monies to Chinese projects / businesses her husband's company was involved in or his company directly. She said SHE WAS AWARE OF THE PERCEPTION OF A CONFLICT OF INTEREST BUT INSISTED THAT IF THERE WAS INE SHE WOULD STEP DOWN.

GEE, where did we hear THAT from? Oh yeah, Rosenstein, who is up to his neck in Conflicts of Interest in the Trump Witch Hunt.

Again, though, Diane Feinstein admitted their was a perception of a conflict of interest involving China / her husband's company - she said she saw it. 'PERCEPTION', as they say, ' IS REALITY'...and in Feinstein's case it literally was.

She and her husband made HUNDREDS of millions of dollars with their dealings with the Chinese Govt. Her old pal, the mayor of Shanghai, became PRESIDENT / LEADER of China. Feinstein and her husband were invited to govt balls and ceremonies, and the doors within the govt / country opened even more to Feinstein.

In the early to mid 1990s Chinese millions flooded into US politics, & no one benefited more than the Clintons & the Feinsteins.

(It was in the 1990s that Bill Clinton changed the balance of power and opened the door to a worldwide threat by signing away missile technology to China. Almost overnight the Chinese went from their missiles exploding immediately after takeoff to launching 'satellite killers' into space. We see part of Bill Clinton's Legacy' in North Korea, because the missile technology the little 'Rocket Man' has acquired was given to them by China ... Who got theirs thanks to Clinton.)

And now - surprise, surprise - we find out that Feinstein has had a CHINESE SPY driving her around and working for her for the last 20 YEARS....

...and we are supposed to believe she never knew....and we are supposed to believe that China kept a spy in-place with Feinstein for 20 years despite never getting anything valuable from her during that 'wasted' tine?!

THERE is you 'collusion' and self-benefiting treason....

How's that 'PERCEPTION' of a Conflict of Interest NOW, Diane?

So, WHEN DOES THE INVESTIGATION IF DIANE FEINSTEIN BEGIN?
I'm guessing this is supposed to be a bait and switch?

It's not working.

Manafort spent 60 million dollars and went broke then offered to work for Trump for free.

Somehow, while working for Trump, he ended up with millions of dollars.

It was merely a coincidence that he managed to get the GOP party platform changed to favor the Russians.

This had nothing to do with BJ's. Nothing to do with Chinese food.
 
You want to talk about 'collusion' and 'treason'?!

1979 - Mayor Diane Feinstein creates / enters a 'Sister City' program with Shanghai's mayor. Trade, business, a relationship is forged. Both Mayors rose is politics. Trade grew. Personal Wealth grew.

Diane met her husband, a man who had already been doing business in China. Once she got in Congress she was put in positions to vote for and award monies to Chinese projects / businesses her husband's company was involved in or his company directly. She said SHE WAS AWARE OF THE PERCEPTION OF A CONFLICT OF INTEREST BUT INSISTED THAT IF THERE WAS INE SHE WOULD STEP DOWN.

GEE, where did we hear THAT from? Oh yeah, Rosenstein, who is up to his neck in Conflicts of Interest in the Trump Witch Hunt.

Again, though, Diane Feinstein admitted their was a perception of a conflict of interest involving China / her husband's company - she said she saw it. 'PERCEPTION', as they say, ' IS REALITY'...and in Feinstein's case it literally was.

She and her husband made HUNDREDS of millions of dollars with their dealings with the Chinese Govt. Her old pal, the mayor of Shanghai, became PRESIDENT / LEADER of China. Feinstein and her husband were invited to govt balls and ceremonies, and the doors within the govt / country opened even more to Feinstein.

In the early to mid 1990s Chinese millions flooded into US politics, & no one benefited more than the Clintons & the Feinsteins.

(It was in the 1990s that Bill Clinton changed the balance of power and opened the door to a worldwide threat by signing away missile technology to China. Almost overnight the Chinese went from their missiles exploding immediately after takeoff to launching 'satellite killers' into space. We see part of Bill Clinton's Legacy' in North Korea, because the missile technology the little 'Rocket Man' has acquired was given to them by China ... Who got theirs thanks to Clinton.)

And now - surprise, surprise - we find out that Feinstein has had a CHINESE SPY driving her around and working for her for the last 20 YEARS....

...and we are supposed to believe she never knew....and we are supposed to believe that China kept a spy in-place with Feinstein for 20 years despite never getting anything valuable from her during that 'wasted' tine?!

THERE is you 'collusion' and self-benefiting treason....

How's that 'PERCEPTION' of a Conflict of Interest NOW, Diane?

So, WHEN DOES THE INVESTIGATION IF DIANE FEINSTEIN BEGIN?
I'm guessing this is supposed to be a bait and switch?

It's not working.

Manafort spent 60 million dollars and went broke then offered to work for Trump for free.

Somehow, while working for Trump, he ended up with millions of dollars.

It was merely a coincidence that he managed to get the GOP party platform changed to favor the Russians.

This had nothing to do with BJ's. Nothing to do with Chinese food.
Very curious
 
I wouldn't have standing to sue her for accepting bribes from Russia.
Yes, I know. Nor do you have any evidence to provide to anyone.

I think you are finally getting my point about your fantasy.

Quid pro quo is as good as a photograph.

You're a ridiculous person. To you, a Republican shoplifting is serious while a Democrat committing murder isn't. You're a partisan hack. The Democrats have your balls in a jar on their mantle. You have no intellectual integrity at all
 
Quid pro quo is as good as a photograph
But not an easy thing to prove. If it were that easy, Donnie and junior would have done the perp walk already.

The Russians got 20% of US uranium reserves
Hillary got $145 million from like five people involved in the deal

That's quit pro quo right there. What was hard about that?

You don't know what you're talking about
 
The Russians got 20% of US uranium reserves
Hillary got $145 million from like five people involved in the deal

That's quit pro quo right there.
Well, your mangling of the facts aside, we're back to my point. Trump got truckfuls of Russian money, and later tried to lift sanctions on them.

It's just not that simple. But again, you are invited to forward your evidence to the authorities. ;)
 
Ahhh collusion with foreign entities is ok if nat thinks they are friends.
Or, if we want to be honest, if it involves a D or R next to their name.

Yep, if nat approves....collusion's all good. Especially, when there was no collusion.

Trump denial is not an evidence or a verdict.

Except....mueller has no evidence.

Since you are part of the investigation. Can you tell us if there are no evidence? Listening with Hannity again?


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
 
Quid pro quo
That would be an awfully tough one to prove.

Actually, it's an easy thing to prove. Like five people involved in the deal gave Hillary money. Slick was paid twice his usual fee by Russians in cash. If Hillary were anyone else, she'd be in jail

Yup all of those incomes were all reported in her tax returns.

Trumpoop has not shown his tax returns because he is corrupt. Yet you and the rest of Trumpets still adore him.
 
Quid pro quo
That would be an awfully tough one to prove.

Actually, it's an easy thing to prove. Like five people involved in the deal gave Hillary money. Slick was paid twice his usual fee by Russians in cash. If Hillary were anyone else, she'd be in jail

Yup all of those incomes were all reported in her tax returns.

Trumpoop has not shown his tax returns because he is corrupt. Yet you and the rest of Trumpets still adore him.

Gotcha, you trumanzees are so corrupt. Pay taxes on your bribes and youre fine. Its you ridiculous worship of the orange clown
 
Quid pro quo
That would be an awfully tough one to prove.

Actually, it's an easy thing to prove. Like five people involved in the deal gave Hillary money. Slick was paid twice his usual fee by Russians in cash. If Hillary were anyone else, she'd be in jail

Yup all of those incomes were all reported in her tax returns.

Trumpoop has not shown his tax returns because he is corrupt. Yet you and the rest of Trumpets still adore him.

Gotcha, you trumanzees are so corrupt. Pay taxes on your bribes and youre fine. Its you ridiculous worship of the orange clown

Gotcha? Like what what what what?
So why Trumpy has not launch any investigation of Clinton corruptness?
Clinton has not been charge of any wrong doing.

But Trump, family and his buddies are being investigated and some are in trial.
 
Quid pro quo
That would be an awfully tough one to prove.

Actually, it's an easy thing to prove. Like five people involved in the deal gave Hillary money. Slick was paid twice his usual fee by Russians in cash. If Hillary were anyone else, she'd be in jail

Yup all of those incomes were all reported in her tax returns.

Trumpoop has not shown his tax returns because he is corrupt. Yet you and the rest of Trumpets still adore him.

Gotcha, you trumanzees are so corrupt. Pay taxes on your bribes and youre fine. Its you ridiculous worship of the orange clown

Gotcha? Like what what what what?
So why Trumpy has not launch any investigation of Clinton corruptness?
Clinton has not been charge of any wrong doing.

But Trump, family and his buddies are being investigated and some are in trial.

Politics. Democrats sre better at it
 
Ahhh collusion with foreign entities is ok if nat thinks they are friends.
Or, if we want to be honest, if it involves a D or R next to their name.

Yep, if nat approves....collusion's all good. Especially, when there was no collusion.

Trump denial is not an evidence or a verdict.

Except....mueller has no evidence.

Since you are part of the investigation. Can you tell us if there are no evidence? Listening with Hannity again?


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Where's the evidence? Mueller has none and is desperate. Anyone with a couple of brain cells can figure this out. Mueller is so desperate that he needs to interview Trump so he can twist his words for a process perjury crime. This is all Mueller has. It's beyond laughable .
 
Ahhh collusion with foreign entities is ok if nat thinks they are friends.
Or, if we want to be honest, if it involves a D or R next to their name.

Yep, if nat approves....collusion's all good. Especially, when there was no collusion.

Trump denial is not an evidence or a verdict.

Except....mueller has no evidence.

Since you are part of the investigation. Can you tell us if there are no evidence? Listening with Hannity again?


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Where's the evidence? Mueller has none and is desperate. Anyone with a couple of brain cells can figure this out. Mueller is so desperate that he needs to interview Trump so he can twist his words for a process perjury crime. This is all Mueller has. It's beyond laughable .

Why would law enforcement reveal their evidence before the investigation is finished?
 
Yep, if nat approves....collusion's all good. Especially, when there was no collusion.

Trump denial is not an evidence or a verdict.

Except....mueller has no evidence.

Since you are part of the investigation. Can you tell us if there are no evidence? Listening with Hannity again?


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Where's the evidence? Mueller has none and is desperate. Anyone with a couple of brain cells can figure this out. Mueller is so desperate that he needs to interview Trump so he can twist his words for a process perjury crime. This is all Mueller has. It's beyond laughable .

Why would law enforcement reveal their evidence before the investigation is finished?


If there were evidence, mueller wouldn't be desperately trying to depose trump. It really is that simple but libs can't see this.
 
If there were evidence, mueller wouldn't be desperately trying to depose trump


Nitwit........"desperately trying to depose Trump" would mean the issuance of a subpoena........Have you seen that happen??? (yet???)

Morons like you would be screaming if a report from Mueller would NOT have Trump's "defense" on it........and, by the way, what happened to the orange buffoon's promise that he would testify under oath???.....LOL
 
Inevitably, Trump "defenders" will attempt to address the criticism of the [possibly criminal] meeting by Junior, Kushner and Manafort and Russian operatives, with a typical, "what about Clinton paying Steele for a dossier on Trump"???

Objectively, there is some lop-sided "logic" to this divertive defense........BUT, two factors must also be considered:

First, Steele is from a nation that is our closest ALLY, versus the attempt to gather opposition research by a country that is a long time ADVERSARY to the U.S.

Second, as we have long learned from the Watergate scandal, the initial wrong-doing PALES in comparison to the attempt to cover up the mistake......Trump has flip-flopped several times in his attempt to covering up the fiasco....directly implicating himself and his family.

Like most ANTI Trump threads on this forum, I expect this one to soon disappear....so, give it a shot in addressing it before the inevitable.
They really have to be lazy for just paying someone else to find the data, this is stupid since they have plenty of Hoggs to root out anything negative about Trump, any Pvt investigator could have done the job for less money and would have come up with better stuff. The Progressive are a joke. Just like that bunch of Nixon hangers on who planned the Watergate break in. They could have hired a group of hoods from NY to do the same job and no one would have been arrested. So it just shows how stupid the people in DC are on both sides of the isle. View attachment 212552
bill.gif

bill.gif

bill.gif
 

Forum List

Back
Top