Durham/Mueller Reports: Valuable Bookends

Or......the Durham's allegations were dogshit.

Look at Sussmann's charges. Sussmann made no false statement to anyone. Durham charged him because he claims Sussman didn't disclose to the FBI that his firm did work for Hillary Clinton.

But this was no secret. It was common knowledge that Sussman's firm worked for Clinton. Even the agent admitted he already knew. Durham tried to charge Sussmann with a felony for supposedly 'witholding' information that was common knowledge and everybody knew. And there were FBI Emails to confirm it.

It took the jury 6 hours to laugh Durham's dogshit allegations out of the court room.

Compare that to say....Mueller's legal case against Manafort, with conviction of 8 felonies.
No you retarded hack. Durham proved his charges. As the jurors admitted. THEY claimed that lying to the FBI was no big deal and shouldn’t have been charged, NOT their decision to make. Manafort? Oh yeah, the bullshit charges of tax crimes that had already been adjudicated. Thrown out of court in the SDNY. Keep digging....
 
Yes he did prove them. Per the jury’s own statements dumbfuck. They don’t get to decide it “wasn’t a big deal and shouldn’t have been charged.” Meanwhile, Smith’s case is on the brink of getting totally tossed out for illegal actions. Again.


.
really now...

bird_56___cuckoo_4_cocoa_puffs_by_masterkrypton_d49chro-fullview.jpg
 
No you retarded hack. Durham proved his charges. As the jurors admitted. THEY claimed that lying to the FBI was no big deal and shouldn’t have been charged, NOT their decision to make. Manafort? Oh yeah, the bullshit charges of tax crimes that had already been adjudicated. Thrown out of court in the SDNY. Keep digging....
Facts:

Despite expectations that Durham might charge senior government officials, his team produced only three prosecutions. A former FBI lawyer pleaded guilty to altering an email the FBI relied on in applying to eavesdrop on an ex-Trump campaign aide. Two other defendants — a lawyer for the Clinton campaign and a Russian-American analyst — were both acquitted on charges of lying to the FBI.

:auiqs.jpg: :auiqs.jpg: :auiqs.jpg:

 
Facts:

Despite expectations that Durham might charge senior government officials, his team produced only three prosecutions. A former FBI lawyer pleaded guilty to altering an email the FBI relied on in applying to eavesdrop on an ex-Trump campaign aide. Two other defendants — a lawyer for the Clinton campaign and a Russian-American analyst — were both acquitted on charges of lying to the FBI.

:auiqs.jpg: :auiqs.jpg: :auiqs.jpg:

After the jury admitted Durham proved his case, Sussman’s own lawyers said he lied, but it didn’t matter. Keep laughing as your boy Smith has his case tossed.
 
Facts:

The report Monday from special counsel John Durham represents the long-awaited culmination of an investigation that Trump and allies had claimed would expose massive wrongdoing by law enforcement and intelligence officials. Instead, Durham’s investigation delivered underwhelming results, with prosecutors securing a guilty plea from a little-known FBI employee but losing the only two criminal cases they took to trial.

 
After the jury admitted Durham proved his case, Sussman’s own lawyers said he lied, but it didn’t matter. Keep laughing as your boy Smith has his case tossed.
Quotes:

As Durham was winding down his investigation in January 2023, it was observed:


But after almost four years — far longer than the Russia investigation itself — Mr. Durham’s work is coming to an end without uncovering anything like the deep state plot alleged by Mr. Trump and suspected by Mr. Barr. Moreover, a monthslong review by The New York Times found that the main thrust of the Durham inquiry was marked by some of the very same flaws including a strained justification for opening it and its role in fueling partisan conspiracy theories that would never be charged in court — that Trump allies claim characterized the Russia investigation

 
Facts:

Despite expectations that Durham might charge senior government officials, his team produced only three prosecutions. A former FBI lawyer pleaded guilty to altering an email the FBI relied on in applying to eavesdrop on an ex-Trump campaign aide. Two other defendants — a lawyer for the Clinton campaign and a Russian-American analyst — were both acquitted on charges of lying to the FBI.

:auiqs.jpg: :auiqs.jpg: :auiqs.jpg:

After the first prosecution failed, Durham realized that convicting a Democrat in DC was a futile endeavor.
 

Forum List

Back
Top