Trump, Republicans Express Concern as Whistleblower Slips Into the Sidelines

[The Purge]

The anonymous whistleblower who is at the center of impeachment inquiry is quietly slipping into the sidelines as Democrats say the individual’s testimony is no longer necessary.

Meanwhile, Republicans have raised concerns over the lack of testimony from the whistleblower, saying that the individual’s testimony is required to ensure due process and fairness.

The Washington Post reported on Thursday that several Democrats have said that they no longer need to hear from the whistleblower because they have gathered enough information from recent depositions obtained in secret hearings to back allegations against President Donald Trump.

The report also said, citing a person familiar with the House investigation, that there are no active efforts to bring in the whistleblower before lawmakers.

The whistleblower filed a complaint in August (pdf) accusing the president of pressuring Ukraine to investigate a political opponent during a call in July. The allegations prompted the House to launch an impeachment inquiry on Sept. 24 to probe for any wrongdoing on the part of the president. The Democrat-led inquiry has attracted intense criticism for its process, in particular, its use of secret closed-door hearings and selective leaks of witness testimony.

(Excerpt) Read more at theepochtimes.com ...

------------

Have no fear. The Whistleblower will be brought out, again, and again whenever it is deemed useful by the Democrats. For now it is too risky to have him testify against the transcript, because some minor discrepancy might be found. However the Democrats will always be able to refer to him or her, and dredge up the emotional impact.

 

[BULLDOG]

The anonymous whistleblower who is at the center of impeachment inquiry is quietly slipping into the sidelines as Democrats say the individual’s testimony is no longer necessary.

Meanwhile, Republicans have raised concerns over the lack of testimony from the whistleblower, saying that the individual’s testimony is required to ensure due process and fairness.

The Washington Post reported on Thursday that several Democrats have said that they no longer need to hear from the whistleblower because they have gathered enough information from recent depositions obtained in secret hearings to back allegations against President Donald Trump.

The report also said, citing a person familiar with the House investigation, that there are no active efforts to bring in the whistleblower before lawmakers.

The whistleblower filed a complaint in August (pdf) accusing the president of pressuring Ukraine to investigate a political opponent during a call in July. The allegations prompted the House to launch an impeachment inquiry on Sept. 24 to probe for any wrongdoing on the part of the president. The Democrat-led inquiry has attracted intense criticism for its process, in particular, its use of secret closed-door hearings and selective leaks of witness testimony.

(Excerpt) Read more at theepochtimes.com ...

------------

Have no fear. The Whistleblower will be brought out, again, and again whenever it is deemed useful by the Democrats. For now it is too risky to have him testify against the transcript, because some minor discrepancy might be found. However the Democrats will always be able to refer to him or her, and dredge up the emotional impact.

You said yourself that the whistle blower's claims were mostly 2nd hand. They were enough to point toward a lot of first hand information. With provable first hand information, why would anone bother with the 2nd hand stuff? You can whine about the process all you want, but unless you can come up with something new, there is nothing about the process that isn't legal and proper. It was really helpful for the Republicans to change the rules giving committee chairmen complete control of subpoenas. Thanks Republicans.

 

[The Purge]

The anonymous whistleblower who is at the center of impeachment inquiry is quietly slipping into the sidelines as Democrats say the individual’s testimony is no longer necessary.

Meanwhile, Republicans have raised concerns over the lack of testimony from the whistleblower, saying that the individual’s testimony is required to ensure due process and fairness.

The Washington Post reported on Thursday that several Democrats have said that they no longer need to hear from the whistleblower because they have gathered enough information from recent depositions obtained in secret hearings to back allegations against President Donald Trump.

The report also said, citing a person familiar with the House investigation, that there are no active efforts to bring in the whistleblower before lawmakers.

The whistleblower filed a complaint in August (pdf) accusing the president of pressuring Ukraine to investigate a political opponent during a call in July. The allegations prompted the House to launch an impeachment inquiry on Sept. 24 to probe for any wrongdoing on the part of the president. The Democrat-led inquiry has attracted intense criticism for its process, in particular, its use of secret closed-door hearings and selective leaks of witness testimony.

(Excerpt) Read more at theepochtimes.com ...

------------

Have no fear. The Whistleblower will be brought out, again, and again whenever it is deemed useful by the Democrats. For now it is too risky to have him testify against the transcript, because some minor discrepancy might be found. However the Democrats will always be able to refer to him or her, and dredge up the emotional impact.

You said yourself that the whistle blower's claims were mostly 2nd hand. They were enough to point toward a lot of first hand information. With provable first hand information, why would anone bother with the 2nd hand stuff? You can whine about the process all you want, but unless you can come up with something new, there is nothing about the process that isn't legal and proper. It was really helpful for the Republicans to change the rules giving committee chairmen complete control of subpoenas. Thanks Republicans.

Why do you lie?...Didn't Schitt read the TRANSCRIPT?....!!



THIS PIECE OF SHIT MADE IT OUT TO BE WHAT TRUMPS PHONE CALL WAS....AND IT IS NO WHERE NEAR IT

 

[toobfreak]

The anonymous whistleblower who is at the center of impeachment inquiry is quietly slipping into the sidelines as Democrats say the individual’s testimony is no longer necessary.

Meanwhile, Republicans have raised concerns over the lack of testimony from the whistleblower, saying that the individual’s testimony is required to ensure due process and fairness.

The Washington Post reported on Thursday that several Democrats have said that they no longer need to hear from the whistleblower because they have gathered enough information from recent depositions obtained in secret hearings to back allegations against President Donald Trump.

The report also said, citing a person familiar with the House investigation, that there are no active efforts to bring in the whistleblower before lawmakers.

The whistleblower filed a complaint in August (pdf) accusing the president of pressuring Ukraine to investigate a political opponent during a call in July. The allegations prompted the House to launch an impeachment inquiry on Sept. 24 to probe for any wrongdoing on the part of the president. The Democrat-led inquiry has attracted intense criticism for its process, in particular, its use of secret closed-door hearings and selective leaks of witness testimony.

(Excerpt) Read more at theepochtimes.com ...

Have no fear. The Whistleblower will be brought out, again, and again whenever it is deemed useful by the Democrats. For now it is too risky to have him testify against the transcript, because some minor discrepancy might be found. However the Democrats will always be able to refer to him or her, and dredge up the emotional impact.

IN OTHER WORDS, just like the Steele Dossier. Even though there were many questions surrounding the Steele Dossier and FISA court, once they used it to get the Mueller Witch Trial, they quietly swept that under the rug.

IN OTHER WORDS, just like Hillary's server intelligence mishandling, even though there were a ton of unanswered questions, once Comey wrote off her prosecution, that too was quietly swept under the rug.

IN OTHER WORDS, just like the Benghazi investigation where many unresolved questions about lies and actions remained, once they accepted Hillary's defense of what difference did it make, they just quashed getting at why those four men were really left to die.

IN OTHER WORDS, just like Obama's wiretapping of Trump and clandestine reshuffling and reorganization of intelligence agencies the day before leaving, despite the fact that this left them wide open to endless porosity and leaks of the president to harm him, Obama was out the door and off on another taxpayer-paid vacation.

And now that they used an anonymous, invisible "whistle-blower" as justification to investigate a phone call, now they are quietly going to sweep him out the back door never to be seen or interviewed, questioned or challenged as they spread this now into an administration-wide new Schiff Witch Trial.

 

[toobfreak]

Why do you lie?...Didn't Schitt read the TRANSCRIPT?....!!

BULLSHIT has already told us that THE ENDS JUSTIFY THE MEANS, so, lying doesn't matter, justice doesn't matter, facts or truth doesn't matter, as long as they get their lynching.

 

[depotoo]

The anonymous whistleblower who is at the center of impeachment inquiry is quietly slipping into the sidelines as Democrats say the individual’s testimony is no longer necessary.

Meanwhile, Republicans have raised concerns over the lack of testimony from the whistleblower, saying that the individual’s testimony is required to ensure due process and fairness.

The Washington Post reported on Thursday that several Democrats have said that they no longer need to hear from the whistleblower because they have gathered enough information from recent depositions obtained in secret hearings to back allegations against President Donald Trump.

The report also said, citing a person familiar with the House investigation, that there are no active efforts to bring in the whistleblower before lawmakers.

The whistleblower filed a complaint in August (pdf) accusing the president of pressuring Ukraine to investigate a political opponent during a call in July. The allegations prompted the House to launch an impeachment inquiry on Sept. 24 to probe for any wrongdoing on the part of the president. The Democrat-led inquiry has attracted intense criticism for its process, in particular, its use of secret closed-door hearings and selective leaks of witness testimony.

(Excerpt) Read more at theepochtimes.com ...

Have no fear. The Whistleblower will be brought out, again, and again whenever it is deemed useful by the Democrats. For now it is too risky to have him testify against the transcript, because some minor discrepancy might be found. However the Democrats will always be able to refer to him or her, and dredge up the emotional impact.

IN OTHER WORDS, just like the Steele Dossier. Even though there were many questions surrounding the Steele Dossier and FISA court, once they used it to get the Mueller Witch Trial, they quietly swept that under the rug.

IN OTHER WORDS, just like Hillary's server intelligence mishandling, even though there were a ton of unanswered questions, once Comey wrote off her prosecution, that too was quietly swept under the rug.

IN OTHER WORDS, just like the Benghazi investigation where many unresolved questions about lies and actions remained, once they accepted Hillary's defense of what difference did it make, they just quashed getting at why those four men were really left to die.

IN OTHER WORDS, just like Obama's wiretapping of Trump and clandestine reshuffling and reorganization of intelligence agencies the day before leaving, despite the fact that this left them wide open to endless porosity and leaks of the president to harm him, Obama was out the door and off on another taxpayer-paid vacation.

And now that they used an anonymous, invisible "whistle-blower" as justification to investigate a phone call, now they are quietly going to sweep him out the back door never to be seen or interviewed, questioned or challenged as they spread this now into an administration-wide new Schiff Witch Trial.

Don’t forget the IRS scandal

 

[BULLDOG]

The anonymous whistleblower who is at the center of impeachment inquiry is quietly slipping into the sidelines as Democrats say the individual’s testimony is no longer necessary.

Meanwhile, Republicans have raised concerns over the lack of testimony from the whistleblower, saying that the individual’s testimony is required to ensure due process and fairness.

The Washington Post reported on Thursday that several Democrats have said that they no longer need to hear from the whistleblower because they have gathered enough information from recent depositions obtained in secret hearings to back allegations against President Donald Trump.

The report also said, citing a person familiar with the House investigation, that there are no active efforts to bring in the whistleblower before lawmakers.

The whistleblower filed a complaint in August (pdf) accusing the president of pressuring Ukraine to investigate a political opponent during a call in July. The allegations prompted the House to launch an impeachment inquiry on Sept. 24 to probe for any wrongdoing on the part of the president. The Democrat-led inquiry has attracted intense criticism for its process, in particular, its use of secret closed-door hearings and selective leaks of witness testimony.

(Excerpt) Read more at theepochtimes.com ...

------------

Have no fear. The Whistleblower will be brought out, again, and again whenever it is deemed useful by the Democrats. For now it is too risky to have him testify against the transcript, because some minor discrepancy might be found. However the Democrats will always be able to refer to him or her, and dredge up the emotional impact.

You said yourself that the whistle blower's claims were mostly 2nd hand. They were enough to point toward a lot of first hand information. With provable first hand information, why would anone bother with the 2nd hand stuff? You can whine about the process all you want, but unless you can come up with something new, there is nothing about the process that isn't legal and proper. It was really helpful for the Republicans to change the rules giving committee chairmen complete control of subpoenas. Thanks Republicans.

Why do you lie?...Didn't Schitt read the TRANSCRIPT?....!!



THIS PIECE OF SHIT MADE IT OUT TO BE WHAT TRUMPS PHONE CALL WAS....AND IT IS NO WHERE NEAR IT

To quote Trump supporters-----It was a joke.

 

[Third Party]

The anonymous whistleblower who is at the center of impeachment inquiry is quietly slipping into the sidelines as Democrats say the individual’s testimony is no longer necessary.

Meanwhile, Republicans have raised concerns over the lack of testimony from the whistleblower, saying that the individual’s testimony is required to ensure due process and fairness.

The Washington Post reported on Thursday that several Democrats have said that they no longer need to hear from the whistleblower because they have gathered enough information from recent depositions obtained in secret hearings to back allegations against President Donald Trump.

The report also said, citing a person familiar with the House investigation, that there are no active efforts to bring in the whistleblower before lawmakers.

The whistleblower filed a complaint in August (pdf) accusing the president of pressuring Ukraine to investigate a political opponent during a call in July. The allegations prompted the House to launch an impeachment inquiry on Sept. 24 to probe for any wrongdoing on the part of the president. The Democrat-led inquiry has attracted intense criticism for its process, in particular, its use of secret closed-door hearings and selective leaks of witness testimony.

(Excerpt) Read more at theepochtimes.com ...

------------

Have no fear. The Whistleblower will be brought out, again, and again whenever it is deemed useful by the Democrats. For now it is too risky to have him testify against the transcript, because some minor discrepancy might be found. However the Democrats will always be able to refer to him or her, and dredge up the emotional impact.

No,not deep throat, deep shit.

 

[toobfreak]

Trump, Republicans Express Concern as Whistleblower Slips Into the Sidelines

Odd, Franco has just told us 720 times on another thread how the Republicans are full participants in this constitutional hearing of Due Process.

 

[BULLDOG]

Trump, Republicans Express Concern as Whistleblower Slips Into the Sidelines

Odd, Franco has just told us 720 times on another thread how the Republicans are full participants in this constitutional hearing of Due Process.

Republicans on the committee are asking just as many questions as Democrats.

 

[The Purge]

The anonymous whistleblower who is at the center of impeachment inquiry is quietly slipping into the sidelines as Democrats say the individual’s testimony is no longer necessary.

Meanwhile, Republicans have raised concerns over the lack of testimony from the whistleblower, saying that the individual’s testimony is required to ensure due process and fairness.

The Washington Post reported on Thursday that several Democrats have said that they no longer need to hear from the whistleblower because they have gathered enough information from recent depositions obtained in secret hearings to back allegations against President Donald Trump.

The report also said, citing a person familiar with the House investigation, that there are no active efforts to bring in the whistleblower before lawmakers.

The whistleblower filed a complaint in August (pdf) accusing the president of pressuring Ukraine to investigate a political opponent during a call in July. The allegations prompted the House to launch an impeachment inquiry on Sept. 24 to probe for any wrongdoing on the part of the president. The Democrat-led inquiry has attracted intense criticism for its process, in particular, its use of secret closed-door hearings and selective leaks of witness testimony.

(Excerpt) Read more at theepochtimes.com ...

------------

Have no fear. The Whistleblower will be brought out, again, and again whenever it is deemed useful by the Democrats. For now it is too risky to have him testify against the transcript, because some minor discrepancy might be found. However the Democrats will always be able to refer to him or her, and dredge up the emotional impact.

You said yourself that the whistle blower's claims were mostly 2nd hand. They were enough to point toward a lot of first hand information. With provable first hand information, why would anone bother with the 2nd hand stuff? You can whine about the process all you want, but unless you can come up with something new, there is nothing about the process that isn't legal and proper. It was really helpful for the Republicans to change the rules giving committee chairmen complete control of subpoenas. Thanks Republicans.

Why do you lie?...Didn't Schitt read the TRANSCRIPT?....!!



THIS PIECE OF SHIT MADE IT OUT TO BE WHAT TRUMPS PHONE CALL WAS....AND IT IS NO WHERE NEAR IT

To quote Trump supporters-----It was a joke.

You lie again...no Trump supporter said it was a joke... only when Schitt was called out on it HE SAID it was a parady....after watching it 3 times, he certainly didn't act as if it was a parady....You ABNORMALS just can't help yourselves lying to cover up your bullshit AND SCHITT'S CRIME!.....let me REPEAT THIS 7 TIMES MORE!!!

 

[BULLDOG]

The anonymous whistleblower who is at the center of impeachment inquiry is quietly slipping into the sidelines as Democrats say the individual’s testimony is no longer necessary.

Meanwhile, Republicans have raised concerns over the lack of testimony from the whistleblower, saying that the individual’s testimony is required to ensure due process and fairness.

The Washington Post reported on Thursday that several Democrats have said that they no longer need to hear from the whistleblower because they have gathered enough information from recent depositions obtained in secret hearings to back allegations against President Donald Trump.

The report also said, citing a person familiar with the House investigation, that there are no active efforts to bring in the whistleblower before lawmakers.

The whistleblower filed a complaint in August (pdf) accusing the president of pressuring Ukraine to investigate a political opponent during a call in July. The allegations prompted the House to launch an impeachment inquiry on Sept. 24 to probe for any wrongdoing on the part of the president. The Democrat-led inquiry has attracted intense criticism for its process, in particular, its use of secret closed-door hearings and selective leaks of witness testimony.

(Excerpt) Read more at theepochtimes.com ...

------------

Have no fear. The Whistleblower will be brought out, again, and again whenever it is deemed useful by the Democrats. For now it is too risky to have him testify against the transcript, because some minor discrepancy might be found. However the Democrats will always be able to refer to him or her, and dredge up the emotional impact.

You said yourself that the whistle blower's claims were mostly 2nd hand. They were enough to point toward a lot of first hand information. With provable first hand information, why would anone bother with the 2nd hand stuff? You can whine about the process all you want, but unless you can come up with something new, there is nothing about the process that isn't legal and proper. It was really helpful for the Republicans to change the rules giving committee chairmen complete control of subpoenas. Thanks Republicans.

Why do you lie?...Didn't Schitt read the TRANSCRIPT?....!!



THIS PIECE OF SHIT MADE IT OUT TO BE WHAT TRUMPS PHONE CALL WAS....AND IT IS NO WHERE NEAR IT

To quote Trump supporters-----It was a joke.

You lie again...no Trump supporter said it was a joke... only when Schitt was called out on it HE SAID it was a parady....after watching it 3 times, he certainly didn't act as if it was a parady....You ABNORMALS just can't help yourselves lying to cover up your bullshit AND SCHITT'S CRIME!.....let me REPEAT THIS 7 TIMES MORE!!!

Calm down BooBoo. You'll have an aneurism.

 

[The Purge]

The anonymous whistleblower who is at the center of impeachment inquiry is quietly slipping into the sidelines as Democrats say the individual’s testimony is no longer necessary.

Meanwhile, Republicans have raised concerns over the lack of testimony from the whistleblower, saying that the individual’s testimony is required to ensure due process and fairness.

The Washington Post reported on Thursday that several Democrats have said that they no longer need to hear from the whistleblower because they have gathered enough information from recent depositions obtained in secret hearings to back allegations against President Donald Trump.

The report also said, citing a person familiar with the House investigation, that there are no active efforts to bring in the whistleblower before lawmakers.

The whistleblower filed a complaint in August (pdf) accusing the president of pressuring Ukraine to investigate a political opponent during a call in July. The allegations prompted the House to launch an impeachment inquiry on Sept. 24 to probe for any wrongdoing on the part of the president. The Democrat-led inquiry has attracted intense criticism for its process, in particular, its use of secret closed-door hearings and selective leaks of witness testimony.

(Excerpt) Read more at theepochtimes.com ...

------------

Have no fear. The Whistleblower will be brought out, again, and again whenever it is deemed useful by the Democrats. For now it is too risky to have him testify against the transcript, because some minor discrepancy might be found. However the Democrats will always be able to refer to him or her, and dredge up the emotional impact.

You said yourself that the whistle blower's claims were mostly 2nd hand. They were enough to point toward a lot of first hand information. With provable first hand information, why would anone bother with the 2nd hand stuff? You can whine about the process all you want, but unless you can come up with something new, there is nothing about the process that isn't legal and proper. It was really helpful for the Republicans to change the rules giving committee chairmen complete control of subpoenas. Thanks Republicans.

Why do you lie?...Didn't Schitt read the TRANSCRIPT?....!!



THIS PIECE OF SHIT MADE IT OUT TO BE WHAT TRUMPS PHONE CALL WAS....AND IT IS NO WHERE NEAR IT

To quote Trump supporters-----It was a joke.

You lie again...no Trump supporter said it was a joke... only when Schitt was called out on it HE SAID it was a parady....after watching it 3 times, he certainly didn't act as if it was a parady....You ABNORMALS just can't help yourselves lying to cover up your bullshit AND SCHITT'S CRIME!.....let me REPEAT THIS 7 TIMES MORE!!!

Calm down BooBoo. You'll have an aneurism.

Because I TYPE in capitals doesn't mean I'm not calm, I simply LIKE MAKING YOU ABNORMALS TRIGGERED!....ROTFLMFAO!

 

[BULLDOG]

You said yourself that the whistle blower's claims were mostly 2nd hand. They were enough to point toward a lot of first hand information. With provable first hand information, why would anone bother with the 2nd hand stuff? You can whine about the process all you want, but unless you can come up with something new, there is nothing about the process that isn't legal and proper. It was really helpful for the Republicans to change the rules giving committee chairmen complete control of subpoenas. Thanks Republicans.

Why do you lie?...Didn't Schitt read the TRANSCRIPT?....!!



THIS PIECE OF SHIT MADE IT OUT TO BE WHAT TRUMPS PHONE CALL WAS....AND IT IS NO WHERE NEAR IT

To quote Trump supporters-----It was a joke.

You lie again...no Trump supporter said it was a joke... only when Schitt was called out on it HE SAID it was a parady....after watching it 3 times, he certainly didn't act as if it was a parady....You ABNORMALS just can't help yourselves lying to cover up your bullshit AND SCHITT'S CRIME!.....let me REPEAT THIS 7 TIMES MORE!!!

Calm down BooBoo. You'll have an aneurism.

Because I TYPE in capitals doesn't mean I'm not calm, I simply LIKE MAKING YOU ABNORMALS TRIGGERED!....ROTFLMFAO!

You're the one who seems to be having a tantrum. Enjoy a little music to help you calm down,

 

[The Purge]

Why do you lie?...Didn't Schitt read the TRANSCRIPT?....!!



THIS PIECE OF SHIT MADE IT OUT TO BE WHAT TRUMPS PHONE CALL WAS....AND IT IS NO WHERE NEAR IT

To quote Trump supporters-----It was a joke.

You lie again...no Trump supporter said it was a joke... only when Schitt was called out on it HE SAID it was a parady....after watching it 3 times, he certainly didn't act as if it was a parady....You ABNORMALS just can't help yourselves lying to cover up your bullshit AND SCHITT'S CRIME!.....let me REPEAT THIS 7 TIMES MORE!!!

Calm down BooBoo. You'll have an aneurism.

Because I TYPE in capitals doesn't mean I'm not calm, I simply LIKE MAKING YOU ABNORMALS TRIGGERED!....ROTFLMFAO!

You're the one who seems to be having a tantrum. Enjoy a little music to help you calm down,

 

[The Purge]

 

[OKTexas]

The anonymous whistleblower who is at the center of impeachment inquiry is quietly slipping into the sidelines as Democrats say the individual’s testimony is no longer necessary.

Meanwhile, Republicans have raised concerns over the lack of testimony from the whistleblower, saying that the individual’s testimony is required to ensure due process and fairness.

The Washington Post reported on Thursday that several Democrats have said that they no longer need to hear from the whistleblower because they have gathered enough information from recent depositions obtained in secret hearings to back allegations against President Donald Trump.

The report also said, citing a person familiar with the House investigation, that there are no active efforts to bring in the whistleblower before lawmakers.

The whistleblower filed a complaint in August (pdf) accusing the president of pressuring Ukraine to investigate a political opponent during a call in July. The allegations prompted the House to launch an impeachment inquiry on Sept. 24 to probe for any wrongdoing on the part of the president. The Democrat-led inquiry has attracted intense criticism for its process, in particular, its use of secret closed-door hearings and selective leaks of witness testimony.

(Excerpt) Read more at theepochtimes.com ...

------------

Have no fear. The Whistleblower will be brought out, again, and again whenever it is deemed useful by the Democrats. For now it is too risky to have him testify against the transcript, because some minor discrepancy might be found. However the Democrats will always be able to refer to him or her, and dredge up the emotional impact.

Perhaps the Senate Judiciary committee can subpoena the supposed whistleblower. Then they can get to the bottom of his sources, if he has any.

.

 

[Slade3200]

The anonymous whistleblower who is at the center of impeachment inquiry is quietly slipping into the sidelines as Democrats say the individual’s testimony is no longer necessary.

Meanwhile, Republicans have raised concerns over the lack of testimony from the whistleblower, saying that the individual’s testimony is required to ensure due process and fairness.

The Washington Post reported on Thursday that several Democrats have said that they no longer need to hear from the whistleblower because they have gathered enough information from recent depositions obtained in secret hearings to back allegations against President Donald Trump.

The report also said, citing a person familiar with the House investigation, that there are no active efforts to bring in the whistleblower before lawmakers.

The whistleblower filed a complaint in August (pdf) accusing the president of pressuring Ukraine to investigate a political opponent during a call in July. The allegations prompted the House to launch an impeachment inquiry on Sept. 24 to probe for any wrongdoing on the part of the president. The Democrat-led inquiry has attracted intense criticism for its process, in particular, its use of secret closed-door hearings and selective leaks of witness testimony.

(Excerpt) Read more at theepochtimes.com ...

------------

Have no fear. The Whistleblower will be brought out, again, and again whenever it is deemed useful by the Democrats. For now it is too risky to have him testify against the transcript, because some minor discrepancy might be found. However the Democrats will always be able to refer to him or her, and dredge up the emotional impact.

I don’t understand why anybody cares about the whistler blower? Everybody knows Trump is just looking for people to attack... somebody to use to distract and discredit from the impeachment. If the dems feel like they have enough evidence and don’t want to subject the whistleblower to the Trump scrutiny machine then that’s understandable, isn’t it?

 

[The Purge]

The anonymous whistleblower who is at the center of impeachment inquiry is quietly slipping into the sidelines as Democrats say the individual’s testimony is no longer necessary.

Meanwhile, Republicans have raised concerns over the lack of testimony from the whistleblower, saying that the individual’s testimony is required to ensure due process and fairness.

The Washington Post reported on Thursday that several Democrats have said that they no longer need to hear from the whistleblower because they have gathered enough information from recent depositions obtained in secret hearings to back allegations against President Donald Trump.

The report also said, citing a person familiar with the House investigation, that there are no active efforts to bring in the whistleblower before lawmakers.

The whistleblower filed a complaint in August (pdf) accusing the president of pressuring Ukraine to investigate a political opponent during a call in July. The allegations prompted the House to launch an impeachment inquiry on Sept. 24 to probe for any wrongdoing on the part of the president. The Democrat-led inquiry has attracted intense criticism for its process, in particular, its use of secret closed-door hearings and selective leaks of witness testimony.

(Excerpt) Read more at theepochtimes.com ...

------------

Have no fear. The Whistleblower will be brought out, again, and again whenever it is deemed useful by the Democrats. For now it is too risky to have him testify against the transcript, because some minor discrepancy might be found. However the Democrats will always be able to refer to him or her, and dredge up the emotional impact.

Perhaps the Senate Judiciary committee can subpoena the supposed whistleblower. Then they can get to the bottom of his sources, if he has any.

.

Like to see them subpoena Schitt.....since he appears the only one that ever TALKED to this mythical person!

 

[The Purge]

The anonymous whistleblower who is at the center of impeachment inquiry is quietly slipping into the sidelines as Democrats say the individual’s testimony is no longer necessary.

Meanwhile, Republicans have raised concerns over the lack of testimony from the whistleblower, saying that the individual’s testimony is required to ensure due process and fairness.

The Washington Post reported on Thursday that several Democrats have said that they no longer need to hear from the whistleblower because they have gathered enough information from recent depositions obtained in secret hearings to back allegations against President Donald Trump.

The report also said, citing a person familiar with the House investigation, that there are no active efforts to bring in the whistleblower before lawmakers.

The whistleblower filed a complaint in August (pdf) accusing the president of pressuring Ukraine to investigate a political opponent during a call in July. The allegations prompted the House to launch an impeachment inquiry on Sept. 24 to probe for any wrongdoing on the part of the president. The Democrat-led inquiry has attracted intense criticism for its process, in particular, its use of secret closed-door hearings and selective leaks of witness testimony.

(Excerpt) Read more at theepochtimes.com ...

------------

Have no fear. The Whistleblower will be brought out, again, and again whenever it is deemed useful by the Democrats. For now it is too risky to have him testify against the transcript, because some minor discrepancy might be found. However the Democrats will always be able to refer to him or her, and dredge up the emotional impact.

I don’t understand why anybody cares about the whistler blower? Everybody knows Trump is just looking for people to attack... somebody to use to distract and discredit from the impeachment. If the dems feel like they have enough evidence and don’t want to subject the whistleblower to the Trump scrutiny machine then that’s understandable, isn’t it?

No....since he supposedly started this whole farce of an impeachment....and isn't the president, like ordinary people who are accused of a crime, get to confront he/her face to face!