Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
the whistler blower isn't accusing Trump of anything... he hasn’t even been accused yet. There is an inquiry going on. If articles of impeachment are filed then the Dems would be accusing Trump based on their findings. At that point trump will have a right to face his accusers and there will be a trail held in the senate. That’s how it works.No....since he supposedly started this whole farce of an impeachment....and isn't the president, like ordinary people who are accused of a crime, get to confront he/her face to face!I don’t understand why anybody cares about the whistler blower? Everybody knows Trump is just looking for people to attack... somebody to use to distract and discredit from the impeachment. If the dems feel like they have enough evidence and don’t want to subject the whistleblower to the Trump scrutiny machine then that’s understandable, isn’t it?The anonymous whistleblower who is at the center of impeachment inquiry is quietly slipping into the sidelines as Democrats say the individual’s testimony is no longer necessary.
Meanwhile, Republicans have raised concerns over the lack of testimony from the whistleblower, saying that the individual’s testimony is required to ensure due process and fairness.
The Washington Post reported on Thursday that several Democrats have said that they no longer need to hear from the whistleblower because they have gathered enough information from recent depositions obtained in secret hearings to back allegations against President Donald Trump.
The report also said, citing a person familiar with the House investigation, that there are no active efforts to bring in the whistleblower before lawmakers.
The whistleblower filed a complaint in August (pdf) accusing the president of pressuring Ukraine to investigate a political opponent during a call in July. The allegations prompted the House to launch an impeachment inquiry on Sept. 24 to probe for any wrongdoing on the part of the president. The Democrat-led inquiry has attracted intense criticism for its process, in particular, its use of secret closed-door hearings and selective leaks of witness testimony.
(Excerpt) Read more at theepochtimes.com ...
------------
Have no fear. The Whistleblower will be brought out, again, and again whenever it is deemed useful by the Democrats. For now it is too risky to have him testify against the transcript, because some minor discrepancy might be found. However the Democrats will always be able to refer to him or her, and dredge up the emotional impact.
Doesnt the whole House have to vote on impeachment, they have to be presented with the CRIME the president committed....what crime was that again?...the same crime Jojo Biden committed?the whistler blower isn't accusing Trump of anything... he hasn’t even been accused yet. There is an inquiry going on. If articles of impeachment are filed then the Dems would be accusing Trump based on their findings. At that point trump will have a right to face his accusers and there will be a trail held in the senate. That’s how it works.No....since he supposedly started this whole farce of an impeachment....and isn't the president, like ordinary people who are accused of a crime, get to confront he/her face to face!I don’t understand why anybody cares about the whistler blower? Everybody knows Trump is just looking for people to attack... somebody to use to distract and discredit from the impeachment. If the dems feel like they have enough evidence and don’t want to subject the whistleblower to the Trump scrutiny machine then that’s understandable, isn’t it?The anonymous whistleblower who is at the center of impeachment inquiry is quietly slipping into the sidelines as Democrats say the individual’s testimony is no longer necessary.
Meanwhile, Republicans have raised concerns over the lack of testimony from the whistleblower, saying that the individual’s testimony is required to ensure due process and fairness.
The Washington Post reported on Thursday that several Democrats have said that they no longer need to hear from the whistleblower because they have gathered enough information from recent depositions obtained in secret hearings to back allegations against President Donald Trump.
The report also said, citing a person familiar with the House investigation, that there are no active efforts to bring in the whistleblower before lawmakers.
The whistleblower filed a complaint in August (pdf) accusing the president of pressuring Ukraine to investigate a political opponent during a call in July. The allegations prompted the House to launch an impeachment inquiry on Sept. 24 to probe for any wrongdoing on the part of the president. The Democrat-led inquiry has attracted intense criticism for its process, in particular, its use of secret closed-door hearings and selective leaks of witness testimony.
(Excerpt) Read more at theepochtimes.com ...
------------
Have no fear. The Whistleblower will be brought out, again, and again whenever it is deemed useful by the Democrats. For now it is too risky to have him testify against the transcript, because some minor discrepancy might be found. However the Democrats will always be able to refer to him or her, and dredge up the emotional impact.
Yes the house votes on impeachment. So if leadership decides to impeach they will call a vote and they will explain whyDoesnt the whole House have to vote on impeachment, they have to be presented with the CRIME the president committed....what crime was that again?...the same crime Jojo Biden committed?the whistler blower isn't accusing Trump of anything... he hasn’t even been accused yet. There is an inquiry going on. If articles of impeachment are filed then the Dems would be accusing Trump based on their findings. At that point trump will have a right to face his accusers and there will be a trail held in the senate. That’s how it works.No....since he supposedly started this whole farce of an impeachment....and isn't the president, like ordinary people who are accused of a crime, get to confront he/her face to face!I don’t understand why anybody cares about the whistler blower? Everybody knows Trump is just looking for people to attack... somebody to use to distract and discredit from the impeachment. If the dems feel like they have enough evidence and don’t want to subject the whistleblower to the Trump scrutiny machine then that’s understandable, isn’t it?The anonymous whistleblower who is at the center of impeachment inquiry is quietly slipping into the sidelines as Democrats say the individual’s testimony is no longer necessary.
Meanwhile, Republicans have raised concerns over the lack of testimony from the whistleblower, saying that the individual’s testimony is required to ensure due process and fairness.
The Washington Post reported on Thursday that several Democrats have said that they no longer need to hear from the whistleblower because they have gathered enough information from recent depositions obtained in secret hearings to back allegations against President Donald Trump.
The report also said, citing a person familiar with the House investigation, that there are no active efforts to bring in the whistleblower before lawmakers.
The whistleblower filed a complaint in August (pdf) accusing the president of pressuring Ukraine to investigate a political opponent during a call in July. The allegations prompted the House to launch an impeachment inquiry on Sept. 24 to probe for any wrongdoing on the part of the president. The Democrat-led inquiry has attracted intense criticism for its process, in particular, its use of secret closed-door hearings and selective leaks of witness testimony.
(Excerpt) Read more at theepochtimes.com ...
------------
Have no fear. The Whistleblower will be brought out, again, and again whenever it is deemed useful by the Democrats. For now it is too risky to have him testify against the transcript, because some minor discrepancy might be found. However the Democrats will always be able to refer to him or her, and dredge up the emotional impact.
Why do you lie?...Didn't Schitt read the TRANSCRIPT?....!!You said yourself that the whistle blower's claims were mostly 2nd hand. They were enough to point toward a lot of first hand information. With provable first hand information, why would anone bother with the 2nd hand stuff? You can whine about the process all you want, but unless you can come up with something new, there is nothing about the process that isn't legal and proper. It was really helpful for the Republicans to change the rules giving committee chairmen complete control of subpoenas. Thanks Republicans.
THIS PIECE OF SHIT MADE IT OUT TO BE WHAT TRUMPS PHONE CALL WAS....AND IT IS NO WHERE NEAR IT
To quote Trump supporters-----It was a joke.
You lie again...no Trump supporter said it was a joke... only when Schitt was called out on it HE SAID it was a parady....after watching it 3 times, he certainly didn't act as if it was a parady....You ABNORMALS just can't help yourselves lying to cover up your bullshit AND SCHITT'S CRIME!.....let me REPEAT THIS 7 TIMES MORE!!!
Calm down BooBoo. You'll have an aneurism.
Because I TYPE in capitals doesn't mean I'm not calm, I simply LIKE MAKING YOU ABNORMALS TRIGGERED!....ROTFLMFAO!
Like to see them subpoena Schitt.....since he appears the only one that ever TALKED to this mythical person!The anonymous whistleblower who is at the center of impeachment inquiry is quietly slipping into the sidelines as Democrats say the individual’s testimony is no longer necessary.
Meanwhile, Republicans have raised concerns over the lack of testimony from the whistleblower, saying that the individual’s testimony is required to ensure due process and fairness.
The Washington Post reported on Thursday that several Democrats have said that they no longer need to hear from the whistleblower because they have gathered enough information from recent depositions obtained in secret hearings to back allegations against President Donald Trump.
The report also said, citing a person familiar with the House investigation, that there are no active efforts to bring in the whistleblower before lawmakers.
The whistleblower filed a complaint in August (pdf) accusing the president of pressuring Ukraine to investigate a political opponent during a call in July. The allegations prompted the House to launch an impeachment inquiry on Sept. 24 to probe for any wrongdoing on the part of the president. The Democrat-led inquiry has attracted intense criticism for its process, in particular, its use of secret closed-door hearings and selective leaks of witness testimony.
(Excerpt) Read more at theepochtimes.com ...
------------
Have no fear. The Whistleblower will be brought out, again, and again whenever it is deemed useful by the Democrats. For now it is too risky to have him testify against the transcript, because some minor discrepancy might be found. However the Democrats will always be able to refer to him or her, and dredge up the emotional impact.
Perhaps the Senate Judiciary committee can subpoena the supposed whistleblower. Then they can get to the bottom of his sources, if he has any.
.
