Trump Jr. Is Not the Problem

[sartre play]

Well as the comments bare no relationship to the topic, ... sigh

 

[Dale Smith]

Well as the comments bare no relationship to the topic, ... sigh

The Washington Post has no relevancy to what real journalism is. It's a mouthpiece of the CFR just like the New York Times. Why should I give a flying fuck what they have to say when they hire someone like John Podesta?

 

[OKTexas]

Jennifer Rubin is WAPO's right wing editorial writer. It's hard to disagree with her assessment of the situation.

The GOP's moral rot is the problem, not Donald Trump Jr. | Opinion

ROFL! She's obviously #neverTrump. The stink coming from the Democrat party overwhelms anything from the Trump administration. Hillary is a criminal married to a sexual predator, and she won the Democrat nomination. That says it all.

Yes, they tend to choose like-minded people as candidates.

Exactly. They didn't see a problem with Hillary because they didn't view anything she did as immoral.

I guess you didn't bother to read the piece and her comments about idiots who say "but Hillary", or who cry victim and blame the MSM.

YOU are exactly the kind of Republican she's talking about.

She shot her credibility when she said Trumps comments about the federal judge was racist. Mexican is a nationality, not a race. She just compounded her ignorance from there.


.

 

[basquebromance]

"Crooked Hillary can illegally get the questions to the Debate & delete 33,000 emails but my son Don is being scorned by the Fake News Media?" - Trump

 

[Wry Catcher]

After we saw the democrat party give a standing ovation to a democrat congressman (Gerry Studds) who was convicted of sexual abusing a male page and Hillary's husband declined into a street pervert offering young girls n autograph for a BJ session in the White House and Obama telling the Country to admit confused boys into the girls locker room and confused men into the ladies room and authorized the IRS to spy on American citizens and authorized the federal cops to give thousands of illegal weapons to Mexican drug cartels, the left suddenly assumed the role of the morality cops? Don't make me laugh

You're a hack. The sexual peccadilloes of members of Congress exists on both sides of the aisle, and many past presidents have had affairs. Your dishonest post and use of hyperbole is way over the top, and thus lacks any topical substance or honest reporting.

 

[Dale Smith]

After we saw the democrat party give a standing ovation to a democrat congressman (Gerry Studds) who was convicted of sexual abusing a male page and Hillary's husband declined into a street pervert offering young girls n autograph for a BJ session in the White House and Obama telling the Country to admit confused boys into the girls locker room and confused men into the ladies room and authorized the IRS to spy on American citizens and authorized the federal cops to give thousands of illegal weapons to Mexican drug cartels, the left suddenly assumed the role of the morality cops? Don't make me laugh

You're a hack. The sexual peccadilloes of members of Congress exists on both sides of the aisle, and many past presidents have had affairs. Your dishonest post and use of hyperbole is way over the top, and thus lacks any topical substance or honest reporting.

Posting truth is being a "hack"? Seriously? It is the best post on this thread so it doesn't surprise me that you don't like it.

 

[Wry Catcher]

After we saw the democrat party give a standing ovation to a democrat congressman (Gerry Studds) who was convicted of sexual abusing a male page and Hillary's husband declined into a street pervert offering young girls n autograph for a BJ session in the White House and Obama telling the Country to admit confused boys into the girls locker room and confused men into the ladies room and authorized the IRS to spy on American citizens and authorized the federal cops to give thousands of illegal weapons to Mexican drug cartels, the left suddenly assumed the role of the morality cops? Don't make me laugh

You're a hack. The sexual peccadilloes of members of Congress exists on both sides of the aisle, and many past presidents have had affairs. Your dishonest post and use of hyperbole is way over the top, and thus lacks any topical substance or honest reporting.

Posting truth is being a "hack"? Seriously? It is the best post on this thread so it doesn't surprise me that you don't like it.

It is a lie by omission. The premise might be valid (if not for the hyperbole) but the conclusion of moral authority is not sound.

"A valid argument may still have a false conclusion. When we construct our arguments, we must aim to construct one that is not only valid, but sound. A sound argument is one that is not only valid, but begins with premises that are actually true.", not half-truths!
Validity and Soundness | Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy

 

[BuckToothMoron]

Jennifer Rubin is WAPO's right wing editorial writer. It's hard to disagree with her assessment of the situation.

The GOP's moral rot is the problem, not Donald Trump Jr. | Opinion

I am conservative, but not Republican. Moral rot is pervasive throughout politics and it is blind to party affiliation; it afflicts the left just as readily as it afflicts the right. If you don't see this, you are simply blinded by your party affiliation.

 

[Dale Smith]

After we saw the democrat party give a standing ovation to a democrat congressman (Gerry Studds) who was convicted of sexual abusing a male page and Hillary's husband declined into a street pervert offering young girls n autograph for a BJ session in the White House and Obama telling the Country to admit confused boys into the girls locker room and confused men into the ladies room and authorized the IRS to spy on American citizens and authorized the federal cops to give thousands of illegal weapons to Mexican drug cartels, the left suddenly assumed the role of the morality cops? Don't make me laugh

You're a hack. The sexual peccadilloes of members of Congress exists on both sides of the aisle, and many past presidents have had affairs. Your dishonest post and use of hyperbole is way over the top, and thus lacks any topical substance or honest reporting.

Posting truth is being a "hack"? Seriously? It is the best post on this thread so it doesn't surprise me that you don't like it.

It is a lie by omission. The premise might be valid (if not for the hyperbole) but the conclusion of moral authority is not sound.

"A valid argument may still have a false conclusion. When we construct our arguments, we must aim to construct one that is not only valid, but sound. A sound argument is one that is not only valid, but begins with premises that are actually true.", not half-truths!
Validity and Soundness | Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy

There was nothing in that post he wrote that wasn't true. I don't have any use for either political party but the way that Trump has been attacked while not applying the same rules and scrutiny to the last three puppet presidents is obvious to me. You couldn't care less if Trump could actually steer this country out of the ditch because he doesn't have a "D" by his name and he isn't a blatant socialist and that is all there is to that one.

 

[Wry Catcher]

Jennifer Rubin is WAPO's right wing editorial writer. It's hard to disagree with her assessment of the situation.

The GOP's moral rot is the problem, not Donald Trump Jr. | Opinion

I am conservative, but not Republican. Moral rot is pervasive throughout politics and it is blind to party affiliation; it afflicts the left just as readily as it afflicts the right. If you don't see this, you are simply blinded by your party affiliation.

As a liberal, I agree. I wonder though, how do you feel about the Supreme Court's decisions in CU v. FEC and McCutcheon v. FEC., and how McConnell is literally bribing Senators to vote for the health care bill?

 

[Wry Catcher]

After we saw the democrat party give a standing ovation to a democrat congressman (Gerry Studds) who was convicted of sexual abusing a male page and Hillary's husband declined into a street pervert offering young girls n autograph for a BJ session in the White House and Obama telling the Country to admit confused boys into the girls locker room and confused men into the ladies room and authorized the IRS to spy on American citizens and authorized the federal cops to give thousands of illegal weapons to Mexican drug cartels, the left suddenly assumed the role of the morality cops? Don't make me laugh

You're a hack. The sexual peccadilloes of members of Congress exists on both sides of the aisle, and many past presidents have had affairs. Your dishonest post and use of hyperbole is way over the top, and thus lacks any topical substance or honest reporting.

Posting truth is being a "hack"? Seriously? It is the best post on this thread so it doesn't surprise me that you don't like it.

It is a lie by omission. The premise might be valid (if not for the hyperbole) but the conclusion of moral authority is not sound.

"A valid argument may still have a false conclusion. When we construct our arguments, we must aim to construct one that is not only valid, but sound. A sound argument is one that is not only valid, but begins with premises that are actually true.", not half-truths!
Validity and Soundness | Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy

There was nothing in that post he wrote that wasn't true. I don't have any use for either political party but the way that Trump has been attacked while not applying the same rules and scrutiny to the last three puppet presidents is obvious to me. You couldn't care less if Trump could actually steer this country out of the ditch because he doesn't have a "D" by his name and he isn't a blatant socialist and that is all there is to that one.

Post evidence that the post in question was the truth and nothing but the truth.

 

[Dragonlady]

After we saw the democrat party give a standing ovation to a democrat congressman (Gerry Studds) who was convicted of sexual abusing a male page and Hillary's husband declined into a street pervert offering young girls n autograph for a BJ session in the White House and Obama telling the Country to admit confused boys into the girls locker room and confused men into the ladies room and authorized the IRS to spy on American citizens and authorized the federal cops to give thousands of illegal weapons to Mexican drug cartels, the left suddenly assumed the role of the morality cops? Don't make me laugh

You're a hack. The sexual peccadilloes of members of Congress exists on both sides of the aisle, and many past presidents have had affairs. Your dishonest post and use of hyperbole is way over the top, and thus lacks any topical substance or honest reporting.

Posting truth is being a "hack"? Seriously? It is the best post on this thread so it doesn't surprise me that you don't like it.

It is a lie by omission. The premise might be valid (if not for the hyperbole) but the conclusion of moral authority is not sound.

"A valid argument may still have a false conclusion. When we construct our arguments, we must aim to construct one that is not only valid, but sound. A sound argument is one that is not only valid, but begins with premises that are actually true.", not half-truths!
Validity and Soundness | Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy

There was nothing in that post he wrote that wasn't true. I don't have any use for either political party but the way that Trump has been attacked while not applying the same rules and scrutiny to the last three puppet presidents is obvious to me. You couldn't care less if Trump could actually steer this country out of the ditch because he doesn't have a "D" by his name and he isn't a blatant socialist and that is all there is to that one.

I guess you completely missed the 17 investigations and special prosecutor hired to take down the Clintons, the 7 Benghazi Investigations against Obama's administration, none of which found any evidence of wrong doing, and the ongoing Fast and Furious investigation.

Trump is dealing with ONE investigation and his entire administration is being paralyzed by it.

 

[Dale Smith]

After we saw the democrat party give a standing ovation to a democrat congressman (Gerry Studds) who was convicted of sexual abusing a male page and Hillary's husband declined into a street pervert offering young girls n autograph for a BJ session in the White House and Obama telling the Country to admit confused boys into the girls locker room and confused men into the ladies room and authorized the IRS to spy on American citizens and authorized the federal cops to give thousands of illegal weapons to Mexican drug cartels, the left suddenly assumed the role of the morality cops? Don't make me laugh

You're a hack. The sexual peccadilloes of members of Congress exists on both sides of the aisle, and many past presidents have had affairs. Your dishonest post and use of hyperbole is way over the top, and thus lacks any topical substance or honest reporting.

Posting truth is being a "hack"? Seriously? It is the best post on this thread so it doesn't surprise me that you don't like it.

It is a lie by omission. The premise might be valid (if not for the hyperbole) but the conclusion of moral authority is not sound.

"A valid argument may still have a false conclusion. When we construct our arguments, we must aim to construct one that is not only valid, but sound. A sound argument is one that is not only valid, but begins with premises that are actually true.", not half-truths!
Validity and Soundness | Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy

There was nothing in that post he wrote that wasn't true. I don't have any use for either political party but the way that Trump has been attacked while not applying the same rules and scrutiny to the last three puppet presidents is obvious to me. You couldn't care less if Trump could actually steer this country out of the ditch because he doesn't have a "D" by his name and he isn't a blatant socialist and that is all there is to that one.

Post evidence that the post in question was the truth and nothing but the truth.

LOL! For cult believers like you? No one could ever produce enough evidence. Hell, not even the revelations of the Wikileaks e-mails has swayed your opinion. You and your leftard pals believe that the DNC and leftards are victims.

 

[Wry Catcher]

After we saw the democrat party give a standing ovation to a democrat congressman (Gerry Studds) who was convicted of sexual abusing a male page and Hillary's husband declined into a street pervert offering young girls n autograph for a BJ session in the White House and Obama telling the Country to admit confused boys into the girls locker room and confused men into the ladies room and authorized the IRS to spy on American citizens and authorized the federal cops to give thousands of illegal weapons to Mexican drug cartels, the left suddenly assumed the role of the morality cops? Don't make me laugh

You're a hack. The sexual peccadilloes of members of Congress exists on both sides of the aisle, and many past presidents have had affairs. Your dishonest post and use of hyperbole is way over the top, and thus lacks any topical substance or honest reporting.

Posting truth is being a "hack"? Seriously? It is the best post on this thread so it doesn't surprise me that you don't like it.

It is a lie by omission. The premise might be valid (if not for the hyperbole) but the conclusion of moral authority is not sound.

"A valid argument may still have a false conclusion. When we construct our arguments, we must aim to construct one that is not only valid, but sound. A sound argument is one that is not only valid, but begins with premises that are actually true.", not half-truths!
Validity and Soundness | Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy

There was nothing in that post he wrote that wasn't true. I don't have any use for either political party but the way that Trump has been attacked while not applying the same rules and scrutiny to the last three puppet presidents is obvious to me. You couldn't care less if Trump could actually steer this country out of the ditch because he doesn't have a "D" by his name and he isn't a blatant socialist and that is all there is to that one.

I guess you completely missed the 17 investigations and special prosecutor hired to take down the Clintons, the 7 Benghazi Investigations against Obama's administration, none of which found any evidence of wrong doing, and the ongoing Fast and Furious investigation.

Trump is dealing with ONE investigation and his entire administration is being paralyzed by it.

I will add to this ^^ very clear and concise post this comment: President Obama and Sect. HRC both acted with the up most class when attacked and subjected to allegations unsupported by evidence which went on for years.

The response from Trump&Co. suggests to me that mens re is behind their continued denial that any crime occurred / collusion occurred. Only a guilty mind lies, and when the lie is exposed continues to try and make the original lie credible, by adding more detail such as an unintentional mistake as to day, time, event or circumstances.

 

[Dale Smith]

After we saw the democrat party give a standing ovation to a democrat congressman (Gerry Studds) who was convicted of sexual abusing a male page and Hillary's husband declined into a street pervert offering young girls n autograph for a BJ session in the White House and Obama telling the Country to admit confused boys into the girls locker room and confused men into the ladies room and authorized the IRS to spy on American citizens and authorized the federal cops to give thousands of illegal weapons to Mexican drug cartels, the left suddenly assumed the role of the morality cops? Don't make me laugh

You're a hack. The sexual peccadilloes of members of Congress exists on both sides of the aisle, and many past presidents have had affairs. Your dishonest post and use of hyperbole is way over the top, and thus lacks any topical substance or honest reporting.

Posting truth is being a "hack"? Seriously? It is the best post on this thread so it doesn't surprise me that you don't like it.

It is a lie by omission. The premise might be valid (if not for the hyperbole) but the conclusion of moral authority is not sound.

"A valid argument may still have a false conclusion. When we construct our arguments, we must aim to construct one that is not only valid, but sound. A sound argument is one that is not only valid, but begins with premises that are actually true.", not half-truths!
Validity and Soundness | Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy

There was nothing in that post he wrote that wasn't true. I don't have any use for either political party but the way that Trump has been attacked while not applying the same rules and scrutiny to the last three puppet presidents is obvious to me. You couldn't care less if Trump could actually steer this country out of the ditch because he doesn't have a "D" by his name and he isn't a blatant socialist and that is all there is to that one.

I guess you completely missed the 17 investigations and special prosecutor hired to take down the Clintons, the 7 Benghazi Investigations against Obama's administration, none of which found any evidence of wrong doing, and the ongoing Fast and Furious investigation.

Trump is dealing with ONE investigation and his entire administration is being paralyzed by it.

Spare me, the stonewalling done by the Clinton, Bush and Obama admins are legendary. I HEARD the whistle blower's own testimony about Benghazi from their own mouths. I HEARD the testimony from whistle blowers about Fast and Furious and what the goals were....how Eric Holder was held in contempt of Congress. Lois Lerner stonewalls and claims her hard drive took a dive. Who in the fuck do you think you are dealing with here? This is what I do all day, every day. You are simply a partisan hack. I know that these sacks of shit are protected by the Deep State and I have seen the "dog and pony" shows of these investigations. The one where Comey admits that the Hildebeast compromised national security by using her private server but (snicker) "She didn't mean to do so" that followed a meeting with Bill "drop trou" and Clinton lackey Loretta Lynch. You are barking up the wrong tree, sis. Next time you get pulled over for a traffic violation and tell the cop you refuse to accept the ticket because "You didn't mean too" and tel me how that works out for ya.

 

[Dale Smith]

You're a hack. The sexual peccadilloes of members of Congress exists on both sides of the aisle, and many past presidents have had affairs. Your dishonest post and use of hyperbole is way over the top, and thus lacks any topical substance or honest reporting.

Posting truth is being a "hack"? Seriously? It is the best post on this thread so it doesn't surprise me that you don't like it.

It is a lie by omission. The premise might be valid (if not for the hyperbole) but the conclusion of moral authority is not sound.

"A valid argument may still have a false conclusion. When we construct our arguments, we must aim to construct one that is not only valid, but sound. A sound argument is one that is not only valid, but begins with premises that are actually true.", not half-truths!
Validity and Soundness | Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy

There was nothing in that post he wrote that wasn't true. I don't have any use for either political party but the way that Trump has been attacked while not applying the same rules and scrutiny to the last three puppet presidents is obvious to me. You couldn't care less if Trump could actually steer this country out of the ditch because he doesn't have a "D" by his name and he isn't a blatant socialist and that is all there is to that one.

I guess you completely missed the 17 investigations and special prosecutor hired to take down the Clintons, the 7 Benghazi Investigations against Obama's administration, none of which found any evidence of wrong doing, and the ongoing Fast and Furious investigation.

Trump is dealing with ONE investigation and his entire administration is being paralyzed by it.

I will add to this ^^ very clear and concise post this comment: President Obama and Sect. HRC both acted with the up most class when attacked and subjected to allegations unsupported by evidence which went on for years.

The response from Trump&Co. suggests to me that mens re is behind their continued denial that any crime occurred / collusion occurred. Only a guilty mind lies, and when the lie is exposed continues to try and make the original lie credible, by adding more detail such as an unintentional mistake as to day, time, event or circumstances.

ROTFLMAO!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! Did you really type that with a straight face???????

 

[Reasonable]

Jennifer Rubin is WAPO's right wing editorial writer. It's hard to disagree with her assessment of the situation.

The GOP's moral rot is the problem, not Donald Trump Jr. | Opinion

ROFL! She's obviously #neverTrump. The stink coming from the Democrat party overwhelms anything from the Trump administration. Hillary is a criminal married to a sexual predator, and she won the Democrat nomination. That says it all.

The only response this mental midget can ever muster up is HILLARYor OBAMA. Lol

 

[Reasonable]

Jennifer Rubin is WAPO's right wing editorial writer. It's hard to disagree with her assessment of the situation.

The GOP's moral rot is the problem, not Donald Trump Jr. | Opinion

It's obvious who and what the problem is.

 

[Dale Smith]

View attachment 139105

Jennifer Rubin is WAPO's right wing editorial writer. It's hard to disagree with her assessment of the situation.

The GOP's moral rot is the problem, not Donald Trump Jr. | Opinion

ROFL! She's obviously #neverTrump. The stink coming from the Democrat party overwhelms anything from the Trump administration. Hillary is a criminal married to a sexual predator, and she won the Democrat nomination. That says it all.

The only response this mental midget can ever muster up is HILLARYor OBAMA. Lol

 

[Dale Smith]

View attachment 139107

Jennifer Rubin is WAPO's right wing editorial writer. It's hard to disagree with her assessment of the situation.

The GOP's moral rot is the problem, not Donald Trump Jr. | Opinion

It's obvious who and what the problem is.