coolzone
Member
- Apr 8, 2018
- 49
- 7
- 21
- Thread starter
- Banned
- #61
Why should the truth make you suspicious.Aaaaah, now we're getting to the crux of where you are.....a bloody Nazi (NATIONAL SOCIALIST German Workers Party). Or, perhaps you actually mean Communism.Fu*k the PC act of 1878. Our government and our nationhood isn't a domestic policy. It is our country! If our country was being invaded through military force, would it be illegal for U.S. troops to stop it? Well our country IS being invaded! Just because mexicans choose to not do so through military means is their problem. They should be shot on sight!The Posse Comitatus Act of 1878, forbids our government from using actual federal troops from enforcing internal domestic policies, of which border control is one. As it would take a 60% majority to repeal the law and the Republicans don't have a 60% majority, the Posse Comitatus Act stands and only the individual states Army National Guard units can be used and they can't detain and arrest, only report to the Border Patrol any illegals crossing over. Although, in my opinion it would be good if they could at least detain the illegals until the Border Patrol could arrive.But then again, so is the U.S. I say this as a descendant of a long line of Americans. The reason I say it is because I recently heard it is against the law to have U.S. troops protecting the border. But in the long list of things the U.S. military should be allowed to do, that should be at the top of the list!!! If they aren't allowed to do at least that, what in the fu*k is the sense of them doing anything else!
I have heard them say on the news basically that having U.S. troops guarding the border would be a policing action. Well the Korean war was a policing action. So was the Vietnamese war. If our troops were allowed to do such things there, it is ludicrous to not allow them to do so here.
As for that POS Trump, I'm still waiting for him to deport those 11 million illegals. That lying scumbag has the legal authority to do so. He just didn't want to pursue it in court. Also, I recently heard that hordes of "people" from Honduras are making their way towards the U.S. There is only one reason they are doing so. Which is that despite what you may have heard, somewhere along the line the U.S. has given them the green light. Our country will talk the talk and put up a big stink about it. But they won't walk the walk as far as doing something that will really work to stop it.
Democracies are messy things and things run sluggishly, but it beats living under communism/socialism.
Next, what in the hell makes you think that republicans would want to repeal the law. They and the democrats are just two sides of the same coin. And with the republicans siding with the wealthy, I can tell you that the wealthy love nothing better than having slaves in the form of cheap foreign labor. They would pimp their own mothers out to mexicans with HIV if it meant they could buy that yacht they've always wanted.
As for detaining illegals until the border patrol arrived, what good would that do. Not long ago people crossing illegally with children actually LOOKED for border patrol to turn themselves over to! Knowing that they wouldn't be sent back. At least not right away. Giving their little spicklings time to dream for the "dream act."
Next, nothing can beat National Socialism. That's why it is so universally slandered and continuously lied about. I'll bet you just can't wait to hit that "report" button.
Even the Russian government admits to the barbarity of their socialist policies of the past. Perhaps you are thinking China. The Chinese government doesn't deny it killed millions to achieve its goal and over time, realized that pure socialism wasn't working and adopted a policy of "whatever works" to get ahead, thus they introduced Capitalism into the system. Or, perhaps Venezuela.....people are deserting Venezuela and fleeing to surrounding countries as they realized that true socialism just wasn't working.
Now, there is, Norway and Sweden, however, they are not true National Socialist countries. They are Capitalist countries with a number of social programs. The trouble is that because they let in vast numbers of migrants, doing so has overwhelmed their available services and they are floundering as they can't serve the numbers that came in and as the numbers increase via more migration and births, they will collapse.
Socialism is at its core, immoral. If you believe that someone walking up to you and demanding your wallet, which is yours, you bought it, you earned it through your work, is committing an immoral act, then so too it is if a group of people walked up to you and demanding your wallet. It's still an immoral act. If huge numbers demand you give up a portion of what you worked for and thus earned, even if they run the government, it too is an immoral act. You worked for whatever money you earned and no one, or group, has the right to take the money you earned and give it to others. I would like to have a mansion, a Lamborghini and a Yacht. But hey, I can't get one. My income doesn't entitle me to have them and taking money from someone else so that I can have nicer things, is immoral. I didn't work for it, I didn't earn it.
As for the really poor, if you are in the US and you have the following: A car, a television, a refrigerator, food in the refrigerator, a cellphone and heat in the winter, you....are not really poor. As for the homeless, interviews were conducted with many of them. They fall into the following niches: mentally-ill (they would have a roof over their head and guaranteed food, except for the interference of the ACLU, they managed to get them out of institutions and on to the streets). Alcoholics/drug addicts, they put themselves into that life. For the drug addicts, they knew the drugs they were going to take were addicting and they didn't care and thus, I'm personally not particularly sympathetic. Runaways, some have made it clear that they just like the nomadic life on the streets and if the boyfriend they won't leave is himself homeless, she has only herself to blame for sticking with him. Hobos/nomads, they just like living off the grid and moving around. Some of these people are criminals that stay on the move to avoid capture. No matter which group some fall in to, I've worked all my life (brought in money for the household, mowing lawns as a kid, worked as a dishwasher in a Chinese restaurant while attending high school, painted fences, dug post holes, moved furniture, worked with fiberglass, property guard, bartender, janitorial, military, and on and on) But, I always "worked" for what I earned, I never accepted "handouts." I'm now retired and damn sure ain't rich, but my life's choices has allowed me to retire, with a modest income so that I will have a roof over my head, some health care and food on the table.
So, get yourself a job and stop dreaming about stealing other peoples money and getting perks, via National Socialism.
Blah blah blah. You say a lot without saying at all. But I read enough of your crap to get the gist of it. Now get the gist of this. In far fewer words. The U.S. is basically a third world country. And just about any despicable thing that any other country has done throughout history, the U.S. is also guilty of. Also, keep in mind what was basically said by JBA Karr. "The more things change, the more they stay the same."
Was that short and to the point enough? Now. How would you like to take the "RED PILL." (The Matrix reference) Download and read what you will find here. It is only about 100 pages long. filehosting.org | free easy unlimited filehosting
I always get suspicious when someone blurts out a statement like "The U.S. is basically a third world country."
So which "third world" country do you claim as home?
