Trump is a joke!

[miketx]

But then again, so is the U.S. I say this as a descendant of a long line of Americans. The reason I say it is because I recently heard it is against the law to have U.S. troops protecting the border. But in the long list of things the U.S. military should be allowed to do, that should be at the top of the list!!! If they aren't allowed to do at least that, what in the fu*k is the sense of them doing anything else!
I have heard them say on the news basically that having U.S. troops guarding the border would be a policing action. Well the Korean war was a policing action. So was the Vietnamese war. If our troops were allowed to do such things there, it is ludicrous to not allow them to do so here.
As for that POS Trump, I'm still waiting for him to deport those 11 million illegals. That lying scumbag has the legal authority to do so. He just didn't want to pursue it in court. Also, I recently heard that hordes of "people" from Honduras are making their way towards the U.S. There is only one reason they are doing so. Which is that despite what you may have heard, somewhere along the line the U.S. has given them the green light. Our country will talk the talk and put up a big stink about it. But they won't walk the walk as far as doing something that will really work to stop it.

So you "heard" something and just assume it's true. lol

 

[The Sage of Main Street]

But then again, so is the U.S. I say this as a descendant of a long line of Americans. The reason I say it is because I recently heard it is against the law to have U.S. troops protecting the border. But in the long list of things the U.S. military should be allowed to do, that should be at the top of the list!!! If they aren't allowed to do at least that, what in the fu*k is the sense of them doing anything else!
I have heard them say on the news basically that having U.S. troops guarding the border would be a policing action. Well the Korean war was a policing action. So was the Vietnamese war. If our troops were allowed to do such things there, it is ludicrous to not allow them to do so here.
As for that POS Trump, I'm still waiting for him to deport those 11 million illegals. That lying scumbag has the legal authority to do so. He just didn't want to pursue it in court. Also, I recently heard that hordes of "people" from Honduras are making their way towards the U.S. There is only one reason they are doing so. Which is that despite what you may have heard, somewhere along the line the U.S. has given them the green light. Our country will talk the talk and put up a big stink about it. But they won't walk the walk as far as doing something that will really work to stop it.

The Posse Comitatus Act of 1878, forbids our government from using actual federal troops from enforcing internal domestic policies, of which border control is one. As it would take a 60% majority to repeal the law and the Republicans don't have a 60% majority, the Posse Comitatus Act stands and only the individual states Army National Guard units can be used and they can't detain and arrest, only report to the Border Patrol any illegals crossing over. Although, in my opinion it would be good if they could at least detain the illegals until the Border Patrol could arrive.
.

Blackjack

How is the border internal or domestic? Also, they'd be shooting Mexicans, not Americans. Once again, government legalistic interpretations stretch laws like a taffy pull. Trump should send the Marines from Camp Pendleton and the Army from Fort Hood. Airstrikes and naval gunfire can turn the border into an inferno. We must invade Mexico itself to end their invasion of the United States.

 

[coolzone]

But then again, so is the U.S. I say this as a descendant of a long line of Americans. The reason I say it is because I recently heard it is against the law to have U.S. troops protecting the border. But in the long list of things the U.S. military should be allowed to do, that should be at the top of the list!!! If they aren't allowed to do at least that, what in the fu*k is the sense of them doing anything else!
I have heard them say on the news basically that having U.S. troops guarding the border would be a policing action. Well the Korean war was a policing action. So was the Vietnamese war. If our troops were allowed to do such things there, it is ludicrous to not allow them to do so here.
As for that POS Trump, I'm still waiting for him to deport those 11 million illegals. That lying scumbag has the legal authority to do so. He just didn't want to pursue it in court. Also, I recently heard that hordes of "people" from Honduras are making their way towards the U.S. There is only one reason they are doing so. Which is that despite what you may have heard, somewhere along the line the U.S. has given them the green light. Our country will talk the talk and put up a big stink about it. But they won't walk the walk as far as doing something that will really work to stop it.

your OP is a JOKE
the Korean WAR and the Vietnam WAR were WARS--not police actions
war
wôr/
noun

1. 1.
   a state of armed conflict between different nations or states or different groups within a nation or state.

Show me the declaration of war for either. They were policing actions. Look it up.

 

[coolzone]

But then again, so is the U.S. I say this as a descendant of a long line of Americans. The reason I say it is because I recently heard it is against the law to have U.S. troops protecting the border. But in the long list of things the U.S. military should be allowed to do, that should be at the top of the list!!! If they aren't allowed to do at least that, what in the fu*k is the sense of them doing anything else!
I have heard them say on the news basically that having U.S. troops guarding the border would be a policing action. Well the Korean war was a policing action. So was the Vietnamese war. If our troops were allowed to do such things there, it is ludicrous to not allow them to do so here.
As for that POS Trump, I'm still waiting for him to deport those 11 million illegals. That lying scumbag has the legal authority to do so. He just didn't want to pursue it in court. Also, I recently heard that hordes of "people" from Honduras are making their way towards the U.S. There is only one reason they are doing so. Which is that despite what you may have heard, somewhere along the line the U.S. has given them the green light. Our country will talk the talk and put up a big stink about it. But they won't walk the walk as far as doing something that will really work to stop it.

So you "heard" something and just assume it's true. lol

Look at post #14.

 

[miketx]

But then again, so is the U.S. I say this as a descendant of a long line of Americans. The reason I say it is because I recently heard it is against the law to have U.S. troops protecting the border. But in the long list of things the U.S. military should be allowed to do, that should be at the top of the list!!! If they aren't allowed to do at least that, what in the fu*k is the sense of them doing anything else!
I have heard them say on the news basically that having U.S. troops guarding the border would be a policing action. Well the Korean war was a policing action. So was the Vietnamese war. If our troops were allowed to do such things there, it is ludicrous to not allow them to do so here.
As for that POS Trump, I'm still waiting for him to deport those 11 million illegals. That lying scumbag has the legal authority to do so. He just didn't want to pursue it in court. Also, I recently heard that hordes of "people" from Honduras are making their way towards the U.S. There is only one reason they are doing so. Which is that despite what you may have heard, somewhere along the line the U.S. has given them the green light. Our country will talk the talk and put up a big stink about it. But they won't walk the walk as far as doing something that will really work to stop it.

So you "heard" something and just assume it's true. lol

Look at post #14.

No.

 

[miketx]

But then again, so is the U.S. I say this as a descendant of a long line of Americans. The reason I say it is because I recently heard it is against the law to have U.S. troops protecting the border. But in the long list of things the U.S. military should be allowed to do, that should be at the top of the list!!! If they aren't allowed to do at least that, what in the fu*k is the sense of them doing anything else!
I have heard them say on the news basically that having U.S. troops guarding the border would be a policing action. Well the Korean war was a policing action. So was the Vietnamese war. If our troops were allowed to do such things there, it is ludicrous to not allow them to do so here.
As for that POS Trump, I'm still waiting for him to deport those 11 million illegals. That lying scumbag has the legal authority to do so. He just didn't want to pursue it in court. Also, I recently heard that hordes of "people" from Honduras are making their way towards the U.S. There is only one reason they are doing so. Which is that despite what you may have heard, somewhere along the line the U.S. has given them the green light. Our country will talk the talk and put up a big stink about it. But they won't walk the walk as far as doing something that will really work to stop it.

The Posse Comitatus Act of 1878, forbids our government from using actual federal troops from enforcing internal domestic policies, of which border control is one. As it would take a 60% majority to repeal the law and the Republicans don't have a 60% majority, the Posse Comitatus Act stands and only the individual states Army National Guard units can be used and they can't detain and arrest, only report to the Border Patrol any illegals crossing over. Although, in my opinion it would be good if they could at least detain the illegals until the Border Patrol could arrive.
Democracies are messy things and things run sluggishly, but it beats living under communism/socialism.

Lol! The military CAN stop a foreign invasion.

 

[LuckyDuck]

But then again, so is the U.S. I say this as a descendant of a long line of Americans. The reason I say it is because I recently heard it is against the law to have U.S. troops protecting the border. But in the long list of things the U.S. military should be allowed to do, that should be at the top of the list!!! If they aren't allowed to do at least that, what in the fu*k is the sense of them doing anything else!
I have heard them say on the news basically that having U.S. troops guarding the border would be a policing action. Well the Korean war was a policing action. So was the Vietnamese war. If our troops were allowed to do such things there, it is ludicrous to not allow them to do so here.
As for that POS Trump, I'm still waiting for him to deport those 11 million illegals. That lying scumbag has the legal authority to do so. He just didn't want to pursue it in court. Also, I recently heard that hordes of "people" from Honduras are making their way towards the U.S. There is only one reason they are doing so. Which is that despite what you may have heard, somewhere along the line the U.S. has given them the green light. Our country will talk the talk and put up a big stink about it. But they won't walk the walk as far as doing something that will really work to stop it.

The Posse Comitatus Act of 1878, forbids our government from using actual federal troops from enforcing internal domestic policies, of which border control is one. As it would take a 60% majority to repeal the law and the Republicans don't have a 60% majority, the Posse Comitatus Act stands and only the individual states Army National Guard units can be used and they can't detain and arrest, only report to the Border Patrol any illegals crossing over. Although, in my opinion it would be good if they could at least detain the illegals until the Border Patrol could arrive.
Democracies are messy things and things run sluggishly, but it beats living under communism/socialism.

Fu*k the PC act of 1878. Our government and our nationhood isn't a domestic policy. It is our country! If our country was being invaded through military force, would it be illegal for U.S. troops to stop it? Well our country IS being invaded! Just because mexicans choose to not do so through military means is their problem. They should be shot on sight!
Next, what in the hell makes you think that republicans would want to repeal the law. They and the democrats are just two sides of the same coin. And with the republicans siding with the wealthy, I can tell you that the wealthy love nothing better than having slaves in the form of cheap foreign labor. They would pimp their own mothers out to mexicans with HIV if it meant they could buy that yacht they've always wanted.
As for detaining illegals until the border patrol arrived, what good would that do. Not long ago people crossing illegally with children actually LOOKED for border patrol to turn themselves over to! Knowing that they wouldn't be sent back. At least not right away. Giving their little spicklings time to dream for the "dream act."
Next, nothing can beat National Socialism. That's why it is so universally slandered and continuously lied about. I'll bet you just can't wait to hit that "report" button.

Aaaaah, now we're getting to the crux of where you are.....a bloody Nazi (NATIONAL SOCIALIST German Workers Party). Or, perhaps you actually mean Communism.
Even the Russian government admits to the barbarity of their socialist policies of the past. Perhaps you are thinking China. The Chinese government doesn't deny it killed millions to achieve its goal and over time, realized that pure socialism wasn't working and adopted a policy of "whatever works" to get ahead, thus they introduced Capitalism into the system. Or, perhaps Venezuela.....people are deserting Venezuela and fleeing to surrounding countries as they realized that true socialism just wasn't working.
Now, there is, Norway and Sweden, however, they are not true National Socialist countries. They are Capitalist countries with a number of social programs. The trouble is that because they let in vast numbers of migrants, doing so has overwhelmed their available services and they are floundering as they can't serve the numbers that came in and as the numbers increase via more migration and births, they will collapse.
Socialism is at its core, immoral. If you believe that someone walking up to you and demanding your wallet, which is yours, you bought it, you earned it through your work, is committing an immoral act, then so too it is if a group of people walked up to you and demanding your wallet. It's still an immoral act. If huge numbers demand you give up a portion of what you worked for and thus earned, even if they run the government, it too is an immoral act. You worked for whatever money you earned and no one, or group, has the right to take the money you earned and give it to others. I would like to have a mansion, a Lamborghini and a Yacht. But hey, I can't get one. My income doesn't entitle me to have them and taking money from someone else so that I can have nicer things, is immoral. I didn't work for it, I didn't earn it.
As for the really poor, if you are in the US and you have the following: A car, a television, a refrigerator, food in the refrigerator, a cellphone and heat in the winter, you....are not really poor. As for the homeless, interviews were conducted with many of them. They fall into the following niches: mentally-ill (they would have a roof over their head and guaranteed food, except for the interference of the ACLU, they managed to get them out of institutions and on to the streets). Alcoholics/drug addicts, they put themselves into that life. For the drug addicts, they knew the drugs they were going to take were addicting and they didn't care and thus, I'm personally not particularly sympathetic. Runaways, some have made it clear that they just like the nomadic life on the streets and if the boyfriend they won't leave is himself homeless, she has only herself to blame for sticking with him. Hobos/nomads, they just like living off the grid and moving around. Some of these people are criminals that stay on the move to avoid capture. No matter which group some fall in to, I've worked all my life (brought in money for the household, mowing lawns as a kid, worked as a dishwasher in a Chinese restaurant while attending high school, painted fences, dug post holes, moved furniture, worked with fiberglass, property guard, bartender, janitorial, military, and on and on) But, I always "worked" for what I earned, I never accepted "handouts." I'm now retired and damn sure ain't rich, but my life's choices has allowed me to retire, with a modest income so that I will have a roof over my head, some health care and food on the table.
So, get yourself a job and stop dreaming about stealing other peoples money and getting perks, via National Socialism.

 

[LuckyDuck]

But then again, so is the U.S. I say this as a descendant of a long line of Americans. The reason I say it is because I recently heard it is against the law to have U.S. troops protecting the border. But in the long list of things the U.S. military should be allowed to do, that should be at the top of the list!!! If they aren't allowed to do at least that, what in the fu*k is the sense of them doing anything else!
I have heard them say on the news basically that having U.S. troops guarding the border would be a policing action. Well the Korean war was a policing action. So was the Vietnamese war. If our troops were allowed to do such things there, it is ludicrous to not allow them to do so here.
As for that POS Trump, I'm still waiting for him to deport those 11 million illegals. That lying scumbag has the legal authority to do so. He just didn't want to pursue it in court. Also, I recently heard that hordes of "people" from Honduras are making their way towards the U.S. There is only one reason they are doing so. Which is that despite what you may have heard, somewhere along the line the U.S. has given them the green light. Our country will talk the talk and put up a big stink about it. But they won't walk the walk as far as doing something that will really work to stop it.

The Posse Comitatus Act of 1878, forbids our government from using actual federal troops from enforcing internal domestic policies, of which border control is one. As it would take a 60% majority to repeal the law and the Republicans don't have a 60% majority, the Posse Comitatus Act stands and only the individual states Army National Guard units can be used and they can't detain and arrest, only report to the Border Patrol any illegals crossing over. Although, in my opinion it would be good if they could at least detain the illegals until the Border Patrol could arrive.
Democracies are messy things and things run sluggishly, but it beats living under communism/socialism.

Lol! The military CAN stop a foreign invasion.

The problem we and other western nations are dealing with, is that the people flowing in, aren't carrying weapons, accompanied by tanks and howitzers and wearing military-style uniforms. While I sometimes quip that our border should have land mines place on it, you really can't just up and shoot and kill large numbers of unarmed people.
This isn't North Korea. Frankly, if I were an Emperor or King, I would indeed put the military along our border (both north and south). But, I'm not an Emperor or King and our leaders are elected for various lengths of service.
I have to admit though, that this was the most clever idea for an invasion. Just send unarmed citizens over a foreign border and change that government from within. This method is going to change western Europe into a group of Islamic nations and the European so-called leaders are naïve and on, ignoring what WILL happen, or are complicit and don't care. Either way, western Europe is going to be gone. If the populace hadn't have been disarmed, the citizens, at least some of them, would have risen up by now and Civil Wars would be underway.

 

[miketx]

But then again, so is the U.S. I say this as a descendant of a long line of Americans. The reason I say it is because I recently heard it is against the law to have U.S. troops protecting the border. But in the long list of things the U.S. military should be allowed to do, that should be at the top of the list!!! If they aren't allowed to do at least that, what in the fu*k is the sense of them doing anything else!
I have heard them say on the news basically that having U.S. troops guarding the border would be a policing action. Well the Korean war was a policing action. So was the Vietnamese war. If our troops were allowed to do such things there, it is ludicrous to not allow them to do so here.
As for that POS Trump, I'm still waiting for him to deport those 11 million illegals. That lying scumbag has the legal authority to do so. He just didn't want to pursue it in court. Also, I recently heard that hordes of "people" from Honduras are making their way towards the U.S. There is only one reason they are doing so. Which is that despite what you may have heard, somewhere along the line the U.S. has given them the green light. Our country will talk the talk and put up a big stink about it. But they won't walk the walk as far as doing something that will really work to stop it.

The Posse Comitatus Act of 1878, forbids our government from using actual federal troops from enforcing internal domestic policies, of which border control is one. As it would take a 60% majority to repeal the law and the Republicans don't have a 60% majority, the Posse Comitatus Act stands and only the individual states Army National Guard units can be used and they can't detain and arrest, only report to the Border Patrol any illegals crossing over. Although, in my opinion it would be good if they could at least detain the illegals until the Border Patrol could arrive.
Democracies are messy things and things run sluggishly, but it beats living under communism/socialism.

Lol! The military CAN stop a foreign invasion.

The problem we and other western nations are dealing with, is that the people flowing in, aren't carrying weapons, accompanied by tanks and howitzers and wearing military-style uniforms. While I sometimes quip that our border should have land mines place on it, you really can't just up and shoot and kill large numbers of unarmed people.
This isn't North Korea. Frankly, if I were an Emperor or King, I would indeed put the military along our border (both north and south). But, I'm not an Emperor or King and our leaders are elected for various lengths of service.
I have to admit though, that this was the most clever idea for an invasion. Just send unarmed citizens over a foreign border and change that government from within. This method is going to change western Europe into a group of Islamic nations and the European so-called leaders are naïve and on, ignoring what WILL happen, or are complicit and don't care. Either way, western Europe is going to be gone. If the populace hadn't have been disarmed, the citizens, at least some of them, would have risen up by now and Civil Wars would be underway.

Your leaders have no spine. Position the military at the borders. Warn them to stop. If they don't, shoot them.

 

[LuckyDuck]

But then again, so is the U.S. I say this as a descendant of a long line of Americans. The reason I say it is because I recently heard it is against the law to have U.S. troops protecting the border. But in the long list of things the U.S. military should be allowed to do, that should be at the top of the list!!! If they aren't allowed to do at least that, what in the fu*k is the sense of them doing anything else!
I have heard them say on the news basically that having U.S. troops guarding the border would be a policing action. Well the Korean war was a policing action. So was the Vietnamese war. If our troops were allowed to do such things there, it is ludicrous to not allow them to do so here.
As for that POS Trump, I'm still waiting for him to deport those 11 million illegals. That lying scumbag has the legal authority to do so. He just didn't want to pursue it in court. Also, I recently heard that hordes of "people" from Honduras are making their way towards the U.S. There is only one reason they are doing so. Which is that despite what you may have heard, somewhere along the line the U.S. has given them the green light. Our country will talk the talk and put up a big stink about it. But they won't walk the walk as far as doing something that will really work to stop it.

The Posse Comitatus Act of 1878, forbids our government from using actual federal troops from enforcing internal domestic policies, of which border control is one. As it would take a 60% majority to repeal the law and the Republicans don't have a 60% majority, the Posse Comitatus Act stands and only the individual states Army National Guard units can be used and they can't detain and arrest, only report to the Border Patrol any illegals crossing over. Although, in my opinion it would be good if they could at least detain the illegals until the Border Patrol could arrive.
Democracies are messy things and things run sluggishly, but it beats living under communism/socialism.

Lol! The military CAN stop a foreign invasion.

The problem we and other western nations are dealing with, is that the people flowing in, aren't carrying weapons, accompanied by tanks and howitzers and wearing military-style uniforms. While I sometimes quip that our border should have land mines place on it, you really can't just up and shoot and kill large numbers of unarmed people.
This isn't North Korea. Frankly, if I were an Emperor or King, I would indeed put the military along our border (both north and south). But, I'm not an Emperor or King and our leaders are elected for various lengths of service.
I have to admit though, that this was the most clever idea for an invasion. Just send unarmed citizens over a foreign border and change that government from within. This method is going to change western Europe into a group of Islamic nations and the European so-called leaders are naïve and on, ignoring what WILL happen, or are complicit and don't care. Either way, western Europe is going to be gone. If the populace hadn't have been disarmed, the citizens, at least some of them, would have risen up by now and Civil Wars would be underway.

Your leaders have no spine. Position the military at the borders. Warn them to stop. If they don't, shoot them.

You are someone who isn't wanted in the US. You are more suited for North Korea. They like to shoot both those who attempt to go in and those who seek to leave. You'd have fun there.

 

[DrLove]

It is legal to put NG on the border but only under the authority of each state's governor. The exception allowing a president to override a governor is either war or a national emergency.

When illegal crossings are at a 46 year low, it could hardly be rationalized as either.

It's also stupid as hell. These people are trained for war, not law enforcement. And they don't have the authority to touch anyone caught crossing.

This is nothing more than a wag the dog whistle nod to the base and a colossal waste of money we ain't got.

 

[The Sage of Main Street]

But then again, so is the U.S. I say this as a descendant of a long line of Americans. The reason I say it is because I recently heard it is against the law to have U.S. troops protecting the border. But in the long list of things the U.S. military should be allowed to do, that should be at the top of the list!!! If they aren't allowed to do at least that, what in the fu*k is the sense of them doing anything else!
I have heard them say on the news basically that having U.S. troops guarding the border would be a policing action. Well the Korean war was a policing action. So was the Vietnamese war. If our troops were allowed to do such things there, it is ludicrous to not allow them to do so here.
As for that POS Trump, I'm still waiting for him to deport those 11 million illegals. That lying scumbag has the legal authority to do so. He just didn't want to pursue it in court. Also, I recently heard that hordes of "people" from Honduras are making their way towards the U.S. There is only one reason they are doing so. Which is that despite what you may have heard, somewhere along the line the U.S. has given them the green light. Our country will talk the talk and put up a big stink about it. But they won't walk the walk as far as doing something that will really work to stop it.

The Posse Comitatus Act of 1878, forbids our government from using actual federal troops from enforcing internal domestic policies, of which border control is one. As it would take a 60% majority to repeal the law and the Republicans don't have a 60% majority, the Posse Comitatus Act stands and only the individual states Army National Guard units can be used and they can't detain and arrest, only report to the Border Patrol any illegals crossing over. Although, in my opinion it would be good if they could at least detain the illegals until the Border Patrol could arrive.
Democracies are messy things and things run sluggishly, but it beats living under communism/socialism.

Fu*k the PC act of 1878. Our government and our nationhood isn't a domestic policy. It is our country! If our country was being invaded through military force, would it be illegal for U.S. troops to stop it? Well our country IS being invaded! Just because mexicans choose to not do so through military means is their problem. They should be shot on sight!
Next, what in the hell makes you think that republicans would want to repeal the law. They and the democrats are just two sides of the same coin. And with the republicans siding with the wealthy, I can tell you that the wealthy love nothing better than having slaves in the form of cheap foreign labor. They would pimp their own mothers out to mexicans with HIV if it meant they could buy that yacht they've always wanted.
As for detaining illegals until the border patrol arrived, what good would that do. Not long ago people crossing illegally with children actually LOOKED for border patrol to turn themselves over to! Knowing that they wouldn't be sent back. At least not right away. Giving their little spicklings time to dream for the "dream act."
Next, nothing can beat National Socialism. That's why it is so universally slandered and continuously lied about. I'll bet you just can't wait to hit that "report" button.

Aaaaah, now we're getting to the crux of where you are.....a bloody Nazi (NATIONAL SOCIALIST German Workers Party). Or, perhaps you actually mean Communism.
Even the Russian government admits to the barbarity of their socialist policies of the past. Perhaps you are thinking China. The Chinese government doesn't deny it killed millions to achieve its goal and over time, realized that pure socialism wasn't working and adopted a policy of "whatever works" to get ahead, thus they introduced Capitalism into the system. Or, perhaps Venezuela.....people are deserting Venezuela and fleeing to surrounding countries as they realized that true socialism just wasn't working.
Now, there is, Norway and Sweden, however, they are not true National Socialist countries. They are Capitalist countries with a number of social programs. The trouble is that because they let in vast numbers of migrants, doing so has overwhelmed their available services and they are floundering as they can't serve the numbers that came in and as the numbers increase via more migration and births, they will collapse.
Socialism is at its core, immoral. If you believe that someone walking up to you and demanding your wallet, which is yours, you bought it, you earned it through your work, is committing an immoral act, then so too it is if a group of people walked up to you and demanding your wallet. It's still an immoral act. If huge numbers demand you give up a portion of what you worked for and thus earned, even if they run the government, it too is an immoral act. You worked for whatever money you earned and no one, or group, has the right to take the money you earned and give it to others. I would like to have a mansion, a Lamborghini and a Yacht. But hey, I can't get one. My income doesn't entitle me to have them and taking money from someone else so that I can have nicer things, is immoral. I didn't work for it, I didn't earn it.
As for the really poor, if you are in the US and you have the following: A car, a television, a refrigerator, food in the refrigerator, a cellphone and heat in the winter, you....are not really poor. As for the homeless, interviews were conducted with many of them. They fall into the following niches: mentally-ill (they would have a roof over their head and guaranteed food, except for the interference of the ACLU, they managed to get them out of institutions and on to the streets). Alcoholics/drug addicts, they put themselves into that life. For the drug addicts, they knew the drugs they were going to take were addicting and they didn't care and thus, I'm personally not particularly sympathetic. Runaways, some have made it clear that they just like the nomadic life on the streets and if the boyfriend they won't leave is himself homeless, she has only herself to blame for sticking with him. Hobos/nomads, they just like living off the grid and moving around. Some of these people are criminals that stay on the move to avoid capture. No matter which group some fall in to, I've worked all my life (brought in money for the household, mowing lawns as a kid, worked as a dishwasher in a Chinese restaurant while attending high school, painted fences, dug post holes, moved furniture, worked with fiberglass, property guard, bartender, janitorial, military, and on and on) But, I always "worked" for what I earned, I never accepted "handouts." I'm now retired and damn sure ain't rich, but my life's choices has allowed me to retire, with a modest income so that I will have a roof over my head, some health care and food on the table.
So, get yourself a job and stop dreaming about stealing other peoples money and getting perks, via National Socialism.

Karl Marx Was the Sex Slave of a Patty Hearst Type Duchess

Anti-semitism is a tool of the plutocracy, whom you worship. Socialism is your idols' spoiled-putrid sons' scheme to take over democratic movements. Calling the Nazis "Socialist" just because that is in their official name is as silly as calling the Union of Soviet Socialist Republics and the People's Republic of China "Republicans."

 

[miketx]

But then again, so is the U.S. I say this as a descendant of a long line of Americans. The reason I say it is because I recently heard it is against the law to have U.S. troops protecting the border. But in the long list of things the U.S. military should be allowed to do, that should be at the top of the list!!! If they aren't allowed to do at least that, what in the fu*k is the sense of them doing anything else!
I have heard them say on the news basically that having U.S. troops guarding the border would be a policing action. Well the Korean war was a policing action. So was the Vietnamese war. If our troops were allowed to do such things there, it is ludicrous to not allow them to do so here.
As for that POS Trump, I'm still waiting for him to deport those 11 million illegals. That lying scumbag has the legal authority to do so. He just didn't want to pursue it in court. Also, I recently heard that hordes of "people" from Honduras are making their way towards the U.S. There is only one reason they are doing so. Which is that despite what you may have heard, somewhere along the line the U.S. has given them the green light. Our country will talk the talk and put up a big stink about it. But they won't walk the walk as far as doing something that will really work to stop it.

The Posse Comitatus Act of 1878, forbids our government from using actual federal troops from enforcing internal domestic policies, of which border control is one. As it would take a 60% majority to repeal the law and the Republicans don't have a 60% majority, the Posse Comitatus Act stands and only the individual states Army National Guard units can be used and they can't detain and arrest, only report to the Border Patrol any illegals crossing over. Although, in my opinion it would be good if they could at least detain the illegals until the Border Patrol could arrive.
Democracies are messy things and things run sluggishly, but it beats living under communism/socialism.

Lol! The military CAN stop a foreign invasion.

The problem we and other western nations are dealing with, is that the people flowing in, aren't carrying weapons, accompanied by tanks and howitzers and wearing military-style uniforms. While I sometimes quip that our border should have land mines place on it, you really can't just up and shoot and kill large numbers of unarmed people.
This isn't North Korea. Frankly, if I were an Emperor or King, I would indeed put the military along our border (both north and south). But, I'm not an Emperor or King and our leaders are elected for various lengths of service.
I have to admit though, that this was the most clever idea for an invasion. Just send unarmed citizens over a foreign border and change that government from within. This method is going to change western Europe into a group of Islamic nations and the European so-called leaders are naïve and on, ignoring what WILL happen, or are complicit and don't care. Either way, western Europe is going to be gone. If the populace hadn't have been disarmed, the citizens, at least some of them, would have risen up by now and Civil Wars would be underway.

Your leaders have no spine. Position the military at the borders. Warn them to stop. If they don't, shoot them.

You are someone who isn't wanted in the US. You are more suited for North Korea. They like to shoot both those who attempt to go in and those who seek to leave. You'd have fun there.

I'd love to go to korea. Wouldn't that be a blast? Finally, somewhere I am wanted!

 

[The Sage of Main Street]

But then again, so is the U.S. I say this as a descendant of a long line of Americans. The reason I say it is because I recently heard it is against the law to have U.S. troops protecting the border. But in the long list of things the U.S. military should be allowed to do, that should be at the top of the list!!! If they aren't allowed to do at least that, what in the fu*k is the sense of them doing anything else!
I have heard them say on the news basically that having U.S. troops guarding the border would be a policing action. Well the Korean war was a policing action. So was the Vietnamese war. If our troops were allowed to do such things there, it is ludicrous to not allow them to do so here.
As for that POS Trump, I'm still waiting for him to deport those 11 million illegals. That lying scumbag has the legal authority to do so. He just didn't want to pursue it in court. Also, I recently heard that hordes of "people" from Honduras are making their way towards the U.S. There is only one reason they are doing so. Which is that despite what you may have heard, somewhere along the line the U.S. has given them the green light. Our country will talk the talk and put up a big stink about it. But they won't walk the walk as far as doing something that will really work to stop it.

The Posse Comitatus Act of 1878, forbids our government from using actual federal troops from enforcing internal domestic policies, of which border control is one. As it would take a 60% majority to repeal the law and the Republicans don't have a 60% majority, the Posse Comitatus Act stands and only the individual states Army National Guard units can be used and they can't detain and arrest, only report to the Border Patrol any illegals crossing over. Although, in my opinion it would be good if they could at least detain the illegals until the Border Patrol could arrive.
Democracies are messy things and things run sluggishly, but it beats living under communism/socialism.

Lol! The military CAN stop a foreign invasion.

The problem we and other western nations are dealing with, is that the people flowing in, aren't carrying weapons, accompanied by tanks and howitzers and wearing military-style uniforms. While I sometimes quip that our border should have land mines place on it, you really can't just up and shoot and kill large numbers of unarmed people.
This isn't North Korea. Frankly, if I were an Emperor or King, I would indeed put the military along our border (both north and south). But, I'm not an Emperor or King and our leaders are elected for various lengths of service.
I have to admit though, that this was the most clever idea for an invasion. Just send unarmed citizens over a foreign border and change that government from within. This method is going to change western Europe into a group of Islamic nations and the European so-called leaders are naïve and on, ignoring what WILL happen, or are complicit and don't care. Either way, western Europe is going to be gone. If the populace hadn't have been disarmed, the citizens, at least some of them, would have risen up by now and Civil Wars would be underway.

Pacifists Are Piñatas

The only effective Wall is a hail of bullets.

 

[coolzone]

But then again, so is the U.S. I say this as a descendant of a long line of Americans. The reason I say it is because I recently heard it is against the law to have U.S. troops protecting the border. But in the long list of things the U.S. military should be allowed to do, that should be at the top of the list!!! If they aren't allowed to do at least that, what in the fu*k is the sense of them doing anything else!
I have heard them say on the news basically that having U.S. troops guarding the border would be a policing action. Well the Korean war was a policing action. So was the Vietnamese war. If our troops were allowed to do such things there, it is ludicrous to not allow them to do so here.
As for that POS Trump, I'm still waiting for him to deport those 11 million illegals. That lying scumbag has the legal authority to do so. He just didn't want to pursue it in court. Also, I recently heard that hordes of "people" from Honduras are making their way towards the U.S. There is only one reason they are doing so. Which is that despite what you may have heard, somewhere along the line the U.S. has given them the green light. Our country will talk the talk and put up a big stink about it. But they won't walk the walk as far as doing something that will really work to stop it.

So you "heard" something and just assume it's true. lol

Look at post #14.

No.

YES!

 

[coolzone]

But then again, so is the U.S. I say this as a descendant of a long line of Americans. The reason I say it is because I recently heard it is against the law to have U.S. troops protecting the border. But in the long list of things the U.S. military should be allowed to do, that should be at the top of the list!!! If they aren't allowed to do at least that, what in the fu*k is the sense of them doing anything else!
I have heard them say on the news basically that having U.S. troops guarding the border would be a policing action. Well the Korean war was a policing action. So was the Vietnamese war. If our troops were allowed to do such things there, it is ludicrous to not allow them to do so here.
As for that POS Trump, I'm still waiting for him to deport those 11 million illegals. That lying scumbag has the legal authority to do so. He just didn't want to pursue it in court. Also, I recently heard that hordes of "people" from Honduras are making their way towards the U.S. There is only one reason they are doing so. Which is that despite what you may have heard, somewhere along the line the U.S. has given them the green light. Our country will talk the talk and put up a big stink about it. But they won't walk the walk as far as doing something that will really work to stop it.

The Posse Comitatus Act of 1878, forbids our government from using actual federal troops from enforcing internal domestic policies, of which border control is one. As it would take a 60% majority to repeal the law and the Republicans don't have a 60% majority, the Posse Comitatus Act stands and only the individual states Army National Guard units can be used and they can't detain and arrest, only report to the Border Patrol any illegals crossing over. Although, in my opinion it would be good if they could at least detain the illegals until the Border Patrol could arrive.
Democracies are messy things and things run sluggishly, but it beats living under communism/socialism.

Lol! The military CAN stop a foreign invasion.

With around 11 million illegal beaners in the U.S., apparently the military isn't doing so. It also obviously means they can't.

 

[HereWeGoAgain]

But then again, so is the U.S. I say this as a descendant of a long line of Americans. The reason I say it is because I recently heard it is against the law to have U.S. troops protecting the border. But in the long list of things the U.S. military should be allowed to do, that should be at the top of the list!!! If they aren't allowed to do at least that, what in the fu*k is the sense of them doing anything else!
I have heard them say on the news basically that having U.S. troops guarding the border would be a policing action. Well the Korean war was a policing action. So was the Vietnamese war. If our troops were allowed to do such things there, it is ludicrous to not allow them to do so here.
As for that POS Trump, I'm still waiting for him to deport those 11 million illegals. That lying scumbag has the legal authority to do so. He just didn't want to pursue it in court. Also, I recently heard that hordes of "people" from Honduras are making their way towards the U.S. There is only one reason they are doing so. Which is that despite what you may have heard, somewhere along the line the U.S. has given them the green light. Our country will talk the talk and put up a big stink about it. But they won't walk the walk as far as doing something that will really work to stop it.

You "recently heard" that it's illegal for a President to send troops to the border?

Then why did GW and Obama both do that? Are you trying to say that Obama broke the law?

Trump would not be first president to send National Guard soldiers to US-Mexico border

One thing that is illegal for sure, is crossing the US border and living here without going through the correct channels.

First of all, as far as I know, they didn't. They sent national guard troops. (As you yourself pointed out) Or whom some have called "weekend warriors." Also, was the Korean war only carried out by national guard troops? Was the Vietnamese war only carried out by national guard troops? And while there, did their duty include more than "Observe and report?"

I see you misspelled your Avatar tag.
Here's your correction.....

"foolzone"

 

[coolzone]

But then again, so is the U.S. I say this as a descendant of a long line of Americans. The reason I say it is because I recently heard it is against the law to have U.S. troops protecting the border. But in the long list of things the U.S. military should be allowed to do, that should be at the top of the list!!! If they aren't allowed to do at least that, what in the fu*k is the sense of them doing anything else!
I have heard them say on the news basically that having U.S. troops guarding the border would be a policing action. Well the Korean war was a policing action. So was the Vietnamese war. If our troops were allowed to do such things there, it is ludicrous to not allow them to do so here.
As for that POS Trump, I'm still waiting for him to deport those 11 million illegals. That lying scumbag has the legal authority to do so. He just didn't want to pursue it in court. Also, I recently heard that hordes of "people" from Honduras are making their way towards the U.S. There is only one reason they are doing so. Which is that despite what you may have heard, somewhere along the line the U.S. has given them the green light. Our country will talk the talk and put up a big stink about it. But they won't walk the walk as far as doing something that will really work to stop it.

The Posse Comitatus Act of 1878, forbids our government from using actual federal troops from enforcing internal domestic policies, of which border control is one. As it would take a 60% majority to repeal the law and the Republicans don't have a 60% majority, the Posse Comitatus Act stands and only the individual states Army National Guard units can be used and they can't detain and arrest, only report to the Border Patrol any illegals crossing over. Although, in my opinion it would be good if they could at least detain the illegals until the Border Patrol could arrive.
Democracies are messy things and things run sluggishly, but it beats living under communism/socialism.

Fu*k the PC act of 1878. Our government and our nationhood isn't a domestic policy. It is our country! If our country was being invaded through military force, would it be illegal for U.S. troops to stop it? Well our country IS being invaded! Just because mexicans choose to not do so through military means is their problem. They should be shot on sight!
Next, what in the hell makes you think that republicans would want to repeal the law. They and the democrats are just two sides of the same coin. And with the republicans siding with the wealthy, I can tell you that the wealthy love nothing better than having slaves in the form of cheap foreign labor. They would pimp their own mothers out to mexicans with HIV if it meant they could buy that yacht they've always wanted.
As for detaining illegals until the border patrol arrived, what good would that do. Not long ago people crossing illegally with children actually LOOKED for border patrol to turn themselves over to! Knowing that they wouldn't be sent back. At least not right away. Giving their little spicklings time to dream for the "dream act."
Next, nothing can beat National Socialism. That's why it is so universally slandered and continuously lied about. I'll bet you just can't wait to hit that "report" button.

Aaaaah, now we're getting to the crux of where you are.....a bloody Nazi (NATIONAL SOCIALIST German Workers Party). Or, perhaps you actually mean Communism.
Even the Russian government admits to the barbarity of their socialist policies of the past. Perhaps you are thinking China. The Chinese government doesn't deny it killed millions to achieve its goal and over time, realized that pure socialism wasn't working and adopted a policy of "whatever works" to get ahead, thus they introduced Capitalism into the system. Or, perhaps Venezuela.....people are deserting Venezuela and fleeing to surrounding countries as they realized that true socialism just wasn't working.
Now, there is, Norway and Sweden, however, they are not true National Socialist countries. They are Capitalist countries with a number of social programs. The trouble is that because they let in vast numbers of migrants, doing so has overwhelmed their available services and they are floundering as they can't serve the numbers that came in and as the numbers increase via more migration and births, they will collapse.
Socialism is at its core, immoral. If you believe that someone walking up to you and demanding your wallet, which is yours, you bought it, you earned it through your work, is committing an immoral act, then so too it is if a group of people walked up to you and demanding your wallet. It's still an immoral act. If huge numbers demand you give up a portion of what you worked for and thus earned, even if they run the government, it too is an immoral act. You worked for whatever money you earned and no one, or group, has the right to take the money you earned and give it to others. I would like to have a mansion, a Lamborghini and a Yacht. But hey, I can't get one. My income doesn't entitle me to have them and taking money from someone else so that I can have nicer things, is immoral. I didn't work for it, I didn't earn it.
As for the really poor, if you are in the US and you have the following: A car, a television, a refrigerator, food in the refrigerator, a cellphone and heat in the winter, you....are not really poor. As for the homeless, interviews were conducted with many of them. They fall into the following niches: mentally-ill (they would have a roof over their head and guaranteed food, except for the interference of the ACLU, they managed to get them out of institutions and on to the streets). Alcoholics/drug addicts, they put themselves into that life. For the drug addicts, they knew the drugs they were going to take were addicting and they didn't care and thus, I'm personally not particularly sympathetic. Runaways, some have made it clear that they just like the nomadic life on the streets and if the boyfriend they won't leave is himself homeless, she has only herself to blame for sticking with him. Hobos/nomads, they just like living off the grid and moving around. Some of these people are criminals that stay on the move to avoid capture. No matter which group some fall in to, I've worked all my life (brought in money for the household, mowing lawns as a kid, worked as a dishwasher in a Chinese restaurant while attending high school, painted fences, dug post holes, moved furniture, worked with fiberglass, property guard, bartender, janitorial, military, and on and on) But, I always "worked" for what I earned, I never accepted "handouts." I'm now retired and damn sure ain't rich, but my life's choices has allowed me to retire, with a modest income so that I will have a roof over my head, some health care and food on the table.
So, get yourself a job and stop dreaming about stealing other peoples money and getting perks, via National Socialism.

Blah blah blah. You say a lot without saying at all. But I read enough of your crap to get the gist of it. Now get the gist of this. In far fewer words. The U.S. is basically a third world country. And just about any despicable thing that any other country has done throughout history, the U.S. is also guilty of. Also, keep in mind what was basically said by JBA Karr. "The more things change, the more they stay the same."
Was that short and to the point enough? Now. How would you like to take the "RED PILL." (The Matrix reference) Download and read what you will find here. It is only about 100 pages long. filehosting.org | free easy unlimited filehosting

 

[ABikerSailor]

But then again, so is the U.S. I say this as a descendant of a long line of Americans. The reason I say it is because I recently heard it is against the law to have U.S. troops protecting the border. But in the long list of things the U.S. military should be allowed to do, that should be at the top of the list!!! If they aren't allowed to do at least that, what in the fu*k is the sense of them doing anything else!
I have heard them say on the news basically that having U.S. troops guarding the border would be a policing action. Well the Korean war was a policing action. So was the Vietnamese war. If our troops were allowed to do such things there, it is ludicrous to not allow them to do so here.
As for that POS Trump, I'm still waiting for him to deport those 11 million illegals. That lying scumbag has the legal authority to do so. He just didn't want to pursue it in court. Also, I recently heard that hordes of "people" from Honduras are making their way towards the U.S. There is only one reason they are doing so. Which is that despite what you may have heard, somewhere along the line the U.S. has given them the green light. Our country will talk the talk and put up a big stink about it. But they won't walk the walk as far as doing something that will really work to stop it.

The Posse Comitatus Act of 1878, forbids our government from using actual federal troops from enforcing internal domestic policies, of which border control is one. As it would take a 60% majority to repeal the law and the Republicans don't have a 60% majority, the Posse Comitatus Act stands and only the individual states Army National Guard units can be used and they can't detain and arrest, only report to the Border Patrol any illegals crossing over. Although, in my opinion it would be good if they could at least detain the illegals until the Border Patrol could arrive.
Democracies are messy things and things run sluggishly, but it beats living under communism/socialism.

Fu*k the PC act of 1878. Our government and our nationhood isn't a domestic policy. It is our country! If our country was being invaded through military force, would it be illegal for U.S. troops to stop it? Well our country IS being invaded! Just because mexicans choose to not do so through military means is their problem. They should be shot on sight!
Next, what in the hell makes you think that republicans would want to repeal the law. They and the democrats are just two sides of the same coin. And with the republicans siding with the wealthy, I can tell you that the wealthy love nothing better than having slaves in the form of cheap foreign labor. They would pimp their own mothers out to mexicans with HIV if it meant they could buy that yacht they've always wanted.
As for detaining illegals until the border patrol arrived, what good would that do. Not long ago people crossing illegally with children actually LOOKED for border patrol to turn themselves over to! Knowing that they wouldn't be sent back. At least not right away. Giving their little spicklings time to dream for the "dream act."
Next, nothing can beat National Socialism. That's why it is so universally slandered and continuously lied about. I'll bet you just can't wait to hit that "report" button.

Aaaaah, now we're getting to the crux of where you are.....a bloody Nazi (NATIONAL SOCIALIST German Workers Party). Or, perhaps you actually mean Communism.
Even the Russian government admits to the barbarity of their socialist policies of the past. Perhaps you are thinking China. The Chinese government doesn't deny it killed millions to achieve its goal and over time, realized that pure socialism wasn't working and adopted a policy of "whatever works" to get ahead, thus they introduced Capitalism into the system. Or, perhaps Venezuela.....people are deserting Venezuela and fleeing to surrounding countries as they realized that true socialism just wasn't working.
Now, there is, Norway and Sweden, however, they are not true National Socialist countries. They are Capitalist countries with a number of social programs. The trouble is that because they let in vast numbers of migrants, doing so has overwhelmed their available services and they are floundering as they can't serve the numbers that came in and as the numbers increase via more migration and births, they will collapse.
Socialism is at its core, immoral. If you believe that someone walking up to you and demanding your wallet, which is yours, you bought it, you earned it through your work, is committing an immoral act, then so too it is if a group of people walked up to you and demanding your wallet. It's still an immoral act. If huge numbers demand you give up a portion of what you worked for and thus earned, even if they run the government, it too is an immoral act. You worked for whatever money you earned and no one, or group, has the right to take the money you earned and give it to others. I would like to have a mansion, a Lamborghini and a Yacht. But hey, I can't get one. My income doesn't entitle me to have them and taking money from someone else so that I can have nicer things, is immoral. I didn't work for it, I didn't earn it.
As for the really poor, if you are in the US and you have the following: A car, a television, a refrigerator, food in the refrigerator, a cellphone and heat in the winter, you....are not really poor. As for the homeless, interviews were conducted with many of them. They fall into the following niches: mentally-ill (they would have a roof over their head and guaranteed food, except for the interference of the ACLU, they managed to get them out of institutions and on to the streets). Alcoholics/drug addicts, they put themselves into that life. For the drug addicts, they knew the drugs they were going to take were addicting and they didn't care and thus, I'm personally not particularly sympathetic. Runaways, some have made it clear that they just like the nomadic life on the streets and if the boyfriend they won't leave is himself homeless, she has only herself to blame for sticking with him. Hobos/nomads, they just like living off the grid and moving around. Some of these people are criminals that stay on the move to avoid capture. No matter which group some fall in to, I've worked all my life (brought in money for the household, mowing lawns as a kid, worked as a dishwasher in a Chinese restaurant while attending high school, painted fences, dug post holes, moved furniture, worked with fiberglass, property guard, bartender, janitorial, military, and on and on) But, I always "worked" for what I earned, I never accepted "handouts." I'm now retired and damn sure ain't rich, but my life's choices has allowed me to retire, with a modest income so that I will have a roof over my head, some health care and food on the table.
So, get yourself a job and stop dreaming about stealing other peoples money and getting perks, via National Socialism.

Blah blah blah. You say a lot without saying at all. But I read enough of your crap to get the gist of it. Now get the gist of this. In far fewer words. The U.S. is basically a third world country. And any despicable thing that any other country has done throughout history, the U.S. is also guilty of. Also, keep in mind what was basically said by JBA Karr. "The more things change, the more they stay the same."
Was that short and to the point enough? Now. How would you like to take the "RED PILL." (The Matrix reference) Download and read what you will find here. It is only about 100 pages long. filehosting.org | free easy unlimited filehosting

Dude..................you are an anonymous person on a message board. WTF makes you think that anyone is gonna be stupid enough to download your crap? You tried this in another thread, and got the same response.

Why can't you just give us the cliffs notes version, rather than expect us to leave our computers vulnerable to whatever crappy virus that might be hiding in the stuff you want us to download?

 

[coolzone]

But then again, so is the U.S. I say this as a descendant of a long line of Americans. The reason I say it is because I recently heard it is against the law to have U.S. troops protecting the border. But in the long list of things the U.S. military should be allowed to do, that should be at the top of the list!!! If they aren't allowed to do at least that, what in the fu*k is the sense of them doing anything else!
I have heard them say on the news basically that having U.S. troops guarding the border would be a policing action. Well the Korean war was a policing action. So was the Vietnamese war. If our troops were allowed to do such things there, it is ludicrous to not allow them to do so here.
As for that POS Trump, I'm still waiting for him to deport those 11 million illegals. That lying scumbag has the legal authority to do so. He just didn't want to pursue it in court. Also, I recently heard that hordes of "people" from Honduras are making their way towards the U.S. There is only one reason they are doing so. Which is that despite what you may have heard, somewhere along the line the U.S. has given them the green light. Our country will talk the talk and put up a big stink about it. But they won't walk the walk as far as doing something that will really work to stop it.

The Posse Comitatus Act of 1878, forbids our government from using actual federal troops from enforcing internal domestic policies, of which border control is one. As it would take a 60% majority to repeal the law and the Republicans don't have a 60% majority, the Posse Comitatus Act stands and only the individual states Army National Guard units can be used and they can't detain and arrest, only report to the Border Patrol any illegals crossing over. Although, in my opinion it would be good if they could at least detain the illegals until the Border Patrol could arrive.
Democracies are messy things and things run sluggishly, but it beats living under communism/socialism.

Lol! The military CAN stop a foreign invasion.

The problem we and other western nations are dealing with, is that the people flowing in, aren't carrying weapons, accompanied by tanks and howitzers and wearing military-style uniforms. While I sometimes quip that our border should have land mines place on it, you really can't just up and shoot and kill large numbers of unarmed people.
This isn't North Korea. Frankly, if I were an Emperor or King, I would indeed put the military along our border (both north and south). But, I'm not an Emperor or King and our leaders are elected for various lengths of service.
I have to admit though, that this was the most clever idea for an invasion. Just send unarmed citizens over a foreign border and change that government from within. This method is going to change western Europe into a group of Islamic nations and the European so-called leaders are naïve and on, ignoring what WILL happen, or are complicit and don't care. Either way, western Europe is going to be gone. If the populace hadn't have been disarmed, the citizens, at least some of them, would have risen up by now and Civil Wars would be underway.

What is happening in Europe, YOU are responsible for! Because your yourself say that you can't shoot unarmed people. Obviously, that is the wrong answer.