Trump Calls For "Immediate" Deportations Of Illegals With "No Judges Or Court Cases"

[Vandalshandle]

Meister, if you get an Associates degree, you can get a job supervising grape pickers. Not only that, but they give out free water bottles to supervisors!

Invest your money young, Vanshady

My retirement, which I am currently enjoying 35 miles north of the Mexican border in sunny AZ, is not threatened by people who speak Spanish and have brown skin. In fact, they do a lot of unpleasant tasks for me at an affordable rate, like my landscaping, which no Anglos want to do in 105 degree heat. Unlike Anglos working for minimum wage, they show up sober.

Good for you, you are part of the problem hiring illegals. In my retirement I live in the north country and Anglos do those jobs in the summer and winter. for a fair wage.....sober.

Part of the problem? Well, pardon me if I don't want to pay double for a drugged out landscaper. Nor do a plan on asking for a birth certificate before I let him prune my citrus tree. There is no illegal immigration crisis. It is all a manufactured booger-bear by Trump.

I won't pardon you, I hold you personally responsible for hiring an illegal alien. YOU are the root of the problem. You are also ignorant if you think
there is not an immigration problem. The problem has been around long before Trump became president.

There are three illegals under your bed who will jump out when you are asleep and cut your throat in the middle of the night.

 

[Meister]

Now that is funny.

The Constitution is the paperwork liberals use to wipe their asses after they dump that chia latte.

It wasn't until there were 'Living Document" judges put on the bench that the Constitution started pertaining to anyone who happens to set foot on our soil.

All through our history, we have controlled the amount and type of people we allow to immigrate to the USA, and not once have those who were forbidden been given Constitutional rights.

I am always amazed at the progressives idiocy. On the one hand, they berate America as evil because the undocumented Europeans showed up and forced the natives off their lands and put them in reservations until they are almost extinct, then out of the same side of their lying mouths, they berate those who say we cannot have uncontrolled illegals entering the country because they may overwhelm our society.

This is called being a two-faced liar.

These are patently untrue. The Constitution has always applied to everyone within our borders; the Founding Fathers, remember, believed that our rights were granted to us by God, and only enumerated in the Constitution, and it follows that to limit them only to citizens would be claiming that God cared only for American citizens, which they, to say the least, did not believe. To clear it up further, James Madison - who wrote the Constitution - wrote that "as [aliens] owe, on the one hand, a temporary obedience, they are entitled, in return, to their [Constitutional] protection and advantage." (I looked that one up to make sure I got it right.) The 14th Amendment settled it for good when the Equal Protection Clause wrote out very specifically that no State may "deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws."

As for restricting who came in, for more than our first century, we had no limits and no restrictions at all. In the 1880s that we passed a law excluding Chinese laborers, and criminals, "idiots," and people who couldn't take care of themselves. Aside from that, it wasn't until after WWI - less than a century ago - that we started controlling or limiting who came in, by a series of quotas per country. Every one of those immigrants from every one of those time periods was entitled to their full Constitutional rights once they set foot on our soil.

The constitution does not apply to ANYONE merely within our borders
We know you libs FEEL that illegal non citizens should be afforded that unique and rare luxury but they are not

Actually, you are dead wrong. The constitution applies to the entire jurisdiction of American courts, to all citizens. Only when a court has determined that a person is not a citizen, does it not apply to him.

Following your incorrect logic, all illegal acts committed by any party with any sort of action would have to first be adjudicated by a court before any enforcement could take place
Does not work like that

I am sure that the local community college in your city offers remedial 8th grade Civics. Sign up for it ASAP.

Invest your money young, Vanshady

My retirement, which I am currently enjoying 35 miles north of the Mexican border in sunny AZ, is not threatened by people who speak Spanish and have brown skin. In fact, they do a lot of unpleasant tasks for me at an affordable rate, like my landscaping, which no Anglos want to do in 105 degree heat. Unlike Anglos working for minimum wage, they show up sober.

Good for you, you are part of the problem hiring illegals. In my retirement I live in the north country and Anglos do those jobs in the summer and winter. for a fair wage.....sober.

Part of the problem? Well, pardon me if I don't want to pay double for a drugged out landscaper. Nor do a plan on asking for a birth certificate before I let him prune my citrus tree. There is no illegal immigration crisis. It is all a manufactured booger-bear by Trump.

I won't pardon you, I hold you personally responsible for hiring an illegal alien. YOU are the root of the problem. You are also ignorant if you think
there is not an immigration problem. The problem has been around long before Trump became president.

There are three illegals under your bed who will jump out when you are asleep and cut your throat in the middle of the night.

I hope you're paying them more than day labor wages, dude.

 

[Vandalshandle]

Now that is funny.

The Constitution is the paperwork liberals use to wipe their asses after they dump that chia latte.

It wasn't until there were 'Living Document" judges put on the bench that the Constitution started pertaining to anyone who happens to set foot on our soil.

All through our history, we have controlled the amount and type of people we allow to immigrate to the USA, and not once have those who were forbidden been given Constitutional rights.

I am always amazed at the progressives idiocy. On the one hand, they berate America as evil because the undocumented Europeans showed up and forced the natives off their lands and put them in reservations until they are almost extinct, then out of the same side of their lying mouths, they berate those who say we cannot have uncontrolled illegals entering the country because they may overwhelm our society.

This is called being a two-faced liar.

These are patently untrue. The Constitution has always applied to everyone within our borders; the Founding Fathers, remember, believed that our rights were granted to us by God, and only enumerated in the Constitution, and it follows that to limit them only to citizens would be claiming that God cared only for American citizens, which they, to say the least, did not believe. To clear it up further, James Madison - who wrote the Constitution - wrote that "as [aliens] owe, on the one hand, a temporary obedience, they are entitled, in return, to their [Constitutional] protection and advantage." (I looked that one up to make sure I got it right.) The 14th Amendment settled it for good when the Equal Protection Clause wrote out very specifically that no State may "deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws."

As for restricting who came in, for more than our first century, we had no limits and no restrictions at all. In the 1880s that we passed a law excluding Chinese laborers, and criminals, "idiots," and people who couldn't take care of themselves. Aside from that, it wasn't until after WWI - less than a century ago - that we started controlling or limiting who came in, by a series of quotas per country. Every one of those immigrants from every one of those time periods was entitled to their full Constitutional rights once they set foot on our soil.

The constitution does not apply to ANYONE merely within our borders
We know you libs FEEL that illegal non citizens should be afforded that unique and rare luxury but they are not

Actually, you are dead wrong. The constitution applies to the entire jurisdiction of American courts, to all citizens. Only when a court has determined that a person is not a citizen, does it not apply to him.

An Illegal is not a citizen

You have to be “of” America and not just merely “in” America(illegally)to be afforded the privledges and protection of citizenry.

...and until you are found guilty by a court, you are s "suspect", or "undocumented". You are NOT an "illegal"

 

[Moonglow]

These are patently untrue. The Constitution has always applied to everyone within our borders; the Founding Fathers, remember, believed that our rights were granted to us by God, and only enumerated in the Constitution, and it follows that to limit them only to citizens would be claiming that God cared only for American citizens, which they, to say the least, did not believe. To clear it up further, James Madison - who wrote the Constitution - wrote that "as [aliens] owe, on the one hand, a temporary obedience, they are entitled, in return, to their [Constitutional] protection and advantage." (I looked that one up to make sure I got it right.) The 14th Amendment settled it for good when the Equal Protection Clause wrote out very specifically that no State may "deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws."

As for restricting who came in, for more than our first century, we had no limits and no restrictions at all. In the 1880s that we passed a law excluding Chinese laborers, and criminals, "idiots," and people who couldn't take care of themselves. Aside from that, it wasn't until after WWI - less than a century ago - that we started controlling or limiting who came in, by a series of quotas per country. Every one of those immigrants from every one of those time periods was entitled to their full Constitutional rights once they set foot on our soil.

The constitution does not apply to ANYONE merely within our borders
We know you libs FEEL that illegal non citizens should be afforded that unique and rare luxury but they are not

Actually, you are dead wrong. The constitution applies to the entire jurisdiction of American courts, to all citizens. Only when a court has determined that a person is not a citizen, does it not apply to him.

An Illegal is not a citizen

You have to be “of” America and not just merely “in” America(illegally)to be afforded the privledges and protection of citizenry.

...and until you are found guilty by a court, you are s "suspect", or "undocumented". You are NOT an "illegal"

That sure doesn't help Trump..

 

[Vandalshandle]

These are patently untrue. The Constitution has always applied to everyone within our borders; the Founding Fathers, remember, believed that our rights were granted to us by God, and only enumerated in the Constitution, and it follows that to limit them only to citizens would be claiming that God cared only for American citizens, which they, to say the least, did not believe. To clear it up further, James Madison - who wrote the Constitution - wrote that "as [aliens] owe, on the one hand, a temporary obedience, they are entitled, in return, to their [Constitutional] protection and advantage." (I looked that one up to make sure I got it right.) The 14th Amendment settled it for good when the Equal Protection Clause wrote out very specifically that no State may "deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws."

As for restricting who came in, for more than our first century, we had no limits and no restrictions at all. In the 1880s that we passed a law excluding Chinese laborers, and criminals, "idiots," and people who couldn't take care of themselves. Aside from that, it wasn't until after WWI - less than a century ago - that we started controlling or limiting who came in, by a series of quotas per country. Every one of those immigrants from every one of those time periods was entitled to their full Constitutional rights once they set foot on our soil.

The constitution does not apply to ANYONE merely within our borders
We know you libs FEEL that illegal non citizens should be afforded that unique and rare luxury but they are not

Actually, you are dead wrong. The constitution applies to the entire jurisdiction of American courts, to all citizens. Only when a court has determined that a person is not a citizen, does it not apply to him.

Following your incorrect logic, all illegal acts committed by any party with any sort of action would have to first be adjudicated by a court before any enforcement could take place
Does not work like that

I am sure that the local community college in your city offers remedial 8th grade Civics. Sign up for it ASAP.

My retirement, which I am currently enjoying 35 miles north of the Mexican border in sunny AZ, is not threatened by people who speak Spanish and have brown skin. In fact, they do a lot of unpleasant tasks for me at an affordable rate, like my landscaping, which no Anglos want to do in 105 degree heat. Unlike Anglos working for minimum wage, they show up sober.

Good for you, you are part of the problem hiring illegals. In my retirement I live in the north country and Anglos do those jobs in the summer and winter. for a fair wage.....sober.

Part of the problem? Well, pardon me if I don't want to pay double for a drugged out landscaper. Nor do a plan on asking for a birth certificate before I let him prune my citrus tree. There is no illegal immigration crisis. It is all a manufactured booger-bear by Trump.

I won't pardon you, I hold you personally responsible for hiring an illegal alien. YOU are the root of the problem. You are also ignorant if you think
there is not an immigration problem. The problem has been around long before Trump became president.

There are three illegals under your bed who will jump out when you are asleep and cut your throat in the middle of the night.

I hope you're paying them more than day labor wages, dude.

His name is Jose. He speaks Spanish. His skin is brown. Therefore, in your mind, he is an illegal. Figures.

 

[Meister]

The constitution does not apply to ANYONE merely within our borders
We know you libs FEEL that illegal non citizens should be afforded that unique and rare luxury but they are not

Actually, you are dead wrong. The constitution applies to the entire jurisdiction of American courts, to all citizens. Only when a court has determined that a person is not a citizen, does it not apply to him.

Following your incorrect logic, all illegal acts committed by any party with any sort of action would have to first be adjudicated by a court before any enforcement could take place
Does not work like that

I am sure that the local community college in your city offers remedial 8th grade Civics. Sign up for it ASAP.

Good for you, you are part of the problem hiring illegals. In my retirement I live in the north country and Anglos do those jobs in the summer and winter. for a fair wage.....sober.

Part of the problem? Well, pardon me if I don't want to pay double for a drugged out landscaper. Nor do a plan on asking for a birth certificate before I let him prune my citrus tree. There is no illegal immigration crisis. It is all a manufactured booger-bear by Trump.

I won't pardon you, I hold you personally responsible for hiring an illegal alien. YOU are the root of the problem. You are also ignorant if you think
there is not an immigration problem. The problem has been around long before Trump became president.

There are three illegals under your bed who will jump out when you are asleep and cut your throat in the middle of the night.

I hope you're paying them more than day labor wages, dude.

His name is Jose. He speaks Spanish. His skin is brown. Therefore, in your mind, he is an illegal. Figures.

Shadie, you don't know me. You want to post like you're an asshole, go ahead, but, in the future speak about yourself and not others.
It just shows just how ignorant you really are. dumbfuck

 

[Indeependent]

This is all quite a manufactured problem. I can't say immigrants have ever done me wrong in any way. Yet Trump has all these peole hating them. Quite fascinating.

When I get robbed that also does not do You any wrong.

So your personal beef with immigrants is what?

My beef is with the despots who made them want to escape.
Why is nobody starting a "pussy hat" protest against any of those tyrants?

I know ... It's because with the left nothing outside of the U.S. matters to them until it becomes politically expedient for them to exploit such a thing unless they want to say that our constitution applies to the illegals who are not Americans, even though we know it doesn't, but they claim that it does as if we are idiots here to believe them. Everything the left does is politically motivated, and then manipulated for public consumption.

The neo-Cons during GW's presidency didn't mind the influx of illegals.
And many of those neo-Cons here became Conservatives simply because Trump won.
The issue is that Liberals are willing to act like psychos and blame everything on Trump because he's got an R next to his name.

 

[Frankeneinstein]

When was America great the last time?

It's a dog whistle phrase, it drives lefties mad and makes them howl like a dog

 

[Nosmo King]

Dispense with the code of law. And the Trumpians cheer!

Cozy up the the Russians and the Trumpians Cheer!

Diss our allies, leave agreements, impose tariffs and the Trumpians cheer!

What is it about America they think needs to be great again? A lack of Authoritarian control?

 

[beagle9]

They deserve no US judicial proceedings as they are not Americans

After all, what is the Constitution but a bit of paper most rightards haven't read?

Now that is funny.

The Constitution is the paperwork liberals use to wipe their asses after they dump that chia latte.

It wasn't until there were 'Living Document" judges put on the bench that the Constitution started pertaining to anyone who happens to set foot on our soil.

All through our history, we have controlled the amount and type of people we allow to immigrate to the USA, and not once have those who were forbidden been given Constitutional rights.

I am always amazed at the progressives idiocy. On the one hand, they berate America as evil because the undocumented Europeans showed up and forced the natives off their lands and put them in reservations until they are almost extinct, then out of the same side of their lying mouths, they berate those who say we cannot have uncontrolled illegals entering the country because they may overwhelm our society.

This is called being a two-faced liar.

These are patently untrue. The Constitution has always applied to everyone within our borders; the Founding Fathers, remember, believed that our rights were granted to us by God, and only enumerated in the Constitution, and it follows that to limit them only to citizens would be claiming that God cared only for American citizens, which they, to say the least, did not believe. To clear it up further, James Madison - who wrote the Constitution - wrote that "as [aliens] owe, on the one hand, a temporary obedience, they are entitled, in return, to their [Constitutional] protection and advantage." (I looked that one up to make sure I got it right.) The 14th Amendment settled it for good when the Equal Protection Clause wrote out very specifically that no State may "deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws."

As for restricting who came in, for more than our first century, we had no limits and no restrictions at all. In the 1880s that we passed a law excluding Chinese laborers, and criminals, "idiots," and people who couldn't take care of themselves. Aside from that, it wasn't until after WWI - less than a century ago - that we started controlling or limiting who came in, by a series of quotas per country. Every one of those immigrants from every one of those time periods was entitled to their full Constitutional rights once they set foot on our soil.

The constitution does not apply to ANYONE merely within our borders
We know you libs FEEL that illegal non citizens should be afforded that unique and rare luxury but they are not

That’s not true. Anyone in your country is entitled to due process under the Constitution.

What due process ?? Turn them around at the breach back over the fence immediately, and then place armed gaurds in the area to gaurd that area of the border to stop further breaches. We don't have the resources to play this idiotic game any longer.

 

[WEATHER53]

Now that is funny.

The Constitution is the paperwork liberals use to wipe their asses after they dump that chia latte.

It wasn't until there were 'Living Document" judges put on the bench that the Constitution started pertaining to anyone who happens to set foot on our soil.

All through our history, we have controlled the amount and type of people we allow to immigrate to the USA, and not once have those who were forbidden been given Constitutional rights.

I am always amazed at the progressives idiocy. On the one hand, they berate America as evil because the undocumented Europeans showed up and forced the natives off their lands and put them in reservations until they are almost extinct, then out of the same side of their lying mouths, they berate those who say we cannot have uncontrolled illegals entering the country because they may overwhelm our society.

This is called being a two-faced liar.

These are patently untrue. The Constitution has always applied to everyone within our borders; the Founding Fathers, remember, believed that our rights were granted to us by God, and only enumerated in the Constitution, and it follows that to limit them only to citizens would be claiming that God cared only for American citizens, which they, to say the least, did not believe. To clear it up further, James Madison - who wrote the Constitution - wrote that "as [aliens] owe, on the one hand, a temporary obedience, they are entitled, in return, to their [Constitutional] protection and advantage." (I looked that one up to make sure I got it right.) The 14th Amendment settled it for good when the Equal Protection Clause wrote out very specifically that no State may "deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws."

As for restricting who came in, for more than our first century, we had no limits and no restrictions at all. In the 1880s that we passed a law excluding Chinese laborers, and criminals, "idiots," and people who couldn't take care of themselves. Aside from that, it wasn't until after WWI - less than a century ago - that we started controlling or limiting who came in, by a series of quotas per country. Every one of those immigrants from every one of those time periods was entitled to their full Constitutional rights once they set foot on our soil.

The constitution does not apply to ANYONE merely within our borders
We know you libs FEEL that illegal non citizens should be afforded that unique and rare luxury but they are not

Actually, you are dead wrong. The constitution applies to the entire jurisdiction of American courts, to all citizens. Only when a court has determined that a person is not a citizen, does it not apply to him.

An Illegal is not a citizen

...and nobody is "illegal" until determined by trial in a court of law.

Also incorrect. If you are observed crossing the border improperly there is no dog and pony show for you to convey the rights of an American citizen to you.

 

[WEATHER53]

Now that is funny.

The Constitution is the paperwork liberals use to wipe their asses after they dump that chia latte.

It wasn't until there were 'Living Document" judges put on the bench that the Constitution started pertaining to anyone who happens to set foot on our soil.

All through our history, we have controlled the amount and type of people we allow to immigrate to the USA, and not once have those who were forbidden been given Constitutional rights.

I am always amazed at the progressives idiocy. On the one hand, they berate America as evil because the undocumented Europeans showed up and forced the natives off their lands and put them in reservations until they are almost extinct, then out of the same side of their lying mouths, they berate those who say we cannot have uncontrolled illegals entering the country because they may overwhelm our society.

This is called being a two-faced liar.

These are patently untrue. The Constitution has always applied to everyone within our borders; the Founding Fathers, remember, believed that our rights were granted to us by God, and only enumerated in the Constitution, and it follows that to limit them only to citizens would be claiming that God cared only for American citizens, which they, to say the least, did not believe. To clear it up further, James Madison - who wrote the Constitution - wrote that "as [aliens] owe, on the one hand, a temporary obedience, they are entitled, in return, to their [Constitutional] protection and advantage." (I looked that one up to make sure I got it right.) The 14th Amendment settled it for good when the Equal Protection Clause wrote out very specifically that no State may "deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws."

As for restricting who came in, for more than our first century, we had no limits and no restrictions at all. In the 1880s that we passed a law excluding Chinese laborers, and criminals, "idiots," and people who couldn't take care of themselves. Aside from that, it wasn't until after WWI - less than a century ago - that we started controlling or limiting who came in, by a series of quotas per country. Every one of those immigrants from every one of those time periods was entitled to their full Constitutional rights once they set foot on our soil.

The constitution does not apply to ANYONE merely within our borders
We know you libs FEEL that illegal non citizens should be afforded that unique and rare luxury but they are not

Actually, you are dead wrong. The constitution applies to the entire jurisdiction of American courts, to all citizens. Only when a court has determined that a person is not a citizen, does it not apply to him.

Following your incorrect logic, all illegal acts committed by any party with any sort of action would have to first be adjudicated by a court before any enforcement could take place
Does not work like that

I am sure that the local community college in your city offers remedial 8th grade Civics. Sign up for it ASAP.

You can always tell when the facts are zinging the libbies as they respond by throwing emotional and personal darts

 

[WEATHER53]

These are patently untrue. The Constitution has always applied to everyone within our borders; the Founding Fathers, remember, believed that our rights were granted to us by God, and only enumerated in the Constitution, and it follows that to limit them only to citizens would be claiming that God cared only for American citizens, which they, to say the least, did not believe. To clear it up further, James Madison - who wrote the Constitution - wrote that "as [aliens] owe, on the one hand, a temporary obedience, they are entitled, in return, to their [Constitutional] protection and advantage." (I looked that one up to make sure I got it right.) The 14th Amendment settled it for good when the Equal Protection Clause wrote out very specifically that no State may "deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws."

As for restricting who came in, for more than our first century, we had no limits and no restrictions at all. In the 1880s that we passed a law excluding Chinese laborers, and criminals, "idiots," and people who couldn't take care of themselves. Aside from that, it wasn't until after WWI - less than a century ago - that we started controlling or limiting who came in, by a series of quotas per country. Every one of those immigrants from every one of those time periods was entitled to their full Constitutional rights once they set foot on our soil.

The constitution does not apply to ANYONE merely within our borders
We know you libs FEEL that illegal non citizens should be afforded that unique and rare luxury but they are not

Actually, you are dead wrong. The constitution applies to the entire jurisdiction of American courts, to all citizens. Only when a court has determined that a person is not a citizen, does it not apply to him.

An Illegal is not a citizen

You have to be “of” America and not just merely “in” America(illegally)to be afforded the privledges and protection of citizenry.

...and until you are found guilty by a court, you are s "suspect", or "undocumented". You are NOT an "illegal"

Wrong
You are late to the game of saying and feeling it over and over not making it so.
What you are saying is that if I shoot someone dead I am not a killer. I may not be a murderer until a court declares me so but I have taken a life-a killer

 

[beagle9]

Dispense with the code of law. And the Trumpians cheer!

Cozy up the the Russians and the Trumpians Cheer!

Diss our allies, leave agreements, impose tariffs and the Trumpians cheer!

What is it about America they think needs to be great again? A lack of Authoritarian control?

If the Demon-crats and republi-crats hadn't have made such a dam disaster in this nation over the years, then we wouldn't be in the situation we are in today. Now it's fix it time... The nation was great in a bubble between certain time periods, and we can repair those bubbles for all to enjoy once again.

We had great relations between blacks and whites during the seventies, eighties, and nineties. Then came the surge of corruption to destroy it, back it all up, and then we elected Obama to finish the situation off or to lead us into the fixes we see now under Trump, and for which are thankfully underway.

What idiots the nation had become since the 1960's foward if we lose it all ?? Think about that one..

Now Trump is trying to restore things as best he can, but the pride of those who are amongst (the Demon-crats), and for whom were instrumental in getting Trump elected to begin with, are crying fowel, and now they are knashing of teeth over it all.

It's just too funny when look at the big picture in it all.

 

[beagle9]

Invest your money young, Vanshady

My retirement, which I am currently enjoying 35 miles north of the Mexican border in sunny AZ, is not threatened by people who speak Spanish and have brown skin. In fact, they do a lot of unpleasant tasks for me at an affordable rate, like my landscaping, which no Anglos want to do in 105 degree heat. Unlike Anglos working for minimum wage, they show up sober.

Good for you, you are part of the problem hiring illegals. In my retirement I live in the north country and Anglos do those jobs in the summer and winter. for a fair wage.....sober.

Part of the problem? Well, pardon me if I don't want to pay double for a drugged out landscaper. Nor do a plan on asking for a birth certificate before I let him prune my citrus tree. There is no illegal immigration crisis. It is all a manufactured booger-bear by Trump.

I won't pardon you, I hold you personally responsible for hiring an illegal alien. YOU are the root of the problem. You are also ignorant if you think
there is not an immigration problem. The problem has been around long before Trump became president.

There are three illegals under your bed who will jump out when you are asleep and cut your throat in the middle of the night.

You wish..

 

[Dragonlady]

i want everybody to appreciate the permanent psychological trauma that a 3 year old child is suffering, who can't speak english, after being taken away from his parents. you dont have to be a child pshyciatrist.

to show how tough you are by bullying little children to get votes is truly pathetic.

Perhaps the law breaking parents should have gone through a port of entry and not an illegal crossing, huh?

The Border Patrol is blocking ports of entry and refusing to let them claim asylum. This violates US law and international treaties the US signed, as well as the US Constitution.

 

[Meister]

i want everybody to appreciate the permanent psychological trauma that a 3 year old child is suffering, who can't speak english, after being taken away from his parents. you dont have to be a child pshyciatrist.

to show how tough you are by bullying little children to get votes is truly pathetic.

Perhaps the law breaking parents should have gone through a port of entry and not an illegal crossing, huh?

The Border Patrol is blocking ports of entry and refusing to let them claim asylum. This violates US law and international treaties the US signed, as well as the US Constitution.

Must be that the ports of entry are overloaded and can't process the asylum seekers?

 

[Rustic]

They deserve no US judicial proceedings as they are not Americans

I agree with his approach

-Geaux
--------------

President Trump on Sunday said that those who enter the United States illegally should be "immediately" returned to their country of origin "with no Judges or Court Cases," adding that "Our Immigration policy, laughed at all over the world, is very unfair to those people who have gone through the system legally and are waiting on line for years!"



"Immigration must be based on merit - we need people who will help to Make America Great Again" Trump added.



We cannot allow all of these people to invade our Country. When somebody comes in, we must immediately, with no Judges or Court Cases, bring them back from where they came. Our system is a mockery to good immigration policy and Law and Order. Most children come without parents...



....Our Immigration policy, laughed at all over the world, is very unfair to all of those people who have gone through the system legally and are waiting on line for years! Immigration must be based on merit - we need people who will help to Make America Great Again!



While in line with fulfilling his campaign promises, Trump's comments are sure to dump jet fuel on the barnfire of controversy over separated migrant families at the southern U.S. border, after pictures of children in cages began to circulate, which the left attributed to Trump's new "zero tolerance" policy of enforcing Clinton, Bush and Obama-era immigration laws.

Trump Calls For "Immediate" Deportations Of Illegals With "No Judges Or Court Cases"

illegal aliens benefit my family in no way possible, so hell no I don’t want them here. Fuck them

 

[Vandalshandle]

Actually, you are dead wrong. The constitution applies to the entire jurisdiction of American courts, to all citizens. Only when a court has determined that a person is not a citizen, does it not apply to him.

Following your incorrect logic, all illegal acts committed by any party with any sort of action would have to first be adjudicated by a court before any enforcement could take place
Does not work like that

I am sure that the local community college in your city offers remedial 8th grade Civics. Sign up for it ASAP.

Part of the problem? Well, pardon me if I don't want to pay double for a drugged out landscaper. Nor do a plan on asking for a birth certificate before I let him prune my citrus tree. There is no illegal immigration crisis. It is all a manufactured booger-bear by Trump.

I won't pardon you, I hold you personally responsible for hiring an illegal alien. YOU are the root of the problem. You are also ignorant if you think
there is not an immigration problem. The problem has been around long before Trump became president.

There are three illegals under your bed who will jump out when you are asleep and cut your throat in the middle of the night.

I hope you're paying them more than day labor wages, dude.

His name is Jose. He speaks Spanish. His skin is brown. Therefore, in your mind, he is an illegal. Figures.

Shadie, you don't know me. You want to post like you're an asshole, go ahead, but, in the future speak about yourself and not others.
It just shows just how ignorant you really are. dumbfuck

That's downright unnieghberly!

 

[Vandalshandle]

These are patently untrue. The Constitution has always applied to everyone within our borders; the Founding Fathers, remember, believed that our rights were granted to us by God, and only enumerated in the Constitution, and it follows that to limit them only to citizens would be claiming that God cared only for American citizens, which they, to say the least, did not believe. To clear it up further, James Madison - who wrote the Constitution - wrote that "as [aliens] owe, on the one hand, a temporary obedience, they are entitled, in return, to their [Constitutional] protection and advantage." (I looked that one up to make sure I got it right.) The 14th Amendment settled it for good when the Equal Protection Clause wrote out very specifically that no State may "deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws."

As for restricting who came in, for more than our first century, we had no limits and no restrictions at all. In the 1880s that we passed a law excluding Chinese laborers, and criminals, "idiots," and people who couldn't take care of themselves. Aside from that, it wasn't until after WWI - less than a century ago - that we started controlling or limiting who came in, by a series of quotas per country. Every one of those immigrants from every one of those time periods was entitled to their full Constitutional rights once they set foot on our soil.

The constitution does not apply to ANYONE merely within our borders
We know you libs FEEL that illegal non citizens should be afforded that unique and rare luxury but they are not

Actually, you are dead wrong. The constitution applies to the entire jurisdiction of American courts, to all citizens. Only when a court has determined that a person is not a citizen, does it not apply to him.

An Illegal is not a citizen

...and nobody is "illegal" until determined by trial in a court of law.

Also incorrect. If you are observed crossing the border improperly there is no dog and pony show for you to convey the rights of an American citizen to you.

Wrong again, Weather. If anyone is seen crossing the border without papers, he is given the choice of being immediately returned, or be arrested and await trail. Please get educated.