Trump administration to propose rule that would cut 3.1 million people from food stamp program

[danielpalos]

unemployment compensation for simply being unemployed is more equal and more cost effective and more market friendly.

/——/ I know people who refused to take a job until their UE ran out. They didn’t want to give up the free money and time off until they had to.

Employment is at the will of either party not just the employer. That lack of Individual Liberty and unequal protection of the law for unemployment compensation on an at-will basis in our at-will employment States is harmful to Labor and the Poor under our current regime of capitalism.

Translation: you don't think you should have to work a job to get paid.

Not under Capitalism, only under Socialism. Fundamentals matter under capitalism, not any subjective value of social morals for free.

/---/ Word salad.

not competent enough for a more serious venue?

 

[Cellblock2429]

/——/ I know people who refused to take a job until their UE ran out. They didn’t want to give up the free money and time off until they had to.

Employment is at the will of either party not just the employer. That lack of Individual Liberty and unequal protection of the law for unemployment compensation on an at-will basis in our at-will employment States is harmful to Labor and the Poor under our current regime of capitalism.

Translation: you don't think you should have to work a job to get paid.

Not under Capitalism, only under Socialism. Fundamentals matter under capitalism, not any subjective value of social morals for free.

/---/ Word salad.

not competent enough for a more serious venue?

/—-/ Your posts make no sense. Just your attempt to sound more educated than you really are.

 

[danielpalos]

Employment is at the will of either party not just the employer. That lack of Individual Liberty and unequal protection of the law for unemployment compensation on an at-will basis in our at-will employment States is harmful to Labor and the Poor under our current regime of capitalism.

Translation: you don't think you should have to work a job to get paid.

Not under Capitalism, only under Socialism. Fundamentals matter under capitalism, not any subjective value of social morals for free.

/---/ Word salad.

not competent enough for a more serious venue?

/—-/ Your posts make no sense. Just your attempt to sound more educated than you really are.

lol. this is a frivolous venue. you don't have any superior argument. why should i take You seriously, knowing that, now?

 

[Cellblock2429]

Translation: you don't think you should have to work a job to get paid.

Not under Capitalism, only under Socialism. Fundamentals matter under capitalism, not any subjective value of social morals for free.

/---/ Word salad.

not competent enough for a more serious venue?

/—-/ Your posts make no sense. Just your attempt to sound more educated than you really are.

lol. this is a frivolous venue. you don't have any superior argument. why should i take You seriously, knowing that, now?

/——/ Serious argument to what, your gibberish?

 

[danielpalos]

Not under Capitalism, only under Socialism. Fundamentals matter under capitalism, not any subjective value of social morals for free.

/---/ Word salad.

not competent enough for a more serious venue?

/—-/ Your posts make no sense. Just your attempt to sound more educated than you really are.

lol. this is a frivolous venue. you don't have any superior argument. why should i take You seriously, knowing that, now?

/——/ Serious argument to what, your gibberish?

you are not that serious.

 

[mikegriffith1]

Well, it's hard to argue with that. It makes perfect sense to make sure that everyone who is getting food stamps is qualified to be getting them. I'm surprised that so many states automatically re-enroll food stamp recipients. That's just asking for waste and abuse. So, yeah, it's about time we took this common sense step to ensure that only the people who need food stamps are getting them.

 

[hadit]

How is it shafting anyone when you stop giving them something they don't need?

unemployment compensation for simply being unemployed is more equal and more cost effective and more market friendly.

/——/ I know people who refused to take a job until their UE ran out. They didn’t want to give up the free money and time off until they had to.

Employment is at the will of either party not just the employer. That lack of Individual Liberty and unequal protection of the law for unemployment compensation on an at-will basis in our at-will employment States is harmful to Labor and the Poor under our current regime of capitalism.

Translation: you don't think you should have to work a job to get paid.

Not under Capitalism, only under Socialism. Fundamentals matter under capitalism, not any subjective value of social morals for free.

You still think you should get paid even though you won't work.

 

[ScorpioRising007]

Well, it's hard to argue with that. It makes perfect sense to make sure that everyone who is getting food stamps is qualified to be getting them. I'm surprised that so many states automatically re-enroll food stamp recipients. That's just asking for waste and abuse. So, yeah, it's about time we took this common sense step to ensure that only the people who need food stamps are getting them.

The problem with that is many low intelligent people on foodstamps wont be able to re-enroll on their own they will need help. My wife is an example. She has been on and off foodstamps all her adult life, but there were times she couldnt get gov benefits because she had no one to help her with paperwork. She cant use computers too confusing for her.She struggles to read and can barely write legible english. She is a high school dropout and was labelled slow. Her IQ isnt low enough to be labelled mentally handicap and to get get assistance from gov for a disability.

If you take away automatic enrollment for food stamps it just creates too large of a road block for many who need foodstamps, but dont have the intelligence level to be able to re-enroll in them thats why automatic enrollment is better.

 

[pknopp]

unemployment compensation for simply being unemployed is more equal and more cost effective and more market friendly.

/——/ I know people who refused to take a job until their UE ran out. They didn’t want to give up the free money and time off until they had to.

Employment is at the will of either party not just the employer. That lack of Individual Liberty and unequal protection of the law for unemployment compensation on an at-will basis in our at-will employment States is harmful to Labor and the Poor under our current regime of capitalism.

Translation: you don't think you should have to work a job to get paid.

Not under Capitalism, only under Socialism. Fundamentals matter under capitalism, not any subjective value of social morals for free.

You still think you should get paid even though you won't work.

You would do yourself well if you would get used to the idea because before long there are going to be a lot of people doing that.

 

[hadit]

/——/ I know people who refused to take a job until their UE ran out. They didn’t want to give up the free money and time off until they had to.

Employment is at the will of either party not just the employer. That lack of Individual Liberty and unequal protection of the law for unemployment compensation on an at-will basis in our at-will employment States is harmful to Labor and the Poor under our current regime of capitalism.

Translation: you don't think you should have to work a job to get paid.

Not under Capitalism, only under Socialism. Fundamentals matter under capitalism, not any subjective value of social morals for free.

You still think you should get paid even though you won't work.

You would do yourself well if you would get used to the idea because before long there are going to be a lot of people doing that.

When we all "get used to the idea", we might as well pack it in, because America will be over.

 

[danielpalos]

unemployment compensation for simply being unemployed is more equal and more cost effective and more market friendly.

/——/ I know people who refused to take a job until their UE ran out. They didn’t want to give up the free money and time off until they had to.

Employment is at the will of either party not just the employer. That lack of Individual Liberty and unequal protection of the law for unemployment compensation on an at-will basis in our at-will employment States is harmful to Labor and the Poor under our current regime of capitalism.

Translation: you don't think you should have to work a job to get paid.

Not under Capitalism, only under Socialism. Fundamentals matter under capitalism, not any subjective value of social morals for free.

You still think you should get paid even though you won't work.

Compensation for Capitalism's, institutional and natural rate of unemployment in our at-will employment States.

why do you believe your "work or die" ethic from the Age of Iron, is useful in a modern information age and modern economic times?

 

[danielpalos]

Employment is at the will of either party not just the employer. That lack of Individual Liberty and unequal protection of the law for unemployment compensation on an at-will basis in our at-will employment States is harmful to Labor and the Poor under our current regime of capitalism.

Translation: you don't think you should have to work a job to get paid.

Not under Capitalism, only under Socialism. Fundamentals matter under capitalism, not any subjective value of social morals for free.

You still think you should get paid even though you won't work.

You would do yourself well if you would get used to the idea because before long there are going to be a lot of people doing that.

When we all "get used to the idea", we might as well pack it in, because America will be over.

Only Capital has to circulate under Capitalism. Nobody takes the right wing seriously about economics or the law.

 

[hadit]

/——/ I know people who refused to take a job until their UE ran out. They didn’t want to give up the free money and time off until they had to.

Employment is at the will of either party not just the employer. That lack of Individual Liberty and unequal protection of the law for unemployment compensation on an at-will basis in our at-will employment States is harmful to Labor and the Poor under our current regime of capitalism.

Translation: you don't think you should have to work a job to get paid.

Not under Capitalism, only under Socialism. Fundamentals matter under capitalism, not any subjective value of social morals for free.

You still think you should get paid even though you won't work.

Compensation for Capitalism's, institutional and natural rate of unemployment in our at-will employment States.

why do you believe your "work or die" ethic from the Age of Iron, is useful in a modern information age and modern economic times?

Because it's what drives the economy. Without it, there is no wealth for you to confiscate and give to those who can contribute, but won't.

 

[hadit]

Translation: you don't think you should have to work a job to get paid.

Not under Capitalism, only under Socialism. Fundamentals matter under capitalism, not any subjective value of social morals for free.

You still think you should get paid even though you won't work.

You would do yourself well if you would get used to the idea because before long there are going to be a lot of people doing that.

When we all "get used to the idea", we might as well pack it in, because America will be over.

Only Capital has to circulate under Capitalism. Nobody takes the right wing seriously about economics or the law.

Maybe not in your Mom's basement, but everywhere else...

 

[pknopp]

Employment is at the will of either party not just the employer. That lack of Individual Liberty and unequal protection of the law for unemployment compensation on an at-will basis in our at-will employment States is harmful to Labor and the Poor under our current regime of capitalism.

Translation: you don't think you should have to work a job to get paid.

Not under Capitalism, only under Socialism. Fundamentals matter under capitalism, not any subjective value of social morals for free.

You still think you should get paid even though you won't work.

You would do yourself well if you would get used to the idea because before long there are going to be a lot of people doing that.

When we all "get used to the idea", we might as well pack it in, because America will be over.

Whatever......I consider that when certain people can break the law and get away with it, we have already crossed that line.

 

[hadit]

Translation: you don't think you should have to work a job to get paid.

Not under Capitalism, only under Socialism. Fundamentals matter under capitalism, not any subjective value of social morals for free.

You still think you should get paid even though you won't work.

You would do yourself well if you would get used to the idea because before long there are going to be a lot of people doing that.

When we all "get used to the idea", we might as well pack it in, because America will be over.

Whatever......I consider that when certain people can break the law and get away with it, we have already crossed that line.

Once it hits a critical mass, there's no stopping it.

 

[danielpalos]

Employment is at the will of either party not just the employer. That lack of Individual Liberty and unequal protection of the law for unemployment compensation on an at-will basis in our at-will employment States is harmful to Labor and the Poor under our current regime of capitalism.

Translation: you don't think you should have to work a job to get paid.

Not under Capitalism, only under Socialism. Fundamentals matter under capitalism, not any subjective value of social morals for free.

You still think you should get paid even though you won't work.

Compensation for Capitalism's, institutional and natural rate of unemployment in our at-will employment States.

why do you believe your "work or die" ethic from the Age of Iron, is useful in a modern information age and modern economic times?

Because it's what drives the economy. Without it, there is no wealth for you to confiscate and give to those who can contribute, but won't.

where do you get your propaganda and rhetoric from? it is definitely not economics.

 

[pknopp]

Not under Capitalism, only under Socialism. Fundamentals matter under capitalism, not any subjective value of social morals for free.

You still think you should get paid even though you won't work.

You would do yourself well if you would get used to the idea because before long there are going to be a lot of people doing that.

When we all "get used to the idea", we might as well pack it in, because America will be over.

Whatever......I consider that when certain people can break the law and get away with it, we have already crossed that line.

Once it hits a critical mass, there's no stopping it.

Whatever.

 

[danielpalos]

Not under Capitalism, only under Socialism. Fundamentals matter under capitalism, not any subjective value of social morals for free.

You still think you should get paid even though you won't work.

You would do yourself well if you would get used to the idea because before long there are going to be a lot of people doing that.

When we all "get used to the idea", we might as well pack it in, because America will be over.

Only Capital has to circulate under Capitalism. Nobody takes the right wing seriously about economics or the law.

Maybe not in your Mom's basement, but everywhere else...

nobody takes right wingers seriously about economics. making up stories is all they know how to do.

 

[danielpalos]

Translation: you don't think you should have to work a job to get paid.

Not under Capitalism, only under Socialism. Fundamentals matter under capitalism, not any subjective value of social morals for free.

You still think you should get paid even though you won't work.

You would do yourself well if you would get used to the idea because before long there are going to be a lot of people doing that.

When we all "get used to the idea", we might as well pack it in, because America will be over.

Whatever......I consider that when certain people can break the law and get away with it, we have already crossed that line.

Show us the express immigration clause. Only illegals don't care about the law. Only hypocrites blame the less fortunate.