Excuse me, but when we are talking about sex, the only thing that matters is biology. As for ID, it can be faked. If a 6 year old kid walks into a bar with ID that proves he is 21 should the bar serve him, or should they believe their eyes and throw him out?
If you read your own article, the only thing that made them suspect she was a male was the fact that she had bigger muscles, and broad shoulders.
They never asked her what gender she was.
It is not my article.
The thing is, I don't give a fuck what argument you come up with, any woman that does not want to use the same locker room as a man has a right to demand he leave, and that trumps anything the state, or the man who believes he is a woman, says about the issue. I full support individual rights, and will always refuse to let the state dictate to anyone. If that inconveniences a guy who dresses up as a woman occasionally, that is the price you pay for your kink.
By the way, you only have one side of the story, yet you are sure the person who is suing is telling the truth, the whole truth, and nothing but the truth, simply because your bias is so screwed up you think that government created LGBT rights trump biology. I am a hell of a lot more liberal than you are, and I still put science over government every day of the week.
This case has nothing to do with the woman wanting to use a locker room, does it?
It has to do with her being judged based solely on her appearance. A fact you conveniently ignore.