The future is very bright for the United States

People are walking away from the deviant lifestyles after experiencing the horrors of that lifestyle first-hand...
 
People are walking away from the deviant lifestyles after experiencing the horrors of that lifestyle first-hand...

States are protecting children...

You are skipping all over the place. You are the one who started this thread regarding your obsession with firearms. Now you've switched to your obsession with sex and gender.

Your posts do not indicate in any way that the future of the U.S. will be bright, unless you are looking forward to the 19th Century. But we're already into the 21st. South Dakota is not on the forefront of anything. It's just an obsessed backwater.
 
You are skipping all over the place.
No I'm not. If you're not capable of following the thread, perhaps it's best you don't comment?
You are the one who started this thread regarding your obsession with firearms. Now you've switched to your obsession with sex and gender.
Because the thread is about good things happening in the US (like upholding the US Constitution against you fascists and protecting children from you sick sexual deviants)
Your posts do not indicate in any way that the future of the U.S. will be bright, unless you are looking forward to the 19th Century. But we're already into the 21st. South Dakota is not on the forefront of anything. It's just an obsessed backwater.
Spoken like a true bat-shit crazy progressive who can't figure out which way is up :dunno:
 
States are upholding the 2nd Amendment...
That's your only standard for a bright future?

Single issue voters are annoying and stupid.

This is one issue that is a make or break condition.
If you have an armed population, then you likely will maintain a democratic republic.
If you ever allow the population to be disarmed, you will likely never again see anything remotely like a democratic republic.
Things always change, governments go corrupt, dictators gain control, etc., but as long as the population is armed, things can and will likely be fixed.
It is only when you have an unarmed general population that there no longer can possibly be any hope of fixing anything.
 
People are walking away from the deviant lifestyles after experiencing the horrors of that lifestyle first-hand...

States are protecting children...

You are skipping all over the place. You are the one who started this thread regarding your obsession with firearms. Now you've switched to your obsession with sex and gender.

Your posts do not indicate in any way that the future of the U.S. will be bright, unless you are looking forward to the 19th Century. But we're already into the 21st. South Dakota is not on the forefront of anything. It's just an obsessed backwater.

I tend agree that we need even better equality, with race, gender, etc.
But the federal government is never the place to do anything other than minimal set aside for the federal government in the constitution.
Why?
Because being the most distant, the federal government is always the most corrupt, controlled by big money, and the least sensitive to personal issues like individual liberties.
And federal gun control is just insane.
It is totally backwards, since the federal government that is the source of the greatest threat to all our individual liberties and rights.
It is the federal government that committed crimes like Prohibition, the invasion of Iraq, the War on Drugs, 3 strikes, etc.
 
People are walking away from the deviant lifestyles after experiencing the horrors of that lifestyle first-hand...

States are protecting children...

You are skipping all over the place. You are the one who started this thread regarding your obsession with firearms. Now you've switched to your obsession with sex and gender.

Your posts do not indicate in any way that the future of the U.S. will be bright, unless you are looking forward to the 19th Century. But we're already into the 21st. South Dakota is not on the forefront of anything. It's just an obsessed backwater.

I tend agree that we need even better equality, with race, gender, etc.
But the federal government is never the place to do anything other than minimal set aside for the federal government in the constitution.
Why?
Because being the most distant, the federal government is always the most corrupt, controlled by big money, and the least sensitive to personal issues like individual liberties.
And federal gun control is just insane.
It is totally backwards, since the federal government that is the source of the greatest threat to all our individual liberties and rights.
It is the federal government that committed crimes like Prohibition, the invasion of Iraq, the War on Drugs, 3 strikes, etc.

What is confusing is, when broken down, the "federal government" is an amalgam of the states. Look at the makeup of Congress, 2 senators from each state, one representative from each district among the states. The "federal government" consists of the people of the United States. It is not an outside entity.
 
States are upholding the 2nd Amendment...
That's your only standard for a bright future?

Single issue voters are annoying and stupid.

This is one issue that is a make or break condition.
If you have an armed population, then you likely will maintain a democratic republic.
If you ever allow the population to be disarmed, you will likely never again see anything remotely like a democratic republic.
Things always change, governments go corrupt, dictators gain control, etc., but as long as the population is armed, things can and will likely be fixed.
It is only when you have an unarmed general population that there no longer can possibly be any hope of fixing anything.
Don't be silly.
 
As long as we the public can vote to elect leaders who understand english and are not constupidated there is a good chance we will get back to what America used to be, a nice place to live and work.
 

Forum List

Back
Top