Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
These torture files are all just a "dog & pony" show to keep Americans distracted from what is really going on. A 3.7 TRILLION dollar budget that has already passed the house, & is sitting in the senate.
To PROVE THE POINT:
1. Nancy Pelosi (on the board of 8 on the intelligence committee) attended over 30 meetings during 2002--regarding the enhanced interrogation technics--which include waterboarding. When asked on Friday about it -- she stated: "Yes she was informed about these technics--but did not know they were using them."
2. Ted Kennedy in 2005 tried to get waterboarding--which was acceptable under authorization stopped because he believe it to be torture. He didn't get anywhere because the congress did not consider waterboarding torture.
3. Around the same time--2005-- President Bush asked congress to "define" torture as the law in place was vague. He wanted congress--" to give strict guidelines-"-for intelligence agencies to avoid the threat of prosecution. "There is video on this statement".
4. Congress lead by NANCY PELOSI--"never" gave the Bush administration a new "torture" definition--which would have concluded that waterboarding was torture.
Approximately 3 weeks ago, under the Obama administration, Eric Holder declared that waterboarding was torture.
Now--the whole country is up in arms over these torture files. The Obama administration may be releasing 47 pictures to the ACLU who will then plaster these pictures all over the news. Remember 6 soldiers at Abu Graibe. That made 24/7 news coverage for two months!
This tactic is simply being used again--to distract the American public from what is really going on within the Obama administration.
They, in essense have politicised National Security for a smoke screen. Now--whether it works is a different thing.
First of all, you won't find many that object to waterboarding the master mind of the 9/11 attacks. Second--this may have played out in democrat popularity with Abu Graide--so will it work again. Third--by doing this, American public opinion may look at Obama as a President who is weak on terror, & is wiling to sacrifice the safety of their kids, for his "moral clarity"--while the enemy who seeks to kill Americans in mass--has no morality what-so-ever.
We kill 3 pirates to save the life of one captain but the left is against the US using waterboarding to save the lives of many. Explain that logic!
when our guys get captured, waterboarding is the least of their worriesWe kill 3 pirates to save the life of one captain but the left is against the US using waterboarding to save the lives of many. Explain that logic!
The golden rule -- do onto others as you would have them do onto you.
I wouldn't want our guys getting legitimately waterboarded.
Beheading is just so much better.We kill 3 pirates to save the life of one captain but the left is against the US using waterboarding to save the lives of many. Explain that logic!
The golden rule -- do onto others as you would have them do onto you.
I wouldn't want our guys getting legitimately waterboarded.
Keith Olbermann Offers Sean Hannity $1000 For Every Second He Can Endure Waterboarding | Video Cafe
What a great idea by Olberman. That's something I'd like to see, how long Hannity could hold out.
Between what this administration has already done and still pictures that are to be released on the 29th, I fear that this is going to be a disaster for our guys that get caught over there.Beheading is just so much better.We kill 3 pirates to save the life of one captain but the left is against the US using waterboarding to save the lives of many. Explain that logic!
The golden rule -- do onto others as you would have them do onto you.
I wouldn't want our guys getting legitimately waterboarded.
We kill 3 pirates to save the life of one captain but the left is against the US using waterboarding to save the lives of many. Explain that logic!
The golden rule -- do onto others as you would have them do onto you.
I wouldn't want our guys getting legitimately waterboarded.
We kill 3 pirates to save the life of one captain but the left is against the US using waterboarding to save the lives of many. Explain that logic!
The golden rule -- do onto others as you would have them do onto you.
I wouldn't want our guys getting legitimately waterboarded.
But you would have them legitimately killed?
So we can kill American terrorists but not waterboard them. The holes in your logic are growing.
So in war you must try every person before killing them. After all this is a war on terror.
yup and every prisoner must be mirandized and the arresting soldiers MUST preserve all evidence at the crime sceneSo in war you must try every person before killing them. After all this is a war on terror.
So in war you must try every person before killing them. After all this is a war on terror.
No.
So in war you must try every person before killing them. After all this is a war on terror.
No.
Then why is using an effective tool for the gathering of information that protects American lives so immoral?
you can kill em, just dont waterboard emBut you just told me that their death was justified but momentary uncomfort was not.
